Judge's Dilemma --- Eagle's Brief Wins In Spite of Felony Ambush

JUDGE GUSWEILER'S DILEMMA --- EAGLE'S BRIEF WINS

Varnau's Attorney WON ON THE MERITS.....at every turn in the issues, as we shall display in the Varnau/Eagle Brief below, (plus the downloadable annotated full filings of his opponents' lawyers)

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN HOWEVER whether the JUDGE WILL DECIDE the issues BASED ON MERITS.......

after all, Gusweiler's so corruptible that's it's openly admitted that 'the other party' wouldn't supply a candidate.... Humanly suggesting that the 'two-party' system has no meaning as seen in Ohio when, last election year, they set aside urgent work and fully collaborated legislatively on shutting out the frozen idea that any other party could run for office, then shut the door on third party (Libertarian this time) objections in the one-party courts in Ohio. Something for another post... For now, it's a toss up what level of corruption vs merits will be coming in this case.

But before we begin, we should warn you that you are being watched... if this were a sitcom, this would be hilarious..... that moronic Phillips law team that the Death-Squad hired, has done it again. His ignorance of the law, courtroom strategy, the internet, the public and their rights is stunning....

In the Death-Squad's frozenly-invalid attempt (among their lying) to find evidence that the Coroner was in violation of the order not to 'convene' an inquest, he claims at the end of his vaunted Closing Argument in his final Brief that they found with diligent sleuthing **another** violation of the TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) on convening an inquest. Proof of defiance. Right here on this blog site. ... Can you imagine they could advertise us any better? Whoohoo!

How, you may ask did the Coroner convene an inquest based on our respected postings?

Well you see that idiot Death-Squad lawyer, Phillips has to go tor the contempt-ruling tyranny target. Why? Because Phillips and company wouldn't admit he had no case, admitting that Eagle, the coroner's personal lawyer was defeating them left and right in the filings. So -- on top of inciting more deputies and sheriff and prosecutor to pile on the coroner with their own law teams -- Phillips had to bring in his law office partner so as to make a more impressive presence since their handiwork so far was so inferior, as filed, and their opponent Coroner Varnau had two lawyers, that would never do!

Hence. in desperation, when the Judge showed no decent put down on their Motion for Contempt based on phony interpretation of the TRO content, they decided to go after the contempt charges with falsified evidence, and total repetitions with their assembled mob of lawyers -- all shouting the line they'd agreed on even though none of them can seem to read and see it's not what the law or the order says --Phillips stupidly is claiming that our copy of the Coroner's work files (preparing for her inquest if allowed by this corrupt court) is proof that she's leaking the content of her inquest on our website, because we were showing their big felony-acquired video in spite of all the challenging lying they put her through at the hearing about that pilfered file.

I guess we should welcome y'all to the inquest but unfortunately it is not here and is still awaiting tyranny's decision on whether the controllers will reveal their despicable fist or allow the semblance of 'rule of law' to go forward.

Phillips does expect the court to believe that the coroner supplied the internet's public world with the here displayed (previous posting) coroner's comparison of the death-squad's interrogation 'answers' with the hallway security camera's video evidence. Imagine the levels of ubiquitous stupidity required for such belief, just on the surface.

The first thing this mob of ignorant lawyers needs to learn is what constitutes CONVENING an inquest (which we'll describe later) and then the rabid mob of stupid coroner's opponents need to learn that there are consequences for *THEIR* OWN BEHAVIOR. WE GOT THE COPY OF THE CORONER'S FILES BY LEGITIMATE MEANS THAT *THEY* ARRANGED. Thank you stupid Phillips for opening the door to distribution. Straight from the evidence files at the courthouse as public records request target

But the issue of contempt for court stupidity in allowing a hacking-based bit of electronic work to stand as validly usable evidence on TRO violation has ballooned. So that now the contempt for court's honorable function is now openly seeable as the unifying characteristic throughout the mob, not at all in the coroner and her law team, led by Eagle

IF GUSWEILER IS LOOKING FOR WHO TO CHARGE WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT, IT SHOULD BE THE DEATH-SQUAD LAWYER! Why ? Because the judge knows that he, personally, had to give out the DVD (he had it in his personal safe instead of in the court case file) to the Court Recorder so she could make a copy in response to an already filed (first open day of court after the Saturday hearing, one of the bloodhounds was at the courthouse with his request money) FOIA/Public Records Request. So GUSWEILER KNOWS THE DVD AND ITS CONTENTS ARE VALIDLY OUT HERE in the public's hands coming from his own safekeeping. How will he react to Phillips flimflamming him.

As a result. if the Judge dares to pound his contempt gavel on the coroner over these video files, he's acting contrary to his personal knowledge. Agreed that such would be openly challengeable to the Bar Association? Maybe we should visit them at their next meeting or maybe swing by their facebook page as entertainment March 20th when Gusweiler is giving a talk on domestic relations, oy......

So Phillips claiming stupidly in his Closing Argument the surprise final blow of his mob that the Coroner is guilty of violating the TRO by handing DVD contents out, with Phillips naming our blog (with the false claim that they found it in a search for the pending inquest report title) to blame the Coroner for our copy as if it were a TRO violation for it being in circulation, is hilariously outrageous nonsensical lying and should QUALIFY AS LYING TO THE COURT, in an obstruction of justice attempt by 'the Plaintiffs' Lawyer'....

BINGO, Contempt of Court on top of Felony 5 intrusion into the private storage of the Coroner's work data... how many months of jailtime scenes of Phillips in orange suit should we be drooling over...

Well... Enough fun from Phillip's idiocy, let's look at decent court writing and the MERITS OF THE CASE per Eagle, the Coroner's personal lawyer..... a real pro. Unlike Phillips, and his mob all involved in support of the Restraining Order.


Eagle begins, saying he's not going to repeat his well researched and established position from his previous brief (just citing it in the judge's folder), nor recite a litany of evidence items suggested with reservations and encumber the Closing Argument and reduce the power of the logic, law and facts. Instead he goes right to the Status of the Arguing, and lays out a knock-out list of TRO-invalidation facts that reduce the arguing to the remaining issues only. As we see here, he has firm control of the weaknesses of his opponents:



Hence he says there's only one question left before the court (deferring contempt discussions til after the crucial TRO issue is resolvable, dissolving the restraining order and releasing any idea of contemptible behavior by the mob til the end)..

That one question: CAN A CORONER DO AN INQUEST AFTER A DEATH CERTIFICATE -- FINAL OR NOT? which he says is the statutatory, legal, policy and practical question...

--1) In the Revised Code, the sections on the Coroner's duties say how and with what needed goal the coroner must proceed. but there is NO STATEMENT THAT LIMITS THE CORONER'S INQUIRIES TO JUST WHAT'S NEEDED FOR A DEATH CERTIFICATE.... as Eagle puts it, "no authority says 'no'. and since the burden of proof is on the Death-Squad (as Plaintiff) side, they have no law behind them,

-- 2) In case law (the only source of rulings left), Eagle cites two crucial defining cases. The cited quotes define the responsibility and show DISCRETION as belonging to the Coroner...

Quoting fragments... The coroner may properly decide to hold an inquest whenever. [she] is "for reasons of substance led to surmise or think that the death has been caused by violence" ... and further, her public report is to cover the primary 'mode, manner and cause' but the investigation is to report on "time, place" and "all attendant circumstances" . In those circumstances, her discretion is her own guide .

-- 3) The key is the coroner's requirement to report for the public... the coroner's records of investigating, especially the inquest being OPEN... law enforcement is opposed to recognizing the dual purpose, of the coroner's public record that's it is more than the co-ordination phase with law enforcement (including filing the death certificate for financial and probate reasons)... In common law, case law. etc the coroner's records and reporting is to balance the secretive nature of the grand jury proceedings which is (for obvious reasons) crucial in cases where the death occurred at the hands of law enforcement ..... so the public's right to assurance that the public safety questions and answers have been dealt with to their satisfaction...

Eagle is the only one to honor the openly stated purpose of the record required and the public proceedings, compared to the closed doors of law enforcement. They need to close the coroner's doors in order for comfortable tyranny to succeed.

The rest don't care about the public's rights nor the next of kin. And public safety rights would insist that no one wants a MURDER SUSPECT with badge and gun TO HANDLE THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS WHEN TROUBLE KNOCKS OR COULD KNOCK.... would you?

Law enforcement hides their proceedings, the Coroner is the counterweight for the public's benefit....

This Goldson case meets those requirements , so the Coroner has authority to do the inquest at HER DISCRETION and the meaning of the 'substantive reason' is now recognizable as urgent since Dr Varnau has finally received the hallway video and other data that were denied her when she was first working on the death certificate deadline limit. The eyes of the protector of the public, the next-of-kin and the deceased do see the evidence not presented to the grand jury because meaning eluded the bias-blinded law enforcement and thereby denying the Grand Jury the needed evidence to go forward with their INDICTMENTS plural and numerous.

And to ensure the court does not fail to see the full extent of the wrongheadedness of the Plaintiff's demands, Eagle has a reality check for Gusweiler, and for us and the public paying attention.

Specifically that one question of whether these officers can demand the court stop the coroner has incredibly important policy and precedent considerations, which surely it does.

1) It is staggering to imagine the IMPLICATIONS OF SUCH A PRECEDENT of the use of the courts by one official to stop another office holder from the performance of the discretionary rights of that office holder.

And to wake up the law enforcement audience as well as the judge, Eagle painted a picture of BCI 'surmising' that there was a possibility of more evidence in an old murder case and announcing that they were re-opening the investigation BUT one of the suspects originally (or the coroner) sued them to get the court to stop BCI ....

Gusweiler is thereby challenged to consider his hasty backing for the Death-Squad even if he foolishly still ignores their guilt. That image of police re-opening an old unsolved murder case is clearly a possible and desirable vision that his haste will block if he ignores the MERITS... that opportunity to reach for the implications of the possible evidence is what most would consider to be acceptable or even desirable in order to get a decent resolution. Else Law Enforcement failures complicate their relationship to the public.

So the judge should envision the can of worms he is opening with his unwise choice to not dismiss such a case as this Death-Squad complaint.. without further delaying

and 2) in this case, a homicide on sheriff's hands, THE INTERFERENCE IS PARTICULARLY STUNNING since the court will be "shielding" a government office by prohibiting a public inquiry of a death in those government officials hands , because they disagree with the office holder authorized to do such inquiries. Clearly such an act has humanly shocking images of tyranny.

Such images stir the public mind to be severely distrustful of any law enforcement and to view the court as an instrument of tyrants.. Visions that should wake up whatever decency still resides in the courtroom.

It draws a line that, should Gusweiler cross it, he will have the infamy of being the confirmation that this country has been lost here in Ohio. The vision of summoning the Federal Law enforcement holds no comfort either. Agreed?

So if interfering is not wholesome, making the pieces of the governmental process co-operate by stand aside of one another what does that do to the big picture. Eagle's description of relationships and boundaries, keeps the coroner in a role of peer, not subordinate to law enforcement.



And as a peer, on a high ground footing with discretion as has not been seen in action before in this county (and maybe in Ohio) where the coroner in the past was as minimally involved as they could manage so as to not interrupt their nine-to-five office work with paying patients.

This coroner, Dr Varnau, has a strong interest in forensics that has been only a private reading project and front row observing process, and (as an Obstetrician bringing lives into the world) is accustomed (more so than the usual family medicine type in politics) to stop and accommodate emergencies off her routine. And being a military woman now retired from that service, has the commitment to be an active coroner. With a husband to assist and accompany her to ungodly death scenes. Though she was a nurse in war zones it was not in any trenches, though ordinance was a constant factor. Does she frighten more authorities in government than most women in authority? Interesting scares (of course never mentioned by her lawyer)

The underbelly of law enforcement in many places has become unseemly corrupted and cosy with unwholesome power, that now writhes and strikes at the oversight that a coroner, using the office for the public record as designed, does bring to the office.

The discretion of an active coroner will be exciting, judging by the law's definitions of what constitutes discretion..



As for what will happen as this levening rises through the process of an inquest.



Welcome to a balance in law enforcement not granted to many places.... only if the Court resists the writhing tentacles of the mob assembled.

On the Merits, case dismissed.

Next Eagle attacks the invalid Contempt charges that the opposing mob are aiming to catalyze in the judge's thinking, since his support for their restraining order would be in trouble on the merits.

First order of business is to establish what the Judge's Orders were. Simply the document said he was prohibiting and enjoining the coroner and her staff, volunteer or other, from CONVENING THE INQUEST. Plain, 'inartful' (?) and simple.



Which then means that the actions complained of by the mob of lawyers must be limited to that prohibition. But that is not what the filings by the mob show.



The mob could not claim any inquest had been convened so they tried to say that the judge meant this and then meant that because they had stumbled on some work project of the Coroner's husband, gathering materials for the eventual inquest in order to be prepared, as well as preparation for the Death-Squad's other case (in federal court, which court was strangely silent, except that the commissioners' lawyers had filed a motion to be excused)....

Such tactics are why there are RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES that say judge's orders require specificity or they are sources of constitutional errors and wrongful torment. In fact vague orders and laws are void in case law records.



Eagle even pointed out that the mob had 2 full months to complain about what the Judge had put in his orders and make it a specific as they needed for their big claim of fear and harming. The mob was getting so unreasonable about their stretching of the orders that Eagle had to remind them that the courts already had decided that impossible demands were not ever grounds for contempt rulings.



So far, the mob had nothing that qualified as proof-worthy evidence on which to base a severe claim... a claim that Eagle would feel the sting of failure both professionally and extremely personally as it shows in his intense defense that occupied more pages than all the rest combined.

And in particular, the ambush of the Felony Hacking evidence set by Phillips and Gates and their unknowable 'source' the night before court definitely opened the flood gates on Eagle's nerves. Page and pages.

His recognition of cheaters, with one in charge who unrighteously seemed greedy for any opportunity to escape judging on the merits -- in a venue that requires intelligent reasonable debating as he and Dr Varnau were prepared for -- triggered Eagle's nightmare visions of myriad twisted cheats that might have been about to be sprung. Resulting in an extended, hydra defense that seemed as tangled as needed to deal with medusa..

The lengthy ordeal of the rest of the brief reveals something of the humanly ungodly terror that ambushes inflict even on the professionals of high skill. That whole medusa ordeal should never have been required in any decent judging on merits... and confidently, Eagle and Varnau should have stopped defending and walked away knowing their arguing had the merits on their side of the ledger. But when dealing with tyrants and mobs, while only permitted the intelligent/reasonableness tactics in a combat where jail and huge fines are wielded by cheaters, does destroy balancing and confidence. So you fight, swinging many directions in wild disorder, just to cover anything imaginable if possible.


So with those considerations made clear, Eagle answers the remaining issue on Contempt and Computer Crime but only after identifying the tactic as an AMBUSH that the court did not censure.. It triggered Eagle's instincts and he defends every angle that Gusweiler could twist. .Particularly unnerving are the internal contradictions in the Plaintiff's claims and tactics showing that there is no justice in their ambush goal intended. Strictly to harm, and humiliate Dr Varnau with the mob's own total contempt for their professional responsibilities and privileges as 'members of the court'.

Fully the contempt of court is on the hands and face of Phillips and his mob. Resorting to attempting to humiliate her badly enough that the judge would find her contemptible and release any inhibition to corrupt ruling that may yet linger among the past history of such tyrannical judge tactics.

Fully annotated filings are here for those who wish to entertain the idea that the incompetent performance of Phillips couldn't have been so total... it was total and stunning that he makes his living as a lawyer and the idea that he could have dropped out of law school would be the only saving grace for his despicable performance. Nor did he do his clients any good, which is the only compensation for tolerating reading his lies and law-twisting.

Phillips, as the Plaintiff's lawyer HAD THE BURDEN OF PROOF REQUIRED and it surely was no where to be seen when 'no authority said no' and case law said the Coroner's discretion extended where ever she surmised it needed to go based on her reasonable ideas of 'substance' IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE PUBLIC WITH AN OPEN ANSWER REPORT. See for yourself, Phillips twists the law to say 'no' when the law does not logically do anything like 'no' and then fills the air with humanure...

Find your deep boots and protect your breathing...

Annotated PhillipsDeathSquad

The others get even more hilariously hysterical, totally inventing their opponent til their target is unrecognizable and their impotent imagined punchingbag is feared to be next seeable descending on their unobserving innocent relatives and torturing them with open hostility and broadcasting the entire circus all over the county and the countryside...

The interesting part (after their scary-punchingbag) is their finally revealed rationale for filing this attack. The BC Sheriff's Office has a HISTORY of suspicious suicides... Something the Public should have had a coroner to rectify when they happened, leading to major distrust of law enforcers from the BCSO.

The previous suspicious suicide was John Funk in April 18-19 of 2011 and the coroner (McKinley) didn't show his face b/c the BCSO said he wasn't needed, as we heard in Court last year. But the law says that the coroner has to keep the autopsy records and in the past BC coroner files is a photo of Funk's neck showing a total blooded ligature mark ALL THE WAY AROUND THE NECK, which is inconsistent with the description of a hanging written in the data .

And what of another death at the BC Jail, John Gault? When we were data mining with this idea of multiple suspicious deaths, a few commenters at public media websites from years back, turned up a couple that indicated the writer was partial to the idea that some unsavory influence had been the real cause of Gault's suicide at the BC Jail. One specifically referenced neck marks, and another simply wanted justice for Gault to R.I.P.

These now-attacking Corrections Offices from BCSO are afraid this CURRENT properly performing coroner would start a precedent that would lead to Funk's justice ( at the very least, indirectly) producing more indictments of Jailers. In fact, in the BCI interrogations, it was Dunning who said the Goldson case was his 'second suicide' at the jail since he arrived. Figure that into the motivations.......

Annotated Gast/MiscJailers

As for the Sheriff's fairly brief Brief, we will point out that he ignored the fact that he and Breyer refused to co-operate with the Coroner's earlier investigation (another obstruction of justice), then repeats the Phillips goofy interpretation of jurisdiction as just over the body and death certificate not supported by any reading of the ORC on Coroner authority and responsibility.

So now we'd wonder how he'd justify his opposition to the Coroner's revisiting the process of investigating with the new evidence she's been provided with this case when he was apparently re-opening old unsolved deaths back when he first was elected and attempting to build his image as an active sheriff seeking justice.

Apparently that was grease for the goose but not the gander...

He should be reminded that his own re-visiting of cold cases could have been stopped by some suspect at that time if the opportunity to work on new evidence was deniable as he and his lawyer are attempting now, crashing his image building and not many cases would be ever re-opened leaving justice out in the cold....

Annotated Kelly/Wenninger

No timetable on the ruling.......... see ya........

Last Ditch:: The Judge Stoops to Felony -- (THE EVIDENCE DVD)

Last Ditch Effort Time for the Death Squad and their retinue of cover-up crony teams, local and state!

Since there was no substance in the Plaintiff-Murderers case (see last posting) and their 'unsuspecting' lawyer Phillips had inadvertently given the Defendant-Coroner the prize evidence-videos that the murderous Deputies and Jailers had prevented her from getting, in spite of law-authorized subpoenas, the Judge was left with very little to work on, in order to cheat the coroner. He doesn't worry about cheating Justice every day.


That's where this story stands. For the details on the earlier battles, we've covered those in these earlier posts, since all this chaos takes time.

If you decently want the overview -- In chronological order:

-- Threats & Death at the Jail, and the Coroner's Investigation Points to the 'Death-Squad' of Deputies and Jailers, compounded with higher Sheriff Office authorities destroying evidence and enlisting state authorities to cover the whole mess up. Mother of the victim uses her rightful access to the coroner's data to stir the county up. How we waited for the TEST of the Justice System to see whether the local Grand Jury can deal with what's coming. WHILE WE EXAMINE THE CORONER'S REPORT... the irrefutable evidence logic was the MARKS ON THE KID'S THROAT -- BLOODED, NARROW, FLAT AND PULLING UPWARD FROM THE BACK, thoroughly never caused by the neatly tied bunchy WIDE SHEET with UNSTRETCHED KNOTTED END ON THE SIDE OF HIS NECK --, see for yourselves... BOOM.. HOMICIDE......
** **
gee whiz this is going to be a slam dunk we hoped if only that Coroner's Report was spread around. So we and the open source local bloodhounds did

-- No luck but surprises.

Surprise #1: The Death-Squad Strikes Back... While waiting for the Crony Special Prosecutor (Breyer) and his Attorney General Special Investigator (Hornyak) to complete their Travesty of Justice Defense-instead-of-prosecution to bamboozle the country bumpkins on the Grand Jury, the Death Squad hurries its strategy into Federal Court with another lawyer (Phillips) in order to claim the Coroner is violating their civil rights, get that?

Surprise #2: The bold liar (Breyer) from Columbus releases a GRAND JURY REPORT, not to be outdone by Ferguson's scum. Boy, did we have a field day taking it apart, nailing Breyer's SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE gathered by the Coroner, his TWISTED LAW DEFINING to cover up assault by deputies, and his CONCEALING THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE FROM THE LIGATURE MARK, -- namely it's back-pulled-direction and its narrowness and bloodiness (versus the neatly level, unstretched sheet set for side yank-resistance)..

Since crucial pieces that appeared to be needed to identify alternative 'when' and 'how' were missing (the hallway video) and the actual BCI Report, denied to the Coroner as well, much speculating and logic-testing did pile up.


-- Free-for-all Lawsuit Blizzard Erupts -- As if the federal civil rights case filed in August was decently defendable, and if the Grand Jury data was so solidly relieving those Death-Squad deputies and Jailers, then you might wonder why they were so TERRIFIED of the INQUEST PLANNED BY THE CORONER TO RESOLVE THE DISAGREEING EVIDENCE between the Coroner's Report and the Grand Jury Prosecutor's Report -- which resolution obviously needed to be done. Answer: it was because at an inquest the Death-Squad would have no lawyer in the room to fend off questions they didn't want to answer under oath... Two of them had already DECLINED A CONTINUATION INTERVIEW (under oath) BY BCI in the early stages. Gee how that could hurt them! Yes it would.

So -- against all standards of fair play in court battle -- Judge Gusweiler let the Death-Squad's lawyer file a lawsuit WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE CORONER THAT THEY WANTED A RESTRAINING ORDER TO STOP THE INQUEST SO SHE COULDN"T OPPOSE IT and tie it up with court wrangling while her resolution process (as well as the federal court's agenda, long prepared for already and having priority) went ahead, even though it was not due for a couple weeks. Imagine that. Then a lawyer for the Sheriff jumps in with his own lawsuit and refuses to comply with the Coroner's subpoenae for his email and phone records. More lawyers jump in, as well as the local Prosecutor jumping out, and the Commissioners get all excited, having just been forced to pay more lawyer bills for all of them, plus an apparently unrelated law altercation in the Board of Elections. Boy were they hot!

Gusweiler doesn't recuse himself, and instead butts in to federal court territory --clearly unlawfully to relieve HIS FAVORITE BULLIES with a Temporary Restraining Order and with all the lawyers, jumping in and out, there was NO TIME THEY COULD AGREE ON for a hearing AS ALL AVAILABLE AND READY. So all the action only consisted of Motions and Answers for months. In the altercation, the BCI Summary for Breyer to use on the Grand Jury became available and showed that it was not just Breyer whitewashing claims that deceived the GrandJury, it was ALSO Hornyak DOING THE REAL FORGERY OF EVIDENCE. They should both do 'time' instead of being paid county tax funds. Agreed? We were hoping the Commissioners would support NON-PAYMENT. No luck!

-- A Breakthrough: All the Motions and Oppositions became a circus with only one good performer, Tom Eagle, the Coroner's personal lawyer. As can be seen in the law research presented and logic of application argued. By contrast the Death-Squad lawyer (Phillips) bungled the ball, opening access to the video evidence that the Coroner had wanted and then, realizing the danger with Tom he ordered the Judge to fire Tom. A genuine Circus but A CHANCE AT JUSTICE . And that video (in a publicity ploy by Phillips) ends up online at Youtube,,, Open Source Bloodhounds delight and even though the coroner couldn't convene an inquest, the bloodhounds were making progress, holding their breath in realization that Gusweiler wasn't reliably interested in truth or facts or even law.

-- SO THIS IS WHERE WE STAND with Gusweiler just completing the long awaited hearing on Saturday the 7th: It was an all day affair and the Judge was clearly hostile to the Coroner but it didn't help his crony lawyers who had not a bit of decent argument for Gusweiler to plagiaristically adapt for his 'Decision'. As a consequence, and not ignoring the involvement (in one capacity potentially) of 8 lawyers, the all day hearing did set the date of the 16th of March for those submitting Briefs to have them filed, WITH NO CHANCE OF RESPONDING TO OTHER'S BRIEFS.

For anyone questioning the opinion that the Judge was hostile, you must remember that he CHOSE TO VIOLATE HER RIGHTS AS A QUASI JUDICIAL ELECTED OFFICIAL WHEN HE CHOSE TO ISSUE THE RESTRAINING ORDER -- a move for which he had no authority and hence that reveals from the start that his allegiance IS NOT TO JUSTICE BUT TO HIS SUPPORT BASE IN THE SHERIFF's OFFICE.

Can you imagine how POWERLESS THE JUDGE IS WITHOUT THE SHERIFF's OFFICERS TO ENFORCE HIS ORDERS, TO DELIVER HIS BAD NEWS TO CITIZENS, TO JAIL THOSE WHO REFUSE TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE's ORDERS...??

His allegiance, just like a PROSECUTOR's ALLEGIANCE to law officers, is to the bully force THAT EMPOWERS HIM IN REALITY.

Gusweiler should have stepped aside and handed the case to at least an outside judge appointed by the OSC. At least that was clearly a conflict of interest in his choice to go ahead and automatically makes it no surprise of him being hostile to the Coroner.

But is goes deeper. in several dimensions. But staying within the area of Court operations and rules, he is now stuck with his INVALID POSITION AND OPENING VIOLATIONS OF LAW.

And.... With no decent argument coming from his allied party against the Coroner, and with the video data she needed for the Inquest now in her hands due to a tactical error by his allies' lawyer, you'd think this Court would be backpedalling rapidly.

But in for a penny, in for a pound, it seems. Weighing it up:

1-- Gusweiler butted in where the Federal Court had already been summoned by the same Plaintiffs, over the same issues so it should have been time to recognize an untenable intrusion (that would be inherent in different opinions and whose should stand) and duck out.... but no...

2-- Gusweiler has no authority to prevent another office holder, a peer, from doing what the law authorizes that office holder to do, which is precisely what he is attempting to impose with his restraining order.... has he even considered those wrongheaded ideas as untenable in any orders he might want, now that Tom Eagle has clearly and elegantly made that claim and defended it...? No that's still on Gusweiler's agenda.. making the Coroner's Lawyer a double annoyance.

POWER IMPLICATIONS;

-- Apparently Gusweiler has no fear of any higher court authority overseeing his outrageous usurpation AND PUNISHING HIM, which implies that in Ohio, judges are dictators. He just has to be able to make some distorted argument -- based on lies of the plaintiffs that he grants credibility to, deserved or not. So far, Phillips handiwork doesn't sound credible. Making the restraining order permanent doesn't look too promising on its own.

-- Curiously, the Ohio State Coroners Association -- who should be screaming at this UNPRECEDENTED violation of their PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS -- is not among the players demanding that the usurper stand down which then allows this outrage to be a precedent to subjugate the defenders of the dead (if they ever live up to their obligation).

But then again, maybe there's a matter of financing as a sign of weakness in their position in the hierarchy... where do they get their funding and where is their law department.... a map check of the head office of OSCA shows that it is a cigar box on a highway access road filled with truck loading docks... another indication of the loss of stature of the Common Law defender of the dead.... They are comatose and led by one of the coroners who was silent when Breyer interpreted their medical findings as 'suicide'. You cannot determine 'suicide' from just the body so Breyer's pretense was that there was nothing indicating a 'hogtying' and 'abuse' and the coroner overseeing the autopsy found silence safer.

So why didn't Gusweiler either go ahead already at the Hearing since the Motions battle have been the arguing game in play for MONTHS if he's going to do it on his gambling with power in conflict with law..?

MAYBE HIS PLAN IS TO AVOID THE CONFLICT-ON-MERIT AND USE HIS TRUMP CARD

At the Saturday Hearing, Gusweiler was not afraid to be dictatorial and indicate that he could decide the case on his whim as we saw him build the possibility that he would use the Contempt of Court charges against the Coroner initiated falsely by Phillips earlier and added to at the hearing..

Back when the Restraining Order was first placed, the Coroner's husband who is in Law Enforcement, a lawyer and engineer by training and who accompanies his wife to death scenes for her safety, had started working on organizing opportunities for any in the community who had knowledge of some aspect of the Zachary Goldson homicide situation to contact him. He also manages a lot of the research and website content for her office from his own background. Hence he was actively checking some of the engineering behind the physical components of the sprinklerheads, where there were large disputes between the Prosecutor's claims and the earlier evidence that formed part of the bases for the Coroner's Report on those devices being claimed as part of the suicide claim.

When the TRO went into effect, Varnau (Dennis) disconnected the link for the inquest data collection. But further work on engineering data and analysis of data was NOT CONVENING ANYTHING. Which was compatible with the precise statement of the Court Order, as can be seen. Specifically the Gusweiler wrote:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. That temporarily, until further order of this Court, the Defendant Brown County Coroner's Office, and all those in active concert or participation with the office who receive actual notice of this order and each of them, be enjoined and restrained preventing Defendant from convening an inquest until further order of this Court.
2. That the Plaintiffs have such other and further relief as may be equitable.

The definition, law or otherwise. of 'convening' says that 'gathering a group' for a group purpose is what is enjoined. Phillips must never have done his homework in preparation for a test, or practiced for a play. It was the SETTING FOR THE TEST and/or the TICKET SELLING and LIVE PERFORMING that is the 'convening' for the stated purpose. In fact, the most competent and high performing students prepare for the lessons to be covered in the next class before ever setting foot in the lecture. (Peak Learning, by R. Gross).

Because Gusweiler indicated that he also was such a slouch in work habits as to consider doing preparation for a performance to be 'convening'. so even Tom Eagle decided to fold and be cautious about the tyranny of Contempt of Court by Judges who are already hostile to his client. Hence Eagle instructed the Varnaus to remove all public access to their work on the inquest. Public access does not mean remove it from your hard drive, by any stretch of law or silicon valley engineering. Nor does it mean that you have to sit on your hands totally.

But what if your hard drive is part of the 'cloud' -- the storage facilities of the internet, as the Varnaus' was?

The internet is a web of computers and hard drives and the catalog of public data is managed by the 'spyders' that crawl the index pages and provide the public search engines with direction to find the public areas of the interconnected systems. Anything not so hyperlinked to some domain's index is private. as confirmed by courts affirming that as 'protected computer resources' under the law. So Dennis Varnau was working on his own protected private hard drive. With a significant invested power point project to compare the Death-Squad's BCI-filmed-testimony with the provided footage of the security cameras' video files. Identifying the 'mis-speaking' and what happens to the handcuffs. Serious bloodhound results.

But now the tyranny factor opened the door to FELONY,

Wayne Gates, the editor of one of the local papers with the reputation of being the party-in-power's mouth, sought to favor the Death-Squad and their lawyer and build his reputation. Boy did his quest for fame succeed in his willingness to expose himself to the faulty law protection of Phillips. Gates effectively confessed (boldly and proudly) to committing a felony five (6-12 months prison) at the behest of Phillips. Who needs that lawyer! Phillips should have left his law degree at the door! Proper lawyer Research would have turned up 18 U.S.C. 1030 (a) etc or Ohio's state law's ORC 2913.04

Gates brought up the power point file on a laptop for the Court to see, using a private hyperlink. Dr Varnau and Eagle protested that such access was violating their private data and was not a public 'convening' of any kind.

Gusweiler was so eager to have something appearing to support his tyranny of Contempt rulings, that he wouldn't even hear of testing Eagle's assertion that the screen could be merely displaying a cached file from prior to the TRO . And Gusweiler's glee at his hammering gavel of contempt charging led to his next move in his project to build a damaging case against the Coroner.

Considering his own lack of expertise, such display of tech expertise opens the door to both directions. In the hands of a favored party, the demonstration of knowledge of an area of expertise bolsters his already biased opinion of that party's credibility as an expert. In the hands of a disfavored party, such a demonstration is suspected as an attempt to deceive and evade the judge's questioning and thus offering GROUNDS FOR A TYRANNICAL CONTEMPT CHARGE.. No law reading, no fact-finding, no understanding, all inflated prejudice of supposed;y trustworthy opinion, straight tyranny.

He literally indicated that he was leaning toward considering Dr Varnau's answers as 'evasive'. It's an opening he's used in the past against opponents he considered too proficient in combat against a county dictocratic bureaucrat, so that the bureaucrat could win against the substance of the law and against the facts and science being in favor of the proficient party. More sly than the bold oppression of the creative fines-extortion seen in Ferguson, but serving the same goal, oppressive tyranny.

Gusweiler was so gleeful once the DVD copy was entered into evidence that he locked the DVD in his office safe instead of its proper place in the case file.

But it was immediately acquired under public records requests and circulated.... We'll look at it momentarily and with no cause for worry over further felony. because NOW IT'S PUBLIC DATA BY THE COURT RULES AND THE PLAINTIFF's CHOICE to enter it as court evidence!

Score points for Justice's possibility with the Death-Squad and cronies going to prison, BUT WHAT OF THE IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE CORONER OF GUSWEILER's TYRANNICAL CONTEMPT CHARGES TO PUT HER IN THE DEATH-SQUAD JAIL.

The dilemma excitement is only beginning. Don't you agree... Decisions on the Restraining Order are yet to be considered. Due to the number of lawyers and clients (though there's only one real pair of opponents), Gusweiler ordered those lawyers to submit their Briefs on Monday the 16th (next week) BUT ALL SIMULTANEOUSLY AND WITH NO ANSWERING battles. At the Clerk of Court's website, the case is 20150001

Now for the bombshell that's IN THE POWERPOINT VIDEO:

[It's rather long but it moves well while in play]
Watch for the interview with CO Felicia Landacre (it's shown twice, the first time at the 19 minute mark, then at 38) and her religiously reported instructions from Meyer to Shadle Jr (on his smoke break) to get the cuffs that were put on Zach when they subdued him after the escape attempt. Then she watches them swing into action to get the cuffs and reports that THEY WENT STRAIGHT TO THE CELL. And that she supposed 'they had left the guy in the cuffs in the cell but didn't know about that' Then watch the clip as Shadle cuts his smoke break short (Landacre reported that they took only 5-10 minutes instead of 15, acting purposefully) and GOES DIRECTLY TO CELL #15... for reading their intended destination, watch their angle after they make the turn from the booking room, they walk diagonal toward the cell15 side of the hall not the commissary side of the hall... their feet stay to the left of the center line, definitely aiming to cell#15, not as an afterthought when getting to their destination. Cell 15 was their intended destination.

And per Dunning, they were to do a whole block check in a little while, so WHY PICK TO LOOK IN CELL15 AS A SPUR OF THE MOMENT CHECK **INSTEAD OF CHECKING CELL 14** WHERE THERE WAS A SUICIDAL INMATE THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE CHECKING **FREQUENTLY** and had clearly neglected. Any responsible impulsive checking would aim to patch up the neglected duty, agreed?

"Force of habit" (Shadles explanation for checking 15) was a joke on the cop-kissy interrogator who didn't even choke on it.......

GUILT ALL AROUND FOR THE DEATH-SQUAD, and ALL THEIR COVER UP TEAMS, local and DEWINE'S FOOLS,.. and now add Gusweiler and Gates as complicit fools, each with their own agendas.

--- not a chance of deceiving the jury of expected country bumpkins, not even with Hornyak and Breyer on team-coverup to make the claim that Zach **IN HANDCUFFS BEHIND HIS BACK** COULD HANG HIMSELF FROM THE SPRINKLER HEAD ---- BOOM !!!

And Landacre is CREDIBLE, not one of the suspects, was not near the events in the cell area at any point, but had a good watching post at the desk with the intercom and screens. And she got Meyer's call-content to relay and watch the effect. Perfect timing by a non-involved observer. So she's credible as a witness, good view/involvement but not even remotely a suspect.

By contrast, McKinzie spends time being pals with the suspects instead of staying in the front desk area where Shadle said was the *females'* area.

Landacre was the blessedly right person in the right place and the right time for Justice to have a chance! ENJOY --- WHILE YOU MAY, BECAUSE THE OUTCOME IS ANYTHING BUT KNOWABLE because this is a drain on everyone's resources.....

Dropbox Download if you prefer, try the copy at: Comparing Testimonies and Security Camera Clips (mp4)

Death-Squad's Lawyer Hands Coroner the Victory.. A Chance for Justice

Death-Squad's Lawyer Hands Coroner the Victory..?? Opening up a Chance for Justice?

ROTFL, unbelievable.. THE DEATH-SQUAD'S LAWYER INADVERTENTLY GIVES THE CORONER THE EVIDENCE SHE'D BEEN DENIED BY THE DEATH-SQUAD'S CRONIES -- AND THEN EMBARRASSINGLY, THAT DEATH-SQUAD LAWYER ATTEMPTS TO 'FIRE' HER LAWYER... WHAT NEXT! What Next!

And then OPEN SOURCE SLEUTHING TAKES OFF, in spite of the crony judge restraining the 'Defendants' -- Coroner Varnau and staff -- from 'convening the inquest.

Phillips --that LAWYER for that murderous bunch of sheriff's deputies and jailers now labeled the DEATH-SQUAD -- INADVERTENTLY GAVE THE CORONER ACCESS TO EVIDENCE THE SHERIFF&SHADLE HAD BLOCKED her from gaining via her law-authorized channels... not quite all that her subpoenas had specified in advocating for full investigating not being done by BCI, like death-squad phone records, but all the video records that the cover-up team of Shadle & the Sheriff & BCI had control of....

So should we feel sympathy for such a criminal gang having the misfortune of having enlisted an incompetent court-mouthpiece... pshaw, no!

WE SHOULD CELEBRATE WHAT LITTLE JUSTICE WE CAN FIND EVEN WHEN IT'S MERELY AN EARNED ACCIDENT..... so CHEERS!

oh yeah, Phillips thought he could overwhelm the courtroom battle so he was grabbing some favorable bravado, with his flashing the evidence in reach of the media, attempting to see them drool, but that was shortlived, and it did not compensate him as he'd planned for his lack of genuine law-based battle-position... Their claims are faulty in the extreme... -- AND so, after a couple of rounds in memorandum-battles, SEEING HE IS THOROUGHLY OUT-ARGUED BY TOM EAGLE, HER PERSONAL FAMILY LAWYER -- you won't believe what his next move is -- PHILLIPS ORDERS THE JUDGE TO FIRE THE CORONER'S LAWYER..... Can you imagine anything so absurd...

WHAT NEXT, what next, what next...... IN THIS BROWN COUNTY CIRCUS...

See for yourself:

Round One: Eagle demolishes Phillips claims of 'having standing' to make demands for a restraining order, as well as Gusweiler's right to butt into an affair that's already in front of another court for adjudication (opening conflicts between courts trying an issue SIMULTANEOUSLY, TOTAL DISORDER)

Round Two: Eagle's opener is a priceless exercise in situational irony (of suspects demanding a judge as fact-finder to stifle fact-finding), followed by demonstrating that such tactics as phillips is demanding the court do are an insult to justice's battle-honor (not engaging in frivolous nor distraction tactics)... Phillips tried to bamboozle the court, trying to assert that you can't hire your own lawyer AT YOUR OWN EXPENSE (not the county's dime), when the county has hired you an official lawyer (b/c the county prosecutor Little was obligated to defend county officials but Little ducked on conflict of favors, so Little enlisted a colleague to do it pro bono, namely the county prosecutor from Pike County, named Robert Junk, who welcomed the role of co-counsel)

We're beginning to empathize with the Commissioners trying to hide their faces and wish these court cases would go away... it must be thoroughly embarrassing, knowing everyone is laughing all around them...at least until the dread sets it, knowing the final round is a ruling from the indescribably wrongheaded Gusweiler...

Aggrieved BCers are so aware of Gusweiler's twisted 'law reading', if you can call it that, and lack of family rights and values, favoring govt dictocratic bureaucrats with "immunity" from liability for their usurped authority and reckless handling of children in recent school administrator cases... so aware of Gusweiler's treacherous perfidy that BCers are taking their cases to federal court instead of county Common Pleas.

You can't blame the ordinary BC citizen for this judgeship performance situation... It's not as though BCers had a choice and still re-elected Gusweiler, he was the only choice on the ballot. Sieg Heil Herr Republicrats.

The justice last straw hope is that maybe if Gusweiler gets the idea that the media -- and public's -- heat is not off what he's dealing with, and people crowd the courtroom, AND (he can't hide behind sealed documents) ALL THE CARDS WILL BE ON THE TABLE, (unlike the Podolski vs Sheriff case) he may decide his face is on the line..  right? Next Gusweiler move is a Saturday (because all the lawyers involved couldn't find a decent weekday as their agreed spot on their calendars)...

Wanna come by and watch? The action starts March 7th at 10:00 AM (not a hard stretch for a Saturday morning) if the judge is on time... once he's in and the doors go shut then it's near impossible to get in late (til there's an intermission which is unpredictable)... better than a demonstration on a picket line in the misery of this climate, imo...

And while you're deciding, let's take a look at what blew up from Phillips' evidence revelation gamble... That should entice more interest in wanting that inquest to get rolling..... unless you're a member of the GrandJury and are shamefaced... or a Death-Squad coverup crony....

So what was it? The golden payoff?

Lots of video from the jail's security cam system!! Something no one --who'd seen the autopsy photos and witnessed the evidence disappearing-acts perpetrated by the Chief Deputy Shadle -- would trust, yet its appearance was wanted, if only to see what was left on it. Shadle and Sheriff Wenninger had blocked the Coroner's access for over a year, beginning with official subpoenas and requests they stonewalled in November 2013, and hadn't even given it to BCI except in pieces, with stories about automatic system overwrites that supposedly now were just other people's rumors, contradicting their own tactical dodges at the time. Aided at one point by the BC Prosecutor Little (Schadle's Babe) claiming she couldn't imagine how to write a subpoena that would pry the Sheriff's hands off the evidence wanted, though the Coroner had listed the law to cite and the precise list wanted.. oy!

In the now accessible videos, There were clips from the camera in the sally port when the cruiser with Zach arrived, as well as a brief clip of hustling Zach through the pat-down room, then finally the supposedly full clip from when they pushed him into the cell til they 'discovered' him later.

Plus whatever BCI official 'interviews' of all those involved the night of the 'homicide' that BCI managed to put together. Mind you, the word is that Hornyak was 'leading' the interviewees in his own effort at whitewash & coverup. But the actual detailed accounts have been interestingly conflicting one another in spite of the 'leading'.. Minor details, maybe not. Yet the implications sparked ZERO interest from the coverup team of Hornyak and Breyer.

Even more interesting is the opportunity to compare and verify stories with the visual record on the security camera record, whatever there is of it. (BCI didn't take the system hard drive, swap it out, just swallowed, unafraid, what the suspects provided)... Clearly scrutinizing was not Hornyak's nor Breyer's intention, just doing the motions with annoyance at the Coroner... And the GrandJurors made no effort to demand anything questioning the coverup team. But now the Coroner has what she had been denied.

And she's not the only one. by a long shot...

When Phillips gave the so-called 'Hallway' film to the WCPO reporters, thinking they were as gullible as the Grand Jury -- which they were, just parroting Phillips' assurances that all was there and confirmed the official story (that BCI's hotshots had checked the video's integrity) -- WHAT PHILLIPS DIDN'T ANTICIPATE WAS THAT WCPO WOULD PUT THE VIDEO IN REACH OF ALL THE PUBLIC in 'CPO's grab for online viewers' attention for 'the real thing'.... WCPO put it up ONLINE (Youtube channel even) WHERE THE BLOODHOUNDS COULD DOWNLOAD IT AND SCARF IT UP......

Which they did.... THEN IT was OFF TO THE RACES... Scouring the footage -- frame by frame-- checking time stamps, looking for 'discontinuities' of any sort... in an excellent demonstration of OPEN SOURCE SLEUTHING TO REACH FACT-FOUND JUSTICE ... !

Pay dirt? Well this is what they found so far.

1) Definitely THE FILE FROM THE CAMERA OUTSIDE THE CELL#15 where they were thrusting Zachary into, WAS NOT THE SAME FORMAT AS THE OTHER CAMERA FILES.. the open source bloodhounds contacted the system manufacturer for confirmation and they said the supplied 'evidence' file had been taken off the system using an unknown third party piece of equipment... BANG... drag the security/evidence deputy into the RING OF SUSPECTS.... someone named Harry Martin has messed with the evidence for some reason... why wouldn't he have used his big system's built-in record-preserving equipment.... what Breyer and Hornyak passed off as unadulterated was not kosher..

2) Manufacturer information said that the Jail security camera system was centrally timestamped by the main computer for consistent precision, so the bloodhounds, assisted by the coroner's engineer husband, found a point on the 'pat-down room' camera (where Zachary was dragged through leading to the cell hallway) that should have had the identical timestamp for the matching point in the action on the hallway clip as that hallway camera took over.... Neat bit of sleuthing, watching for the point where the door hits the jamb as the last person passes through... the time stamp on the adulterated file from the cell-hallway camera was A HALF A MINUTE OFF (a full thirty seconds, each over a dozen frames long) a lot of frames off from the time stamp on the pat-down room camera, whose file type was kosher....

BANG... not only had the format been altered but THE CONTENT HAD BEEN CHANGED...... Fall down on your knees, BCI hotshots, and give the taxpayer back their money for your puffed-up, legendary, hotshot claims of inyegrity...

What content was changed? Not so easily determined....

3) At one point after the 'discovery', CO Shadle looks around as he leaves cell#15 and he notices and retrieves a SHEET OF PAPER OFF THE DOOR OF CELL#14 and takes it away (for some reason?)... it turns out the INMATE IN CELL#14 WAS ON SUICIDE WATCH!!.. that means the COs were on orders to CHECK ON #14 EVERY TEN MINUTES... and they would initial and time-mark their duty completed, being just ear-shot and eye-shot away from #15... so where was that paper now... AND WHY IS THERE NO SIGN of activity ON THAT HALLWAY VIDEO OF ANY OF THE COs PERFORMING THEIR CHECK, NOT EVEN ONCE IN THE 2 or 3 checks for the VIDEO INTERVALS SUPPOSEDLY RECORDED... too busy preparing for completing their ruse, perfecting their alibi and finishing THE murder?

Do I detect another use of incompetence coming as 'plausible deniability'? Like all the security forces failing, in leading up to 9-11... extremely suspect.... not a single mention anywhere in any testimony, not even Shadle's, whom we hear got a promotion from Shadle Sr for good performance??? That tidbit traveled like lightning,

Even more exciting was the realization of a different flaw in their staged 'discovery'...

4) No one looks upward at any point in the activity of 'discovery' and supposedly preparing to get him down -- how odd when they all say he was hanging high... consistently they all are looking down... Clearly complicating any chance that the caller to 9-1-1 should be free of the ring of suspects.. She's in up to her eyeballs,,, BANG.... She's as guilty as sin.... prison time all around..

In the Coroner's photo of Zach on the floor, the neck-end of the bedsheet would just extend to the top of his head. So the top of Zach's head in the official story would have been right at the end of the ceiling-half of the sheet, which was 23" down from the ceiling in the measurements taken at the scene on the night of the homocide...

The official story and measurement (of ceiling height and sheet's pieces) would put Zachary's head just 23 inches away from the 9.5 foot high ceiling.... his head would have been -- in the death-squad official story-- 7ft high, clearly an *up* angle for each and any 'discoverer'... yet none look up, always downward into the cell's space, about where his thighs or lower would have been in the death-squad official story...

BANG.. ALL GUILTY... no Oscar awards for any of them... bloodhound-audience booing such lousy production quality... even Harry Martin can't make up for their fraud.... so what did he try? what was crucial to cut and patch, a task that's tough to make ends match at start and end... but maybe not as totally impossible for low quality, motion-sense controlled video... ending up only 30 seconds over......

5) There were a couple places/frames that looked rather uncomplicatedly odd... there was some jostling at the cell#15 door after they thrust Zach in and a couple of them followed, but was there a third head going in (view of body blocked by those remaining in the hall) -- other than the ones nearer the camera... artifact of mismatched frames or mystery person..???. no mystery person is available anywhere in the official story, and only two came out when they closed the door... did some unknown individual stay inside...?? or was someone messing with the video frames at that point??

There was also, much later, what looked like a bright light, almost like a flash camera or flash light, that shone UNDER THE DOOR.... momentarily... WHAT WAS THAT... After discarding tazer-tormenting as not flash-producing likely, the speculation went creatively looking to connect the mystery person to the flash... one idea was that the COs have a (drum roll) jail-porn -- sadism specialty -- business on the side and Zachary's highly decorated body parts would draw good money for photos in that sort of market, also offering an explanation for the unexplainable affluence that allowed small-county deputies to afford so many law cases.. it also tied to the rapidly available high tech photo taking done by Shadle while they wait for the EMTs to certify Zach as no longer able to contradict their official narrative... OY!

Bloodhounds have to look at possibilities that coroners might not

5) A more productive entertainment for bloodhounds was the game of "where are the handcuffs". Like tracking the pea in a shell game... the number of handcuffs, shackles and transport belts going into the cell vs what came out looked like there was still a pair of handcuffs on Zach when they locked him in. Overlooked like the sheet!!?? We don't suppose that would fly even in Breyer's book, although he'd likely try.......

It's kind of hard to tie sheets to sprinkler-heads while hand cuffed! Have no fear, Breyer'd work on it...

SO DO YOU THINK WE NEED AN INQUEST.... Raise your hand if you do... Perhaps we should ask County Commissioner Gray if Enough is enough yet.. maybe they could vote on it....


The theory so far is that they hogtied the kid in a way that made the strap pull his head back, tied to his shackles so his own tortured pose strangled him as he would be unable to stop his body from trying to relieve the tormented position....

now I'm not at all acquainted with hogtying but it seemed to me that the tension on the strap tied to shackles would press on the victim's shoulders as the legs tried to straighten....... but THAT'S INCONSISTENT WITH THE ANGLE OF THE STRANGULATION STRAP-MARK... something else or someone held that strap up..

that 'ligature mark' runs away from the shoulders and up toward the top-back of the kid's head.......

the only way I can see that mark being there is if the thug just strung the strap around the kid's throat (after pushing him face down, still cuffed and shackled), and pulled up on the strap while putting his boot on the kid's spine between the kid's shoulderblades.....

murder 1..... not a miscalculated hogtying accident.....

that murder-1-scenario is also consistent with the scraped up adams apple, as the upward pulled strap slid til it reached under the kid's jaw and ears (not toward his shoulders)......

I'd also point out that the thugs were hot and hurtful in the dragging of the kid out of the cruiser so the thugs were able to intentionally slam the kid's upper body/head on the concrete... then hoisted him --jostling his body and rough as possible-- hustled through the pat-down room to the cell-hallway with urgency beyond any visible need than their personal vengefulness about to be satisfied, and thrust the kid through the cell doorway with a push that would end him up facedown on the floor, cuffed and shackled still... the precise opportunity for the chosen thug to strangle the kid, foot on the kid's spine, while the rest of the thugs glowered and got their satisfaction vicariously......

the time required would have been plenty for this theory of murder 1... and fits the hallway video timing, not wiped out in their messing with what they desperately had exposed to camera view... the actual murder would not be their camera-evidence worry........

perhaps any hogtying expert could counter the recognition of the angle of the strap mark, but I doubt it...

HOWEVER.... there's medical suggestions that the bloody ligature mark takes longer to form than the time to cut off his circulation and kill him..... average 3 minutes but would the minimum be near 1.5 minutes.... don't know yet... INQUEST TIME

FreeForAll !! LAWSUIT BLIZZARD Erupts in Brown County Government Offices!!

FREE FOR ALL !! LAWSUIT BLIZZARD ERUPTS IN BROWN COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES
The deputies & sheriff are desperately trying to use their same-party courts TO STOP THE CORONER'S INQUEST b/c they know they are guilty and this coroner will nail them in their lies, since she does her homework and the BCI whitewash masquerading as a Goldson homicide investigation is ripe with forged evidence, and guilty fingerprints that go all the way to Columbus. Columbus is desperate to get rid of the Varnaus, both of them.

Inquests to resolve 'disparities' in evidence are law-authorized (such as ORC 313.09) and the judge (GUSWEILER, the Dems didn't even run a candidate against the Republican's mowing machine) has a hot potato restraining order to be ruled on in early Feb 2015.

CLEARLY THE SHERIFF'S MEN -- WHILE SCREAMING THAT INVESTIGATION MUST STOP AND THE CORONER'S DECISIONS MUST BE CHANGED -- ARE CONTRADICTORILY SETTING IN MOTION **MORE** INVESTIGATION PROCESSES

A-- Things to tally up in scoring the free-for-all PLAYERS' STATUS:
-- A GJ issuing a 'no bill' decision ONLY INDICATES THAT THE EVIDENCE THEY WERE MADE PRIVY TO DID NOT ADD UP TO 'ENOUGH' TO PROCEED TO TRIAL ON MURDER CHARGES... in no way does it CLEAR any one of GUILT... they are not 'cleared' and do not deserve 'innocence' labels in any valid thinking

-- The 'disparities' showing how the GJ was 'misled' are annotated at our previous post showing the need to resolve whose evidence should stand -- THE CORONER'S OR PROSECUTOR BREYER'S

B-- Things to tally up in the PLAINTIFFS' YELLING and ARGUMENT-ILLOGIC
1) -- Even before the game of a BCI 'investigation' was barely afoot, the Sheriff (Wenninger) revealed in a major newspaper QUOTE (Maysville iirc) that they intended to take the 'homicide' ruling to court to force a change to 'suicide' when the GJ no billed the suspicious behavior of 'his men'... my wasnt he confident... every other police captain or sheriff takes suspect officers off the street out of public safety concerns.... not wenninger! THE PUBLIC HAD TO LIVE WITH HIS UNPROVEN RISKY CHOICE and were told to expect even more court battling after the GJ's..... meanwhile he weeps that 'his men' were suffering from their being investigated, imagine that..!!!

2)-- Right before the GJ finally issued a decision, those very same 'men' filed a case in FEDERAL COURT to claim that their civil rights were being violated by the coroner's release of evidence to the victim's next of kin (which she is obligated to do and the kin are not obligated to keep the DeathSquad stress-free) -- and as part of that Federal trial, the Coroner's defense process would include a thorough "Discovery' deposition/questioning of those she would subpoena as well as 'Discovery' demands for their DATA.... THE DEATH SQUAD'S TERROR IS BECAUSE AN INQUEST BLOCKS THEIR LAWYERS' FROM BLOCKING QUESTIONS.... imagine that as the motive for their yelling and lawsuit BLIZZARD......

HOW CAN A JUDGE --- OR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -- CLAIM THE IMPETUS FOR INVESTIGATION IS COMING FROM THE CORONER, and that only her investigation is UNWARRANTED in the screaming Plaintiff's LITIGINOUS planning??

BUT INSTEAD THE REPUBLICAN LOCAL MEDIA -- SHOUTING HEADLINES that are *SCRIPTED* BY THOSE REPUBLICAN COMMISSIONERS' REPUBLICAN LAWYERS-- to entertain the public and mind-bend the party parrots in their daily gossiping -- broadcast in the local paper that "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"

You'd think the Coroner was the bully and that the Sheriff's detriment to the county just started when that bully coroner was elected.... think again!

Let's tally the Sheriff vs Coroner's scoring on detriment to the County

Starting with the tally of the Sheriff's detriment to the County

1) back when budget belt tightening was first pushed hard in BC and departments did all sorts of cutting, THE SHERIFF TOLD THE COUNTY TO GIVE HIM HIS MONEY DEMANDS OR HE WAS SENDING INMATES TO BUTLER COUNTY'S JAIL AND THE COUNTY COULD SEE IF THEY WANTED TO PAY BUTLER COUNTY OR HIM..... remember that bit of EXTORTION... and before you think that his administrative limits were truly reached, think back to the alternate candidate JOSH BLACK of Mt Orab's Police with exciting action credibility WHO SHOWED A PLAN TO EXPAND SHERIFF'S SERVICES WITH LIMIT-ENGINEERED STAFF AND DECENT SAVINGS..... Black almost got elected so some people do read campaign Q&As, unfortunately, not enough... leaving the verdict standing that the SO's demands are lazy thinking extortion by Wenninger and Schadle...

2) or how about the bullying incident recently against the current county commissioners where Wenninger THREATENED (yes threatened) that he'd TAKE HIS MEN COMPLETELY OFF ROAD DUTY AND HAVE THEM SIT IN THE OFFICE TIL 9-1-1 CALLED THEM **UNLESS** THE COMMISSIONERS FORKED OVER EXTRA MONEY FOR 3 MORE COP CARS THAN WERE DUE UNDER NORMAL BUDGETING... then to dominate the players, Wenninger played games with the court attempt at using mediation til the County forked over most of what his demands were IMMEDIATELY, with the rest under commitment for this next period's 'extra' funds.

3) or remember the dictatorial AND AGAINST CITIZEN SAFETY rules that Wenninger unilaterally set up to establish his territorial control when a call for help might come from his territory but another police officer was closer... that nasty factor meant death to a BC woman intent on suicide when her husband died leaving her suddenly without a caregiver, right after emotional winter holidays.... NewYears 2013, iirc... a spectacular start for the new coroner's initiation to BCSO law enforcers 'cooperation'..

4) or maybe we should recognize a corrupt motive when, just a week before the news hit the streets that Wenninger was being sued for mistreating a sick inmate while the inmate was temporarily in BC jail custody, the oh-so-budget-conscious Shadle dumped responsibility on village/town police budgets for seeing to the medical needs of every Sheriffs-inmate-to-be before delivering that inmate (gift wrapped and cared for) to the Sheriff's wondrously unable-to-cope (though wondrously-able-to-be-state-quality staffed) jail....

5) oh but maybe he's such a prima donna at crime solving that BC citizens feel so protected on our streets... like how he *solved* the Stykes murder where the young mother was shot to death while simply driving down our main highway.. last we heard he claimed he had a decent *clue* on a motive.. that was half a year ago (nothing but silence since) which was when a local reporter raised the image of the 1 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNSOLVED MURDER to public attention, so now a year-and-a-half of NIL...... that whiz-bang qualified sheriff (known for his lack of qualifications) SHOULD HAVE HAD THE KILLER IN HIS GRASP WITHIN A WEEK OF THE MURDER... IF HE HAD ANY TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE OF CELLPHONE INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATION... that's right! Cellphone data are MAJOR Law topics on what privacy data that law enforcements are getting for crime-solving and prevention, hot topics even among the public,,,, all he needed to do was A) subpoena the tower owners for all the cell phones physically in the shooter's relevant/tight area for the hour before to the hour after the murder, B) do a search to identify those phone numbers that were stationary before the shooting and left the area briefly after, C) subpoena the relevant phone companies for the identity of those clearly suspect candidates... D) round em up.... and he had a limited time (a week, iirc) to get that data before the tower data was written over.... EITHER WENNINGER HAS NO DECENT CLAIM TO LAW ENFORCEMENT KNOWLEDGE **OR** THERE'S A *MOTIVE* OF HIS OWN FOR NOT PRODUCING THE KILLER... take your pick of detriments to the county's citizens....

6) as for his motives behind that campaigning grin, it's rather patently not his concern to keep his credentials up to 'snuff', since the Board of Elections CEASED EVEN RECORDING WHETHER HIS LAW-MANDATED CREDENTIALS MEET THE LAW'S REQUIREMENTS. They apparently don't check whether his paperwork is done or not, since WENNINGER FILED *NONE* FOR THE LAST 3 ELECTIONS, when bloodhound Podolski filed Public Records Requests to see them. Podolski is the joe fellow who sued to see what was in Wenninger's trial for 'counterfeit' credentials (openly filed in his 1st campaign), a trial that made him officially illegal but 'innocent' of knowingly passing counterfeit claims of eligibility so the local media trumpeted 'innocence' without admitting his stupidity plea, nor raising the question of how and when he would be required to make those counterfeitting debts right... but Gusweiler (the same one now bobbling the hot potato) decided voters did not have enough 'rights' to see the trial's outcome, compared to his buddy Wenninger's 'right' to keep it a secret......

...is that enough, or do you want more...

So now let's look at the ledger on detriments due to the coroner's operations...

Hmmm... she committed to go to EVERY DEATH SCENE (more service, unlike previous officeholder who reneged on going death scenes the Sheriff said he was not that needed on, like the year before's sheriff-ruled-'suicide' at the jail... but she actually PAYS toward her office staffing expenses, out of her own pocket... hmmm... never heard of something like that, eh?

Hmmmm.... all the ruckus in the media witchhunting (which court testimony and phone recording showed was the co-ordinated instigation of Schadle and his support babe the current prosecutor Little) turned out to be unrecognizable as valid ruckus in the evidence before 4 judges so far....

..... and the latest settlement over battles about conflicting areas of responsibility between SO and Coroner's Office (in preparation for the altercations in court) turned out in court to be the version the Coroner had initially insisted on when the SO tried to lock her into their own demands, her having seen those now-agreed rules successfully written about in law enforcement JOURNALS (some indication AGAIN of the Sheriff & Schadles lack of erudition) so SHE WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG....

Hmmm... SO WHERE IS HER DETRIMENT CAUSATION???? WHETHER IN COURT BATTLES (where the errors were the Sheriff&Schadles, per the 9-1-1 and policeband communications records) or in taxpayers' service rights.....

So CONCLUSION #1: THE COUNTY SHOULD BE BACKING THE CORONER

Hmmm.. and IF THE CORONER DOES THE NEEDED FURTHER INVESTIGATION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE 'DISPARITIES' IN THE GOLDSON UPHEAVAL SO FAR, IT WILL LIKELY COST THE COUNTY LESS BLOOD, SWEAT AND TEARS THAN IF A BUNCH OF LAWYERS MIX IT UP IN FEDERAL COURT... Agreed?

Although on the Federal Court route to resolution it's a distinct possibility that the PARTY CONTROL IN CINCINNATI'S FEDERAL COURT MAY NOT BE SO REPUBLICAN... interestingly that could result in even more 'consequences' since the Cincinnati Federal Court DIDN'T BUY THE OHIO SUPREME COURT'S MISREPRESENTATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE on government employee 'immunity' from prosecution AND INSTEAD JUDGED that THE SCIOTO COUNTY JAILERS WERE *NOT IMMUNE* IN THEIR 'MISHANDLING' OF A SICK PRISONER.... DO YOU SUPPOSE DEWINE ALREADY STEERED THE DEATH SQUAD TO A PERSUADABLE FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE JUDGE (than the pair of federal judges that handled the Scioto case) ON THE CINCINNATI BENCH? (it's a secret)

BUT JUDGING BY THE WHITEWASHING MISINFORMATION AND DOWNRIGHT FABRICATION OF THE EVIDENCE BY THE SPECIAL LAWYER/PROSECUTOR VISIBLE IN THE GrandJury REPORT, THE OUTCOME UNDER THE CORONER'S INQUEST WILL STAND UP CLEANLY IN JUSTICE'S SCALES. .... Agreed? at least I'd bet on that!

But of course if that hotpotato judge (GUSWEILER) says the coroner cannot hold her own inquest, ignoring the scoring above (and the law) THEN IT WOULD SEEM TO BE IN THE INTERESTS OF PROPER SERVICE TO THE TAXPAYERS' VALID NEED FOR JUSTICE FOR SAID TAX FUNDS TO BE SUPPORTING THE LEAST DETRIMENTAL OFFICEHOLDER IN THE BATTLE....... Agreed? So Dear Commissioners, pay the Coroner's chosen lawyer, for your own duty to county well being

And should you doubt that the lawyer/prosecutor Breyer (straight from Ohio Attorney General's special lawyer forces) would ever visibly fabricate lies in a court proceeding and defeat justice, take a look at the previous post (The Death Squad Strikes Back...) so titled because that Death Squad was NEVER **PROSECUTED** BY ANYONE IN FRONT OF THE GRAND JURY... BREYER WAS A DREAM DEFENSE LAWYER ALL THE WAY, slathering whitewash and fabricating unethical evidence even....

.... like Breyer's BCI 'evidence' that Shadle didn't perpetrate a felony obstruction of justice by authorizing the destruction of the sprinkler head supposedly used for the 'suicide' but instead BCI's Hornyak recovered precisely cell #15's sprinklerhead, guaranteeing it with proffered phony chain of control fantasy signed statement (wonder what those installers' signatures cost him).... BUT IT'S NOT THE SAME SPRINKLERHEAD, regardless of the fantasized guarantees to the jurors... SEE FOR YOURSELVES....

Here's pg 22 of the BCI prosecution 'Summary' for Breyer's use at the GJ hearings:

Note the crimescene photo of the sprinkler head. Small, like a sawed off cone that would almost fit in a tuna can... that matches the crimescene photo certified by the coroner (See two posts ago: Justice Process TEST: Coroner's Proof....) ...

Now let's look at BCI's Summary page 23...
Wow ANOTHER CRIME SCENE PHOTO THIS TIME SHOWING A BIT OF A 'BEND'

For the Grand Jury, the BCI pandered a physical "evidence" item and backed it up with a manufactured crimescene photo to entertain the GJ that Goldson hung full weight on the jail sprinkler head with an apparently seeable deformation of the crimescene sprinkler.... while blindingly hiding that said photo was not even a crimescene sprinkler, let's enjoy a demo-proof-in-the-pudding:...

For pg 22's 'zoomed' knowably genuine photo measurement ratios.....

For pg 23's 'close-up' photo measurement ratios, to account for different angle POVs (point of view)...

Now the 3D proof-th-the-pudding modeling starts:







BOOM! THE GRAND JURY WAS TOLD A LIE, COMPLETE WITH FORGED PHOTO..

IN FACT, IF THE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR WAS SO CLOSE-UP **AND** IF (per BCI testimony recorded in the GrandJury Report) the investigator EASILY SLIPPED THE KNOTTED SHEET OFF THE SPRINKLER, THEN WHY WOULDN'T SAID INVESTIGATOR HAVE TAKEN A CLOSEUP OF THE **BENT** SPRINKLER-HEAD WITH SUCH A SUICIDE-PROOFWORTHY SHOT IN FRONT OF HIS NOSE, EH?

Why no such naked sprinkler crimescene photo? because the 'closeup' pandered as a crimescene photo is NOT a crimescene photo at all, it's carefully FORGED EVIDENCE (complete with meticulously matching rag to complete the 'convincing' goal) IN ORDER TO LIE THE JURORS INTO SWALLOWING THE OFFICIAL STORY (AKA BIG FELONY LIE)

CONCLUSION #2

BCI AND BREYER SHOULD GET THEIR **COMPENSATION** but IN A FORM (trial, jury, jail) NOT IN DOLLARS FROM COUNTY COFFERS..... agreed. rotflmho at the Ohio POLICESTATE, while ducking out of reach.... Possibly you'd want to relay these 'sentiments' above to the BC Commissioners (who somehow qualified their lawyers' recommendation to reject payment and kept a backdoor OPEN) by downloading this copy (pdf already) and emailing it to your elected, cowardly county commissioners who do take citizen input at commissioners (at) browncountyohio (dot) gov

The DeathSquad Strikes Back and the Grand Jury (Under Breyer's Direction) Strikes Out

Finally the Grand Jury 'speaks'.... or at least they repeat what their special Prosecutor (Daniel Woody Breyer) tells them.. As we shall see. Breyer's fingerprints are all over the ERRORS in their document..

We now have a copy of the GrandJury's report to display with annotations, so let's get started in examining what went wrong. Ferguson MO and Staten Island, NY are roiling with shock at their GrandJury errors and now Brown County has just such an error-ridden GJ effort free of the race card to reveal how the system 'works' to favor cop crime.


** **


Interestingly, the GJ wants to advertise their discontent AFTER the Prosecutor has led them all the way to NO BILL EVERYTHING... and clearly this visit shows that the GJ had no first hand look at the site of the death AT ALL during all the 'demonstrations' and 'story telling'.


Yep, I'm sure the Sheriff and the fine Prosecutor Breyer shares that deepest sympathy.

In fact, the Sheriff has so much sympathy for the mother of the jail victim, that he's charging her for the sheet he says killed her son... no kidding! Real insight into the Sheriff's ideas of justice and HIS OWN FALSIFYING OF THE PUBLIC'S HOPES FOR JUSTICE.

We'd wonder about the validity of a juvenile court's anti-gun 'disability', imposed in the Homeland Security early attacks on young people, all the way to what age when the early charges didn't seem to involve guns...

No apparent recognition that the scary list of current charges now were totally victimless, possibly even unconstitutionally pursued, nor of any other decent personal factors in the kid's life as a young father and decent son. Just prejudicial images.

And as for Hamilton County's narrowing down on Zachary, that IS NO INDICATION OF GUILT IN ANY DECENT COURTROOM, Grand or otherwise, since you're innocent until proven otherwise. Or at least that was the jewel of the American justice system.


The item number 4) is a total whitewash to make any reader gag. Violent threatening of someone over whom the deputies had the power to implement it BECAME IN BREYER's WHITEWASH: *could* be *interpreted* as threatening. Would a decent lawyer allow that as an indication of law definitions applied to the situation? Not likely. But then who says Breyer is a decent lawyer any more since now he works for Mike DeWine!

And then the carelessness of the 'escorting' oh so nice deputy, became an unprovoked 'attacked and INJURED' episode, to be discarded and to blot out the deputy's crucial error in LAW ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE, by suggesting that the reader and the speaker should think that 'recuffed' was accurate and thereby to cover up the judgment error of the deputy.

BUT THAT WHITEWASH PALES BY COMPARISON TO THE CRIME OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE BOMBSHELL IN 5)

BREYER HAS HIDDEN THE EVIDENCE IN THE CORONER'S REPORT WHERE SHE DISCOVERED THAT THE DEATH HAD BEEN KNOWN to some members of the Sheriff's Investigators A FULL 12 MINUTES BEFORE THE DEATH IS SUPPOSEDLY **DISCOVERED** back at the Jail and reported to 911.

How can such a knockout piece of evidence be OMITTED in any DECENT prosecution determined to FIND THE TRUTH...

No -- only in a whitewash to COVER THE CRIME... THAT COVER UP IN A GRAND JURY MISDIRECTION TO EFFECT THE ESCAPE OF THE MURDERERS MAKES PROSECUTOR BREYER AN ACCOMPLICE IN FRAUD... and ultimately an accomplice in HOMICIDE.... aiding and abetting the escape from discovery of the killer is precisely being a PARTY TO THE CRIME.

Try to visualize WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS in deciding on indictments or no-billing...
SCENARIO #1... the official story of the DeathSquad..
Try to imagine any way in a suicide, that 'the perpetrator' (with no involvement by those unbesmirched deputies) could reveal his crime to a remote detective while 'the perpetrator' is sequestered in his cell, just before the jail officers could discover his crime against himself... impossible...

SCENARIO #2... the official story ALMOST.. with fear-of-the-Coroner colors
Since we can't escape the idea that SOME involvement of the deputies or corrections-officers did occur, then to preserve the possibility of that involvement being INITIALLY innocent, we'd have to suppose the involved deputy/CO who made the early-discovery was just afraid of the potential consequences when the suicide would be officially discovered, so in order to warn his superiors to allow them some time to adjust in some way, this early-discoverer makes a phone call to DETECTIVE MEYER and delivers the news, then proceeds to slink away, SOMEHOW...

***BUT*** HOW COULD THEIR EARLY-DISCOVERY NOT BE ON THE HALL SECURITY MONITOR.??? That deputy/CO should be worried about that, don't you think.... CLEARLY they'd realize their presence in this secretive suicide-discovery scenario 2 from outside the cell would be VIEWABLE ON THE HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA and presumably would catch them up in any investigation?!

BOOM -- *****that hall security monitor HAD TO HAVE BEEN DISABLED IN THE SLINK AWAY at the very least***** no matter who "knew of" the dead body ahead of the 'official' discovery, that person was standing in the hall at some point and there is no record of that hall visitor, ON ANY "PORTION" OF THAT HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA ... So the camera was OFF or DISABLED....

AND IF THAT HALL MONITOR WAS SHUT DOWN OR DISABLED IN SOME PERIOD BETWEEN THE 'CHECKING' of Goldson's status in that cell AND THE NEXT PASSAGE (by ZANE SCHADLE) DOWN THAT HALLWAY AT THE OFFICIAL DISCOVERY, THEN THE SHUTTING-DOWN WAS MORE LIKELY DONE AHEAD OF THE "VISIT" TO EMPOWER THE MURDERERS TO TORTURE AND KILL ZACHARY... not just to escape culpability for early discovery and surreptitious relaying of the warning of trouble coming.... MAKING SCENARIO #3 HIGHLY POSSIBLE, so here it is.

SCENARIO #3 -- HOMICIDAL HANGING BY INSIDERS AT THE BCSO
Based on time stamps on existing footage from the hallway security camera, the homicide was committed in the interval from 2:38 to 2:45, when the perpetrators threw a dark cleaning rag over the motion detector in the hallway and proceeded to cuff and shackle Zachary with no explanation that would stir resistance. Then roped his throat with the first hobble strap, tossed him down, roped his ankle shackles with a second hobble strap and pulled him to death.... all within the time frame that matches the ForensicsPathology estimates for such a murderous deed, as the average time for death (where the neck bones are not broken as is reported in the autopsy) by such a deed is roughly 3 to 5 minutes, leaving adequate margins for execution, including the 'affixing' of a severed sheet to the sprinkler head and the other end tied to Zachary's throat... all within that 7 minute 2:38-2:45 timeslot and escape subsequently during the interval from 2:45 to 2:55 ditching the hobble straps, the cuffs and shackles and getting an alibi set.... driving from the jail to the hospital is a short trip, easily...

The interval between the expeditious placement of Zachary into the holding cell and the return to curiously "look in on him" 3 minutes later -- 2:34 to 2:37 -- is fully adequate for the murderous thugs to prepare the sheet and flat tool (since hobble straps are likely standard for law enforcers, as are cuffs and shackles) and prepare the sheet by cutting it in half, knotting one end in an estimated loop. No excessively suspicious hurrying, just expeditious like they were already moving in during the handling of Zachary's placement in the holding cell. And the casual advance knotting and later (as soon as the deed was done) suspending of the one end of the sheet on the sprinkler escutcheon fits the BCI mention that the knotted end of the sheet at the sprinkler was easily slipped off with the slight space (likely opened with the flat tool) just between the usually tight fitting escutcheon and the ceiling.
BOOM, HOMICIDE IS FULLY A FIT TO THE TIME AND TOOLS AND PERSONALITIES AT THE SITE..... motive, means and modus operandi.... don't you think we're geniuses! gag!

BOOM -- and on top of that realization, is the realization that:

*** The Bureau of Crime Investigation had a whole year to think of this, and the Prosecutor DISCARDED that troublesome HOLE in HIS WHITEWASHING STORY-LIE TELLING.... to DECEIVE THE GRAND JURY AND THE PUBLIC *** AND IGNORE THE SUSPICIOUS DEVIOUS PARTIAL HANDING OVER OF PORTIONS OF THE HALLWAY TAPE, WITH ONE PORTION NOT HANDED OVER FOR THREE WEEKS....

OH MY THAT'S NOT SUSPICIOUS IS IT MR BREYER OR WAS IT BCI'S HORNYAK WHO AUTHORIZED IGNORING THAT CLEAR TAMPERING WITH THE SECURITY TAPE FOR THE MOST CRUCIAL PERIOD OF THE DEATH'S OCCURRENCE....

So now do you really think it was a suicide, Prosecutor Breyer? {sarcasm alert}

Oh how we should weep for those poor deputies and their 'besmirched reputations' as they put it in their ignominious federal lawsuit .{/end sarcasm} just recently filed against the amazing Coroner and her equally amazing engineer/lawyer overly determined husband/helpmate... funny how this town can revere General Grant for his unwavering determination, from early childhood on in Ned Lodwick's fascinating history accounts, but consider the Varnau fellow to be a troublemaker who is relentlessly pursuing an 'agenda' against the esteemed BC Sheriff...

Well, now we're not through with discovering the FELONIES OF THE PROSECUTOR, even if we think we've got him and his cronies in the corral.. so let's move on.......

So how did Prosecutor Breyer get away with this when it was going to be in the Coroner's testimony, well it appears that SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE along the line, the esteemed Detective Larry Meyer decided to CHANGE HIS HALF OF THE EARLY NOTIFICATION STORY, leaving just the PHONE RECORDS OF DETECTIVE BUDDY MOORE and Buddy's own report that he'd been told in a 2:46 phone call from Det Meyer, to shoulder the load of this evidence, *only* supported by his phone record....

AND that was the EXCUSE that Breyer made up to duck the Scenario #3 by discarding DETECTIVE MOORE'S TESTIMONY AND TIME RECORDS... and to stonewall the Coroner's demands that proper completion of her own duties did require that the BCI investigators would GET THE PHONE RECORDS FOR THE DEATH SQUAD AND SEE WHO MADE WHAT CALL TO DETECTIVE MEYER..

Well guess what... BCI only got the phone records of a couple of the deputies BUT somehow NEGLECTED TO GET THE PHONE RECORDS FOR CO ZANE SCHADLE... BOOM and then figured out that even QUESTIONING DEATHSQUAD DEPUTIES WAS TOO DANGEROUS??? so BCI had no objection when two of the Death Squad members decided they'd spoken enough to investigators and refused to co-operate further with a second round of questions... imagine doing that if you were a suspect in a suspicious death....

BY COMPARISON, in Common Law practice EVERY DEATH OF AN INMATE IN A JAIL OR POLICE CUSTODY IS CONSIDERED SUSPICIOUS, and in British Coroner's courts the law requires that there be an inquest with a jury trial under the coroner's direction, as the protector of the dead.. somehow it's not quite so well organized in Ohio law, as it seems at the moment....

WE'LL SEE WHEN THE BROWN COUNTY'S CORONER HOLDS HER INQUEST... wanna come?.. Back to examining Breyer's Grand Jury's mess......


FORENSIC PATHOLOGY ONLINE FACTORS FOR DECISION:


"Hanging is that form of asphyxia which is caused by suspension of the body by a ligature which encircles the neck." It may be 'partial' or 'complete' depending on whether some part of the body is touching the ground or supported in some other way, or none is. Complete suspension of the body is UNUSUAL IN A SUICIDE. Guess what we're told in the official BCSO, BCI and AG story!

Symptoms Loss of power, subjective random sensations, intense mental confusion, loss of logical thought, then rapid loss of consciousness. Then convulsions. Respiration stops before the heart.

Ligature THE LIGATURE MARK IN THE NECK IS THE MOST IMPORTANT EXTERNAL POST MORTEM, per ForensicPathologyOnline.

"The doctor should note whether the mark on the neck corresponds with the material alleged to have been used in hanging and if it is strong enough to bear the weight and the jerk of the body. He/she should also note its texture and length, to know whether it was sufficient to hang. Before removing the ligature from the neck, it should be described as to the nature and composition, width, mode of application, location and type of knot."

1) composition, pattern and texture produced on the skin. Dr Varnau did, Montgomery had no record. Respect is given where earned.
2) width & multiplicity... a broad ligature will produce only a superficial mark, unlike narrow ligatures. THE WIDTH OF THE GROOVE/MARK IS ABOUT OR JUST SLIGHTLY LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE LIGATURE.... a 1.5 inch folded sheet would only make a mark that was nearly the same width, not a mark that is a whole inch narrower!

So what did make it !!! Per the Grand Jury's report, they believed the ligature mark was consistent with a hanging by the sheet! *Someone* *mis-informed* them, either the Montgomery Allen or untrustworthy Breyer, and based on performance so far, the money is on Breyer doing the lying. Agreed?

Significance? BOOM! Forensics is saying that THE SHEET DID NOT MAKE THAT LIGATURE MARK!!! Look at the sheet and the ligature mark in the now famous Coroner's Autopsy Report, Here it is:
.
THE LIGATURE WAS A STRAPLIKE LIGATURE, not that sheet!!!

What does that tell us about those behind the story that Zachary hung himself from a sheet tied to the ceiling sprinkler?? eh? They never abused him, eh? They just put him safely back in his cell in expeditious manner, and went about their respected duties, then found him hanging by the sheet. eh? THE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS, THE DEPUTIES, THE CHIEF DEPUTY, BCI AND THE PROSECUTOR ARE **KNOWINGLY** **DECEIVING** US, THE PUBLIC AND THE GRAND JURY, ALL.... LOOK AT THAT MARK... Didn't the Grand Jurors LOOK?

BOOM!

How far do you want to trust them? eh? Clearly some kind of hanging torture was inflicted on Zachary. USING A STRAP. like a hobble strap. Precisely "when" is yet to be determined, But the strap and the autopsy data reveals more than we want to know. But it is necessary. For Zachary's justice sake, for public safety in removing murderers from freely acting, and even acting supposedly in our name.

Perhaps some like the "current sheriff" would like to insist that the 1/2" ligature mark is not a ligature mark in order to escape the Breyer embarrassment, but then what is it... eh? It looks like one, even the Montgomery medical examiner called it a ligature mark.. It fits all the specs that describe ligature marks in the ForensicsPathology manual for a specific type....
it has the oblique angle,
an extent from front to along the sides of the neck for a ligature formed in a fixed loop with its fixed-knot over the back of the neck, and
it has the requisite impressed ligature-mark and red haemorrhage discoloration (indicative of suspension while alive) for a narrow, hard edge ligature.
It even has the roughed up scuffing of the front of Zachary's throat where ligatures are prone to scrape upward as the ligature is pulled upward from behind, while Zachary is prone on his back.
(Unlike the suspiciously level sheet tied at the side on Zachary's neck even though a ligature that's been used for hanging, is uniformly pulled up at the suspending knot.. that sheet lie is confirming its untruth..) AND How could the jurors swallow the idea that such SCRAPING was done by a sheet??!!

The strap-ligature mark clearly was not there when he was at the hospital, or the medical doctors wouldn't have released him without explanation and treating it, now would they, now??? so how many times are we supposed to believe that choking strangling holds by sheet and strap were inflicted on Zachary by Zachary himself in the Prosecutor/BCI official suicide lie? eh? twice! all within that remarkably limited time while UNOBSERVED by the 'sheriff's deathsquad....

And while we're at it, in that crazy double suicide idea, where did that strap come from, hocus pocus, eh? Got it away from another dumb deputy while he was handcuffed,,, How do you deal with such a sheriff's office... How do you deal with such a crooked prosecutor.....

Oy, how much whitewash did that GJ swallow... better call Poison Control...

So let's do the seemingly Simple stuff first.... The Chief Deputy Schadle was on the hook publicly for suspiciously replacing the sprinkler head, so BCI sent their talented investigators to recover that item before there's another indictment-fire to be fighting in court trials. My how impressive that they managed to recover that evidence from the maintenance trash heap at a company that services a whole list of such fire suppression sites. Aren't we impressed?? ROTFL.. but let's hold that thought til we see their miracle.

Not only was it recovered, it was unaltered by the maintenance people or their tools, sure it was, just so the Grand Jurors could see the proof that there was a hanging body on that sprinkler.. so Breyer insists that we should believe that the damage we're supposed to see was done by Zachary, not the maintenance crew... nor anyone else either... yup...

So for the edification of the non-believers, the recovered sprinkler head was supposedly damaged presumably by Zachary in comparison to a standard model that we should be able to envision... a sort of obvious warping out of shape compared to the nice machined roundness of a new model.. well maybe the physical gizmo was sort of ovoid, instead of machined round perfect.. but is that really from hanging and not from subsequent influences..?

Perhaps a grand jury would want to be able to have a closer look to compare the warped physical gizmo supposedly recovered to what the original crime scene looked like, to make sure the damage was seeable before being discarded by Schadle... so BCI handily provided what they claimed was their crime-scene photo so you can see what shape that sprinkler head was in, ovoided back in Oct 2013,

Which still leaves the question open of what Breyer's talking about as damage from a *major* weight yanking the escutcheon out of shape.. is that ovoided enough or should the damage be altogether different... so for the GJ's further misunderstandings, here is the BCI claimed crime scene photo of the actual warped sprinkler head...
-vs- the zoomed image from a KNOWN CRIME SCENE PHOTO TAKEN BY THE CORONER WHILE HER EXAMINATION WAS IN PROGRESS...
This looks terribly suspect.... the Coroner's knowably genuine photo where we can see the rest of the room before the focus was zoomed on the sprinkler head shows NO OBVIOUS OVOIDING... No sign of Goldson's weight distorting that mildsteel escutcheon covering the sprinkler head that I can see. And the angle of view is almost the same, with the knotted sheet on the back right of the sprinkler head. WHERE's THE DAMAGE???

BUT WAIT..

Look at the extent that the sprinkler heads in these two photos extend down from the ceiling..!!

BCI's sprinkler head extends much further out from the ceiling than the knowably genuine sprinkler head...

-- BOOM --
The sprinkler head in the BCI CLAIMED CRIMESCENE PHOTO IS **NOT** THE REAL SPRINKLER HEAD
AND HENCE THEIR PHOTO IS NOT A CRIME SCENE PHOTO EITHER..

The whole BCI CREDIBILITY JUST FLUSHED SOUTH DOWN THE TOILET HOLE...

BCI, the illustrious Bureau of Criminal Investigations, are criminals themselves, because they

--FABRICATED A PHOTO, COMPLETE WITH PHONIED KNOTTED SHEET IN PLACE AND PRESUMABLY THE **CO-OPERATING JAILHOUSE** CEILING
--AND THEN SENT BREYER TO LIE TO THE GRAND JURY WITH THE GIZMO AND THIS FRAUDULENT PHOTO FORGERY,
--AS WELL AS SENDING THIS PHOTO TO THE MEDIA SINCE THAT PHOTO WAS GIVEN TO THE TV STATIONS FOR RELEASE TO JUSTIFY THE BCI CLAIMS OF SATISFACTORY INVESTIGATION OF A SUICIDE... totally a lie..

thereby invalidating NOT ONLY the decision of the Grand Jury in not indicting Chief Deputy John Schadle FOR DESTRUCTION OF CRIME SCENE EVIDENCE, a clear felony BUT ALSO the idea that we should trust ANYTHING COMING FROM THE OHIO BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION..

BCI put a knotted sheet as nearly as they could fabricate into the warped escutcheon of their unknowable sprinkler head with just the right size knots and with the precisely peeking tip showing out the opposite edge, so that took some careful emulating of the actual sprinkler/sheet image, yet they screwed up on the extent that the gizmo extends down from the ceiling??? Simultaneous precision and incompetence.. huh?

Did they think no one would notice? And they'd get away with their forgery.?

Mind boggling brazen fraud and insulting flimflamming the JUSTICE PROCESS.. all courtesy of the OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S MIKE DEWINE'S HIGH POLISHED, HIGH PAID, CRIME INVESTIGATING SERVICE FOR SMALL TOWNS....

So now why do we bother wondering about the hanging resistance of devices, a quality not viewable in any crimescene image as to ovoidability, and should we wonder why that sprinkler head needed replacing, ROTFL

Considering the 'cooperating jail ceiling', the forgery had to have been done with Chief Deputy Schadle's knowledge and assistance, and we shall wonder what the rest of the correction's officers were doing, while the game was afoot....
Completely RACKETEERING

But maybe we should wonder how and when the 'retrieved' sprinkler head's escutcheon cover EVENTUALLY GOT DAMAGED... They said in the BCI document submitted to Breyer that Schadle HAD NOT CONSULTED WITH BCI BEFORE REMOVING THE SPRINKLERS, but that they had NOT ONLY re-acquired the sprinkler from the maintenance service BUT HAD A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FROM THOSE SERVICE STAFF THAT THIS PRECISE SPRINKLER WAS FROM GOLDSON'S CELL... isn't that interesting?? So now, even though it's difficult to imagine that the difference in shape was an unnoticed denial of their acquisition's genuineness, they had covered themselves, at the service people's risk, with a written guarantee of authenticity in case this scheme was discovered. The blame would go back on the service people. Don't you think that was clever of them? In fact it''s so clever that it seems quite likely that they were disappointed that the acquired sprinkler had no apparent warping, another difficulty to be overcome... but being clever technical geniuses, they could scientifically take that ungenuine sprinkler and mount it on a beam, hang a sheet tied to the beam with a significant weight attached and viola the escutcheon gets somewhat warped in a grand jury fooling way. That only left the photographic challenge of taking the now suitably mangled substitute sprinkler and putting it back up in Zachary's cell, studying the crimescene photos and rigging the sheet to match knots and edges.... then they would have a 'substitute' crime scene photo to match their 'substitute' mangled sprinkler head... the perfect proof that Goldson hung successfully from that crime scene sprinkler head... Thoroughly thwarting Justice. Another day's work achieved for the Attorney General's unblemished record of a well run system..... Wow, maybe there's a promotion in this for someone named Hornyak!!!

Clearly the GJ could see the proof before their eyes, sigh!

So let's move on to the next misleading entertainment for the GJ.

A couple of points... the sprinkler system PIPES are not what the sheet was tied to, BECAUSE BREYER REMINDS US LATER that it was so easy to slide the knotted sheet off the sprinkler assembly.. Presumably some written log would confirm this so clearly the knotted loop was not reaching up into the attic and wrapped on the pipes. It was on the head with its escutcheon cover just like we see in the enlarged photo. That's the piece that would break off with the amount of force from Goldson's weight jerking it, because the head, though metal, and the pipes though structurally secured by hangers, the two are joined by a much less sturdy joint-piece for easy replacement of sprinkler heads. Flood time at break-off, but no pipes down. Pointless technical bragging about pipes withstanding high pressure (an internal force, not a suicidal jerking force) as a deceptive method of impressing the GJ with the 'strength' of the system under force of a suicidal maniac? But Breyer was desperate to make the suicidal hanging body appear believable.

Then comes the 'reachability' of the sprinkler head by Goldson. As demonstrated in the Coroner's report, the problem was the slant at which the 'reacher' would have to work (with BOTH hands) as well as the distance. That difficulty of the 'reacher' having to hold onto the light fixture (as the only other support while at the slant) is seeable in this Coroner's Report image, leading some to flat out simply say it was not doable to tie the knots while standing there, especially since the knots were on the opposite side of the sprinkler head. But that was lied about profusely to turn the GJ's heads.
 

As Breyer pointed out, the knotted loop over the sprinkler head, being easily slipped off the sprinkler head, would open the possibility that WHOEVER tied the sheet to the sprinkler head could have tied the knots in advance (estimating the loop-size needed) and slipped the loop over the device while clinging to the light fixture... all done after the preliminary clinging to the light fixture while prying the escutcheon down slightly with some stiff tool, stiffer than a fingernail..

That WHOEVER person could just as easily have been Dunning or Wedmore or Schadle or Meyer or any of the others 'interested' in their idea of a 'welcoming party' based on just this 'reaching' analysis... as you can see from the previous Breyer-hidden evidence, it's now a question of which 'reaching' deputies to include in the 'welcoming'....

Then to complete number 9) the effervescent Breyer laughably reveals his intent (or likely orders) to stifle any grand jury intentions of indicting any of the potential suspects of anything, even Chief Deputy Schadle. In order to do it he had to claim that there would be no need for that sprinkler head to be kept in place as evidence, implying that there would be no trial needed when he got through. ROTFLOHO

But let's get some more hilarity in Breyer's next batch of felony-quality fabricated obfuscations.


Rotfl, Breyer's very first statement was blown up in the explosions in number 5).. go check it out if you've forgotten and see if you would not imagine that some enterprising deputy simply tossed his handcuff-cleaning-rag over the motion detector as CO Schadle is exiting the hallway at 2:37 after appearing to 'check on Goldson'. Simpler than shutting that device off, or not? Once the hallway camera is shut down, the group reassembles and murder happens with a pair of hobble straps, shackles and cuffs. It won't take but a few minutes per the estimated rapidity of death, along with the force needed with hobblestraps, one to choke him and one to pull from the shackles, for whatever psychopathic partying their evil minds could entertain in their sick brains and still have time left over in the interval from 2:37 to 2:58 to be making calls before 2:45 and getting their alibis in place and/or preparing the sheet while on that proverbial smoke break and be ready for the official 'discovery' at 2:58.

Doesn't that seem logical, enough to please Sherlock? or Columbo even better? Aren't we so pleased, and now disappointment settles down on the euphoria, since with our puzzle pieces fitting to catch the killers, we can't stop them. All the figuring was for nothing.

We'll let you wonder about the letters supposedly taken from Zachary's cell....


Perhaps we are pushing our speculation here on the 'missing' number 12) but we've seen other crooked prosecutors MISINFORM grandjurors about the level of certainty required for indicting... telling them that near certainty was needed to indict in a criminal case, making it impossible to get an indictment since at grand jury time, it's not nearly well enough prepared (well maybe when BCI takes 14 MONTHS to put together the case, you'd expect better than 'not nearly well enough' wouldn't you) to have 'without a doubt' type of certainty.....

Purely speculation, but clearly some number 12) was taken out of the report by someone, at someone's intended dissatisfaction. Before signing? After signing? Why? and What was in it......

In any case, the Grand Jury was excitingly 'misinformed' providing you can call felony obstruction of justice a simple matter of 'misinformation'.... do you agree?



Concluding, FIRSTLY and CLEARLY, THE CREDIBLE REPORT BY SGT DETECTIVE MOORE THAT THERE WAS AN "EARLY DISCOVERY" WOULD SHOW THAT ANY CREDIBLE SCENARIO FOR HIS PIECE OF EVIDENCE REQUIRES THAT IT BE RECOGNIZED THAT THE HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA WAS DISABLED/TAMPERED WITH FOR THE PERIOD OF ZACHARY'S DEATH......
otherwise there would be some record on the camera data showing someone in the hall during the interval 2:38AM to 2:45AM.... and according to BCI there was no sign of any person in that hallway based on the camera data, but no one except BCI (whose credibility was destroyed in their sprinkler evidence episode) claims to have examined the camera data and certified that it was all there, rotfl at their loss of credibility as true evidence handlers after their performance on the sprinkler substitution snafu.

SECONDLY, THE BLOODY NARROW LIGATURE MARK ON ZACHARY'S THROAT MEANS THAT HE WAS MURDERED BY SOME PAIR OF INDIVIDUALS, with possibly more attending their murderous party, WITH HOBBLE STRAPS (one around his throat and the other pulling on his ankles) AND THAT CONFIRMS SCENARIO 3'S LIKELIHOOD (that their murderous party re-assembled in the interval while the security cam was disabled) TO A LEVEL THAT DEMANDS AN INDICTMENT OF ZANE SCHADLE, JASON HUFF, GEORGE DUNNING AND RYAN WEDMORE.... because the bloody hemorrhage shows that injury was done while his heart was pumping blood, and was applied with a jerk from BEHIND, NOT FROM A KNOTTED SHEET STRUNG UP FROM THE **SIDE** of his head... and furthermore the blood called lividity (that settles into tissues in the direction of gravity after death) was seen AT THE ARRIVAL OF THE CORONER to be in Zachary's back, showing that he died on his back, not hanging vertically from a sheet until official "discovery"... clearly Montgomery's assistant coroner is a fraud or a COWARD and because of her cowardice the perpetrators soon would be free to strike again making her 'cowardice professionally' a justification for an indictment as a getaway accomplice to a murder.... which example would bring up the question of why the previous BC Coroner never showed his face when the last inmate supposedly committed suicide. Don't you think that previous BC Coroner should LIKELY be hung if only we could find the evidence and indict him as well... but we aren't going to be satisfied til we hear from herself that she said what the Hornyak/Breyer duo reported to the GrandJury

AGREED?

FURTHER THE EXTENT, FREQUENCY AND CRUCIAL 'WARPING' OF THE TRUTH AND EVIDENCE AND LAW GUIDANCE THAT PROSECUTOR BREYER 'CONTRIBUTED' TO THE GRAND JURY DECISION IS GROUNDS FOR HIS INCLUSION IN THE INDICTMENT AS AN **ACCESSORY TO MURDER AND FELONY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE** as surely as any getaway driver after a murder was committed.

RIGHT ALONG WITH CHIEF DEPUTY JOHN SCHADLE FOR **FELONY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE**... for his collaboration in the security camera tampering and the removal of the sprinkler heads...

PLUS BCI'S DAVE HORNYAK FOR **OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN FABRICATING A FORGERY OF FALSE EVIDENCE**... with producing a visibly wrong sprinkler head (claiming it was the original evidence item) and then producing with considerable effort an imitation crime scene photo, and passing those off as the original evidence and photo... (Here's Hornyak's BCI Report to Breyer, which accidentally exposes Hornyack's forgery on pg 23 versus pg 22. See for yourself secretly)....So... We'd surely want to grill him on whose idea his effort was expended for.. Conceptually, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine could be sweating bullets right now... or maybe he has planned other obstructions to be dealt with perseveringly by those insisting of justice in Law Enforcement...

AND DETECTIVE LARRY MEYER MAY BE UNDER FURTHER INVESTIGATION to see what his explanation was for hiding his own pre-knowledge of the suicide in his early phone call confirmed as 12 minutes before the official 'discovery'.... CO MCKINZIE MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE INDICTMENTS FOR at least being an **ACCESSORY TO HIDING THE MURDER** WITH HER FALSELY REPORTING A "HANGING INMATE" until such details of possible threats against her child as are needed have been secured if real. Or whatever food-eating excuse she could come up with for not looking before reporting that curiously phrased 'a hanging inmate'...

THESE AND FURTHER QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED WHEN THE CORONER HAS HER INQUEST.... STAY TUNED..... IT MIGHT BE IN JANUARY...

Wouldn't it be exciting if they summoned a talented bloodhound to identify whose scent (assuming the evidence was decently preserved ROTFL) is on the sheet's pieces, both halves should be tested.. agreed, wow! Aw darn, there would be too many confusing reasons why Schadle and Dunning might have touched the sheet, without it being for corrupt reasons. Or any other corrections officer, actually, for that matter, even McKinzie.. hmmmm...

Any more suggestions....Maybe a cool demonstration for the idiot Montgomery assistant coroner -- idiot OR GETAWAY EXPERT SUSAN ALLEN WHO WOULD BE INDICTABLE AS WELL FOR ACTING AS AN ACCOMPLICE IN A MURDER-GETAWAY if she fails to satisfactorily explain her idiocy -- to show that a wide, soft ligature does not make a narrow ligature-mark in animal flesh (skinned mutton perhaps).... Not to mention the direction that the ligature is being pulled is important. SINCE THE NARROW MARK WAS PULLED FROM THE **BACK**, and the SHEET WOULD HAVE BEEN PULLED FROM THE KNOT ATTACHMENT ON THE **SIDE"" Her idiot performance (OR COWARDLY PERFORMANCE) suggests that medical board examinations are not worth much in practice. Agreed, rotfl at my own mistake in favoring practical logic over classroom testing when I am well qualified theoretically myself.. ttyl

TTYL