FreeForAll !! LAWSUIT BLIZZARD Erupts in Brown County Government Offices!!

FREE FOR ALL !! LAWSUIT BLIZZARD ERUPTS IN BROWN COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES
The deputies & sheriff are desperately trying to use their same-party courts TO STOP THE CORONER'S INQUEST b/c they know they are guilty and this coroner will nail them in their lies, since she does her homework and the BCI whitewash masquerading as a Goldson homicide investigation is ripe with forged evidence, and guilty fingerprints that go all the way to Columbus. Columbus is desperate to get rid of the Varnaus, both of them.

Inquests to resolve 'disparities' in evidence are law-authorized (such as ORC 313.09) and the judge (GUSWEILER, the Dems didn't even run a candidate against the Republican's mowing machine) has a hot potato restraining order to be ruled on in early Feb 2015.

CLEARLY THE SHERIFF'S MEN -- WHILE SCREAMING THAT INVESTIGATION MUST STOP AND THE CORONER'S DECISIONS MUST BE CHANGED -- ARE CONTRADICTORILY SETTING IN MOTION **MORE** INVESTIGATION PROCESSES

A-- Things to tally up in scoring the free-for-all PLAYERS' STATUS:
-- A GJ issuing a 'no bill' decision ONLY INDICATES THAT THE EVIDENCE THEY WERE MADE PRIVY TO DID NOT ADD UP TO 'ENOUGH' TO PROCEED TO TRIAL ON MURDER CHARGES... in no way does it CLEAR any one of GUILT... they are not 'cleared' and do not deserve 'innocence' labels in any valid thinking

-- The 'disparities' showing how the GJ was 'misled' are annotated at our previous post showing the need to resolve whose evidence should stand -- THE CORONER'S OR PROSECUTOR BREYER'S

B-- Things to tally up in the PLAINTIFFS' YELLING and ARGUMENT-ILLOGIC
1) -- Even before the game of a BCI 'investigation' was barely afoot, the Sheriff (Wenninger) revealed in a major newspaper QUOTE (Maysville iirc) that they intended to take the 'homicide' ruling to court to force a change to 'suicide' when the GJ no billed the suspicious behavior of 'his men'... my wasnt he confident... every other police captain or sheriff takes suspect officers off the street out of public safety concerns.... not wenninger! THE PUBLIC HAD TO LIVE WITH HIS UNPROVEN RISKY CHOICE and were told to expect even more court battling after the GJ's..... meanwhile he weeps that 'his men' were suffering from their being investigated, imagine that..!!!

2)-- Right before the GJ finally issued a decision, those very same 'men' filed a case in FEDERAL COURT to claim that their civil rights were being violated by the coroner's release of evidence to the victim's next of kin (which she is obligated to do and the kin are not obligated to keep the DeathSquad stress-free) -- and as part of that Federal trial, the Coroner's defense process would include a thorough "Discovery' deposition/questioning of those she would subpoena as well as 'Discovery' demands for their DATA.... THE DEATH SQUAD'S TERROR IS BECAUSE AN INQUEST BLOCKS THEIR LAWYERS' FROM BLOCKING QUESTIONS.... imagine that as the motive for their yelling and lawsuit BLIZZARD......

HOW CAN A JUDGE --- OR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -- CLAIM THE IMPETUS FOR INVESTIGATION IS COMING FROM THE CORONER, and that only her investigation is UNWARRANTED in the screaming Plaintiff's LITIGINOUS planning??

BUT INSTEAD THE REPUBLICAN LOCAL MEDIA -- SHOUTING HEADLINES that are *SCRIPTED* BY THOSE REPUBLICAN COMMISSIONERS' REPUBLICAN LAWYERS-- to entertain the public and mind-bend the party parrots in their daily gossiping -- broadcast in the local paper that "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"

You'd think the Coroner was the bully and that the Sheriff's detriment to the county just started when that bully coroner was elected.... think again!

Let's tally the Sheriff vs Coroner's scoring on detriment to the County

Starting with the tally of the Sheriff's detriment to the County

1) back when budget belt tightening was first pushed hard in BC and departments did all sorts of cutting, THE SHERIFF TOLD THE COUNTY TO GIVE HIM HIS MONEY DEMANDS OR HE WAS SENDING INMATES TO BUTLER COUNTY'S JAIL AND THE COUNTY COULD SEE IF THEY WANTED TO PAY BUTLER COUNTY OR HIM..... remember that bit of EXTORTION... and before you think that his administrative limits were truly reached, think back to the alternate candidate JOSH BLACK of Mt Orab's Police with exciting action credibility WHO SHOWED A PLAN TO EXPAND SHERIFF'S SERVICES WITH LIMIT-ENGINEERED STAFF AND DECENT SAVINGS..... Black almost got elected so some people do read campaign Q&As, unfortunately, not enough... leaving the verdict standing that the SO's demands are lazy thinking extortion by Wenninger and Schadle...

2) or how about the bullying incident recently against the current county commissioners where Wenninger THREATENED (yes threatened) that he'd TAKE HIS MEN COMPLETELY OFF ROAD DUTY AND HAVE THEM SIT IN THE OFFICE TIL 9-1-1 CALLED THEM **UNLESS** THE COMMISSIONERS FORKED OVER EXTRA MONEY FOR 3 MORE COP CARS THAN WERE DUE UNDER NORMAL BUDGETING... then to dominate the players, Wenninger played games with the court attempt at using mediation til the County forked over most of what his demands were IMMEDIATELY, with the rest under commitment for this next period's 'extra' funds.

3) or remember the dictatorial AND AGAINST CITIZEN SAFETY rules that Wenninger unilaterally set up to establish his territorial control when a call for help might come from his territory but another police officer was closer... that nasty factor meant death to a BC woman intent on suicide when her husband died leaving her suddenly without a caregiver, right after emotional winter holidays.... NewYears 2013, iirc... a spectacular start for the new coroner's initiation to BCSO law enforcers 'cooperation'..

4) or maybe we should recognize a corrupt motive when, just a week before the news hit the streets that Wenninger was being sued for mistreating a sick inmate while the inmate was temporarily in BC jail custody, the oh-so-budget-conscious Shadle dumped responsibility on village/town police budgets for seeing to the medical needs of every Sheriffs-inmate-to-be before delivering that inmate (gift wrapped and cared for) to the Sheriff's wondrously unable-to-cope (though wondrously-able-to-be-state-quality staffed) jail....

5) oh but maybe he's such a prima donna at crime solving that BC citizens feel so protected on our streets... like how he *solved* the Stykes murder where the young mother was shot to death while simply driving down our main highway.. last we heard he claimed he had a decent *clue* on a motive.. that was half a year ago (nothing but silence since) which was when a local reporter raised the image of the 1 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNSOLVED MURDER to public attention, so now a year-and-a-half of NIL...... that whiz-bang qualified sheriff (known for his lack of qualifications) SHOULD HAVE HAD THE KILLER IN HIS GRASP WITHIN A WEEK OF THE MURDER... IF HE HAD ANY TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE OF CELLPHONE INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATION... that's right! Cellphone data are MAJOR Law topics on what privacy data that law enforcements are getting for crime-solving and prevention, hot topics even among the public,,,, all he needed to do was A) subpoena the tower owners for all the cell phones physically in the shooter's relevant/tight area for the hour before to the hour after the murder, B) do a search to identify those phone numbers that were stationary before the shooting and left the area briefly after, C) subpoena the relevant phone companies for the identity of those clearly suspect candidates... D) round em up.... and he had a limited time (a week, iirc) to get that data before the tower data was written over.... EITHER WENNINGER HAS NO DECENT CLAIM TO LAW ENFORCEMENT KNOWLEDGE **OR** THERE'S A *MOTIVE* OF HIS OWN FOR NOT PRODUCING THE KILLER... take your pick of detriments to the county's citizens....

6) as for his motives behind that campaigning grin, it's rather patently not his concern to keep his credentials up to 'snuff', since the Board of Elections CEASED EVEN RECORDING WHETHER HIS LAW-MANDATED CREDENTIALS MEET THE LAW'S REQUIREMENTS. They apparently don't check whether his paperwork is done or not, since WENNINGER FILED *NONE* FOR THE LAST 3 ELECTIONS, when bloodhound Podolski filed Public Records Requests to see them. Podolski is the joe fellow who sued to see what was in Wenninger's trial for 'counterfeit' credentials (openly filed in his 1st campaign), a trial that made him officially illegal but 'innocent' of knowingly passing counterfeit claims of eligibility so the local media trumpeted 'innocence' without admitting his stupidity plea, nor raising the question of how and when he would be required to make those counterfeitting debts right... but Gusweiler (the same one now bobbling the hot potato) decided voters did not have enough 'rights' to see the trial's outcome, compared to his buddy Wenninger's 'right' to keep it a secret......

...is that enough, or do you want more...

So now let's look at the ledger on detriments due to the coroner's operations...

Hmmm... she committed to go to EVERY DEATH SCENE (more service, unlike previous officeholder who reneged on going death scenes the Sheriff said he was not that needed on, like the year before's sheriff-ruled-'suicide' at the jail... but she actually PAYS toward her office staffing expenses, out of her own pocket... hmmm... never heard of something like that, eh?

Hmmmm.... all the ruckus in the media witchhunting (which court testimony and phone recording showed was the co-ordinated instigation of Schadle and his support babe the current prosecutor Little) turned out to be unrecognizable as valid ruckus in the evidence before 4 judges so far....

..... and the latest settlement over battles about conflicting areas of responsibility between SO and Coroner's Office (in preparation for the altercations in court) turned out in court to be the version the Coroner had initially insisted on when the SO tried to lock her into their own demands, her having seen those now-agreed rules successfully written about in law enforcement JOURNALS (some indication AGAIN of the Sheriff & Schadles lack of erudition) so SHE WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG....

Hmmm... SO WHERE IS HER DETRIMENT CAUSATION???? WHETHER IN COURT BATTLES (where the errors were the Sheriff&Schadles, per the 9-1-1 and policeband communications records) or in taxpayers' service rights.....

So CONCLUSION #1: THE COUNTY SHOULD BE BACKING THE CORONER

Hmmm.. and IF THE CORONER DOES THE NEEDED FURTHER INVESTIGATION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE 'DISPARITIES' IN THE GOLDSON UPHEAVAL SO FAR, IT WILL LIKELY COST THE COUNTY LESS BLOOD, SWEAT AND TEARS THAN IF A BUNCH OF LAWYERS MIX IT UP IN FEDERAL COURT... Agreed?

Although on the Federal Court route to resolution it's a distinct possibility that the PARTY CONTROL IN CINCINNATI'S FEDERAL COURT MAY NOT BE SO REPUBLICAN... interestingly that could result in even more 'consequences' since the Cincinnati Federal Court DIDN'T BUY THE OHIO SUPREME COURT'S MISREPRESENTATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE on government employee 'immunity' from prosecution AND INSTEAD JUDGED that THE SCIOTO COUNTY JAILERS WERE *NOT IMMUNE* IN THEIR 'MISHANDLING' OF A SICK PRISONER.... DO YOU SUPPOSE DEWINE ALREADY STEERED THE DEATH SQUAD TO A PERSUADABLE FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE JUDGE (than the pair of federal judges that handled the Scioto case) ON THE CINCINNATI BENCH? (it's a secret)

BUT JUDGING BY THE WHITEWASHING MISINFORMATION AND DOWNRIGHT FABRICATION OF THE EVIDENCE BY THE SPECIAL LAWYER/PROSECUTOR VISIBLE IN THE GrandJury REPORT, THE OUTCOME UNDER THE CORONER'S INQUEST WILL STAND UP CLEANLY IN JUSTICE'S SCALES. .... Agreed? at least I'd bet on that!

But of course if that hotpotato judge (GUSWEILER) says the coroner cannot hold her own inquest, ignoring the scoring above (and the law) THEN IT WOULD SEEM TO BE IN THE INTERESTS OF PROPER SERVICE TO THE TAXPAYERS' VALID NEED FOR JUSTICE FOR SAID TAX FUNDS TO BE SUPPORTING THE LEAST DETRIMENTAL OFFICEHOLDER IN THE BATTLE....... Agreed? So Dear Commissioners, pay the Coroner's chosen lawyer, for your own duty to county well being

And should you doubt that the lawyer/prosecutor Breyer (straight from Ohio Attorney General's special lawyer forces) would ever visibly fabricate lies in a court proceeding and defeat justice, take a look at the previous post (The Death Squad Strikes Back...) so titled because that Death Squad was NEVER **PROSECUTED** BY ANYONE IN FRONT OF THE GRAND JURY... BREYER WAS A DREAM DEFENSE LAWYER ALL THE WAY, slathering whitewash and fabricating unethical evidence even....

.... like Breyer's BCI 'evidence' that Shadle didn't perpetrate a felony obstruction of justice by authorizing the destruction of the sprinkler head supposedly used for the 'suicide' but instead BCI's Hornyak recovered precisely cell #15's sprinklerhead, guaranteeing it with proffered phony chain of control fantasy signed statement (wonder what those installers' signatures cost him).... BUT IT'S NOT THE SAME SPRINKLERHEAD, regardless of the fantasized guarantees to the jurors... SEE FOR YOURSELVES....

Here's pg 22 of the BCI prosecution 'Summary' for Breyer's use at the GJ hearings:

Note the crimescene photo of the sprinkler head. Small, like a sawed off cone that would almost fit in a tuna can... that matches the crimescene photo certified by the coroner (See two posts ago: Justice Process TEST: Coroner's Proof....) ...

Now let's look at BCI's Summary page 23...
Wow ANOTHER CRIME SCENE PHOTO THIS TIME SHOWING A BIT OF A 'BEND'

For the Grand Jury, the BCI pandered a physical "evidence" item and backed it up with a manufactured crimescene photo to entertain the GJ that Goldson hung full weight on the jail sprinkler head with an apparently seeable deformation of the crimescene sprinkler.... while blindingly hiding that said photo was not even a crimescene sprinkler, let's enjoy a demo-proof-in-the-pudding:...

For pg 22's 'zoomed' knowably genuine photo measurement ratios.....

For pg 23's 'close-up' photo measurement ratios, to account for different angle POVs (point of view)...

Now the 3D proof-th-the-pudding modeling starts:







BOOM! THE GRAND JURY WAS TOLD A LIE, COMPLETE WITH FORGED PHOTO..

IN FACT, IF THE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR WAS SO CLOSE-UP **AND** IF (per BCI testimony recorded in the GrandJury Report) the investigator EASILY SLIPPED THE KNOTTED SHEET OFF THE SPRINKLER, THEN WHY WOULDN'T SAID INVESTIGATOR HAVE TAKEN A CLOSEUP OF THE **BENT** SPRINKLER-HEAD WITH SUCH A SUICIDE-PROOFWORTHY SHOT IN FRONT OF HIS NOSE, EH?

Why no such naked sprinkler crimescene photo? because the 'closeup' pandered as a crimescene photo is NOT a crimescene photo at all, it's carefully FORGED EVIDENCE (complete with meticulously matching rag to complete the 'convincing' goal) IN ORDER TO LIE THE JURORS INTO SWALLOWING THE OFFICIAL STORY (AKA BIG FELONY LIE)

CONCLUSION #2

BCI AND BREYER SHOULD GET THEIR **COMPENSATION** but IN A FORM (trial, jury, jail) NOT IN DOLLARS FROM COUNTY COFFERS..... agreed. rotflmho at the Ohio POLICESTATE, while ducking out of reach.... Possibly you'd want to relay these 'sentiments' above to the BC Commissioners (who somehow qualified their lawyers' recommendation to reject payment and kept a backdoor OPEN) by downloading this copy (pdf already) and emailing it to your elected, cowardly county commissioners who do take citizen input at commissioners (at) browncountyohio (dot) gov