Finally the Grand Jury 'speaks'.... or at least they repeat what their special Prosecutor (Daniel Woody Breyer) tells them.. As we shall see. Breyer's fingerprints are all over the ERRORS in their document..
We now have a copy of the GrandJury's report to display with annotations, so let's get started in examining what went wrong. Ferguson MO and Staten Island, NY are roiling with shock at their GrandJury errors and now Brown County has just such an error-ridden GJ effort free of the race card to reveal how the system 'works' to favor cop crime.
**
**
Interestingly, the GJ wants to advertise their discontent AFTER the Prosecutor has led them all the way to NO BILL EVERYTHING... and clearly this visit shows that the GJ had no first hand look at the site of the death AT ALL during all the 'demonstrations' and 'story telling'.
Yep, I'm sure the Sheriff and the fine Prosecutor Breyer shares that deepest sympathy.
In fact, the Sheriff has so much sympathy for the mother of the jail victim, that he's charging her for the sheet he says killed her son... no kidding! Real insight into the Sheriff's ideas of justice and HIS OWN FALSIFYING OF THE PUBLIC'S HOPES FOR JUSTICE.
We'd wonder about the validity of a juvenile court's anti-gun 'disability', imposed in the Homeland Security early attacks on young people, all the way to what age when the early charges didn't seem to involve guns...
No apparent recognition that the scary list of current charges now were totally victimless, possibly even unconstitutionally pursued, nor of any other decent personal factors in the kid's life as a young father and decent son. Just prejudicial images.
And as for Hamilton County's narrowing down on Zachary, that IS NO INDICATION OF GUILT IN ANY DECENT COURTROOM, Grand or otherwise, since you're innocent until proven otherwise. Or at least that was the jewel of the American justice system.
The item number 4) is a total whitewash to make any reader gag. Violent threatening of someone over whom the deputies had the power to implement it BECAME IN BREYER's WHITEWASH: *could* be *interpreted* as threatening. Would a decent lawyer allow that as an indication of law definitions applied to the situation? Not likely. But then who says Breyer is a decent lawyer any more since now he works for Mike DeWine!
And then the carelessness of the 'escorting' oh so nice deputy, became an unprovoked 'attacked and INJURED' episode, to be discarded and to blot out the deputy's crucial error in LAW ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE, by suggesting that the reader and the speaker should think that 'recuffed' was accurate and thereby to cover up the judgment error of the deputy.
BUT THAT WHITEWASH PALES BY COMPARISON TO THE CRIME OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE BOMBSHELL IN 5)
BREYER HAS HIDDEN THE EVIDENCE IN THE CORONER'S REPORT WHERE SHE DISCOVERED THAT THE DEATH HAD BEEN KNOWN to some members of the Sheriff's Investigators A FULL 12 MINUTES BEFORE THE DEATH IS SUPPOSEDLY **DISCOVERED** back at the Jail and reported to 911.
How can such a knockout piece of evidence be OMITTED in any DECENT prosecution determined to FIND THE TRUTH...
No -- only in a whitewash to COVER THE CRIME... THAT COVER UP IN A GRAND JURY MISDIRECTION TO EFFECT THE ESCAPE OF THE MURDERERS MAKES PROSECUTOR BREYER AN ACCOMPLICE IN FRAUD... and ultimately an accomplice in HOMICIDE.... aiding and abetting the escape from discovery of the killer is precisely being a PARTY TO THE CRIME.
Try to visualize WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS in deciding on indictments or no-billing...
SCENARIO #1... the official story of the DeathSquad..
Try to imagine any way in a suicide, that 'the perpetrator' (with no involvement by those unbesmirched deputies) could reveal his crime to a remote detective while 'the perpetrator' is sequestered in his cell, just before the jail officers could discover his crime against himself... impossible...
SCENARIO #2... the official story ALMOST.. with fear-of-the-Coroner colors
Since we can't escape the idea that SOME involvement of the deputies or corrections-officers did occur, then to preserve the possibility of that involvement being INITIALLY innocent, we'd have to suppose the involved deputy/CO who made the early-discovery was just afraid of the potential consequences when the suicide would be officially discovered, so in order to warn his superiors to allow them some time to adjust in some way, this early-discoverer makes a phone call to DETECTIVE MEYER and delivers the news, then proceeds to slink away, SOMEHOW...
***BUT*** HOW COULD THEIR EARLY-DISCOVERY NOT BE ON THE HALL SECURITY MONITOR.??? That deputy/CO should be worried about that, don't you think.... CLEARLY they'd realize their presence in this secretive suicide-discovery scenario 2 from outside the cell would be VIEWABLE ON THE HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA and presumably would catch them up in any investigation?!
BOOM -- *****that hall security monitor HAD TO HAVE BEEN DISABLED IN THE SLINK AWAY at the very least***** no matter who "knew of" the dead body ahead of the 'official' discovery, that person was standing in the hall at some point and there is no record of that hall visitor, ON ANY "PORTION" OF THAT HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA ... So the camera was OFF or DISABLED....
AND IF THAT HALL MONITOR WAS SHUT DOWN OR DISABLED IN SOME PERIOD BETWEEN THE 'CHECKING' of Goldson's status in that cell AND THE NEXT PASSAGE (by ZANE SCHADLE) DOWN THAT HALLWAY AT THE OFFICIAL DISCOVERY, THEN THE SHUTTING-DOWN WAS MORE LIKELY DONE AHEAD OF THE "VISIT" TO EMPOWER THE MURDERERS TO TORTURE AND KILL ZACHARY... not just to escape culpability for early discovery and surreptitious relaying of the warning of trouble coming.... MAKING SCENARIO #3 HIGHLY POSSIBLE, so here it is.
SCENARIO #3 -- HOMICIDAL HANGING BY INSIDERS AT THE BCSO
Based on time stamps on existing footage from the hallway security camera, the homicide was committed in the interval from 2:38 to 2:45, when the perpetrators threw a dark cleaning rag over the motion detector in the hallway and proceeded to cuff and shackle Zachary with no explanation that would stir resistance. Then roped his throat with the first hobble strap, tossed him down, roped his ankle shackles with a second hobble strap and pulled him to death.... all within the time frame that matches the ForensicsPathology estimates for such a murderous deed, as the average time for death (where the neck bones are not broken as is reported in the autopsy) by such a deed is roughly 3 to 5 minutes, leaving adequate margins for execution, including the 'affixing' of a severed sheet to the sprinkler head and the other end tied to Zachary's throat... all within that 7 minute 2:38-2:45 timeslot and escape subsequently during the interval from 2:45 to 2:55 ditching the hobble straps, the cuffs and shackles and getting an alibi set.... driving from the jail to the hospital is a short trip, easily...
The interval between the expeditious placement of Zachary into the holding cell and the return to curiously "look in on him" 3 minutes later -- 2:34 to 2:37 -- is fully adequate for the murderous thugs to prepare the sheet and flat tool (since hobble straps are likely standard for law enforcers, as are cuffs and shackles) and prepare the sheet by cutting it in half, knotting one end in an estimated loop. No excessively suspicious hurrying, just expeditious like they were already moving in during the handling of Zachary's placement in the holding cell. And the casual advance knotting and later (as soon as the deed was done) suspending of the one end of the sheet on the sprinkler escutcheon fits the BCI mention that the knotted end of the sheet at the sprinkler was easily slipped off with the slight space (likely opened with the flat tool) just between the usually tight fitting escutcheon and the ceiling.
BOOM, HOMICIDE IS FULLY A FIT TO THE TIME AND TOOLS AND PERSONALITIES AT THE SITE..... motive, means and modus operandi.... don't you think we're geniuses! gag!
BOOM -- and on top of that realization, is the realization that:
*** The Bureau of Crime Investigation had a whole year to think of this, and the Prosecutor DISCARDED that troublesome HOLE in HIS WHITEWASHING STORY-LIE TELLING.... to DECEIVE THE GRAND JURY AND THE PUBLIC *** AND IGNORE THE SUSPICIOUS DEVIOUS PARTIAL HANDING OVER OF PORTIONS OF THE HALLWAY TAPE, WITH ONE PORTION NOT HANDED OVER FOR THREE WEEKS....
OH MY THAT'S NOT SUSPICIOUS IS IT MR BREYER OR WAS IT BCI'S HORNYAK WHO AUTHORIZED IGNORING THAT CLEAR TAMPERING WITH THE SECURITY TAPE FOR THE MOST CRUCIAL PERIOD OF THE DEATH'S OCCURRENCE....
So now do you really think it was a suicide, Prosecutor Breyer? {sarcasm alert}
Oh how we should weep for those poor deputies and their 'besmirched reputations' as they put it in their ignominious federal lawsuit .{/end sarcasm} just recently filed against the amazing Coroner and her equally amazing engineer/lawyer overly determined husband/helpmate... funny how this town can revere General Grant for his unwavering determination, from early childhood on in Ned Lodwick's fascinating history accounts, but consider the Varnau fellow to be a troublemaker who is relentlessly pursuing an 'agenda' against the esteemed BC Sheriff...
Well, now we're not through with discovering the FELONIES OF THE PROSECUTOR, even if we think we've got him and his cronies in the corral.. so let's move on.......
So how did Prosecutor Breyer get away with this when it was going to be in the Coroner's testimony, well it appears that SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE along the line, the esteemed Detective Larry Meyer decided to CHANGE HIS HALF OF THE EARLY NOTIFICATION STORY, leaving just the PHONE RECORDS OF DETECTIVE BUDDY MOORE and Buddy's own report that he'd been told in a 2:46 phone call from Det Meyer, to shoulder the load of this evidence, *only* supported by his phone record....
AND that was the EXCUSE that Breyer made up to duck the Scenario #3 by discarding DETECTIVE MOORE'S TESTIMONY AND TIME RECORDS... and to stonewall the Coroner's demands that proper completion of her own duties did require that the BCI investigators would GET THE PHONE RECORDS FOR THE DEATH SQUAD AND SEE WHO MADE WHAT CALL TO DETECTIVE MEYER..
Well guess what... BCI only got the phone records of a couple of the deputies BUT somehow NEGLECTED TO GET THE PHONE RECORDS FOR CO ZANE SCHADLE... BOOM and then figured out that even QUESTIONING DEATHSQUAD DEPUTIES WAS TOO DANGEROUS??? so BCI had no objection when two of the Death Squad members decided they'd spoken enough to investigators and refused to co-operate further with a second round of questions... imagine doing that if you were a suspect in a suspicious death....
BY COMPARISON, in Common Law practice EVERY DEATH OF AN INMATE IN A JAIL OR POLICE CUSTODY IS CONSIDERED SUSPICIOUS, and in British Coroner's courts the law requires that there be an inquest with a jury trial under the coroner's direction, as the protector of the dead.. somehow it's not quite so well organized in Ohio law, as it seems at the moment....
WE'LL SEE WHEN THE BROWN COUNTY'S CORONER HOLDS HER INQUEST... wanna come?.. Back to examining Breyer's Grand Jury's mess......
FORENSIC PATHOLOGY ONLINE FACTORS FOR DECISION:
"Hanging is that form of asphyxia which is caused by suspension of the body by a ligature which encircles the neck." It may be 'partial' or 'complete' depending on whether some part of the body is touching the ground or supported in some other way, or none is. Complete suspension of the body is UNUSUAL IN A SUICIDE. Guess what we're told in the official BCSO, BCI and AG story!
Symptoms Loss of power, subjective random sensations, intense mental confusion, loss of logical thought, then rapid loss of consciousness. Then convulsions. Respiration stops before the heart.
Ligature THE LIGATURE MARK IN THE NECK IS THE MOST IMPORTANT EXTERNAL POST MORTEM, per ForensicPathologyOnline.
"The doctor should note whether the mark on the neck corresponds with the material alleged to have been used in hanging and if it is strong enough to bear the weight and the jerk of the body. He/she should also note its texture and length, to know whether it was sufficient to hang. Before removing the ligature from the neck, it should be described as to the nature and composition, width, mode of application, location and type of knot."
-
1) composition, pattern and texture produced on the skin. Dr Varnau did, Montgomery had no record. Respect is given where earned.
2) width & multiplicity... a broad ligature will produce only a superficial mark, unlike narrow ligatures. THE WIDTH OF THE GROOVE/MARK IS ABOUT OR JUST SLIGHTLY LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE LIGATURE.... a 1.5 inch folded sheet would only make a mark that was nearly the same width, not a mark that is a whole inch narrower!
So what did make it !!! Per the Grand Jury's report, they believed the ligature mark was consistent with a hanging by the sheet! *Someone* *mis-informed* them, either the Montgomery Allen or untrustworthy Breyer, and based on performance so far, the money is on Breyer doing the lying. Agreed?
Significance? BOOM! Forensics is saying that THE SHEET DID NOT MAKE THAT LIGATURE MARK!!! Look at the sheet and the ligature mark in the now famous Coroner's Autopsy Report, Here it is:
.THE LIGATURE WAS A STRAPLIKE LIGATURE, not that sheet!!!
What does that tell us about those behind the story that Zachary hung himself from a sheet tied to the ceiling sprinkler?? eh? They never abused him, eh? They just put him safely back in his cell in expeditious manner, and went about their respected duties, then found him hanging by the sheet. eh? THE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS, THE DEPUTIES, THE CHIEF DEPUTY, BCI AND THE PROSECUTOR ARE **KNOWINGLY** **DECEIVING** US, THE PUBLIC AND THE GRAND JURY, ALL.... LOOK AT THAT MARK... Didn't the Grand Jurors LOOK?
BOOM!
How far do you want to trust them? eh? Clearly some kind of hanging torture was inflicted on Zachary. USING A STRAP. like a hobble strap. Precisely "when" is yet to be determined, But the strap and the autopsy data reveals more than we want to know. But it is necessary. For Zachary's justice sake, for public safety in removing murderers from freely acting, and even acting supposedly in our name.
Perhaps some like the "current sheriff" would like to insist that the 1/2" ligature mark is not a ligature mark in order to escape the Breyer embarrassment, but then what is it... eh? It looks like one, even the Montgomery medical examiner called it a ligature mark.. It fits all the specs that describe ligature marks in the ForensicsPathology manual for a specific type....
- it has the oblique angle,
an extent from front to along the sides of the neck for a ligature formed in a fixed loop with its fixed-knot over the back of the neck, and
it has the requisite impressed ligature-mark and red haemorrhage discoloration (indicative of suspension while alive) for a narrow, hard edge ligature.
It even has the roughed up scuffing of the front of Zachary's throat where ligatures are prone to scrape upward as the ligature is pulled upward from behind, while Zachary is prone on his back.
The strap-ligature mark clearly was not there when he was at the hospital, or the medical doctors wouldn't have released him without explanation and treating it, now would they, now??? so how many times are we supposed to believe that choking strangling holds by sheet and strap were inflicted on Zachary by Zachary himself in the Prosecutor/BCI official suicide lie? eh? twice! all within that remarkably limited time while UNOBSERVED by the 'sheriff's deathsquad....
And while we're at it, in that crazy double suicide idea, where did that strap come from, hocus pocus, eh? Got it away from another dumb deputy while he was handcuffed,,, How do you deal with such a sheriff's office... How do you deal with such a crooked prosecutor.....
Oy, how much whitewash did that GJ swallow... better call Poison Control...
So let's do the seemingly Simple stuff first.... The Chief Deputy Schadle was on the hook publicly for suspiciously replacing the sprinkler head, so BCI sent their talented investigators to recover that item before there's another indictment-fire to be fighting in court trials. My how impressive that they managed to recover that evidence from the maintenance trash heap at a company that services a whole list of such fire suppression sites. Aren't we impressed?? ROTFL.. but let's hold that thought til we see their miracle.
Not only was it recovered, it was unaltered by the maintenance people or their tools, sure it was, just so the Grand Jurors could see the proof that there was a hanging body on that sprinkler.. so Breyer insists that we should believe that the damage we're supposed to see was done by Zachary, not the maintenance crew... nor anyone else either... yup...
So for the edification of the non-believers, the recovered sprinkler head was supposedly damaged presumably by Zachary in comparison to a standard model that we should be able to envision... a sort of obvious warping out of shape compared to the nice machined roundness of a new model.. well maybe the physical gizmo was sort of ovoid, instead of machined round perfect.. but is that really from hanging and not from subsequent influences..?
Perhaps a grand jury would want to be able to have a closer look to compare the warped physical gizmo supposedly recovered to what the original crime scene looked like, to make sure the damage was seeable before being discarded by Schadle... so BCI handily provided what they claimed was their crime-scene photo so you can see what shape that sprinkler head was in, ovoided back in Oct 2013,
Which still leaves the question open of what Breyer's talking about as damage from a *major* weight yanking the escutcheon out of shape.. is that ovoided enough or should the damage be altogether different... so for the GJ's further misunderstandings, here is the BCI claimed crime scene photo of the actual warped sprinkler head...
-vs- the zoomed image from a KNOWN CRIME SCENE PHOTO TAKEN BY THE CORONER WHILE HER EXAMINATION WAS IN PROGRESS...
This looks terribly suspect.... the Coroner's knowably genuine photo where we can see the rest of the room before the focus was zoomed on the sprinkler head shows NO OBVIOUS OVOIDING... No sign of Goldson's weight distorting that mildsteel escutcheon covering the sprinkler head that I can see. And the angle of view is almost the same, with the knotted sheet on the back right of the sprinkler head. WHERE's THE DAMAGE???
BUT WAIT..
Look at the extent that the sprinkler heads in these two photos extend down from the ceiling..!!
BCI's sprinkler head extends much further out from the ceiling than the knowably genuine sprinkler head...
-- BOOM --
The sprinkler head in the BCI CLAIMED CRIMESCENE PHOTO IS **NOT** THE REAL SPRINKLER HEAD
AND HENCE THEIR PHOTO IS NOT A CRIME SCENE PHOTO EITHER..
The whole BCI CREDIBILITY JUST FLUSHED SOUTH DOWN THE TOILET HOLE...
BCI, the illustrious Bureau of Criminal Investigations, are criminals themselves, because they
-
--FABRICATED A PHOTO, COMPLETE WITH PHONIED KNOTTED SHEET IN PLACE AND PRESUMABLY THE **CO-OPERATING JAILHOUSE** CEILING
--AND THEN SENT BREYER TO LIE TO THE GRAND JURY WITH THE GIZMO AND THIS FRAUDULENT PHOTO FORGERY,
--AS WELL AS SENDING THIS PHOTO TO THE MEDIA SINCE THAT PHOTO WAS GIVEN TO THE TV STATIONS FOR RELEASE TO JUSTIFY THE BCI CLAIMS OF SATISFACTORY INVESTIGATION OF A SUICIDE... totally a lie..
BCI put a knotted sheet as nearly as they could fabricate into the warped escutcheon of their unknowable sprinkler head with just the right size knots and with the precisely peeking tip showing out the opposite edge, so that took some careful emulating of the actual sprinkler/sheet image, yet they screwed up on the extent that the gizmo extends down from the ceiling??? Simultaneous precision and incompetence.. huh?
Did they think no one would notice? And they'd get away with their forgery.?
Mind boggling brazen fraud and insulting flimflamming the JUSTICE PROCESS.. all courtesy of the OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S MIKE DEWINE'S HIGH POLISHED, HIGH PAID, CRIME INVESTIGATING SERVICE FOR SMALL TOWNS....
So now why do we bother wondering about the hanging resistance of devices, a quality not viewable in any crimescene image as to ovoidability, and should we wonder why that sprinkler head needed replacing, ROTFL
Considering the 'cooperating jail ceiling', the forgery had to have been done with Chief Deputy Schadle's knowledge and assistance, and we shall wonder what the rest of the correction's officers were doing, while the game was afoot....
Completely RACKETEERING
But maybe we should wonder how and when the 'retrieved' sprinkler head's escutcheon cover EVENTUALLY GOT DAMAGED... They said in the BCI document submitted to Breyer that Schadle HAD NOT CONSULTED WITH BCI BEFORE REMOVING THE SPRINKLERS, but that they had NOT ONLY re-acquired the sprinkler from the maintenance service BUT HAD A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FROM THOSE SERVICE STAFF THAT THIS PRECISE SPRINKLER WAS FROM GOLDSON'S CELL... isn't that interesting?? So now, even though it's difficult to imagine that the difference in shape was an unnoticed denial of their acquisition's genuineness, they had covered themselves, at the service people's risk, with a written guarantee of authenticity in case this scheme was discovered. The blame would go back on the service people. Don't you think that was clever of them? In fact it''s so clever that it seems quite likely that they were disappointed that the acquired sprinkler had no apparent warping, another difficulty to be overcome... but being clever technical geniuses, they could scientifically take that ungenuine sprinkler and mount it on a beam, hang a sheet tied to the beam with a significant weight attached and viola the escutcheon gets somewhat warped in a grand jury fooling way. That only left the photographic challenge of taking the now suitably mangled substitute sprinkler and putting it back up in Zachary's cell, studying the crimescene photos and rigging the sheet to match knots and edges.... then they would have a 'substitute' crime scene photo to match their 'substitute' mangled sprinkler head... the perfect proof that Goldson hung successfully from that crime scene sprinkler head... Thoroughly thwarting Justice. Another day's work achieved for the Attorney General's unblemished record of a well run system..... Wow, maybe there's a promotion in this for someone named Hornyak!!!
Clearly the GJ could see the proof before their eyes, sigh!
So let's move on to the next misleading entertainment for the GJ.
A couple of points... the sprinkler system PIPES are not what the sheet was tied to, BECAUSE BREYER REMINDS US LATER that it was so easy to slide the knotted sheet off the sprinkler assembly.. Presumably some written log would confirm this so clearly the knotted loop was not reaching up into the attic and wrapped on the pipes. It was on the head with its escutcheon cover just like we see in the enlarged photo. That's the piece that would break off with the amount of force from Goldson's weight jerking it, because the head, though metal, and the pipes though structurally secured by hangers, the two are joined by a much less sturdy joint-piece for easy replacement of sprinkler heads. Flood time at break-off, but no pipes down. Pointless technical bragging about pipes withstanding high pressure (an internal force, not a suicidal jerking force) as a deceptive method of impressing the GJ with the 'strength' of the system under force of a suicidal maniac? But Breyer was desperate to make the suicidal hanging body appear believable.
Then comes the 'reachability' of the sprinkler head by Goldson. As demonstrated in the Coroner's report, the problem was the slant at which the 'reacher' would have to work (with BOTH hands) as well as the distance. That difficulty of the 'reacher' having to hold onto the light fixture (as the only other support while at the slant) is seeable in this Coroner's Report image, leading some to flat out simply say it was not doable to tie the knots while standing there, especially since the knots were on the opposite side of the sprinkler head. But that was lied about profusely to turn the GJ's heads.
As Breyer pointed out, the knotted loop over the sprinkler head, being easily slipped off the sprinkler head, would open the possibility that WHOEVER tied the sheet to the sprinkler head could have tied the knots in advance (estimating the loop-size needed) and slipped the loop over the device while clinging to the light fixture... all done after the preliminary clinging to the light fixture while prying the escutcheon down slightly with some stiff tool, stiffer than a fingernail..
That WHOEVER person could just as easily have been Dunning or Wedmore or Schadle or Meyer or any of the others 'interested' in their idea of a 'welcoming party' based on just this 'reaching' analysis... as you can see from the previous Breyer-hidden evidence, it's now a question of which 'reaching' deputies to include in the 'welcoming'....
Then to complete number 9) the effervescent Breyer laughably reveals his intent (or likely orders) to stifle any grand jury intentions of indicting any of the potential suspects of anything, even Chief Deputy Schadle. In order to do it he had to claim that there would be no need for that sprinkler head to be kept in place as evidence, implying that there would be no trial needed when he got through. ROTFLOHO
But let's get some more hilarity in Breyer's next batch of felony-quality fabricated obfuscations.
Rotfl, Breyer's very first statement was blown up in the explosions in number 5).. go check it out if you've forgotten and see if you would not imagine that some enterprising deputy simply tossed his handcuff-cleaning-rag over the motion detector as CO Schadle is exiting the hallway at 2:37 after appearing to 'check on Goldson'. Simpler than shutting that device off, or not? Once the hallway camera is shut down, the group reassembles and murder happens with a pair of hobble straps, shackles and cuffs. It won't take but a few minutes per the estimated rapidity of death, along with the force needed with hobblestraps, one to choke him and one to pull from the shackles, for whatever psychopathic partying their evil minds could entertain in their sick brains and still have time left over in the interval from 2:37 to 2:58 to be making calls before 2:45 and getting their alibis in place and/or preparing the sheet while on that proverbial smoke break and be ready for the official 'discovery' at 2:58.
Doesn't that seem logical, enough to please Sherlock? or Columbo even better? Aren't we so pleased, and now disappointment settles down on the euphoria, since with our puzzle pieces fitting to catch the killers, we can't stop them. All the figuring was for nothing.
We'll let you wonder about the letters supposedly taken from Zachary's cell....
Perhaps we are pushing our speculation here on the 'missing' number 12) but we've seen other crooked prosecutors MISINFORM grandjurors about the level of certainty required for indicting... telling them that near certainty was needed to indict in a criminal case, making it impossible to get an indictment since at grand jury time, it's not nearly well enough prepared (well maybe when BCI takes 14 MONTHS to put together the case, you'd expect better than 'not nearly well enough' wouldn't you) to have 'without a doubt' type of certainty.....
Purely speculation, but clearly some number 12) was taken out of the report by someone, at someone's intended dissatisfaction. Before signing? After signing? Why? and What was in it......
In any case, the Grand Jury was excitingly 'misinformed' providing you can call felony obstruction of justice a simple matter of 'misinformation'.... do you agree?
Concluding, FIRSTLY and CLEARLY, THE CREDIBLE REPORT BY SGT DETECTIVE MOORE THAT THERE WAS AN "EARLY DISCOVERY" WOULD SHOW THAT ANY CREDIBLE SCENARIO FOR HIS PIECE OF EVIDENCE REQUIRES THAT IT BE RECOGNIZED THAT THE HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA WAS DISABLED/TAMPERED WITH FOR THE PERIOD OF ZACHARY'S DEATH......
otherwise there would be some record on the camera data showing someone in the hall during the interval 2:38AM to 2:45AM.... and according to BCI there was no sign of any person in that hallway based on the camera data, but no one except BCI (whose credibility was destroyed in their sprinkler evidence episode) claims to have examined the camera data and certified that it was all there, rotfl at their loss of credibility as true evidence handlers after their performance on the sprinkler substitution snafu.
SECONDLY, THE BLOODY NARROW LIGATURE MARK ON ZACHARY'S THROAT MEANS THAT HE WAS MURDERED BY SOME PAIR OF INDIVIDUALS, with possibly more attending their murderous party, WITH HOBBLE STRAPS (one around his throat and the other pulling on his ankles) AND THAT CONFIRMS SCENARIO 3'S LIKELIHOOD (that their murderous party re-assembled in the interval while the security cam was disabled) TO A LEVEL THAT DEMANDS AN INDICTMENT OF ZANE SCHADLE, JASON HUFF, GEORGE DUNNING AND RYAN WEDMORE.... because the bloody hemorrhage shows that injury was done while his heart was pumping blood, and was applied with a jerk from BEHIND, NOT FROM A KNOTTED SHEET STRUNG UP FROM THE **SIDE** of his head... and furthermore the blood called lividity (that settles into tissues in the direction of gravity after death) was seen AT THE ARRIVAL OF THE CORONER to be in Zachary's back, showing that he died on his back, not hanging vertically from a sheet until official "discovery"... clearly Montgomery's assistant coroner is a fraud or a COWARD and because of her cowardice the perpetrators soon would be free to strike again making her 'cowardice professionally' a justification for an indictment as a getaway accomplice to a murder.... which example would bring up the question of why the previous BC Coroner never showed his face when the last inmate supposedly committed suicide. Don't you think that previous BC Coroner should LIKELY be hung if only we could find the evidence and indict him as well... but we aren't going to be satisfied til we hear from herself that she said what the Hornyak/Breyer duo reported to the GrandJury
AGREED?
FURTHER THE EXTENT, FREQUENCY AND CRUCIAL 'WARPING' OF THE TRUTH AND EVIDENCE AND LAW GUIDANCE THAT PROSECUTOR BREYER 'CONTRIBUTED' TO THE GRAND JURY DECISION IS GROUNDS FOR HIS INCLUSION IN THE INDICTMENT AS AN **ACCESSORY TO MURDER AND FELONY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE** as surely as any getaway driver after a murder was committed.
RIGHT ALONG WITH CHIEF DEPUTY JOHN SCHADLE FOR **FELONY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE**... for his collaboration in the security camera tampering and the removal of the sprinkler heads...
PLUS BCI'S DAVE HORNYAK FOR **OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN FABRICATING A FORGERY OF FALSE EVIDENCE**... with producing a visibly wrong sprinkler head (claiming it was the original evidence item) and then producing with considerable effort an imitation crime scene photo, and passing those off as the original evidence and photo... (Here's Hornyak's BCI Report to Breyer, which accidentally exposes Hornyack's forgery on pg 23 versus pg 22. See for yourself secretly)....So... We'd surely want to grill him on whose idea his effort was expended for.. Conceptually, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine could be sweating bullets right now... or maybe he has planned other obstructions to be dealt with perseveringly by those insisting of justice in Law Enforcement...
AND DETECTIVE LARRY MEYER MAY BE UNDER FURTHER INVESTIGATION to see what his explanation was for hiding his own pre-knowledge of the suicide in his early phone call confirmed as 12 minutes before the official 'discovery'.... CO MCKINZIE MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE INDICTMENTS FOR at least being an **ACCESSORY TO HIDING THE MURDER** WITH HER FALSELY REPORTING A "HANGING INMATE" until such details of possible threats against her child as are needed have been secured if real. Or whatever food-eating excuse she could come up with for not looking before reporting that curiously phrased 'a hanging inmate'...
THESE AND FURTHER QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED WHEN THE CORONER HAS HER INQUEST.... STAY TUNED..... IT MIGHT BE IN JANUARY...
Wouldn't it be exciting if they summoned a talented bloodhound to identify whose scent (assuming the evidence was decently preserved ROTFL) is on the sheet's pieces, both halves should be tested.. agreed, wow! Aw darn, there would be too many confusing reasons why Schadle and Dunning might have touched the sheet, without it being for corrupt reasons. Or any other corrections officer, actually, for that matter, even McKinzie.. hmmmm...
Any more suggestions....Maybe a cool demonstration for the idiot Montgomery assistant coroner -- idiot OR GETAWAY EXPERT SUSAN ALLEN WHO WOULD BE INDICTABLE AS WELL FOR ACTING AS AN ACCOMPLICE IN A MURDER-GETAWAY if she fails to satisfactorily explain her idiocy -- to show that a wide, soft ligature does not make a narrow ligature-mark in animal flesh (skinned mutton perhaps).... Not to mention the direction that the ligature is being pulled is important. SINCE THE NARROW MARK WAS PULLED FROM THE **BACK**, and the SHEET WOULD HAVE BEEN PULLED FROM THE KNOT ATTACHMENT ON THE **SIDE"" Her idiot performance (OR COWARDLY PERFORMANCE) suggests that medical board examinations are not worth much in practice. Agreed, rotfl at my own mistake in favoring practical logic over classroom testing when I am well qualified theoretically myself.. ttyl
TTYL
No comments:
Post a Comment