LET'S EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE from the SANDY HOOK so-called "PRE-VISIT"
with THE HELPFUL IMPLICATIONS OF ASPERGERS
First of all, we demand to know the name/identity of the claimed Sandy Hook staff member who the media boldly reported that he had been involved in an 'altercation' with Adam Lanza, and precisely the "three other" adult victims of the mass murder and that this claimed confrontation took place THE DAY BEFORE THE MASSACRE, specifically on December 13th at the Sandy Hook school. With such an undeniable agenda to convict Adam Lanza of intention to kill those three people (and likely the claimant himself, by his inference), such an explosive statement is INDICATIVE OF A SEVERELY INCRIMINATING PLOT PIECE. Yet the bearer of such lying is hidden from public view, and should be entirely suspected.
Worse, the ability to substantiate or explore that explosive claim was suspiciously EXTINGUISHED in the massacre itself, so what was the police's basis for trusting or dismissing such an explosive motive. In which case, we now have the responsibility to demolish that bearer of lying.
And we further wonder how that suspect got credibility to be broadcast on NBC and major media, with NO verification from the official controllers either, since NBC declined to reveal who their 'police' source was, REVEALING THAT IT SEEMS THE MEDIA IS DRIVING THE OFFICIAL CONTROL.
HOW DO WE EVEN KNOW THAT SUCH A PERSON AND STATEMENT WAS EVEN EVER EXISTING..?
It could all be a FABRICATION of the mainstream-media to hide their totally exposed false-reports on Adam that they broadcast the day before and to now hide how those broadcasted-lies were defeated by the internet with the strangely fine help of people's cellphones and cameras, completely to the media's embarrassment online (though in the TV world, the major networks were dribbling toxins into the TV-viewing public's veins, though not quite successfully), now being papered over by some mythical newly emerging chimera with lies to distract the public from their puzzling and to seem to repair the media's previous toxic 'opinions' in their now-claimed revival from the 'fog of war' confusions down in the trenches with the police (where they imply the public's internet was not privy) so as to denigrate the consensus forming in the public mind that the media were in on something unwholesome..
And lo and behold. we have just seen that unwholesomeness is so likely the case, as we see again in another one of those amazing discoveries. Now the discovery is of the stunning AP bulletin that was issued TWO HOURS BEFORE THE SHOOTINGS and found in extended searching by a sharp sleuther. That internet sleuther has displayed on Youtube the screen print of that AP news bulletin THAT WAS POSTED at precisely 7:25 AM ON THE DAY OF THE MASSACRE... that AP Bulletin says:
- "Police respond to report of school shooting in Newtown, Conn.: few other details available"
See this understatement here:
I don't suppose the control of data is so tight that AP could discover the identity of the poster of that BULLETIN, or would they... surely there were an amazing number of 'mistaken' press bulletins in that early period, fully confusing most people totally, and creating the 'fog of war' that the media later used as their 'out' for their own later-and-with-full-research-credibly-doable bad coverage. If that identity were available, right now, it had better be retrieved or be swept off the scene, as other evidence slipping out.
And we shall remember that the powerful over-reaching forces behind this engineered massacre will have some spokesperson declaring that 'some' programmers made 'some' sleight of hand datestamp-option for 'some' reason that is not very logical but obviously it accounts for the date discord and we are scolded: we must trust "THEIR COMMON SENSE" or risk being seen as a tin-hat. Which common sense of the generic sort says they've been caught and ALL THE MANY programmers IN SEVERAL DIVERSE SYSTEMS were not conceivably the problem in CASE AFTER CASE OF PREMATURE ESCAPES OF EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL PREPARATION... from Facebook pages that memorialized the valiant death of Soto DAYS BEFORE she was 'a victim', to the United Way solicitation of donations for the victims before any 'shooting' happened, to death certificates prior to deaths, to the KNOCKOUT VIDEO ON VIMEO showing a polished presentation on the heroics at Sandy Hook with an upload date of mid-November, a whole MONTH AHEAD OF THE MASSACRE (which cowardly Vimeo management when confronted with the discovery of the date of uploading, said they opined that it was truly possible that you could upload a new video over the older one without the date-of-upload being changed, believe it or not, and when the discoverers didn't believe it, the notified owners of the video made it 'private' and then removed it altogether)... So use your common sense, because there are at least some copies, including ones made with the screencasting displayed? However, in the event that some Sandy Hook staffer still has his involvement-trepidation-overcome so that he will persist in his lying, we shall insist that Adam's evidence of Aspergers conditions exposes that Staffer's lying, and that ADAM NEVER ACCOSTED ANYONE AT SANDY HOOK and the logic works in the following way:
5) Since aspergers' symptoms were being considered in some depth in our previous post, we shall not repeat the details and shall, on that basis, demand that the fellow on staff at the school who claimed that he and 'the three' other dead staff members were accosted by Adam unexpectedly the day before the massacre, be held in suspicion, maybe even in custody. He curiously did not show up 'for work' **in time** at the school on the day of the shooting as the 'other three victims' did whom he claims were with him in some nebulous 'altercation' with Adam the day before the massacre. HE SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY CONSIDERED A LIAR BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW OF ASPERGER ADAM, since Aspi Adam would, first of all, not have been poking around unexpectedly at some place unusual for him, as this school surprise visit may clearly be seen to be. Such an unfamiliarity-plagued, location-changing discomfort is not desirable by any Aspi and would not have been pursued on his own, especially with his mother out of town as his carer, should things go wrong if such a wild idea ever crossed an Aspi's thoughts in the first place. Secondly, Nancy had left Adam a supply of prepared meals so that he'd be comfortable with his usual routines while she was on her latest holiday in NH for a pair of days. That is how Adam operated. No way would a super cautious, intelligent Aspi take off into the uncertainty-charged atmosphere of unfamiliarity and venture to accost strange people, not seen in a dozen years at the very least. No way! [ If ever at all, since another source said that Adam went to St Rosa's in the early years, not Sandy Hook Elem.]
As for the purpose of such lying claim and prejudicial-conviction-attempt... clearly the MURDEROUS PLANNERS' goal was to focus everyone's attention on Adam. THE MURDERING SCHEMER'S PATSY, their FALL-GUY IS SUPPOSED TO GET THE ATTENTION so that police/media attention to investigation in the crucial early hours when the trail is hot is taken away from pursuing any other possible criminal collaborators.
RESULT in PATSY IMAGE: Creating an 'animosity' and hatefulness, not just drugged-confusion senselessness AS WE WERE SEEING IN AURORA last summer.
RESULT in VICTIM IMAGES: Maybe the 'brave three' were to be seen as too trusting of Autists (?) and other 'strangely different' people, but then even if beneficently trusting, they SHOULD HAVE REPORTED such odd-visit behavior, making the 'three' not so clever, and providing a 'lesson' for the public. This somewhat diminishes the victims now being credited with heroism in potentially defending child victims, so it must be highly important as the intended message (now who would want such a snitch-embellishing message imprinted on the public mind)... Counter interpretation: (If, as some have suggested, no one really died, then envy of the glory being attributed to the adult victims in the preposturous pronouncements of the posing-as-all-seeing Superintendent -- without any real events knowledge in her possession -- could be another favored explanation, depending on when this 'pre-visit' story did get put into circulation.)
Well at least on "timing" we have the next-day-AM NBC video date, pretty much eliminating the envy route (since the superintendent's sort of praise was not yet in play so soon): the villain had already put this claim of a supposed pre-visit into the police thinking before the end of the day of the massacre, but possibly not so late as to be seen as still needing questioning overnight, so that would put the disinformation likely in the midst of the confusion of the other captured suspects (from the woods, etc). because it was said in the NBC report early the next day, that the authorities were 'still' questioning this individual at that time with no reported results. We must have the name of that lying staffer who was magnifying his own crime-scene-intelligence while attempting to point at Adam with a libelously claimed motive.
But more than that criminal need to point at Adam as 'to-be-hated', there's another level of significance... The fabrication of such a full-blown image-tale with potentially risky revealing explanation DETAILS (as such an altercation episode would have and be requirable to be revealed) out of thin air (since Adam's innocence reveals the void where Adam was said to have been), suggests considerable *need*, not just prejudice against someone 'different' and 'conveniently accusable' nor as an explanation for not being at work that morning, which leads us to conclude that his motives were likely severely criminal, of some sort. So what were those risky involvements and motives...
How would such an individual be involved as one of the criminals? A number of possible gyrations in the tangled lying start unraveling as soon as we look, all of them seem to leave this lying individual in the line-up of criminals. So let's untangle them, just to favor the idea that he might not be *entirely* lying about 'the three':and him being in an altercation, though he was entirely lying about Adam's involvement.
To analyze the possible gyrations, visualize a branching tree. First branching point (there was no altercation at all) or (there was an altercation with that group among themselves). Then from each of those branching alternative explanations of reality, there are consequences to be explored in order to arrive at the motives and risky involvements.
BRANCH 1: Since Adam wasn't involved in any such altercation, was there an altercation at all?
If there was no altercation at all, then what role do the 'other three' victims play in a non-altercation scenario? CRUCIAL PUZZLE to identify consequences: Branch 1a) -- (Were they intentionally targeted for some as yet unknown reason) or (were they simply in the way and got killed?)
- If those 'three' weren't supposed to be in the way but were there anyway, possibly the plan was to USE ANYONE WHO DID GET IN THE WAY as being the main mysteriously-explainable target of the murderous planner's chosen patsy. Such an immediate connection would focus more police/media feeling of there having been intent to get those 'three' (not that they were just collateral damage) in the lone-shooter-theory image and so the killers' team would plan to belatedly reveal such pre-visit disinformation about some 'altercation' with *whomever* got in the way on shooting day, with the lying disinformer as an observer/paricipant of such altercation who could lyingly point to Adam as possibly seeking revenge. Since there would likely be some other victims than just children, then WE'D WANT TO KNOW HOW **SOON** THIS LYING INDIVIDUAL WAS FOISTING HIS LIE ON THE OFFICIALS..
- If he waited until he was informed about the identities of the adult victims, then there's a possibility that his role was simply as 'escape-accomplice to murder' of the children and Adam.by distracting police from other work on the case
If however that lying individual did present his faulty story before being told the identity of the victims, then he is one of the shooters and maybe even the precise killer designated to 'handle' anyone who would get in the way. And he wouldn't have to run away very much, since he would be expected to be onsite, so he'd want to maybe be found just cowering in a closet like the rest, or be seen as if he were just arriving from the parkinglot (not fleeing, just hiding down in his car that he'd left there over night).
Else if the 'three' were actually to be targeted, then a lot of 'interesting questions' should follow. Not the least of which is what was the basis of the discord between that lying individual and the 'three' that brought on their targeting during the massacre...
- Was the 'discord' already in the open prior to the massacre (in which case they must have known something about what was going on that affected the killers so as to trigger such a payback).
Or was the discord between them and the lying individual still just *impending* (and then they apparently stood in the way of some opportunity or new player who would replace one of them and undo the relationship of the 'three' in a way crucial to some mafia style operation, like a pedophile ring in the area using school resources after hours, for example. Or using Sandy Hook's information resources, etc, but wanting more. In any case, the disinformer is DIRECTLY implicated in their murders.
The official story is that 'the other three' went to the first grade classroom after the shooting started to see what was going on and rushed right in. Believable? Umm, sure, maybe or maybe not. If the shooters had to shoot their way into the front door as is believed, and then turned immediately toward the first grade classrooms (instead of toward the offices as the floorplan description in the governor's summary did claim per police-provided analysis) then how fast did 'these other three' (instead of summoning police help) rush from their meeting down the hall in order to arrive in time to intercept the shooters and be caught in the firing squad? Try picturing that as possible. Impossible, in your opinion, too?
Hundreds of rounds were supposedly being fired in those close quarters. In fact, if the shooters went straight to the classroom as the governor was supposedly summarizing with precision and a floorplan for the TV audience to understand how fast the disaster did overtake Sandy Hook before the highspeed response police could possibly arrive -- in 10 minutes? he emphasized, but clearly he is measuring from the time when the 9-1-1 calls came in reporting the shooting which calls were eventually numerous, but the front desk person was reported to have dove into hiding and didn't re-emerge for a lengthy time, per the varnished account provided by the nurse, iirc, so how much time elapsed, before the first call came at 9:35 is wobbly. Unvarnished accounts from the far side of the building (to be explored later), after they were hustled into classrooms and locked in by the janitor, per their story did estimate (unfortunately colored by fear) that the 10 minutes was 25min. Working from the ten minutes rapidity, then how did the first graders get hidden in the cabinets before the rushing shooters got to the room. They must have taken a full ten seconds, just to realize that the incredible cacophony was inconceivable-to-ordinary-people real gunfire right inside their hallways and nearby. The whole blessed room would have still been standing in a state of shock from the entry-way shootup noise, and possible security camera disabling. No time to register that an assault is what's in progress and make plans (not unless you're israeli and/or you've been drilled in such a ridiculous alarm strategy of hiding in cabinets for a shooter lockdown). You'd barely have time to screech 'what the hell was that' and look at your co-workers and/or students for their state of shock, before the idea sets in that it's real gunfire, but what to do. Those guns are LOUD, especially indoors (about 150 decibels, where people complain about generator noise of a paltry few decibels). Meanwhile those gun-wielders are on their way to go the short distance down the hall to the first room.
For analyzing the police theory for 'the three', in those short moments after the initial 10 second shock and awe, then seconds to drop what you are doing 'in the meeting' in some account, what would 'the three' be thinking on their way, following and seeing the destruction of the security lock and camera, and anything near those items, already having to have been 'blown away' without hesitation since their function and location were known to the shooters? Meanwhile the shooting is still going on. Doesn't 'oh my god' slow you down in your haste? 'What do I do?' Using up roughly a whole 60 seconds of the likely 3 minutes that the shooters were 'devoting' to the first classroom, with about an eery 3 minute pause (accounted for in the report of the an arriving mother with a bookbag to deliver and an unvarnished account of one locked-down teacher's aid on the far side of the building) with another 3 minutes spent in the second classroom before the police arrived and the shooters had split. So although their arrival and targeting is still possible, it doesn't seem likely that there was anyone from that classroom moving about to be saved by the last half minute of the three.
So we see, that 'the three' being in the midst of the first classroom massacre does more practically require some pre-planning, just to make the whole story hang together time-wise and misplaced sense of helping. So concluding, if there was an altercation among 'those three' and the disinformer, then there's likely another complicit-in-the-murder insider who co-operated in order to target 'the three'. Agreed, so as to arrange their presence with the disinformer not at the school yet that day? So that takes care of Branch 2 as well , and with Branch 1 included, then either that disinformer is complicit in mass murder or is one of the shooters himself. So give us his identity and make him take the Fifth in order to avoid FURTHER self-incrimination. Agreed?
The other realization that there are at least one and maybe a FEW more insiders in the mass murder. We wonder just when the 'one' in the offices did make the call to 9-1-1 which may not have been quite as soon as 'first' since one account said there were still more calls coming in when she called the second time, after the "pause". quite 'late' (relative to the bursting in the door) though that 'one' would have had to have known that the responsibility was on their heads, specifically on the head of the office person in charge of opening the front security door. Agreed that's likely?
And the office person in charge of opening the front security door would not likely -- on that 'shooting' day -- have been the 'secretary' who was so unusually taking a sick-day that precise day and then showing up when the mess was done, apparently not so down-and-out-for-the-count at all. That person in charge of the security door is one we want to ask about her own activities during the shooting. Plus there was -- according to the sources cited on wikipedia-- a 'secretary' hiding with the 'nurse', somehow, with the nurse under her desk in one account? What kind of infrastructure does Sandy Hook have? How many staffers did honestly have control of people-contact for the school.. and where were they when the shooting started?
With now possibly two insider accomplices and a possible insider as shooter emerging from pacifying one or another of the explanations needed, one begins to take the mafia and pedophile images rather seriously. The nationality of the 'mafia' is open to limited exploring since we are of the opinion that Eric Holder appears to have CONFIRMED links to drug cartel Sinaloa, whereas Obama has both Israeli/Jewish and muslim motivation ties. And Holder/Obama/Napolitano all have American mafia-style forces in the less-than-honorable employee elements in DHS, FBI, ATF and CIA. Consider the book I was an economic hitman whose author says that not all the employees in the U.S. spy and enforcement ranks are as naive as to deny the existence and knowledge of those mafia-style forces inside the Executive Branch. Taking the groups, one by one:
- The Sinaloa option is going to be somewhat compromised by current courtroom difficulties in Chicago. Those relations are stressed to their limit.
Israeli enterprising swat squads would be uninterested in aiding Obama's tyrannical anti-gun progress since Obama was unsupportive of the Israeli's expressed wishes that the US should block Palestinians receiving favor from the U.N. just that month so those highly trained squads would only be snubbing such an assignment, under any banner. And as for the Israeli intelligence operatives being the ones possibly designing this massacre for their own swat teams, even Netanyahu would be unwilling to put the American Jewish population into defensive modes again without real benefit to Israel, not just his image-pique nor simple revenge against the U.S. for not blocking the Palestinians in their U.N. bid.. And the Israelis have no motive for involving Adam.
- And furthermore, we would thoroughly notice the amazing amount of British news coverage that was filthy with misinformation. Usually they do better. The British are not as known for being controlled by the "Jewish block" as the American politicians are reputed to be, and are instead easily more inclined to be under Moslem influence, in London especially, yet they're not pointing at some 'Israeli' intrigue, though they would be inclined to, under Moslem influence, don't you agree?
However we're not switching to accusing any Moslem terrorists either. Not as the manpower source, which was discredited in 9-11 as camel jockeys used as pawns, who couldn't fly a piper but could jet-pilot-enviably spiral a 757 into ground-skimming precision to thread the needle's eye and smash into the precisely least monitored path and point on the entire perimeter of the high-security Pentagon Building, and/or even more hilariously magically bring down even Building 7, independent of the World Trade Buildings 1 and 2, from remotely caused ordinary office fires, precisely descending gracefully into its own footprint. ROTFLMHO
So far, the hitmen seem more likely executive branch insiders with violent rogue services as their resume.. Adding other government mouthpieces as media insiders.. exposed by media-insider slipups in AP-evidence escaping into public view, if you will agree that your tinhat feels ok.
Now, that momentary pedophile-reference above (in the mafia list) may seem rather shocking out of the blue, but as a matter of fact the black honda thought to be "Nancy's car" allegedly "being driven by Adam" in their lone gunman theory (presuming that Adam was still alive and able to drive with his Aspergers, some Aspis cannot handle road stress even without other life stresses, and certainly not under such enormously horrendous conflict circumstances as the killers were putting Adam under) leads someplace unexpected and almost discarded. Who drove the car, not just who owned it.
That black honda was described by one of the earlier unknowing parents arriving to deliver part of a missing schoolbag's needed requirements, just as the shooting was likely restarting (since according to one teacher's assistant inside the 'safely lockdown' side of the school building, there had been a significant pause, and this arriving mother was unaware of any shooting noises as she approached the school entry (but soon noticed the broken glass at the entry, so the massacre was in play) and as she was just reaching the frontstep, she noticed the strangest feature of a black honda just STANDING WITH ALL FOUR DOORS WIDE OPEN and some cloth-like items, possibly a couple of dark towels scattered around it. Why would a lone shooter open all four doors?? is what those of us pursuing this case want to know. She just thought it was unusual and had only a momentary look before she claimed to have realized there was trouble inside the school after noticing that the glass pane alongside the door was broken up, and then the shooting started (again) so she quickly high-tailed it out of harm's way. (To use her cellphone from the safety of her car to seek help?)
About that noticing of broken glass next to the entry door, someone analyzing overhead views (news chopper video covering the incident? though maybe taken earlier?) frame-by-frame, showed an image of the entry that didn't seem busted up. Oh well, surely no one would clean up a crime scene. Also analyzing that scene, some suggested that the discarded black cloths were to conceal their guns until the last moment, and were dropped when ready to enter the school. Much examination was going on. But that initial recognition of the strange black honda as the vehicle the killers may have likely come in started even more interesting searching.
That black honda was wrapped in crime-scene yellow tape once the police were in charge and was left sitting there overnight, at least it seems so, because they didn't discover the sole long gun (bushmaster? shotgun? whatever, the only long gun anywhere) in its trunk until it was quite dim out, and maybe even that car was unattended over two nights, since the mainstream media made a fuss about the towing away of "Nancy's car", supposedly on the 16th, two days later. WITH NO MENTION OF FINGERPRINTS TAKEN. And over that period, a couple of other cars seemed to be also suspiciously unattended (left for what by whom), some with yellow tape, plus one (with a busted driver-side window, covered up) in the driveway of the neighbor (his role to be discussed later) just a stones' throw from the school and across from the firehouse where supposedly all the rescued children were sent in order to organize reuniting episodes with parents? The license plates of those cars were duly copied, when possible, from examining crime scene images. Those plate numbers could be magical. Other vehicles of interest to the police were not so easily taggable by their plates.
The black honda with the doors originally wide open (closed later by someone with likely no examination?) at the front of the school had plates that said 872YEO so most attention was on that plate. Wondering what the police were finding (or hiding again), folks were listening and recording police band radio. A few who were listening to the police radio bands for the local area, some taping simultaneously as many as 2 or 3 at a time, were convinced that they heard a police officer identify the owner of that car as being someone named Christofer Rodia and the race was on to find out what there was on that individual, via data mining.
It turned up that he had a couple of homes, one in the area and one in Florida. But most stunning was the record of HIS CONVICTIONS, for PEDOPHILE CRIMES. Someone with likely 'ring' connections as a CHILD-ABUSER suspiciously near a murder of small CHILDREN... Fireworks.. And connections to drug names/addresses in the area. After bringing the information to query the police officials, and being told by them that there was no record of any relationship to Sandy Hook, the re-examining of the audio records went into high gear and produced a possible explanation, namely that the Rodia suspect, while driving his own car by that time, was almost an hour away and was stopped for some other reason, and his identity exposed, but the signal on that radio band from the police making the stop, was underlaying the audio from the other police department band, making it sound as if the identification was for the 872YEO request. Dang.
So after that discouraging discovery, it was decided that maybe there was no connection to the murders. Another clue thrown away, prematurely.? Although Rodia was now considerably further away than most might have thought was relatable to the Sandy Hook location, the fact that Rodia is not the "owner" of the black honda, DOES NOT MEAN THAT HE WASN'T POSSIBLY THE DRIVER for the killers and left immediately in his pre-planned escape vehicle -- since the Honda had to be left for the police to tie to Adam's arrival and failure to escape -- for some reason not yet figured out, maybe because he had that triggering record as a pedophile, that would blow the case wide open if his presence close to Sandy Hook were noted when the shooting was done.
And if it was so incredibly important that his connection to Sandy Hook and pedophilia was so crucial to be avoiding his involvement at such lengths, then who's skin is behind this operation to make it unforgivable to fail to keep him off the radar. So should this be discarded, not in my neophyte opinion. The connection to VULNERABLE CHILDREN is TOO UNCOMFORTABLE TO JUST DROP IT YET.
Such a pedophile connection to a 'school tragedy' was part of the monstrous strategy that may be part of the recent scandal in Britain that took down the BBC's chairman/CEO for his squashing of a revealing documentary. I remember seeing a video a while back (sometime around the time of the scandal's aftermath this fall in which a high ranking group of pedophiles was -- after the hours of work -- running a ring for the rich and powerful, as well as for visiting dignitaries and government spies from all over, possibly going all the way back to the Profumo affair of the 1960s. This ring was specifically engaging in child abuse beyond sexual abuse. In one of those episodes to try to escape discovery, they needed to get rid of a group of victims, brutally harmed, and so they arranged a fire at some **other** children's school, switched the bodies of the children they needed to be rid of with the children of that school, burned the school with the identities of the undesired victims obliterated conveniently in the fire as if they were the original children attending that school. The children that they absconded with who used to be quietly attending that one now-burned school, became the 'new flesh' for the rich and famous abuser-pedophiles.
So we think that we should explore this Sandy Hook massacre very thoroughly just in case those Sandy Hook children (supposedly the ones in the coffins) are still alive somewhere, in the custody of some mafia's pedophile operations, which operations btw may include some CPS (child protective services') disappearing children, though those children are reputed to be mostly black children, as I recall in the furor over the CPS attempt to take that woman's child and force drug her child in Detroit, which the mother (Maryanne Godboldo) was trying to prevent. Eventually getting to a justifiable gun involvement at one point where the furor that resulted made widespread awareness come online..
That British operation did sometimes use what they would call 'homes' (more maybe like orphanages) to 'store' their supply of victims. Horrifying is not even close to what this did imply about the complicity of the government's "carers" on top of the elite's access to control and escape from justice when anyone got wise. People trying to blow their abusers' cover, had accidents, documented in that video coverage, and people living in the area (as well as royalty when one of the older children appealed for help) shunned the idea that such wild talk was 'real' and/or did not seem to understand that it was precisely the *carers* who were the pedophiles' , the 'johns' and accomplices, and so the pedophiles did manage to kill that boy in one of the attempts, not just his, to end the pedophile tormenters' access. As you may agree, such a story is not one you always think you'd need to keep more carefully filed. Now if I could just unearth that referenced video that came in an email, stashed somewhere in my inbox...
- [ This is the latest British pedophile scandal story as it appears in the mainstream at the moment: A major media scandal has toppled the head of the BBC over the network’s handling of two reports on sex abuse, wrongly implicating a politician in one report, and killing the other report on its own popular BBC host, the late Jimmy Savile. One year after his death, Savile has been accused of abusing potentially hundreds of victims, over 300 children, while the BBC stayed silent. ]
It was covered by many media about in mid November 2012, about when this Sandy Hook operation may have been in planning stages? Inspiring the killers still in planning mode?
And before anyone tries to ever claim that such massive corrupt pedophile rings could never be part of this country's own elite, we just were lucky enough to have wonderfully intuitive BrasscheckTV.com circulate the rough UNAIRED DOCUMENTARY (planned to be broadcast in Ireland and the UK) THAT WAS SILENCED TOTALLY BACK IN 1993 digging into the FRANKLIN SCANDAL, a $40 million bank fraud with A PEDOPHILE RING that reached from Nebraska's Boy's Town to the Whitehouse party guests and Embassy Row. The sex perversion was covered up by the FBI who sealed the evidence in such a tangled list of obstacles-to-release as to make it gone forever. In Washington DC, there were special services and The Golden Boys 'specialty' sought boys under 10years old. And yes, the drugs, sadism, and blackmailing of influential officials, etc was all in that maze.
That story was attempted to be investigated by the Washington Times in DC, to no avail when the FBI sealed the evidence after seeing that the WT reporter, Rodriguez, was digging into the files; the witness-victims were prosecuted for perjury in NB's attempt (started by a righteous legislator, then thwarted by the county prosecutor 'editing' the video evidence being shown to the jury so as to frame the witness for perjury, with further assistance from the FBI) with unheard-of sentences of 25 years for telling the truth! While the pervert ring operator, Lawrence King, who was eventually brought down by the IRS for his financial fraud and theft from the Franklin Credit Union of $40Million, only got a 15 year sentence, with no part of the pedophile ring ever revealed to the public, in court or media. People were murdered, had unexplained accidents (FBI impounded the accident evidence there too), faced threat after threat if they pursued their case. Sound familiar yet?
After the murders, the whole team, foster care investigator, special investigators, witnesses, and their families, pursuing justice gave up and left the lawyer, John Dekamp, who had bravely and boldly stepped up to try to win the appeal of the witness' perjury case in spite of the threats, was left with nothing but his analysis of what is needed for the elite to totally squelch discovery of such a monstrous evil, namely control of the media, the Justice Department, and the police. His counter examples where even Presidents were unable to silence discovery of vile dirty laundry were where the media was not controlled by those attempting suppression... Look what we now face, acting as genuinely independent media, instead of the mainstream government mouthpieces... We must not let the government control our internet media..
The unaired roughcut video is here (maybe for a while); And if not, try the website: FranklinScandal.com
So now we have -- after all that tangential exploration of child-related sex-perversions in despicable networks operating here in the USA, formerly unchallengeable -- a candidate theory for Sandy Hook, the PEDOPHILE THEORY, for involvement of pedophiles in the children's thread-fitting, to add to the loose ends as we continue the examination of clues. The switching of two groups of children with one set being the majorly unfortunate cover for the PROCUREMENT of the other now-unfortunate set of children, is the favored idea at the moment for explaining 'why the children'?
Except for the ANTI-GUN-RIGHTS THEORY based on the realization that children's deaths would empower the 'Justice' department to make the claim that current world conditions, life and voter demands for action make it requirable to take down the 2nd Amendment and confiscate the public's LAST RESORT of self-defense against assaults by that constitution-violating government's agents, thereby ignoring the recognition that the purpose of the 2nd Amendment was citizen control of rogue government and citizens' right for using weapons against tyrannical bureaucratic government, which one speaker at a hearing on gun-control said we'd best not 'lose our last resort'! And that Anti-Gun-Rights Theory surely has some powerful merit as a motivation for accessing Holder's and Napolitano's ample resources b/c this 'classic project of tyrants' will need even more money, manpower and contact controllers, than we see even in this engineered massacre. But we saw the corrupt FBI in the Franklin Scandal engage in both courtroom criminality and also saw mafia-like events perpetrated against those seeking justice. Some powerful elite was mobilizing government criminals and even causing murders and 'accidents'. The corrupt elements in government are there for accessing by those who know who and how and that sort of 'knowledge' possessors includes very highly positioned elite elements within the government, high enough to shield the operations. Like Fast&Furious. We shall make note of what departments of government make appearances, who they report to, their modes and motives. Among those making unexplained, unceremonious 'visits' to the Sandy Hook Police Department's management was Eric Holder. More later.
But that tyrannical citizen-disempowering planning of the anti-gun-rights planners would be served as well (or better) if the Justice Department's mafia allies would agree to take the role of implementers of death and destruction with other insiders in government handling the scene control. Think that alliances between mafia and 'Justice' are not claimable? That Fast&Furious were 'lapses' in judgment? In case the drug cartel Sinaloa and their mob operatives is not on your agenda to explore, Pulitzer Prize nominee, Jon Rappoport reported on 'Justice' and government connections to the mob in this open letter to Obama:
Mr. President, just thought of something else. You've heard of the name, Jesus Vicente Zambada-Niebla? I'm sure you've been getting briefings on him. He's standing trial in your old city, Chicago.
Niebla is a member of the Sinaloa Cartel (drug gang). For some reason, his trial keeps getting postponed. Niebla and his lawyers state that he has special immunity from the DEA, because there is a deal between the US federal government and Sinaloa.
In exchange for the Sinaloa providing intelligence on rival Mexican drug gangs, the US government is permitting Sinaloa to ship tons of drugs into the US through Chicago.
US prosecutors have been asserting the right to suppress quite a bit of evidence in the Niebla trial, for national security reasons.
Is this perhaps one reason why you don't mention gang gun violence in your campaign to take away guns?
The intuitive difficulty with a purely government operation comes primarily when/if we figure that the government would have to supply the killers: would we be as ready intuitively to look for government "employees" to serve as killers of children of our citizens, say from the CIA turning their anti-foreign populations skills inward. But in fact that's just precisely like what the POTUS is trying to do with drone-kill-capable control impositions in the hands of local police as servants of the DHS, aka Homeland 'Security'. Feel safer yet with government-only in charge? Clearly these anti-citizen thought-processes are fully in play INSIDE government bureaucratic heads, though the public may still be sleeping, or at least not fully awake to that extent of the horror. Except maybe for Senator Paul who boldly challenged Holder to answer Paul's constitutional challenge in his risky filibuster. In fact, however, Obama actually asked his secretly authorized anti-citizen future military forces at a signing whether they would 'fire on Americans while on American soil IF HE ORDERED IT UNDER HIS AUTHORITY' AS POTUS. Shocked yet, because we had our jaws on the floor, and not rolling and laughing. Can't people hear? Don't they think such a clear statement could be fully calculated by the speaker to test his control of willing implementers honored by inclusion at a signing giving them powers?
So we shall not be disposing of the anti-citizen hideous theory -- on its own self-sufficient abilities -- that the 'Justice' department and 'Health & Human Service' could supply the firepower with full confidence that they would not hesitate to take down children. In fact, market news shows that the government has ordered 'unusual' target models for their target practice ranges, not the usual threatening black sillouettes with bold circle bullseyes. No the latest include a pregnant woman image, a child with a gun, and an elderly old coot with a shotgun. And the federal government has bought hundreds of billions of rounds for their 'target practicing'. What else do these government employees do with taxpayer dollars, all of which are getting scarcer by the day. Maybe they have ideas on how to get blood from those taxpayer-turnips (as they say, not so unscarily, and with no pun intended, in these circumstances).
On the other hand, as police bullies have found out, the current social infrastructure with highspeed uncontrollable communications devices in all hands, large and small, there is a high risk of discovery and disruption of the plan (assuming the first responders do not include corrupted individuals able to suppress receipt of distress calls). It's not just a few security cameras and no firepower in the hands of victims that these practiced hitmen would have to work with and then escape, because setting up a patsy is going to be a complication that could make the unpredictableness of the myriad communication devices speed in summoning help be the flaw that turns an escape into a shootout. The ability to 'place' operatives into the school staff, the local law enforcement and control of the media would be a deciding factor in choice of plans.
On the other hand, it would be -- judging by our own observation of the difficulty in executing such an engineered massacre as this, even with practiced hitmen, especially in this current social infrastructure, with so many nearby responding resources to try to anticipate and with highspeed uncontrollable communications in all hands, large and small -- only total desperation that would launch a government tyrannical planner on that heinous route of a real bloodbath involving potentially hundreds. NOT WHEN THERE'S THE WITNESS PROTECTION THEORY option, as our next theory is going to be called in our explorations, wherein the children are 'kidnapped' temporarily (with full knowledge of their parents) so no one gets hurt (just in case something goes south) and all public contact is handled by trained actors.
Under the Witness Protection Option, the Justice Department only has to supply things that government is publicly known to be well practiced at:
--- kidnapping using sedation technologies, likely not going into school on the 14th at all, more like an outing with protective medical staff for the 20 from the two classes, resulting in a couple scattered empty seats on the regular school buses among the other 400some students, and a handful of 'busy-ness' child actors with semi-closed classroom doors at the far end of the hallway near the offices..
--- phony death certificates, funerals with closed caskets, and
--- new phony birth certificates, possibly same last name but a year younger like being your own sibling, altered school records just for K-1 as having gone to another local school
--- underadvertised resources for relocation jobs for the parents of the victims possibly doing unmonitored government jobs which would be a welcomed solid job future for the parents of the short-term 'victims'..
--- with phony death certificates for participating staffers, phony birth certificates, revised job resumes, credit histories, and other identities, with explanations for them to provide to spouses and close family (if any) on 'possible' high-security clearance opportunities requiring silence for their family safety... government has plenty of experience in gaging silence-keeping factors (as we shall see next posting )... accounting for how close were the adult victims on a daily basis with their responding family members?
--- plus new school opportunities for three years for the children (the ones being kidnapped and their younger siblings). Older siblings would be rather unacceptable risks so selection of candidate children based on their households would be advantageous and doable, e.g. after knowing family data on last year's kindergartners (so choose 1st graders for the class to be used). Just like it would be unadvisable to 'kidnap' older than k-1st age victims b/c older age children's speech is sometimes given credibility by the public in general
--- with an option for dispersal instead to military base support government functions as a family option, since children's education could be tutored during a transition favored to convince the kidnapped victims that they are temporarily hospitalized with full access to parents in visiting roles.. and maybe tutoring by familiar teacher also in that facility's dedicated staff... extended daycare with hospital-style medicating for a few weeks?? .
--- convincing indoctrination (masquerading as continuing education) of local authorities, both police and public services, by authority-drenched federal government resources, on the terrorist realities of lone-gunman horrors, frightening gun hazards, plus glorifying their public service potential roles in identifying and responding to such severe threats, plus ascertaining compliance and future complicity measurement (built into evaluations) for when they are confronted with their opportunity-to-serve to 'end crime' against small children and the harmless public, (exceptionally unrealistic idealism would serve the purpose, like the press released personnel information on 'the three' and Soto ) and their public service importance in convincing legislators and the public when presented with a strong taste of the possible reality, "without actually harming anyone" they would be promised...
Basically reams of paperwork, government employment, and intimidating indoctrination of local authorities with whom DHS and HHS have been working for over a year on a benificent project for the betterment of Sandy Hook, per the major grants, etc
Which would suggest that these potentially complicit kidnappers/staffers MAY NOW BE wondering just how not-dead and not-harmed are Adam and Nancy, so these staffers may be just cautiously silencing their own doubts.. agreed? Censorship of the emulated-'hospital' internet access would be expectable, and since those staffers would instantly have "lost" their own adequately trackable phones with mobile internet resources at the day's start, if any, the federal government may not worry about 2nd-doubts possibility since they'd figure, that the doubters would conclude that Adam and Nancy were as unharmed as the doubters themselves would be unharmed...
So there you have it, somehow it does have initially credible workable ideas that seem quite possible and maybe less harmful-to-the-government if something blows up, though they have solid control of mainstream media for any eventuality
How much more credible/risky would it be to make their favored friends in the mafia do the dirty work, for their mafia's own profit as long as they do it to appear to happen in the prescribed way of intended public thinking, timing of manipulations, etc, and that mafia branch can expect appropriate government 'gratitutde' and for government to fully and simply provide the background control for their mafia perpetrators' safe escape to profitable pedophile operation. What do you think..??
Although each of these theories does account for 'the children' and 'staff victims', each of them would be relegating Adam (and necessarily Nancy) to a 'handy patsy' role, with the idea that any inside-the-government controllers could data-mine in order to find a suitable patsy as simply as data-mining to locate
- 1-- a nearby household with gun licenses registered in the government's database as well as
2-- A MALE in the household who had been prescribed, whether taken or not, some autism or depression pharmaceuticals, OR might be claimed to have been simply b/c HE was listed in some database of autistics, mostly young males, possibly considered as potential class action participants in the government's ongoing efforts to silence anti-vaccine court cases. The government does have a database of mental health diagnoses, for one example for data-miners.
3-- Preferably divorce-involvement and fairly isolated, like in census data.
Data-mining potentials for picking-out Adam & Nancy for their patsy role this way wouldn't be so unimaginable as being government-insider doable. Maybe even if the murderous planners were outside government, using online consulting staff (who had worked inside government) whose services could be bought since none of the searches is openly vile to someone talented but in need of money.. Otherwise a different school would have to be selected. How many small towns have received HHS and DHS favored attention like Sandy Hook so that there would be federal employees dispersed through the town's operation as part of the help from DC? A lot.. but gun ownership and autistic sons are not such small databases, so candidates might not be too difficult to narrow down.
HOWEVER, there is a very interesting route to understanding the Sandy Hook massacre (to the extent that someone was (actually at least two were) indeed killed, brutally) that STARTS with Adam and Nancy. And that route need not be so entirely focused on guns and drugs AS AURORA WAS. In fact in the efforts by those studying the police band radio recordings to unravel the entanglement of the pedophile's presence from Nancy's license plate search, another shocking (presumably police) voice got everyone's attention online. The muffled voice was saying, pretty certainly, 'End the life of Adam'.
That portion was played and replayed, yet it produced only that fine idea that Adam was not yet dead about one hour after the arrival of the police.
More like the Aurora situation with an alive shooter like the substitute James Holmes, practically turning himself in as the shooter, is what the murderous planners wanted except that Adam had maybe been found drugged-unconscious, demolishing the lone-shooter plan, no chance that he was responsible...
Had there been some plan for Adam to be a confused, frightened withdrawn captured shooter who was physically not able to cope with the reality and simply be seen a crazy and hateful gun-toting threat *IF* HE HAD ONLY COME OUT FROM THE DRUG WHILE THE SHOOTING WAS IN PROGRESS? Had he ONLY NOW, an hour later, begun to come out from under the drug used to bring him onsite, limp but not bloodying the one hauling him, but much more deeply unconscious than expected BECAUSE THE USUAL DRUG DOSE WAS TOO MUCH FOR AN ASPI'S LOW CORTISOL...
Imagine the confusion in the shooters, who were supposed to leave fogged Adam to face the consequences, as he is just coming to. Nothing they could do to bring him to but shaking him, and more loud noisy sounds like breaking furniture. Losing time that was for retrieving the extra gun in the trunk. Meanwhile the police are showing up. Should the killers split and hope Adam will wake up or should they make an attempt to shoot him, but like a failed suicide, like a grazing wound, since he was supposed to survive to serve as a 'hostage' in the lengthy court processes during which his connection to corrupted financial characters would be exploitable.
Imagine any corrupted members of the police who were primed to work with media on a captured shooter, but now what they are finding is looking like a suicide since Adam was likely sprawled horribly and bloodied (if there was real carnage all around) and surrounded by several guns. Maybe no one noticed the absence of the expected long gun, except those in charge of media-disinformation. Wouldn't they be wondering where that gun had been dropped, somewhere around and just let the lying disinformation go out to media as planned hoping they'd find where it was dropped.
So Adam would be another James Holmes, ONLY THIS TIME HE'D BE THE REAL SON of the targeted financial insider -- not a curiously substituted 'son' in the attempt at mimicking James -- OF THE INTENDED FINANCIAL INSIDER TO BE HELD SILENT. Being the real son would presumably have some leverage, unlike the substitute-James, where the Aurora shooter lacked any real hold on the real James Holmes' financial insider father, other than some embarrassment.
So why would they substitute when having the real son would give them the leverage the killers wanted, presumably? Maybe the killers had made their move on taking control of James in the week before the killings but James had made a fatal attempt to escape his captive status in his own apartment. It was in the week before the Batman opening planned carnage, when the gun ordering was suddenly initiated. If they still held the real James then possibly kidnap-hostage leverage would still be useful, though risky for the psyop.
In any case, the real James is not the booked-James. In facial movement, smiling, grimacing etc, the backs of the ears and the lower eyelid do not flex their 'width' in the changing of facial expressions. Hence the substitute, even if he mimicked James' happy engaged smile could not match James' neat pinned-back ear (visible on his left) nor the protective lower eyelids in the photo comparisons online. They are clearly not the same person, as seeable in the genuine pre-med student in one photo and in the substitute's photo after arraignment. James' ear lays flat to the curve of his head, the psyop-substitute in custody has the type of ear that protrudes relative to the curve of his head. You can stretch you ear higher, but you can't spread it outward, making it protrude. Done. The authorities don't have the real James Holmes. Where is he? Was it a Failed psyop. Was the plan for Sandy Hook's Adam to be done differently, better for leverage, no substitute, but alive?
And yes we are going to explore the ADAM AND NANCY THEORY in another posting, since it has a significant burden of heavy digging and connecting to make it credible, since some diggers have already fallen short on attempting this path. For now we shall call this the ADAM AND NANCY THEORY and acknowledge that we shall be digging into their, and our, financial realities. But for now, the idea is simply to designate that there's a crucial thread or three yet to be woven into any ultimate theory, maybe a multi-dimensional coat of many colors to be woven.
Well, before we begin to dig into the merits of one theory COMPARED TO another, against each and every bit of evidence and testimony on what we know of the REAL EVENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND EVIDENCE, there are still a few more 'loose ends' not yet in our hands, in that list of 'evidence and testimony' to have in our weaving. Hence we shall work on those bits of evidence and testimony in our next posting to prepare for ultimate theory concluding.
Finally.... Wrapping up on the staffer claiming falsely that there was a pre-visit plus an altercation... for that staff member's conviction-attempt-motivated lying and all its implications on aiding the killers' escape, even likely knowing the killers, and/or possibly even having been one of the shooters, we would suggest that HE BE HELD IN JAIL or CUSTODY for possible CHARGING WITH COMPLICITY IN MURDERING 20 SMALL INNOCENTS AND ADAM AS WELL AS "THE OTHER THREE" THAT HE PRESUMABLY HAD THE ALTERCATION WITH. Fundamentally, based on his obvious complicity in the execution of the necessary planning of disinformation-spreading in order to complete the other shooters' escapes, at the very least, while all police, media and observers were being focused on Adam. with possible role as a shooter. Interpretation of his altercation will be examined in the context of each theory, in due time, after more characters, testimony and evidence, including looking for other possible insiders as accomplices.
[ I wonder just how many communities 'benefit' from government largesse because the government would benefit from community favoritism-to-government that isolates people with verifiable grievances against government FDA for authorizing a bad vaccine??? or against some other government malfeasant criminality] ttyl