tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-85100401165080528642024-03-16T06:24:13.669-07:00Indy Michael - at WAOIthe Western Appalachian Ohio Independent indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-8848342061400578542024-03-06T08:44:00.000-08:002024-03-06T08:44:45.295-08:00Open Letter to the County Commissioners of Brown County<p> <span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-weight: 700; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Open Letter to BrownCountians: </span></p><span id="docs-internal-guid-d26bee64-7fff-f0fc-a3c9-8f984ce1fd16"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Safer, More Effective, Less Expensive, More Pleasant Drug-cessation Therapy</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Because it EXISTS and is NEEDED here as well as all over the U.S. of A.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Recently I wrote this to our elected officials in Brown County</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> because of the constant drug cases in the BC court news, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> because of the extreme harm statistics in the news, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> because of the demonstrable failure of the ''mental health'' and ''drug cessation programs'' </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> and their inhuman costs..</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Presumably this subject fits all their stated election campaigns…yet they stonewall the SOLUTIONS that I claimed needed their attention…..</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Very disappointing </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">because Brown County had bravely joined the class action lawsuit against the manufacturers of false hope that the company’s pain-relief drug was not going to be addictive, when company internal documents showed that they KNEW IN ADVANCE that it definitely was addictive…</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">What do we-the-people of this county sense is real and good? Doable, preferred, and a just solution to the tangles of mistakes and bad luck..</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">If you prefer a video of the research history, on those cure solutions, here it is.. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">https://isom.ca/ascorbic-acid-in-the-treatment-of-opioid-addiction/</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">If you thought that the forces that control news and commentary were successful in suppressing covid *early treatments* that showed beneficial prospects as well as suppressing conservative voices of the ‘deplorables’, then let me tell you that such unholy control is nothing compared to what they do to cures that are not profitable to those in charge.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">What I am about to show you has been struggling to be adopted for decades, in spite of multiple studies proving my initial claims above of </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> incessant drug-tangled lives being revivable, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> extreme harm avoided, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> medical failures that merely enslave the caught victim to a different drug profitable to exactly the medical failure sources </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> and inhuman costs being easily escaped as well..</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Do you, like many Americans, take nutrient supplements? Vitamin C specifically.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Most don't take more than 1,000mg/day thinking they are pushing the limits since the FDA's RDA is only 100mg, yes... 1/10th of what the public has been led to believe is aggressive and hence an unnecessary and pointless dose.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">But FACT: Nature designed the animal kingdom vastly differently than what the FDA plans for Americans, specifically FDA experts persist in calling the RDA the </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">'ordinary' human need, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">but in reality it's </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">'ordinary poor health' for humans..</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">You see, EVERY animal -- except guinea pigs, fruit bats and primates, including us -- MAKES their own vitamin C in their organs, usually the liver…[kidney in a few species]</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">AND...</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">their amounts would seriously displease the drug-bought FDA.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Ever notice how resilient wild animals are, to be able to thrive in nature's normal daily survival difficulties?</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">If the genes in humans had been left like those in the goat -- an animal about human size 150lbs and with nutrient/metabolic systems like ours [demonstrated by the fact that human mother's milk is closest to goat's milk] -- then</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> what did nature intend for our bodies to want of vitamin C?</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">***** 13,000mg per day on quiet days, ***** yes 13,000!</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">And as much as 130,000mg when threatened by injury or disease.</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">..</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">So why did humans evolve without that ability?</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Because that production level of C requires constant eating [more than just what is needed for energy] in order to have the materials to produce their ascorbate that's needed for healthy thriving... hence humans had the ability to SURVIVE extreme FAMINES, likely part of their existences.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">However, our amazing progress in tech has given us the ability to manufacture it, and inexpensively.... </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">So logically we should be manufacturing and consuming the amount that would make us thrive, ditching the traitorous FDA's ordinary poor health that makes drug companies excessively profitable....</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Profitable to the extent that they can walk away each time they are prosecuted for their crimes, with penalties in billions, as a mere cost of doing business. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Don't you agree that such manufacturing and consuming is logical? </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Because we've seen….. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Even when proven to have knowingly harmed their patients... Pharma doesn't struggle..</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Billions is a planned-for cost of doing corrupt profitable business..</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">So </span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; text-decoration-line: underline; text-decoration-skip-ink: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">now maybe it won't be so unbelievable that nature-based high-dosing with vitamin C</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> could</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">make things right naturally, and </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-style: italic; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">take patients/addicts out from the clutches of their addiction, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-style: italic; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">with minimal discomfort, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-style: italic; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">in record time, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-style: italic; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">with only beneficial side effects </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-style: italic; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">and pleasantly to boot</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">... </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[huge doses, yes but dividing the large dose throughout the day, as would be done in our livers' workings if naturally done]...</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">and inexpensively compared to the drug company-based ‘addiction’ programs.....that require months of oversight... maybe years.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Picture this... as was done in one of the earliest pilot studies [Libby and Stone]... each addict was given a quart of milk each day </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">in which MULTIPLE TABLESPOONS of SODIUM ASCORBATE [the salty version of ascorbic acid vitC] was mixed.. [as well as a simple one-a-day multivitammin at each meal] </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">The number of tablespoons of ascorbate was determined based on the severity of the addiction and type of drug…</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Between 4 to 6 tablespoons was needed in most cases. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">By the end of day 1 they were coherently thinking, </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">and by day 3, they were free enough of drug effects to begin reducing to 2 tablespoons per day as their long term maintenance dose.. about double the goat's quiet day production, basically because their body will be having to rebuild a lot of damage done by their drugs or alcohol in their days past... </span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[Comparably using ascorbic acid in fruit juice in the same proportions has been done as well.]... no reason why not set up both quart jars in the fridge and drink as need desires.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[[J. Orthomolecular Psychiatry, vol 6, no 4, pg 300-308, 1977 documents the Libby&Stone reporting]]</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">In my opinion, the most stunningly hopeful observation in the Libby&Stone pilot study was that the recovering addicts actually LOST ANY CRAVING FOR DRUGS while on even merely their maintenance dosing !!! One even tried to undo progress when encountering his former dealer, but became angry at the dealer because the product supplied had little effect , to the extent that he forcefully suggested that the dealer had cut the concentration.. lol...</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Think about that, let that sink in…..immune from drugging..</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Now for some of the confirming studies to prove it works as kindly as claimed while being ‘effective’, namely amazingly minimizing the terrifying WITHDRAWAL PHASE...as described above as ‘inhuman costs’.....</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">1--- the Evangelou et al study GOING HEAD-to-HEAD with CONVENTIONAL treatment.</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">.. for HEROIN addiction.. to document the success levels in minimizing WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME effects of stopping drugs...</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[[ Powerful drugs like </span><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #040c28; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">opiates, heroin, and methamphetamine</span><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> lead to some of the most severe examples of life-threatening drug withdrawal symptoms. Extreme delusion and hallucinations during the withdrawal may cause a person to hurt themselves or others.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">AND</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Withdrawal symptoms are usually worst </span><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #040c28; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">during the first week after quitting, peaking during the first 3 days</span><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">. From that point on, the intensity of symptoms usually drops over the first month. However, everyone is different, and some people have withdrawal symptoms for several months after quitting..</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">SO…. now the Evangelou results:........</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[[Heroin Withdrawal Protocol Days 1-3]]</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/HeroinWithdrawalProtocolDays1-3.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="261" data-original-width="430" height="261" src="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/HeroinWithdrawalProtocolDays1-3.png" width="430" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">AND</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[[Heroin Withdrawal Protocol Days 4-6]]</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/HeroinWithdrawalProtocolDays4-6.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="261" data-original-width="430" height="261" src="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/HeroinWithdrawalProtocolDays4-6.png" width="430" /></a></div><br /><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span><p></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Which produced stellar results right away...</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Roboto, sans-serif" style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[[EvangelouHead-to-Head-vsStandardResultsDay2]]</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/EvangelouHead-to-Head-vsStandardResultsDay2.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="258" data-original-width="439" height="258" src="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/EvangelouHead-to-Head-vsStandardResultsDay2.png" width="439" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">AND</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="color: #4d5156; font-size: 16px; text-align: left; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[[EvangelouHead-to-Head-vsStandardResultsDay4-4Weeks]]</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/EvangelouHead-to-HeadResultsDay4-4Weeks.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="258" data-original-width="439" height="258" src="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/EvangelouHead-to-HeadResultsDay4-4Weeks.png" width="439" /></a></div><p></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><b>Yes vitC defeated conventional treatment..better than 2-to-1..</b> which means that less than 10% of those patients on vitC had bad withdrawal symptoms -vs- over 58% on the conventional therapy having bad withdrawal symptoms.. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[90% being symptom light with C -vs- 42% being symptom light without C = 2-to-1, eh?] </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">and that's the hardest period, Day2</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><b>AND </b></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><b>the defeat margin widens TOTALLY to victory for vitC.. over time..</b></span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Note crucially that only some of the vitC patients were under in-house care through the withdrawal hazards, since those hazards were potentially severe in past standard of care withdrawal attempts, BUT some patients were simply back home operating on their own, yet the results were uniformly so desirable… </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Huge implications for patients' independence as well as in cost of care and oversight and brick and mortar expense as well, for the standard conventional arrangement…</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Whose benefit???</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 14pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">2---Libby and Stone --the earliest proof of efficacy </span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">-- will be linked at the bottom of this posting... a month long study with 30 addicts observed for 30days with 100% cures... and discovery that any incursion of their old habit produced no 'high' when their body was saturated with vitC at mere maintenance doses.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">3---Freeman and Sanders -- in 1978 in SanFrancisco</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">, also successful and demonstrated even what the opinion of the addicts being treated was because by the end of the study's 276 subjects, 30-40 at a time, the word was so favorable from former addicts that street addicts started coming voluntarily to see if they could be included.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">4---Seattle's Keller-Phelps challenge:</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Yes Keller-Phelps brought NIDA in for a thorough introduction to the success at her clinic</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><a href="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/PhelpsCallsNIDA.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="258" data-original-width="439" height="258" src="http://10c98f3.netsolhost.com/Files4Transfer/2024-03/IndyMichael-AddictionCuring/PhelpsCallsNIDA.png" width="439" /></a></span></div><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></span></p><span style="font-size: 12pt; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Yes, NIDA admitted the program was a stunning success, but stonewalled til challenged over the phone [with several eager witnesses in the Dean's Office], but declined to adopt the program because the success would make 80% of his staff useless and expendable.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p>So now you see what you would be up against... Are you in?</span><p></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">There are so many others who would benefit if a breakthrough could be achieved in understanding the vitC biology that has been demonstrated and suppressed... like high-dosing for pregnancy for perfect outcomes, not 20% stillbirths and miscarriages [even frighteningly higher now after the vaccine RICO crimes] and for cancer patients with no pain and full quality of life for whatever time they have which remaining time further was five times longer than with conventional therapies in stage 4 cases. </span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">In my opinion, VitC should be a national security reserved material.. We could end the CCP and MexicanCartel's deadly fentanyl assault on Americans, a form of warfare... In fact, back in WW2, vitC ordered by a young American doctor in WW2 was </span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-style: italic; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">likely the reason American troops so thoroughly beat Rommel in the desert.</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> </span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Are you in? With drug addicts volunteering and pushers failing to sell, the crime rates would drop precipitously. Don't you agree? Fewer suicide and overdose victims too and strengthened first responders once they saw the results and tried maintenance doses appropriate for their own stressful workload.</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Plus a huge reduction in Criminal Court caseload.. The Court problem now should be the question of just WHO IS REALLY TO BLAME FOR THE INDIVIDUAL WRONGDOING? </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">It’s theoretically much easier to be more generous, more civil, more clearly thinking of consequences when one has the delightful feeling described in the test results as feeling vibrant wellness and wholesome appetite and sleeping well.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">When some have simply been robbed of their wellbeing and strength of character by distant actors, some long ago, some definitely NOW, who do not stand trial as they should, along with their robbed victims…</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Because the Evangelou results from the high, continuous dosing with C, at the 4week testing showed complete renewal of wellbeing and improvement in psychokinetic behavior. <b>Those government officials, and medical school research administrators should bear their share of every robbed person’s impaired psychological BEHAVIOR. Don’t you agree?</b> So ….</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Are you in? </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">For the record I am not doing any of this vitC in sales or grants or whatever. By profession I was a mathematical decision analyst consulting in property and casualty insurance as well as later in retail [Federated, now Macy].. <i><b>I surely would like to see vitC in its various forms produced in the USA, considering the world we live in AND the fact that 90% of its production is done in China</b></i>... the rest by a Dutch company with facilities in Scotland.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Perhaps some of my elected officials will have expected my complaining letter and were swayed, in advance, by annoyance to turn away because they will have received earlier of my emails on various civic concerns, including the Covid disaster. Total silence so far... but there's hope.. here</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">TTYL</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Most sincerely,</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Dr MJ Raicchyk, PhD [UCin 1970]</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Mathematical Decision Analyst, long retired</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">now in rural western Appalachian Ohio, USA</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"><br /></span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Research article:</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v10n17.shtml</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">for the Libby and Stone pilot study, at theISOM</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; white-space-collapse: preserve;">[International Society of Orthomolecular Medicine].</span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> </span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-size: 11pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Vitamins in REAL OPTIMUM DOSES are the REAL POWER NEEDED.</span><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> </span></p><br /><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span face="Arial, sans-serif" style="font-size: 12pt; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-position: normal; vertical-align: baseline; white-space-collapse: preserve;"> </span></p><br /></span>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-25038875240662572742021-07-09T15:50:00.083-07:002021-07-13T17:57:56.016-07:00Justice Lost -- Montgomery County Medical Examiner's SHAME<font face=arial size="4">
<b><EM>To Kent Harshbarger,<BR></EM> Montgomery County Medical Examiner:</b>
<br><br><br>
<IMG SRC="http://www.cighe.net/Files4Transfer/2021-07/IndyMichael-onMurderAccomplices/Hojo-jutsu.jpg" ><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/Files4Transfer/2021-07/IndyMichael-onMurderAccomplices/MontgomeryMedExaminerSHAME.jpg">
<BR><UL><UL><UL>
If there are any decent bones in your body left....... RECANT............
<BR><BR><b>
Goldson was <BR>
NEVER <BR>
"found HANGING" <BR>
<BR><BR>
as the <BR>
*SUSPECTS* <BR>
claim<BR>
<br><br>
... ONLY **SUSPECTS** WORDS
<BR><BR>
Evidence says NEVER HUNG
<BR><BR>
RECANT <BR>
<br>
So Coroner Harshbarger,
<br> <br>
"PROTECTOR OF THE DECEASED" as coroner's are under oath to do... <br>
Where is your loyalty? To the Deceased? <br>
<br>
RECANT
<br> <br>
...lest you think you can escape the reality of the evil YOU ARE AN ACCOMPLICE TO <br>
by trying to claim that such TORTURE WOULD TAKE TOO LONG TO DO IN THE LIMITED TIME ON THE VIDEO OF THE THUGS HANDLING THE VICTIM IN THE CELL AND OUT OF VIDEO MONITOR SIGHT..
<br> <br>
Let me point out that HOGTYING is a STANDARD TACTIC TAUGHT IN POLICE TRAINING.
<br> <br>
Of course, the version taught only cinches the shackles on the ankles to the cuffs on the suspect's wrists, behind their back... and it is to be done IN A MATTER OF SECONDS IN CASES WHERE THE SUSPECT IS RESISTING ARREST AND WOULD POSSIBLY KICK THE CRUISER'S WINDOWS OUT, if not restrained completely.
<br> <br>
WELL, for the record.. GOLDSON WAS ALREADY IN SHACKLES AND CUFFS, and clearly was NOT RESISTING at any point in the video of their dragging him out of the cruiser, with intent to have him fall face down on the concrete floor, nor in the scenes of yanking him through doorways to reach the cell.
<br> <br>
FURTHER, in the TESTIMONY OF BOTH THUGS [Schadle and Dunning], they threw him DOWN ON THE FLOOR OF THE CELL, immediately on crossing the threshhold, and even admitted that they threatened him if he tried to get up.... IN THEIR TESTIMONY TO BCI...
<br> <br>
SO AT TIME ZERO on the video clock, GOLDSON IS DOWN ON THE FLOOR, CUFFED [multiple sets] and SHACKLED and NOT RESISTING..
<br> <br>
VISUALIZE IT YOURSELF... 15 seconds MAX to take that STANDARD HOBBLE STRAP AND RUN IT AROUND THE SHACKLES, UP TO THE THROAT AND BACK TO THE SHACKLES.. of a victim, passively, thrown to the floor, with cuffs behind his back and shackled....
<br> <br>
...count... while you visualize... 15 seconds<br> is more than adequate for a recruit who has practiced hogtying.
<br> <br>
And yes, in police training, the recruits are told that it is HIDEOUSLY WRONG to use the throat, and not the wrist/cuffs, but ORDERS AND RULES MEAN VERY LITTLE TO THUGS WHO ARE ANGRY..
<br> <br>
And yes, ALL THE VIDEO CLEARLY SHOWS THUGGISH ANGER.
<br> <br>
Add a few more seconds to tighten, take at least one set of cuffs off and pick up Goldson's shoes and blanket and the belt... and walk back out...
<br>EASILY FITTING INTO THE **96 SECONDS**
<bre>[80seconds more than the 15 max] THEY HAD TO ACCOMPLISH
<br>THEIR **PARTY AT THE JAIL**..
<br> <br>
Feeling so smug that HE WOULD KILL HIMSELF, so they could DELUDE THEIR OVERSEERS WITH *STATEMENTS* ABOUT GOLDSON KILLING HIMSELF, the thugs emerge from the cell with the shoes, the blanket, the belt and a set of cuffs --- NO SIGN OF THE EVEN MORE GANGLY AND CLANKY SHACKLES IN ANY OF THEIR HANDS...
<br> <br>
YOU, KENT HARSHBARGER, MUST RECANT YOUR ENABLING COVERUP.
<br> <br>
Should you attempt to cling to the DECOY SHEET as your feeble evidence...
<br> <br>
The one they used to fool YOU into swallowing their lie that they SAY THEY FOUND HIM ^^HANGING**,... even tho the sheet showed no PHYSICAL SIGNS OF HAVING BEEN EVER **STRESSED** BY SUCH A FORCEFULLY HANGING WEIGHT..
Well let's look at the PHYSICS OF HOW THEY FAKED THE SHEET DECOY.
<br> <br>
</ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/Files4Transfer/2021-07/IndyMichael-onMurderAccomplices/Access2Sprinkler-2thugmethod.jpg">
<ul><br> <br>
RECANT <br>
The thugs had a full <br>TEN MINUTES <br>
TO CUT THE SHEET IN HALF, <br>
CINCH ONE HALF [nice neat and bunchy] AROUND GOLDSON'S THROAT [after removing the murder strap], <br>
and do the PRYING & CINCHING AROUND THE SPRINKLER.. <br>
<br>
A FULL 11 MINUTES BEFORE THE EMTS ARRIVE.
<br> <br>
RECANT. <br>The sheet was a decoy to fool the naive and the stupid..
<br> <br>
The gates of Hell are waiting for the ACCOMPLICES.
<br>
RECANT OR PACK YOUR BAGS.
</b> <BR></UL></UL></UL>
<//font>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-25921698864983536062018-05-31T13:30:00.001-07:002018-05-31T16:52:25.591-07:00Brown County Gusweiler's DeathSquad Coverup Hits the Fan in Federal Court Wrongful Death CaseAnyone that was around Brown County in 2013-15 will remember all the days when they couldn't open the local newspapers without seeing mention about the <b>'Death in Brown County's Jail'</b> or<b> Zachary Goldson. </b>
<br><br>
<b><i><u>The jail and the Coroner had differing opinions</u> over whether the death was <u>a suicide or a homicide</u></i></b>. The Coroner stood alone.
<br><br>
Brown County courts denied the then Coroner Judith Varnau a chance to hold *another* inquest over the death, despite there NOT having been a 1st inquest into the matter. Which also kept Zachary's mother from getting any closure over the properly coroner-declared homicide.
<br><br>
Media coverage has died down over the years and it would be easy to think that everything's blown over...<b>except there's a Wrongful Death Case IN FEDERAL COURT</b> (<u>not Gusweilers' court</u>) against the accused deputies still ongoing as filed by Zachary's momma (Christy Dennis) and family -- technically by the administrator for Zachary's estate Ashley Bard.
<br><br><br>
The <a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/WrongfulDeathFederalCase/Goldson Memo in Opp doc 91.pdf" TARGET="NEW">latest round of court documents</a> caught our interest. The Defendants' (the DeathSquad) Lawyers have filed for summary judgment, stating all the evidence against their clients was mere 'opinion.'
<br><br><br>
How about we take a look at what could be some very damning 'opinions'?
<br><br><br>
<b>1st:</b> There are 'opinions' of other law enforcement individuals, including Hamersville's own Police Chief, that the mark around Zachary Goldson's neck looked more like it came from 'a dog leash' and another law enforcement member suggested a similar but more relevant possibility would be a hobble strap -- USED AS A COLLAR, not its intended use. A hobble is a strap used by police for additional restraint of legs when transported in cruisers, so that the leash end can anchor and prevent the shackled legs of the apprehendee from kicking out the vehicle's windows. Use as a 'collar' is forbidden.
<ul><ul><ul><ul><img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/WrongfulDeathFederalCase/hobble-leash.jpg" WIDTH="200" ></ul></ul></ul></ul>
FURTHERMORE it was other law officer's opinions that <b>A bunched-up sheet wouldn't make as <i><b>smooth edged, narrow, even-width mark</b></i> as was present on Mr. Goldson's throat</b>. And that mark wasn't there when they roughly dragged Mr Goldson through the entry room on the surveillance video, so where did it come from?
<br><br>
<br><br>
<b>2nd:</b> The sheriff's chief deputy removed (for 'upgrading') the sprinkler head that they claimed Mr. Goldson hung himself from before the investigation of said sprinkler could be conducted for any court cases that could follow. As such any re-creation of events done in that cell would be problematic. (A felony of evidence destruction) However, a Mr Scott G Roder and his staff (who do <a href="http://www.evidence-room.net" TARGET="NEW">forensic scene reconstruction</a> for a living) made a re-creation of Cell 15 that Mr. Goldson supposedly hung himself in. And as part of the court-case discovery process they produced calculations and video evidence of their attempts to reach across the open space to the sprinkler and tie the required knots while standing on the rim of the cell's sink and leaning at that difficult angle, without using one hand on the ceiling to counter the leaning-angle since both hands were needed to work on prying and tying. <i>Not possible</i>. All confirmed by the sprinkler system providers as well who insisted that, additionally <i>a tool of some kind would be needed</i>, while wrestling with the sheet, to pry the escutcheon of the sprinkler away from the ceiling where <i>the installers tighten them securely for their profession's safety reasons</i>.
<br><br><br>
<b>3rd:</b> Now this gets really damning of the deputies' honesty. The currently existing copy of the <b>security hall video</b> (which was unprofessionally at best in the extended custody of the suspected deputies) does, at least, have the scene of the deputies entering and exiting the cell after they supposedly took the cuffs and shackles off of Mr Goldson and left him in the cell. <b>Close examination of the scenes shows</b> that there is a severe discrepancy in their testimony as <b>there were no shackles </b>and only two of the sets of cuffs and a transport belt they had used on him<b> in anyone's hands, pockets, belts etc when they came out</b>.
<br><br>
What were the cuffs and shackles still doing while no one was watching the alleged attempt to climb (barefoot since they did take his shoes out of the cell) and wrestle with sheets and sprinkler heads????
<br><br>
And furthermore there was <b>testimony from a reception phone area deputy</b> that said the murder <b>suspects had to retrieve 'the cuffs' per her information from the phone message</b> among the deputies after they'd split up to regular duties before 'discovering' the poor victim.
<br><br>
The hall <i>video even shows them stare more downward than upward</i> when supposedly looking at the victim in the claimed 'hanging-discovery' scene. Totally at odds with the depositions the death-squad gave to the BCI interrogators in charge of the initial investigation. How is this a matter of 'opinion'?
<br><br>
<b>4th: But this is the bit of evidence we find most interesting.</b>..and would want to know how it could possibly be an 'opinion'? Long before all this drama started, as a kid, Zachary was in an incident that electrocuted the middle finger of his left hand, leaving parts of the hand including the finger weaker and difficult to handle. Anyone that looks at Mr. Goldson's fingerprints on file can see the weakness in the middle finger. And there they are,
<ul><img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/WrongfulDeathFederalCase/fingerprints-bothHands.jpg" WIDTH="500" ></ul>
<br>
Now let's think about tying the knots required for Mr. Goldson to hang himself. If you tried doing it one-handed how far would you get, how long would it take and<b> how much help would a damaged left hand help in the matter</b>. Especially if you factor in all the other events that'd taken place beforehand and would need to take place for him to reach the sprinkler head to tie the sheet around it. Doubly especially when there was even that testimony from the sprinkler's installer that all such heads are directly flush against the ceiling, making there not be enough room for a thick, bunched up sheet to be squeezed in-between without a lot of manual work for prying and tool use.
<br><br>
This leaves evidence and 'opinions' sounding quite damning despite this all being 'just' a Wrongful Death case, coming ingeniously to likely 'homicide' conclusions
<ul><ul>even after the <b>state appointed (DeWine’s) 'special prosecutor' Daniel ‘Woody’ Breyer</b> manipulated a sweeping show til the grand jury unlawfully decided it was 'suicide', <i>not just that the suspects were not indictable</i>,
<br>AND <br>worse, after the county's own <b>judge Gusweiler</b> is still prohibiting, under threat of contempt of court, the then coroner Dr. Judith Varnau from continuing her investigating according to her sworn statutory duty,
<br>AND <br>even after coming on top of the Death squad's own lawsuit demanding the Coroner's lawful work was violating their civil rights (a case still pending in FEDERAL COURT also, <b>if any of these Federal Law Enforcers are allowed to notice this wrongful death data, rotfl at what's about to hit the fan).</b> CAUGHT! AT LAST.</ul></ul>
ROTFL, <b>as Gusweiler is <u>hopefully</u> limited in his threats of <u>contempt of court jailtime against the former Coroner</u> on top of his already imposed $7grand for working at her private files.</b>
<br><br>
Surely this is the reason that the Common Law Coroners were designated to protect the rights of the deceased, and Brown County used to have such a Coroner. Now the County is back to having a coroner per ohio law that only comes to death scenes when invited. Too bad.... But at least we can hope for the arrival of the US Marshal, making the swat team visits to the courthouse, the Sheriff's Deputies offices and wherever else the Death Squad and collaborators are now.... ttyl
indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-30065902560726364452015-06-11T15:31:00.000-07:002015-06-11T20:49:31.187-07:00Gusweiler Reads Neither the Law Nor the Filings -- Here's the ProofIs there no end to this tragic-comedy?
<br><br>
Just this month, the infamous Judge Gusweiler -- accused rightfully of adjudicating under some influence -- just proved my point.
<br><br>
Look at these 'Rulings':
<br><br>
1-- CIRCULAR REASONING -- Eagle had filed a motion to dismiss this case for a dozen unopposable reasons, from the assorted list of invalid claims in the DeathSquad lawyers bases. Including that they had already filed a case on the same issues in federal court and this current case was pitting one court against the other court since courts could differ in their orders. ROTFL as we picture the DUEL OF THE GAVELS... the DeathSquad lawyers live in the land of the grossly absurd.
<br><br>
But never fear the DeathSquad's Judge (Gusweiler of course is in their pocket as is clear already, see earlier posts) is on guard, ready with more strawmen and invalid fact-finding about 'second inquests' when the first was not completed.....
<br><br>
Obviously they have no confidence in any hold on the Federal Court Judge Barrett since that whole filing at Federal Court was just to smear the Coroner as her evidence was about to be presented to the local GrandJury looking at whether there was sufficient evidence to INDICT THE DEATHSQUAD, nothing more will be needed from that court of Southern Ohio....
<br><br>
SO HOW DID GUSWEILER EVADE THE EVIDENCE AND LOGIC AND CASE LAW?
<br><br>
Well just look at this 'ruling'
<br><br>
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilersTangle-ReadsNoLawNorFilings/RepetitionToMakeRealityFromLies.jpg" WIDTH="500">
</ul>
<br><br>
When you look at his referenced April 14th "Decision and Entry", and look to see what is the grand justification for this current argument (since the earlier one is all that is asserted), you find NADA.... LITERALLY IN THAT APRIL 14TH WORK, GUSWEILER AGAIN STATES A NAKED CONCLUSION, NOT A SHRED OF DECENT HINT OF THOUGHT ON AN ARGUMENT...
<br><br>
To be precise, all Gusweiler said on April 14th was<br><ul><i>
"The Court finds that there is great likelihood that Plaintiffs will prevail in their Declaratory Judgment Action in these cases"</i></ul>
<br><br>
That's it, that's all, no fact-finding to identify the needed single issue of law under dispute and that the rest of the facts are 'relatively undisputed' by the world of logical arguing...
<br><br>
That's what is needed to 'succeed' in a Declaratory Judgment... without that, the case GOES TO BENCH TRIAL --with Jury in Federal Court, or whereever the 'cases' are that Gusweiler is inadvertently referencing among the battle of the gavels stirred up as mudslinging frivolity.....
<br><br>
And then Gusweiler HAS THE NERVE TO STATE THAT HE'S GOING TO **INCORPORATE THOSE FINDINGS** IN THIS CURRENT RULING...... boldly implying that there was anything existing in the April document that could be incorporated anywhere... except his prejudice... oh my.. Yup, now I see it, it's on the head of that pin prick at the end of the paragraph.... OY!!!!
{/end of sarcasm attack}
<br><br>
Do you see that anywhere to be 'found' and 'incorporated'??? FAKERY
<br><br>
How can anybody stand such fraud on the court? Have these judges, like Gusweiler, recognized the possibility that no one in the law profession ever really does examine how far wrong a case could go and so it's safe to pad any situation with such fraud and expect to walk freely and even get re-elected??
<br><br>
The circular reasoning in this circle of zero dimension is so obviously a display of HOW A CRIMINAL IN BLACK ROBES CAN CAUSE THEIR PREJUDICE TO BECOME REALITY IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THEIR CRIME -- STRAIGHT REPETITION OF FALSEHOODS IN ORDER TO CONVINCE THE PUBLIC OF THAT FAKERY AS BEING REAL... straight from books on propaganda tactics... repetition becomes weight of a public's ill-formed opinion
<br><br>
Shall we let the public drink the koolaid? No we don't adore the 'public mind' but it's untolerable to think they are not suspicious yet.....
<br><br>
So maybe the next ruling will make them stronger...
<br><br>
2--GUSWEILER NEITHER READS THE LAW BOOKS NOR EVEN THE FILINGS -- and that's the most generous assessment possible to make of what he did in the ruling on the Motion to protect the Coroner's files from unauthorized access.....
<br><br>
You'll recall the hearing-ambush and the video evidence that the Death-Squad's lawyer stole from the Coroner's private files using the location that he tormented the weak Rob Junk to expose... yeah that Rob Junk who was supposed to be one of the Coroner's own lawyers. Granted he was a 'volunteer' to relieve the BC Prosecutor of her OBLIGATION to serve the County's officeholders so she enlisted Junk to do her chores and he obliged with the knowledge that the Coroner's own family lawyer (Eagle) was already doing all the litigating and needed no other fingers in the stew.....
<br><br>
After the turmoil --of the sudden appearance of one of the Coroner's WORK DATA FILES from her PRIVATE SPACE in the Coroner's ONLINE CLOUD STORAGE-- got thoroughly in an uproar as being THEFT OF OFFICIAL WORK FILES BY THE DEATH-SQUAD'S LAWYER, that thief revealed that he'd gotten the address of the file from Junk, which fact he had concealed for the ambush til after he'd smeared the Coroner with false claims that she was violating the court order to cease CONVENING AN INQUEST...
<br><br>
All of these facts on events were FULLY ADMITTED IN THE DEATHSQUAD'S LAWYERS' AFFIDAVIT.... YES A REAL, UNDER OATH AFFIDAVIT FROM ONE OF THE OPPONENTS' **LAWYERS** ...... as well as fully delineated in the opponents' FILING... and hence appeared TWICE among the "INTERESTING ARGUMENTS PROPOUNDED" AS GUSWEILER CALLS IT in his ruling..... lol.....
<br><br>
Yet after boldly claiming that he'd enjoyed those "interesting arguments" being propounded, <b>Gusweiler comes right out and says what is</b> TOTALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH ANY IDEA THAT HE HAD READ ANY OF THE FILINGS,,,
<br><br>
See for yourself, <b>Gusweiler unbelievably says that the fact that the files had been stolen was a matter to be resolved BETWEEN THE DEFENDANT AND HER I.T. PROVIDER</b> .. ROTFL...
<br><br>
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilersTangle-ReadsNoLawNorFilings/GusweilerDoesntReadFilingsB4Decisions.jpg" WIDTH="500">
</ul>
<br><br>
The esteemed Court has been again defiled...... BY GUSWEILER... ON **MULTIPLE LEVELS**...
<br><br>
He not only ignorantly OR ARTFULLY (your guesstimate) expects the public record to accept that lawyers stealing files from an opponent is OK UNDER THE LAW, or he is attempting to pretend he has EXCUSABLY MADE A MISJUDGMENT DUE TO MISUNDERSTANDING THE COMPLICATED ONLINE ARCHITECTURE WHEN THE FACTS OF THE THEFT WERE IN THE FILINGS TWICE IN FULL DETAIL..... take your pick, artful or incompetence or inexcusable failure to read the filings on which he is purportedly making rulings....
<br><br>
Gusweiler agrees that the files were STOLEN... the DeathSquads' lawyer had the files that were supposedly unavailable to the public.... he literally says that..... WHERE IS GUSWEILER'S LAW TRAINING, WHERE IS HIS UNDERSTANDING OF UNHOLY VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSECRATED IN THE RULE OF LAW IN THE U.S.A. IN OUR CONSTITUTION AS PRIVACY RIGHTS.....
<br><br>
One of the bloodhounds proposes this analogy for WHAT A JUDGE IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO EMPLOY:
<br><br>
<ul>
Suppose the Coroner had her work-vehicle parked on her driveway BEHIND SOME BUSHES, NOT EVEN TAKING IT OUT ON THE ROAD, but 'someone' snitched on the vehicle's owner by simply relaying the idea that the Coroner's unpaid assistant was working on the engine with obvious intent to have a drivable vehicle.... and the person the snitch told was a law-trained member of the community who decidedly wanted to stop work on that vehicle.
<br><br>
Next suppose that the Court had said that the Coroner could not drive the work-vehicle around and do her obligated chores (as Gusweiler has done)....
<br><br>
Furthermore that snitch said that the coroner's assistant kept the key under the doormat... all those pieces of information are then in the hands of a law-trained member of the community...
<br><br>
what would be the ONLY APPROVABLE *LEGAL* WAY TO TAKE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE???
<br><br>
why of course, any 1st year law student would tell you that the LAW-TRAINED opponent would go to law enforcement officers AND LAW ENFORCEMENT WOULD GET A ***WARRANT*** FROM A **COURT** TO SEARCH AND SEIZE THAT WORK-VEHICLE FROM ITS PARKED LOCATION ON PRIVATE PROPERTY USING THE KEY.... Agreed?
<br><br>
ANY LAW ABIDING CITIZEN SHOULD AGREE AND PERFORM THE REQUEST FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR A WARRANT......agreed?
<br><br>
<ul><ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilersTangle-ReadsNoLawNorFilings/WheresTheWarrant.jpg" WIDTH="300"> ???
</ul></ul>
<br><br>
ANYONE WHO SIMPLY USED THE KEY TO STEAL THE CAR IS A CAR-THIEF, A FELON -- IN FACT EVEN MORE CULPABLE AS HAVING BEEN FULLY LAW TRAINED INDEED....
<br><br>
AND ANYONE WHO AIDED AND ALLOWED THAT FELON-THIEF TO ESCAPE AND WALK AWAY FROM FELONY CHARGES IS ALSO A FELON....... Agreed?
<br><br>
Arrest Gusweiler. Arrest Phillips. Call the SHERIFF'S MEN ...... rotflmhoas
</ul>
<br><br>
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilersTangle-ReadsNoLawNorFilings/WheresTheWarrant.jpg" WIDTH="470"> !!!
</ul>
<br><br>
Gusweiler shows no recognition of having meant any part of his Oath of Office, nor his law license requirements. Throw the bloke in the river and see if he can swim any better than he can adjudicate... oh my, shades of domestic terrorism? Shades of Kaczynski? Shades of the Unabomber? Call the Sheriff's men.. rotfl
<br><br>
So what's your conclusion? Inexcusable laziness at logic and reading? Ignorance of the Rule of Law and it's constitutional requirements? OR ARTFUL CRIME IN ACTION TO DEPRIVE US OF JUSTICE?
<br><br>
I think the evidence is accumulating that favors the artful crime explanation, though clearly having an <b>inexcusable prejudice while pretending to adjudicate instead of recusing himself</b> would also lead to stonewalling the reading required with the judge-benefit of less work needed, allowing more focus on the art of cheating... But that says that Gusweiler is totally cynically engaging in fraud in judge's robes with likely full knowledge that he's IMMUNE from CONSEQUENCES set in place by his fellow LAWYERS IN THE LEGISLATURE with the excuse that holy justice required that judges not fear consequences...... rotfcas.....
<br><br>
To confirm this cynical criminal attitude, we'd add that Gusweiler displays total ignorance of logic OR TOTAL TYRANNICAL POMPOSITY in his peak fit of invalid demands when he imposed the 'injunction' forbidding the Coroner to DO ANYTHING WITH THE GOLDSON CASE
<br><br>
Gusweiler puffed himself up into a real fever pitch with his gavel waving in the air, threatening he would send the Sheriff's men to make his demanding threats have force...
<ul><i> "The Court does want to make its Order abundantly clear at this time. There is one action and one action only that"</i> the lowly ORC-creature female Judith Varnau <i>"may take with respect to the death of Zachary Goldson. "</i> She may grovel and beg and <i>"petition"</i> <b>me</b> the mighty <i>"Brown County Court of Common Pleas to change the cause of death... to something other than'"</i> her annoying medical opinion that it was <i>"homicide by strangulation"</i>.</ul>....
<br><br>
Don't you agree he was having a good ol fantasy... BECAUSE THAT ISN'T WHAT THE LAW REALLY SAYS.... NOR WHAT CASE LAW SAYS EVEN CLEARER..... Judge for yourself, here's the text from a recent case in the 8th District Ohio Appeal Court...
<br><br>
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilersTangle-ReadsNoLawNorFilings/2015-8thDistonORC313-saysGusweilerStupid.jpg" WIDTH="500">
</ul>
<br><br>
So did Gusweiler *just* stupidly misread the statute OR is the total picture of his bombastic delivery give away that Gusweiler was thwarted in his power grabbing attempt to control what the Coroner was allowed to do... so frustrated that he puffed himself up and twisted the statutes to bamboozle the ignorant Brown County NEWSPAPER EDITORS into mouthing his threats as if it was HOLY LAW..?
<br><br>
Which you will see is EXACTLY WHAT STUPIDLY MONEY-GROVELING WAYNE GATES DID,,, TWICE ON THIS POMPOUS THREAT ALONE.... Gates needs those Sheriff Sale advertisement pages to fund his multi section weekend paper, to the demise of the not-sufficiently equally groveling News Democrat who used to have the advertising revenues to afford multisection weekend publications back when the ND was carrying the Sheriff's ads........
<br><br>
How can they stand it?
<br><br>
How can Brown Countians stand it?
<br><br>
Wouldn't it be grand if Brown County could find <b>a judge like the one in this news story</b> from <a href="http://www.truthinmedia.com/four-illinois-officers-charged-felony-perjury-drug-case/">Truth in Media</a>
<ul><i> A transcript of the March 2014 hearing quoted the judge as saying in the courtroom following the revelation (video evidence), "All four officers lied on the stand today. ... All their testimony was a lie. So there's strong evidence it was a conspiracy to lie in this case, for everyone to come up with the same lie. ...Many, many, many, many times they all lied." </i></ul>
So now all four are charged with Felony Perjury.... WOW, don't we faint from wanting such justice here...
<br><br>
Well it looks like the TIME MAY HAVE COME WHEN THE PEOPLE OF BROWN COUNTY CAN WEIGH IN ON SLAPPING DOWN A SHERIFF WHO MISPERFORMS AS BADLY AS WENNINGER DOES -- WITHOUT WAITING FOR 2016 NOVEMBER WHEN HE'S UP FOR RE-ELECTION....
<br><br>
MORE ON THAT LATER... OR SOONEST WE CAN, NEXT POSTING.... TTYL
<br><br><br><br>
indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-38649508316630600752015-05-26T23:18:00.001-07:002015-05-31T21:26:31.144-07:00Quality of Brown County Adjudication -- NADA, all AUI -- the infamous Adjudicating Under the Influence<b>QUALITY of BROWN COUNTY ADJUDICATION --- NADA
<br><br>
GUSWEILER HIDES BEHIND STRAWMEN -- REVEALING THE GAME AT FEDERAL COURT LAST AUGUST
<br><br>
AND Boss-Shadle is Exposed By Gusweiler's Strawman -- and Sheriff Wenninger crawls in shame of association
<br><br><br>
</b>LET THE EXAMINING BEGIN <BR><BR>
First let's recap where we stand as of the moment, having analysed <b>Judge Gusweiler's recent 'Decision' on the issues </b>of <ul>
1) replacing the 'restraining order' on the Coroner's investigation plans with an INJUNCTION for which he pretended to have the requisite 4 necessary points when he barely had 1 (maybe 2 if you gave him credit for circular reasoning in CAUSING the needed precondition with the imposed injunction)<br><br>
2) quashing all the coroner's already issued Subpoenas<br>
and <br><br>
3) extending the Contempt of Court THREAT against the coroner if she even breaths anything with Goldson's name on it.
</ul>
.... along with <b>a strong response by Zachary's Momma</b> (<i>releasing everything she could get from the Coroner's files in her role as next-of-kin, several bombshells</i>)
<br><br>
-- as well as a second <b>bombshell by Eagle (the coroner's lawyer) with his knockout 'Supplemental Authority' filing </b>(<i>'reminding' Gusweiler of the <u>Curtis murder trial</u> in which Gusweiler's attitude. as well as the Appeal Court's, contradicted his attitude here</i>)...
<br><br>
We have now been waiting for the dust to settle on that Richard Curtis Murder Case 'reminder'... expecting the opposition's writhing and imagining how Gusweiler would slither out (with or without their help)... <b>meanwhile analysing the Coroner's email history</b> (that Zach's Momma had gotten) of the SO and BCI STONEWALLING instead of law-obligated co-operation with the Coroner's investigation. Seeing clearly that <i>Gusweiler had failed to enforce the Coroner's subpoena</i> to the SO (care of <i>Chief Deputy Boss Shadle withholding subpoenaed evidence</i>) for the hallway video cam evidence, aided by <i>(feigned or real) incompetence on the face of Shadle's Babe Prosecutor Little</i> (delaying by saying she couldn't do the subpoenas until she found someone in another county who knew how, wow.... til <u>the Coroner wrote the subpoenas herself</u>).
<br><br>
Those were the April 9th's posting and the 3rd of May's posting....
<br><br><br>
So yeah, <b>now for the examining... we have two big new bombshells.
<br><br><br>
ONE -- RICHARD CURTIS WANTS COPIES OF THE FILINGS in this Varnau case </b>... his request just arrived at the Clerk's office at the end of last week, straight from <b>Marion Ohio's Correctional Facility.</b> Yes, the Curtis-Murder-Trial Curtis....that Curtis...
<br><br>
How did he find out and better yet, it would seem that he might have plans to conjure a Supreme Court filing to test what the Group of Seven would think of Gusweiler's change of attitude on Coroner's investigating cases after the Death Certificate is done, and maybe whether Coroner's are mere artifacts of statute like Gusweiler now wants to smear the Coroner with.
<br><br>
<b>Do you suppose Gusweiler wants the Group of Seven raising eyebrows over his slithering?</b> lol. Slither Gusweiler slither...
<br><br><br>
<b>TWO -- Gusweiler did deny that the Curtis decision has any bearing on this Varnau case.. is there a bombshell coming?</b> or is this just 'entertainment'? We shall see... Any bets -- like we did last time --on Gusweiler acknowledging Eagle's massive point in the Curtis case law...
<br><br>
Well,,, 'in for a penny, in for a pound' was our bet that Gusweiler would reject the evidence in the Curtis Case Law that he (Gusweiler) had no exciting ideas in that Curtis case that would have reflected sane thinking about this Varnau case.... did we 'win', rotfl... let's see....
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/HowDoYouArgue-Gagged&Cuffed/GusweilerStrawmanFight.jpg" WIDTH="550"><br><br>
Yup we 'won'... <u>very</u> loosely speaking, Agreed?
<br><br>
But obviously WE HAVE OUR CONSIDERED OPINION of the Curtis dynamics that Gusweiler's 'adjudicating under the influence' was supposed to hide, AS PART OF OUR SLEUTHING'S COMPLICATED FIGURING. so let's get started confirming that Gusweiler's idea-wrestling opponent that he 'beat' to arrive at his conclusion <u>is definitely a strawman argument</u>
<br><br>
<UL> <B>STRAWMAN ARGUING</B><br>
Look at the Strawman he chose to use as his own victim. Strawman arguing is his hiding place for his treachery. Strawman arguing is done by those who cannot defeat the REAL ARGUMENT BY HIS OPPONENT. So the cowardly arguer pretends that his opponent said *something* weaker than his opponent really did... That *something* is a Strawman, no muscle, just bunches of stuffing inside his apparent clothing... Whereupon the coward proceeds to beat the stuffing out of the Strawman and shout that he won the argument....
<br><br></ul>
Recognize the cowardly Gusweiler yet.....?!?.. the basic shape seems a match so we'll look closer
<br><br>
Gusweiler had to work a bit to find a weaker candidate for 'opponent' that he could 'associate' with Eagle's case-law... and believe it or not, as we saw, Gusweiler claimed that Eagle was referring to the former Coroner changing the Cause of Death from Undeterminable to Homicide, as the parallel that Eagle had raised,,,
<br><br>
There were two Death Certificate changes in the Curtis Case --
<ul>-- the first one showing that the former coroner had totally failed to properly deal with the evidence AT THE SCENE, since the weapon, aka THE GUN, was never found (leaving the cause of death clearly not suicide, only homicide) disgracing the 'undeterminable' entry by that coroner on the original death certificate for cause of death. Other things may have been undetermined but the idea that some housekeeper misplaced such in cleaning is strictly in the movies of the absurd.
<br><br>
-- the second one showing that some serious effort at investigating... narrowing the time of death from "morning" (OR "late morning to early afternoon" per the presumptuous lunatic doing Montgomery's autopsy report with no on-site data) down to a much earlier more specific '2AM-8AM'... what a knockout improvement, involving some physical evaluations of rates of biological deterioration of the body as examined in the autopsy,,
</ul>
<br><br>
Obviously the anti-Varnau charges of <i>*excessive investigating* (not negligence ever)</i> DO NOT PARALLEL the first, only the second. But Gusweiler claims he <i>'sees' the first as the parallel</i> AND THEN SAYS IT's NOT A RELEVANT PARALLEL....wow, what a KOpunch in the stuffing.... if you submitted that gag as a script for a movie scene. the producers would show you the door..... yet we're supposed to nod and smilingly say the Judge is not a crook, be sure vote for him, groan.... this is step one of the 'test' for AUI.... THE STUFFING IS CONFIRMABLE..
<br><br>
So let's look at the second death-certificate-change and evaluate its relevance. In the interests of Justice figuring. To be technically accurate we shall eliminate the opinion that there was no decent better opponent -idea to be struggled with,,,, agreed, we should be careful and precise? No rash accusations of strawman-phonied adjudication
<br><br>
Why would Gusweiler choose to 'see' the first change of the death certificate, when instead the comparable Curtis-history to A CONVICTION-NAILING WHO-DUN-IT DETERMINATION was this <b>Coroner Varnau finding that the ligature was *not* the sheet but instead it was the hobble strap-like ligature that the thugs used to lynch the kid. She nailed the weapon's character.</b>
<br><br>
In contrast, the 'Undeterminable' was an obvious error, not a revelation, ROTFL. Varnau's revelation of 'homicide' was her ORIGINAL cause of death, determined within a month AND BASED ON SOLID AUTOPSY ANALYSIS OF SKIN IMPRESSIONS, not the former coroner's embarrassing discovery that he'd not ever looked at the evidence data... the LEO data where the weapon was nowhere to be seen when the first responder plainly made his report to summon a coroner... what a bag of stuffing game... <b>Gusweiler was desperate to favor his fraud that he would be able to beat SOMETHING so he could CLAIM HE WON against Eagle's Supplemental Authority......</b>
<br><br>
But was it the coroner's handiwork or the law enforcers? I have a theory....
<br><br>
<B>1-- MY HYPOTHESIS..</B> says Gusweiler's vision is unlikely in the extreme
<br><br>
<b>What could have caused a former coroner to make that second change -- in Time of Death... ?
</b><ul>
How about the former Coroner's recognition that <b>the first responder reporting</b> (as we see in the Appeal Court's account of the evidence) that <b>the victim's bedroom a/c had been set so cold as to make the room where the victim was found incredibly cold</b>... <i>as cold as a morgue</i>, would reliably have triggered <b>a Coroner's idea</b> that <i>an earlier time of death would be justified with some refiguring</i>...
</ul>
But <b>why would such a recognition have ever come to be</b>? When it hadn't inspired *anyone* before....
<ul>
<i>Random searching</i> the files for something to work on? Not likely... {sarcasm alert} Wouldn't that be just fine and dandy for a Coroner looking over Law Enforcement files and reports, that he never bothered with before, especially if the reason that he was looking was because the Coroner had no blessed reason to look before since nobody else had any reason to look before. {/end sarcasm} <i>No way</i>...
<br><br>
<i><b>Prodding by someone with a motive</b></i>... Such as MAYBE the new Prosecutor (Shadle's Babe) was ridiculously looking for a victim <i>(in the run-up to the elections of 2008)</i> to pay for her election and the family of the Curtis woman had made a nice 'appeal' to the wanna-be candidate who then got the idea that <i>there might be something doable if she prodded anybody for new ideas on the Curtis case</i>.. Don't you agree that looks like it..?? <i><b>Timing-wise, motive-wise...</i></b>
<br><br>
So under those circumstances, patiently <i>why wouldn't the Coroner dig back into that file for the family's kin to see whether he could find something as vitally missed as he had needed to correct in his first error correction -- as a favor to the prosecutor of his choice</i>....
<br><br></ul>
<B>Still think Gusweiler has any right to consider a Coroner as unable to bring about a murder charge? CLEARLY THE PREVIOUS CORONER DID THE DEED when he CHANGED THE TIME OF DEATH....
<br><br>
Like the continued sleuthing we need now.....!
<br><br>
2--</B> AND THIS IS NOT JUST OUR OPINION THAT GUSWEILER WAS FAKING THAT SUCH A STRAWMAN WAS SEEABLE. this is not just our opinion,,, nope,,
<br><br>
<b>Clearly even Gusweiler's favored Sheriff's Lawyers agree with us that Gusweiler's Strawman was NOT Eagle's powerful comparison point..</b> Look at this page from the Sheriff's lawyer's arguing......
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/HowDoYouArgue-Gagged&Cuffed/SheriffRevealsGusweilerStrawmanFraud.jpg" WIDTH="550"><br><br>
<br><br>
Clearly neither did <i>the Appeal Court</i> consider Gusweiler's fantasy strawman as credible in the Curtis case..... They <i>listed the Time of Death as the crucial factor in the sufficiency of the conviction, nailing the issue of 'opportunity' in the usual triad of 'motive. means and opportunity,'
</i><br><br><b>
There ought be a law against Judge's making the Rule of Law look stupid. Some people have called that sort of offense FRAUD ON THE COURT...
</b><ul>
What is "fraud on the court"?
<br><br>Here is the conventional definition -- courtesy of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals -- usually quoted:
<br><br><ul><i>
"Fraud upon the court" embraces <b>that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is <u>a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court</u></b> so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication." Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); found in 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23.
<br><br></i>
And it has consequences
<br><br>
<i>The 7th Circuit further stated "a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence
a decision at all, and never becomes final."</i>
</ul></ul>
Unfortunately the odds are miniscule to non-existent that some judge is going to apply it to a peer. But it was 'nice' of the Appeal Court to think of it.
<br><br>
There's even a rule in Ohio Civil Procedures that would apply IF the lawyers fiddling with the rules would recklessly conceive of a JUDGE making an ERROR or committing FRAUD. NO. ONLY ADVERSE PARTIES EVER WOULD MAKE MISTAKES or ENGAGE IN FRAUD. See what you think.
<br>
<ul><b>Rule 60(B) Mistakes, inadvertance, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, fraud, etc</b> <br>On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party from a final judgment for the following reasons: (1) Mistakes, etc. (2) newly discovered evidence etc (3) <b>fraud </b> (whether intrinsic or extrinsic), etc or other misconduct <b>of an adverse party</b> etc
</ul>
<br><br>
Do you suppose you could now imagine a judge committing holy fraud in his court adjudicating? After seeing it? The Rules don't 'imagine it' and the lawyers in the legislators' chairs blessed their judge-peers with full blown immunity. Otherwise judges would be intimidated, right? <i>Where's the check-and-balance in freedom from consequences... Check-and-balance was the guiding light of the careful engineers of the Constitution</i>...
<br><br>
<b>But don't think that the Sheriff's lawyer was not supporting Gusweiler. He just hadn't imagined such <u>a bag of stuffing would come rolling off the judge's dais</u></b>. Instead the sheriff's lawyers <i>pretended that <u>if the changing</u> time of death <u>wasn't some hair-splitting</u> legal issue <u>then it wasn't the point</u> of the case law</i>. Illogically ignoring Eagle's point -- that <b><u>not</u> being a legal issue</b> in the previous encounter with the comparable activity by a coroner <u>was in conflict with</u> <b>making it a legal issue now</b> and hence <i>it was inconsistent for Gusweiler to persist in that illogic.</i>
<br><br>
Sometimes you wonder what reading skills these lawyers have. Demonstratedly, their reading ability does not impress us positively. Agreed? Else we;re left with some explanation less 'palatable'....
<br><br>
To complete the lawyers limited imagining of decency in responding to Eagle's evidence, they fall back on the <b>'another inquest'</b> chanting. Are they learning ability challenged?
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/HowDoYouArgue-Gagged&Cuffed/Sheriffs2ndInquestError.jpg" WIDTH="550"><br><br>
<br><br>
<b>Isn't it strangely unsettling watching this Sheriff's mouthpiece arguing to shut down an investigation of a homicide that happened under his own nose?
<br><br>
3--</B> Clearly there's MORE to this story of Gusweiler's treachery THAN OUR CONFIRMED HYPOTHETICAL OPINION that Gusweiler is wrestling a strawman in a game of FRAUD ON THE COURT'S HOLY RULE OF LAW...
<br><br>
It's mind-boggling how A SHERIFF can stand in the public courtroom claiming justice is his life BUT<ul><br>
<B>-- authorize the stifling of law-specified investigation continuing</B> that is seeking to pursue information from those in charge of the safekeeping of the victim on circumstances, events and clues<br><br>
while simultaneously having to <br><br>
<b>accept as law-verified, that there was a HOMICIDE IN HIS JAIL, AND IT'S UNEXPLAINABLE in his own handiwork,</b> since under law the medical determination is the law-confirmed, court-accepted reality...
<br><br>
if BCI failed to deal with the homicide, you'd think the Sheriff would be adamant <b>he'd</b> *do something*!!! Like what?
<ul>His situation: he's surely looked at the marks on the kid's throat and knows it was no hanging, <i>THE SHEET WAS A DECOY, NOT THE LIGATURE THAT MADE THE DEADLY BLOODED MARKS</i>... <br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Sheet&LigatureStrapTreachery.jpg" WIDTH="500">
<br>
so -- in order to cling to his 'friend' status with 'his honorable men' -- he must also cling to the idea that either <ul>
1) -- it was an accident and the lying (that they saw Goldson "hanging" etc) was done to protect the department and him from state-overseeing consequences (<i>yet the perpetrators showed no such fear of state-level investigators, and instead messed with the evidence and boldly only supplied video cam files when they were done tampering with it</i>)
<br><br>or 2) --
there was an extremely disgraceful security failure that allowed a murderous intruder access to the jail and the jailers are lying to protect their jobs (<i>an intruder with no known motive, and from Wenninger not a word on the only available alternative that a decent Sheriff has to deflect the evidence that his 'friends' are murderous thugs </i>)...
<br><br>
no sense of his responsible authority
</ul>leaving him with <b>felony on top of felony no matter what fantasy he clings to</b>,,,
<br><br>
but there is no sign of any fantasy management either.... like re-assigning men that he has to view as 'weak' links that *jeopardize the others* under his leadership and responsibility, until he can personally nail the homicide down.... as well as nailing down where else the tentacles of felony were spreading (<i>like into the technical skilled area of security camera data tampering</i>), UNLESS YOU COUNT THE SUDDEN LEAVING OF BOSS SHADLE after Wenninger gave the plum assignment (the drug czar ) to Mt Orab Asst Chief Josh Black... suggesting recognition of 'weak link' problems (<i>when your chief deputy destroys evidence in a homicide</i>), ....
<br> <br>
nor any sign of tightening security.....
<br><br>
Speaking of security, Wenninger (if he has any logic skills) would be nervously clinging to the realization that the security camera system seemed to have failed, either technically or through treachery, and worse his up-the-line crime advisors at BCI didn't offer any guidance (<i>they failed to find any system failure to explain the homicide. and appear to have swallowed the suicide lie or *worse*</i>) ---leading to the idea that maybe he should swallow it also....
<br><br>
so Instead of being a sheriff, he works his way through the media games of being the department poster boy and ends up square in the middle of the felonies. Up to his eyeballs in a proverbial racketeering operation. Showing no signs of aptitude for being a Sheriff, on top of his disgraced lack of law-required education and experience to have been allowed to run for the office legitimately. Now compounded by the evidence that his current law-required oath to live up to the job is completely left in the debris of his fine mess...
</ul><br><b>
There are so many signs that the whole law enforcement operation under Wenninger's leadership is malfeasant <u>in the extreme</u> that it's impossible to consider his retirement. Decently HE SHOULD RESIGN -- AS HUMANLY UNABLE TO RUN A DECENT SHERIFF'S OFFICE </b>
</ul><br>
CLEARLY THE SHERIFF DOES NOT BELIEVE HE HAS TO UPHOLD THE LAW ANYMORE, IF HE EVER DID...... <B>nobody's laughing.</B>
<br><br>
Does shocking the conscience work with the Sheriff any better than we saw it 'working' (not) in judges' evaluation of evidence that takes your breath away.......?
<br><br>
Does shocking the conscience work with the Sheriff's highschool schoolmates... What would the public expect from such a 'sheriff' and his 'gang' of thugs if/when Brown Countians face extreme circumstances? CRINGE..... cringe..... cringe
<br><br>
Wenninger and his lawyers can't even get through a court challenge without smashing any semblance of rule of law, <b>The holy idea of fair fighting in law enforcement is being setup to be replaced with an unholy AMBUSH</b>... right in front of the public's eyes.... right in the Sheriff's lawyers' final salvo. Look and you will see. THEY KNOW GUSWEILER'S GAMES... and they intend to play them.....
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/HowDoYouArgue-Gagged&Cuffed/SheriffsOverbroadAmbushApproval.jpg" WIDTH="550">
<br><br>
So the fact that they realize the ambush game works in Gusweiler's court raises the parallel question:
<ul>
Would a federal judge allow that ambushing outside his reach? NOT LIKELY,,,
<br><br>
so this all comes down to the idea that they had NO PLANNED IDEA THAT FEDERAL COURT WAS ANY MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT TAR-AND-FEATHERS MISUSE OF THE U.S. FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM...... <b>BOOM</b>
</ul><br><br>
Can you see it? Boss Shadle and his conspiring Prosecutor Babe Little were shown in the recordings played in the Hanson-Jones-Petition-to-oust Coroner Varnau TRIAL to be fully able to authorize misuse of the Courts in order to smear their political opponent, since it's beyond believing that they didn't know that the trumping up of false anxiety in the souls of grieving families wasn't decent. Furthermore they are obligated to know that the claims they manufactured were actually the fault of Shadle's management of the BCSO's if anybody dug into the law's rules on who does what and what it's like to work in the real world of crime scenes.
<br><br>
For one example of the real causes of next-of-kin grief being the SO, Shadle's office has a high tech chemical van (used only for 'nuisance' pestering unbelievably as an escort for the health department's sewage 'director') that is built to deal with crystal meth blowups/cleanups. Possibly humanly your tax dollars at work. If any one was responsible for cleaning up the suicide mess of blowing the top of the young fellow's head off, it was Shadle. Ditto it turned out to be Shadle's and Wenninger's fault for every blessed claim that hearse-chaser Hawkins waved around.
<br><br>
<b>Misuse of the Courts is Shadle's MO. And this conflict now between the CommonPleas Gusweiler and the Federal Court's Barrett NOW LOOKS TOTALLY LIKE THE STEPS THREE-THRU-SIX IN SHADLE'S STRATEGY TO TAR-AND-FEATHER THE CORONER WHO WAS CHASING THE MURDERER IN THE JAIL STAFF (including Shadle's offspring).... THEY HAVE NO CASE IN FEDERAL COURT. AND AS WE SAW, IT WILL BE LIKELY THROWN OUT.</b>
<br><br>
It was all just rubbish-heaping when Shadle & Little's first attempt (with the petition to court) fell apart and the second griefstricken relatives' case (Elfers) was hanging back too much to be of use while the Elfer's family's lawyer observed the loss in the Hanson/Hawlins Petition case. SO THEY NEEDED SOME OTHER SMEAR. The claims they (Boss Shadle and his lawyer) threw together for federal court were based -- sometimes fully openly and wrongly -- on *state* law AND the state law hadn't been shown to have failed in their cause, so the case was a losing battle from the start as a genuinely federal court case by anyone with any idea of the limits of each court system.
<br><br><b>
Their benefit -- implying and consistent with motive -- was to use the 'mighty' U.S. Government's *image* as supporting them. Infinitely better than Gusweiler and local court filing in the public/media's mind AND TIMED TO DAMAGE THE IMAGE OF THE CORONER AS SHE WAS BRINGING HER EVIDENCE BEFORE THAT GRAND JURY.... </b>
<br><br>
Maybe they even thought the GrandJury might smell some of the Breyer/Hornyiak lying, so the smear was needed... and they'd be simultaneously prepping the public to swallow the defeat of the Grand Jury ...
<br><br>
Once they had the GrandJury suckered into agreeing with Breyer, then it was safe to use Gusweiler, and his disgraceful court that Brown County had no choice that would have enabled the voters to remove him at election time... all they had to do for openers was seek a temporary restraining order (claiming justice would arrive) but knowing it was Gusweiler's ambushes and strawmen they were wanting then... and just as soon as the case went far enough to defeat any interest the Federal Court might have considered, then Gusweiler would be in charge.
<br><br>
TOTAL ABUSE OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM
<br><br>
Shadle's MO is confirmed. Likely the MURDER RAP is fairly clearly entertaining everybody keeping score. <B>But there should be FEDERAL court sanctions FOR ABUSE OF COURT -- JUST LIKE OTHER FORMS OF FRIVOLOUS FILINGS. There is no way any honorable bones exist in those 'law enforcement' officers. </B>
<br><br>
Perhaps there's something useful to be learned from this scam Shadle set in motion. Think about the idea of standing around the perimeter of the next election's voting sites THIS FALL with a blessed petition -- based on the surprising ORC 3.07 and 3.08 -- to OUST GUSWEILER and WENNINGER, the central empowering criminals in BC law enforcement. Maybe include Shadle's Babe LITTLE as well,,,,,, ALL SIGNERS you would encounter WOULD AUTOMATICALLY BE REGISTERED VOTERS (nothing to tediously check)..... Doesn't that sound invigorating? just need a lawyer who can support the idea that there are flaws in the election process that jeopardize PUBLIC SAFETY,,, of course some crook in Columbus would decide on replacements for each disposed official, unless the extent of the turmoil would justify a SPECIAL ELECTION.... What say you......... hmmmmm..... TTYL
<br><br><br><br>
indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-54331275329802393632015-05-03T21:06:00.001-07:002015-05-13T11:09:30.779-07:00The 'Inartful' Art of Calculated Derailing of Justice - BackfiresGusweiler's Orders inartful? -- or exactly what ART is GUSWEILER PRACTICING??
<br><br>
ANSWER: The CALCULATED ART OF DERAILING JUSTICE
<br><br>
In writing Briefs and Decisions there is a usual structure expected. First recount the history of the disputed events. Then recount the in-court blow-by-blow of Motions and Responses, etc. which is called the Procedural Posture... After which begins the development of the Argument and Conclusion.... Well.....
<br><br>
Gusweiler purports to start out with 'history' as would be normal BUT HE DECIDEDLY OMITS CRUCIAL EVENTS from one side's history. Guess which side has diligently managed every step they took and had documented all contacts and is now being gagged.....
<br><br>
The whole question of what the history status of the Coroner's efforts in seeking justice GOT LEFT OUT BY GUSWEILER.... for a reason..
<br><br>
And that obviously central history shows that the Sheriff's Office and Prosecutor were not responding to the Coroner's justice efforts AS THEY ARE OBLIGATED TO DO, ala ORC 313.09 which states, in pertinent part:
<br><ul><i>
"The sheriff of the county, the police of the city, the constable of the township, or marshal of the village in which the death occurred may be requested to furnish more information or make further investigation <b>when requested by the coroner </b>or his deputy."
</i></ul>
And once the evidence ball was passed to BCI by Shadle's SO, they likewise stonewalled requests from the Coroner for evidence.
<br><br>
So in the interests of making Justice possible, let's show the world the email records that Zachary's Mother acquired legitimately from the Coroner, showing the status of the work on her son's case.
<br><br>
Beginning on OCTOBER 25th 2013 -- keep that date in mind since the LEO liars have tried to duck their malfeasance egg on their face (for the tampered hallway video) by saying the Coroner didn't ask for the tapes in time....
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST-2.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST-3.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST-4.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST-5.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
Hold on... dear Johnny Shadle HAS the HALLWAY VIDEO (Nov 22nd) according to his babe Prosecutor Little BUT HE REFUSES TO TURN IT OVER TO THE CORNER IN SPITE OF THE SUBPOENA IN HIS HANDS (Nov 25th)...... <b>BANG</b><br><br>
But this has CONSEQUENCES besides,,, <br><br>
The blessed GUSWEILER IS OBLIGATED TO **ENFORCE** THE CORONER's SUBPOENAS -- <b>DOUBLE BANG</b>
<br><br>
<b>So not only did Gusweiler violate the law, but Gusweiler's responsible for the FIRST INQUEST NOT BEING DONE..</b>... holy Mackerel! How does he dare call the Coroner's Inquest "her second inquest"? Fraud alert in Gusweiler's Court Order.. he's a fraud, for not rejecting Phillips claim that the inquest Dr Varnau is preparing is a claimed-illegitimate 'second' inquest.
<Br><BR>
He's gaming the Public with full knowledge that her first inquest is still ahead to be completed and reported. And quashing all her subpoenas under color of that 'second' fraud. Here's the one sent for Shadle to hand over the Sheriff's Office's videos, all listed. It's addressed to Sheriff Wenninger's authority and has Gusweiler's signature! deadlined as at November 27th 2013...... <br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST-6.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST-7.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Incomplete1stInquest/Incomplete1stINQUEST-8.jpg" WIDTH="480">
</ul>
CLEARLY THERE'S A LENGTHY HISTORY OF CRIMINAL BLOCKING OF THE CORONER'S INVESTIGATING -- precisely by the Sheriff's Office, and even BCI -- both seeking Gusweiler's muscle in this Court to continue their stonewalling of Justice -- so the Coroner's FIRST INQUEST IS STILL IN PROGRESS whether they label it closed or not...
<br><br>
Which means Gusweiler turned a blind eye to the evidence/testimony in his SUPPOSED FACT-FINDING and CALCULATEDLY CHOSE TO CALL THE CORONER's USE OF HER POWERS OF THE INQUISITION A **SECOND** INQUEST... <b>for public misperception</b> as well as twisting the focus of his argument <b>so he could claim her duties and rights were extinguished by now.</b> Nada could she be allowed to do after she finished her Death Certificate <b>(a Health Dpt project, law-written as separate from Justice projects)</b>..... So no further work on the Goldson death case was 'authorizable' in his imagined fantasy rule of law, wanting the public to not think of cases being reopened, just remembering hazily the ultimate prohibition against "double jeopardy" as a blessed safe-guard to citizens.
<br><br><br>
Gusweiler shielded from view the fact that <b>new evidence (or updated methods applied to unsolved cases) authorizes the Coroner to REOPEN a DEATH INVESTIGATION as was seen in the Curtis Case History in Gusweiler's own Court</b> as was shown twice in Eagle's <b><i>Supplemental Authority</i></b> filing challenging Gusweiler's Orders that we are now ripping up here. Which challenge by Eagle, Phillips is attempting to counter as being inappropriate in application to this Goldson case since Phillips claimed that the Curtis case was re-opened 'by the prosecutor', And Phillips expects us to think that PRESUMABLY the Prosecutor had no interesting "guidance" from anyone else... Rotfl as if the Prosecutor imagined she had anything new that <i>caused </i>the then Coroner to re-examine the medical records... Causation clearly would not be needed only if the Coroner had no ideas of his own
<br><br>
BUT LOOKING AT THE EVIDENCE USED TO FINALLY GET THE CURTIS CONVICTION -- as seeable in the Appeal court confirmation posted in our previous episode -- THE ONLY LIKELY *NEW* EVIDENCE WAS THE *CORONER'S* UPDATED EVALUATION OF THE TIME OF DEATH which put Curtis at the scene and seeable as the only known suspect at the scene...
<br><br>
The rest of the evidence was OLD NEWS -- other than Curtis' fellow inmate claiming Curtis confessed to him, conveniently for the Prosecutor, after the case was well re-opened and Curtis in custody after extradition from down in Florida which claimed-sonfession clearly didn't reopen anything !! <i>All the rest of the evidence was old news of life insurance and court-involved domestic trouble and past licensed gun ownership and his then pillowcase 12 years ago</i>. THE CASE WAS BLOWN OPEN BY THE CORONER'S RE-INVESTIGATING THE TIME OF DEATH regardless of whoever thought of digging into a high profile unsolved old case that had been already brushed up to improve the direction that Law enforcement needed to take. All of which would interest a coroner (realizing that his earlier ERROR on cause of death was still nagging) to familiarize himself with what flaws might still be opportunities to assuage his conscience.
<br><br>
Want to bet whether the old crook Gusweiler opines this Phillips' attempted disqualification of the Curtis Case Law authority is "well taken"? Would he dare? Well as we are already seeing the old crook has already grossly violated the Court's responsibility to FACT-FINDING as well as required LAW READING, so "in for a penny, in for a pound" is our bet
<br><br><br>
Nor does the reality that the Coroner's investigation is not done YET mean that the Coroner prematurely filed the Health Dpt's Death Certificate... the only other lawful document-allowed choices for that crucial entry were suicide or undeterminable for the time being... neither of which was true or accurate..... and suicide was impossible based on just the ligature marks on the victim's throat and neck, as we have seen all the way back in last October's episode when Zachary's Mother released to the press the data from the Coroner's office that Zach's mom acquired as Next-of-Kin.
<br><br>
See for yourself that HOMICIDE IS THE ONLY JUSTIFIABLE DEATH CERTIFICATE ENTRY POSSIBLE... based on this autopsy analysis by the Coroner.... and it was done timely, as they say.... timely matters and the Coroner does what matters.....
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Sheet&LigatureStrapTreachery.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/CompletedDeathCertificate/strangulationTheory.jpg" WIDTH="240">
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/CompletedDeathCertificate/strangulationTheory-hangingmarks.jpg" WIDTH="240"><br>
...notice that the normal ligature marks for strangulation and vertical hanging (official story)are distinctly different and represent the physical reality of the direction of the force applied and the noose needed for a suicide-hanging... the sheet tied on Zach's neck was knotted on the side of his head so the hanging-force would stretch the sheet straight up along the side of his head from the primary knot slightly behind his ear AND the ligature violently compress the neck all the way around the back of the neck... whereas the actual deadly blooded ligature mark doesn't go all the way around Zach's neck... See for yourself....<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/CompletedDeathCertificate/strangulationTheory-backofZhead.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
....and the force applied to produce those blooded marks went up from behind though at an angle to his spine, not parallel like the usual hanging CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN THE WAY THE JAILERS FOUND ZACH 'HANGING" FROM THE SPRINKLERHEAD<br>
So clearly the blooded ligature marks were not 'hanging' marks, <b>making the claim that the jailers 'found him hanging' a total FABRICATION </b>but without really solving what precisely the actual causation acts were. <b>The sheet was thoroughly suspect then as well,</b> with one end tied to the sprinklerhead in the ceiling and one end neatly knotted around his neck <b>AND NO OTHER LIGATURE IN SIGHT... where did it go!</b>
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/CompletedDeathCertificate/strangulationTheory-livormortis.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
...and the intertissue blood settled into the skin area on Zach's back, not on his feet.. so gravity-settled blood shows Zach was not hanging vertically when he died in the period after the blood pumping stopped... else the extended hanging til claimed-discovery would have sent the 'livor mortis' to Zachs feet and there was none there<br>
A thoroughly stupid medical examiner in Montgomery County actually wrote that the body's condition was consistent with hanging and was found with a ligature around his neck. Unbe-freakin-lievable. No physical sense.
<br>
The blooded marks were 0.5 inch wide and the bunched up sheet was a full 1.5 inch width. The knots showed no serious tightening from a tension of a hanging body, and the sheet was clearly missing any sign of tension having been severely applied. The idea that the 1.5 inch width would compress to 0.5 under the strains of the weight stretching on the length would be something to expect a sophisticated answer from BCI but no, nada. Should we have expected their skepticism to emerge when the Coroner alerted them or they'd produce some science attempt to justify their rejection of the Coroner's observation? Darn right we should ! Look what we found....
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/CompletedDeathCertificate/StrangulationLigature-PoissonRatio4wovenfabric.jpg" WIDTH="480"><br>
The abstract above from the University of Zagreb would answer such a puzzle, handily. The Poisson's Ratio says that the strain of compression on the crosssection of such a fabric (woven textile) would be in the range of about 0.4 as an example so the Poisson ratio of the compression percentage of the width to the stretching percentage on the length would be roughly around 0.4
<br>
Now the supposed Medical Examiner and/or BCI saying that their swallowed compression strain on the sheet from the hanging was (1.5-0.5)/1.5 = 66% so the strain on the stretching length must be figured straightforwardly: <ul>
Poisson Ratio = compression strain / stretching strain..... <br>
so substituting gives <br>
0.4 = 66% / stretching strain <br>
which solves to stretching strain = 66% / 0.4 = 166% <b>[in other words the sheet had to stretch 166% of its original length in order to compress its width down to 66% </b></ul>
Any one think they could stretch a sheet 166% of its starting length?
And worse, have such a deformed fabric go right neatly back to its snug fit around his neck, with tidy, knotted configuration once the stress was released??
How could BCI, much less the MedicalExaminer swallow the OBVIOUS DECOY AS REAL??? <br>
No science in their brains, no physical experience in their life???
<br>
Coroner Varnau beats them hollow, with her own analysis of the marks, their shape, the uniform width of the marks, the impossibility of the compression of the DECOY and topped it off with a close inspection of the weave pattern on Zach's skin where the ligature was pressed !! <br>
For which the idiots showed disdain. Brown County should demand their money back from Montgomery and even moreso from DeWine's so-called forensics experts ... lol -- call the County Commissioners, and show them the incredible failure of their trusted expenditure
</ul>
But a lot more was derivable from the medical and body and scene data that a Coroner is obligated to acquire, analyse and keep. Gusweiler doesn't want you to know that and insists that the Coroner is a simple ORC-created clerk who uses expert medical knowledge of the body to fill in the blanks on the Death Certificate and then goes away. IGNORING THAT USING HER MEDICAL OBSERVATIONS AND LOGIC SHE IDENTIFIED THE WEAPON AS WELL AS DESTROYING THE OFFICIAL STORY, making his defense of the LYING JAILERS A TOTAL FAILURE OF FACT-FINDING....
<br><br>
Gusweiler literally says that the Coroner is a trinket created by the ORC WITH NO COMMON LAW TRADITION BEHIND HER. A cheap slur on his part in order to diminish his intended victim he wants to gag and handcuff AS WELL AS being a lie that's part of the lawyers' Bar Association attempts to consolidate their power and control against a coroner as a possible challenging contender..... JUST LIKE THE LAW ASSOCIATIONS ARE STILL ATTEMPTING TO DO WITH JURY POWERS...... Look up <a href="http://www.fija.org">FIJA -- the Fully Informed Jury Association</a> -- who preserve the long established RIGHT OF THE JURY TO JUDGE THE VALIDITY OF THE LAW AS WELL AS THE GUILT OF THE ACCUSED LAW-BREAKER... The lawyers make the laws (most legislators are lawyers) and they apply the laws in the courts as judges and prosecutors (exclusively lawyers), so they don't want you the public to decide their chosen law is INVALID AND OF NO FORCE, A NULLITY AND VOID, TO BE DISREGARDED. <br><br>
As juries should do with every Marijuana case since <b>the designation of marijuana as a level 1 drug is based on the lie that it has no medical merit, while instead the Department of Health and Human Services HOLDS MULTIPLE PATENTS ON MARIJUANA AS A MEDICAL CURE</b>... <br><br>
The Rule of Law requires that laws be based on truth and be intelligible for people to understand and be able to honor and held accountable for as our contract (agreeing to be governed) with Common Law government. Rightfully it is not necessary that the Public petition lawmakers to undo the violation of the Rule of Law, if the Public would simply refuse to convict anyone violating the voidable-law... however by now the consequences have compounded, making straightforward solutions, just a beginning, as you may expect....<br><br>
But back to Gusweiler and the Bar Association's attempts to diminish the Defender of the Dead, as the Coroner is called in Common Law countries like England.
<br><br>
The Coroner is a challenge to the Lawyers with their secret Grand Jury proceedings and their dependence on ENFORCERS of their laws... In England where our concepts of Rule of Law came from, the Coroner is OBLIGATED to HOLD AN INQUEST FOR **EVERY** DEATH THAT OCCURS AT THE HANDS OF LAW ENFORCERS because law enforcement have special privileges, as they do here. And as we've seen graphically LAWYERS WHITEWASH DEATH-CAUSING POLICE/FBI/etc WITH NEAR PERFECT CONSISTENCY... Baltimore's new Black Prosecutor (Marilyn Mosby) now being the sole apparent exception in recent years, now that these issues are getting questioned seriously
<br><br>
So Gusweiler figures he can slur this current Coroner as --- get this --- <I>" a creature of Statute.. with no Common Law rights, duties and privileges"</I>.....
<br><br>
He forgets that this county has a strong undercurrent of interest in history and that this county remembers that this county was granted and settled by Virginia officers of the Revolutionary war with England, retaining their Common Law heritage. This county of Brown was even named for an officer in the War of 1812, politically demanding rights that they expected as Common Law guarantees. That heritage shouldn't have been so undeniably desecrated as Gusweiler did in order to forward his disgraceful agenda.. without consequences at the ballot box, if he lasts that long with such a corruption of justice as these Orders, that should be an embarrassment to his peers, As if they care, as we shall see....
<br><br>
So why would he risk that deniable claim of no common law background. Well because <b>he wants to deny that Coroner Varnau has any powers but what is EXPLICITLY specified in the ORC 313....... but even there he is out of line... repeatedly.,.</b>
<br><br>
For example ORC 313.15
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/ORC313_15-AssistLawEnforcementINTHEIRDUTIES.jpg" WIDTH="480">
<br>
but 'their duties' includes WHO-DUN-IT and WEAPONS and indications of motivations (emotion or calculated) etc... who-dun-it can be a matter of who were the only ones with access to the victim at the time of death, and weapons could be -- as in the Goldson case -- an analysis of the ligature marks on the victims neck... Gusweiler wants a gag on the Coroner as do the Deputies, the Sheriff and BCI and by now who else would be grossly embarrassed..?? eh DeWine?
<br>
or this implication of scope of investigatory power in ORC 313.17 (not convicting power, but investigatory conclusions are certified as facts in courts of law and would indicate complicated politics to be answered when law enforcement fails to be in synch raising public suspicions and awkward questions)... information matters mightily....
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/ORC313_17-Inquisition.jpg" WIDTH="480">
<br>
Gusweiler knew and/or IS REQUIRED TO HAVE READ THE LAW and digested the part that says Coroner Varnau can <b> investigate using quasi-judicial powers "how the deceased came to his death... AND ALL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING THERETO"...... BANG</b>
</ul>
<br>
Every time Gusweiler magisterially pretends he is adjudicating this case he is as fraudulent as a $3000 bill, which we're pretty sure doesn't exist.... yet.... hopefully...
<br><br>
We hear Joe Podolsky caught Gusweiler''s treacherous tactic of faulty fact-finding and failed law-reading when he saw this 'second inquest' game and read ORC 313.17 above. So reliably realizing that Coroner Varnau does what matters Podolsky magisterially modelled what Gusweiler should have confirmed. Per the law if there'd been a first inquest done, that it would have been public record filed at the Clerk of Courts. Diligently Podolski apparently filed a public records request for a copy of the 'first inquest' required to be filed with the Clerk. Gusweiler could have just lifted the phone to see whether Phillips' claims of inquests done was true. Clark himself apparently checked and told Joe that there was no such document in existence at his office, suggesting that it must be in the Coroner's Office. Podolsky wants to know how it's explainable that the Judge would not be obligated to have said Coroner's inquest document in his hands before making assertions of fact found existence of such a thing... cheers to Podolsky for nailing the Gusweiler failure of both fact and law.
<br><br>
More bloodhounds needed. More Gusweiler 'opportunities' in abundance.
<br><br>
Dig this next pretentious fraud as typical, if you can stomach his assault on justice..
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Gusweiler-calculatedIgnoranceofCoronerIMPLIEDPowers.jpg" WIDTH="480">
</ul>
Is there any need to undermine the idea of a calculated assault on justice as simple error? A spur of the moment indiscretion, rotfl{clasp face}.......this is the CALCULATED ART OF DERAILING JUSTICE......
<br><br><br>
Oh, but he's not done, not by a long shot. Wait til you see how he justifies his INJUNCTION. Dig this BASIS ARGUMENT....
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Gusweiler-miscalculatedInjunctionBasis.jpg" WIDTH="480">
</ul>
I support the idea that Gusweiler is right about the Inquest causing "irreparable harm" to the DeathSquad may be the one thing Gusweiler got right, rotfl because justice would require it for the irreparable harm they did to Zachary Goldson. SCORE 1 point.
<br><br>
Clearly his idea that the Public's Interest is served is WAY OFF THE MARK. as well as his bold claim that the Death Squad's lawyer can argue successfully that there is only a single issue of law under dispute and the rest is 'relatively undisputed facts' which is what Declaratory Judgments are used for. Highly not what is in front of Federal Court, Without mentioning Phillips prowess in courtroom strategy, nor the demand for a jury that was Phillips handiwork... SCORE 0 points of the needed 2...
<br><br>
Third party harm is rather disingenuous considering what this puts people through but we'll not deal with that based on how far off the score is......
<br><br>
Hence NO VALID BASIS FOR GUSWEILER's INJUNCTION. BOOM... not the needed 4 points... Not even if we were to give him 1 more point that his CHEATING in imposing the unjustified injunction would complicate the Coroner's battle-while-handcuffed-with-the-injunction to the point as would make Phillips success a *little* more "likely"... rotfl at Gusweiler's circular reasoned cheating.....
<br><br>
Federal Judge Barrett didn't seem to be warranting that Gusweiler knows some dark secret about Barrett's propensity to cheat like Gusweiler himself. Hence we believe Gusweiler gets NO CIGAR for his fraud masquerading as adjudicating..... {roll eyes}
<br><br><br>
And to make sure there is no deviation from his ordered injunction, he puts the gun to the Coroner's head.. like this...<br>
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Gusweiler-contemptGunToHead.jpg" WIDTH="480">
</ul>
A total act of violence... BUT HE MAY HAVE OVERSTEPPED HIMSELF ......
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerCalculatedCrime/Gusweiler-thumbOnFedCourtScale.jpg" WIDTH="480">
</ul>
Think about this.... The Federal Judge may take offense that Gusweiler has his fat thumb on the Federal Judge's gavel when Gusweiler disdvantages one party in Barrett's proud effort at careful adjudication, with assiduous reading of the law and alert fact finding work going down the drain because Gusweiler interferes with one party's ability to engage in the federal court's Discovery process without going to jail if she says or seeks anything to indicate finding out some fact not already in her hands or heaven forbid adds up facts in her arguing.
<br><br>
Don't you think a federal judge would be incensed at Gusweiler's fat thumb stuck into the operation of his federal court? {face-clasping}
<br><br>
I don't want to think about how sour this could get with Federal court issuing its own 'injunction' telling Gusweiler to butt out, graciously behind the scenes but *convincingly* and with repercussions all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court justices... oo-weee.... shame faced Gusweiler.... he lost his head this time... rotfloho.... don't know how much more Justice derailing everybody could handle without pounding poor computer keyboards... so let's go find another way to chase away the headaches.... ttylindymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-29433241075844575942015-04-19T18:23:00.000-07:002015-04-21T14:16:59.555-07:00Eagle and Zachary's Momma Score Again after Gusweiler Robs Justice with intent to shut the public upWell, did we not say that <i>Gusweiler's history of invalid decisions, contrary to the laws as readable plainly, contrary to the court documents of motions and responding, contrary to the evidence on file in his hands</i> was legendary.
<br><br>
Applied to this case, in the final rounds as in all the previous ones -- once the back-an-forth was completed for each motion and order, like in the <u>Last Ditch </u>episode as well as <u>Judge's Dilemma</u>--, the coroner's family lawyer (Thomas Eagle) won on the merits as well as the strategic tactics as was seeable in our public examination on these pages. But when that point where the final back-and-forth was reached and realized, we said:
<br><br><ul>
"That leaves all the egg on Phillips face and leaves Gusweiler with NOTHING to validly use for his wanted CONTEMPT charges. <b> <i>CAUTION, It doesn't mean Gusweiler won't do it anyway, based on his past history of invalid decisions." </i> </b></ul>
<br><br>
And sure enough he did it. Conjured some nonsense (to be torn apart later) and proceeded to order the Coroner to sit on her hands UNDER THREAT OF POTENTIAL JAIL TIME, for lifting a finger against the DeathSquad or for Goldson.
<br><br>
And in Gusweiler's calculated attempt to rob the county of justice and the rule of law, he chose an extremely amazing 'con' in order to attempt to defeat public interest in these proceedings since every move in these court battles had been talked about and bandied in chat online and elsewhere. <i><b>He craftily released his Orders NOT TO THE COURT's CLERK for all intents and purposes, AND 'somehow' he 'happened' to handicap objectors til when the main deadline for the local papers was closed for weekend editions with possible balancing Letters. In effect, Opposing Opinions weren't possible to reach every driveway in the county so people got only HIS orders as FINAL and unopposed...</b></i>
<br><br>
To be specific, HE RELEASED HIS ORDERS AS FINAL JUDGMENT **IN SELECTED MEDIA** as his first order of business to be seen at press level locally at the Ledger Independent and at electronic level at WCPO TV... media were sent on their way with the impression that <i>the issue was decided and the story was finished</i>. Move along. Any queries to the media by concerned readers, were not appreciated. The public would be left with that same conclusion. The game was now over...
<br><br><b>
And to guarantee no different opinions</b>, the ploy was not complete with just early release to reliable government PR mouthpieces, no, no.
<br><br>
As soon as the court had allocated the press their dose of poison, then <b>*SOMEHOW* the CLERK of COURT's new ONLINE SYSTEM</b>, now frequently accessed by the Public, <b>developed 'a problem', suspiciously and suddenly, and could not supply any interested people (nor other media) with downloadable copies of the Gusweiler's poisoning Orders so as to CRITIQUE them over </b>what magical, illogical case law the Gusweiler chosen media had implied was used as the basis for his magisterial near **PERMANENT** INJUNCTION (replacing the RESTRAINING ORDER) AND a THREATENING DETAILED CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDER IMPOSED ON THE CORONER if she as much as batted an eye at the case until after the Federal Court case is ended. Imagine that, Gusweiler purports that his idea of a fair trial in federal court shall be had with one petitioner having her hands tied behind her back... Gusweiler should add that straight to the DeathSquad thuggery manual, a perfect reflection of their tactics with Zachary...
<br><br>
<b>A total ROBBERY.... which is what a theft at gun-point is defined as. And 'contempt of court' IS gunpoint.</b> How could any law abiding citizen manage to swallow these seeable as illegitimate decisions? And how could Gusweiler EXPECT TO GET AWAY WITH SUCH PUBLIC ABUSE OF TRUTH AND LAW? Clearly the 'corrupt enterprise' in the Ohio courts goes up far enough to make judges like Gusweiler SAFE from being exposed by peers when the Appeal process is accessed by aggrieved victims, assuming they have the finances (as well as adrenal strength) to continue. According to the clerks' office, Gusweiler's victims don't often file nor succeed in overturning his orders, yet fairly we've only looked at a fewer number of grossly mishandled cases than we'd need to venture a list of where the 'enterprise' sits in Ohio's courts, specifically in the 12th District on up to OSC.
<br><br>
AND THE BC CLERK EVEN TOLD SOMEONE WHO USED A PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST FOR THAT INFAMOUSLY REPORTED ORDER THAT 'THEY COULD NOT SEND IT'... "their system was down"... AS IF THEY ONLY HAD THAT ONE COPY IN THE ONLINE SYSTEM... and could not print one from a desk computer in their offices...
<br><br>
We wonder who has access to the trunkline or other backdoors to the Clerk of Court's magnificently simple online processing docket. COULD IT BE THE INFAMOUS SUSPECT WHO TAMPERED WITH THE SECURITY CAMERA DATA IN THE JAIL? (see proof in the <u>DeathSquad lawyer hands Victory to the Coroner</u>..episode.)... That individual is reputed to have a major setup in his private home with access to nearly every aspect of law enforcement's electronic resources and likely the Court's since the SO security staff monitors the Court's electronic security system there. How much access does he have. And what fox is guarding that henhouse? Such things are sometimes not thoroughly figured out... such as... Apparently the BC Board of Elections left their door open after they went home for the day around election time last year IIRC because some electric repair fellow was still not done with his project going indoors as well as outside. Anyone could walk right in where the programs and paperwork for counting votes is accessible... Big scandal on election validity control. Trusting the Sheriff is something that needs examining, including their security procedures and concentrations of vulnerable systems. Clearly the SO individual who tampered with the security cam data needs to be replaced, for the damage he is and/or can be doing. He has violated the public trust in the jail hallway tampering.
<br><br>
He, Harry Martin, just hopefully hasn't figured out how to anticipate SO mistakes frequently enough and intercept the evidence of the SO criminality before the ill-favored Varnau candidate for Sheriff has identified the needed documents, capturing the illegal activity's existence and procured those documents legitimately using public records methods pronto. But Harry Martin may have met his doom when he tampered with the hallway video... surprise is coming.....
<br><br>
Meanwhile this Gusweiler scam of media-release done in the midst of system failure, done by Gusweiler was a clear attempt to quash further interest by the public as he had credibly seen take shape each time we uncovered their erroneous law citing, each time Eagle destroyed their claims with precise rebuttals based on logic and facts and law, each time the bloodhounds had dug in and acquired data, shared analyses and kept the public informed. Everybody was having a good ol time. The impact on the unsavory and incompetent activities in the Court battles, induced even Phillips (the main opposing-justice attorney) to express annoyance and felt it necessary to enter his annoyance in one of his recent court docs, referring to our handiwork.... They were watching us.... That was the clearly UNWANTED PUBLIC RESPONSE THAT GUSWEILER HAD ATTEMPTED TO PREVENT BEING POSSIBLE in his anticipated finale..... with his 'untimely' release to ONLY THE WANTED GOVT-PR RELAYING MEDIA...
<br><br>
GUSWEILER EVEN MANAGED TO go so far as to PREVENT DR VARNAU'S LAWYER -- who would be the one to respond -- FROM SEEING THE CONTENT OF THE ORDERS AND THREATS... AND THIS WENT ON FOR A FEW DAYS...
<br><br>
The media WCPO was blaring the 'resulting finale' on late night news Tuesday --the very day it was stamped and made official for the clerk handling entry of the docs into their system yet nothing appeared online nor in the mail... convenient timing... so the media could cluck that the coroner's lawyer was not available for response...
<br><br>
LUCKILY THE DECEDENT's MOTHER, at her restaurant work, saw the WCPO announcement. She was surely annoyed and did take things into her hands promptly -- BY OFFICIALLY REQUESTING **EVERYTHING** IN THE CORONER'S FILES ON HER SON'S CASE....... BEAUTIFUL AND PERFECT THINKING BY HIS MOTHER.... AND SO NOW IT'S HER TURN TO DEFEAT GUSWEILER......
<br><br>
She cannot believe that this injustice is occurring, having seen the results of the arguing in a supposed court of law, and has begun again to relay the content of the file to every voice who has shown an interest AS SHE IS ENTITLED TO DO AS NEXT-OF-KIN........
<br><br>
So shall we start with the recognition that we are hindering their 'unseemly' poisoning of public interest -- DEMONSTRATED BY THE MEASURES THEY MANAGED TO ORCHESTRATE TO PREVENT US EXAMINING AND EXPOSING THE UNDERLYING BASES OF THE COURT ACTION while the iron was peak heat temperature..... <b>So let's see what's hidden in their threats of violence and demands for the coroner to acquiesce to Gusweiler's unlawful orders.....???</b> Court stuff next.
<br><br><br>
<b>LET THE HINDERING OF CRIME BEGIN........
<br><br><br>
Here's Zachary's momma's next round --- </b>
<br><br>
See the animosity and <b>boiling hatred still hot when they arrive at the jail and it shows NO SIGN OF ABATING</b> AS THEY BRUTALLY DRAG HIM where they have their opportunity waiting.....
<br><br>
<ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.00.57.25.jpg" WIDTH="220">
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.00.58.25.jpg" WIDTH="220"><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.01.00.21.jpg" WIDTH="420"><br>
with less than a second between any pair in this sequence, it's clear the kid was not 'resisting' as deputies were claiming was the reason for their need for forceful handling... they barely had the door open when they were already reaching for the kid's shackled ankles to yank him out so as to slam him helplessly onto the concrete floor<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.01.01.06.jpg" WIDTH="220">
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.01.05.16.jpg" WIDTH="220"><br>
then yanked him upright and hauled him like an oversized aggravating bag of refuse to be disposed of angrily...<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.01.15.03.jpg" WIDTH="220">
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.01.16.21.jpg" WIDTH="220"><br>
stumbling, dragged backwards...
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/RemovalFromCruiser_0.01.20.27.jpg" WIDTH="420"><br>
and shoved him, still shackled, arms held behind his back, unbalanced, into the cell onto the floor.... they are clearly out of control.. their testimonies afterwards are full of other lies about what they did to take the restraints off and walk out.. but that does not deserve credibility either based on this next NEW evidence...
<br><br></ul>
After the Schadle smoke-break point -- where Felicia Landacre at the monitoring desk reported in interrogation that Schadle (out on his smoke break for that round of jail work) was <b>instructed by Detective Meyers (intercom/phone) to get the handcuffs</b> used at the hospital and put them in the evidence room -- then watch as Schadle and Dunning go STRAIGHT TO ZACHARY's CELL to get the handcuffs ...... <b>no way was suicide possible HAND CUFFED</b>....
<ul><img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/AllVideosCompiledData/SchadleBypassCommissary_0.08.54.10.jpg" WIDTH="420"><br>
All the way down the hall they are aiming toward cell#15, and go clear passed the commissary on the opposite side of the hall.. watch where their feet carry them left of the hall centerline.....</ul>
<br><br>
And <b>when they pretend to discover him</b> -- for the benefit of their realized security cam ALIBI down the hallway -- notice that they inadvertantly give away that HE'S NOT HANGING FROM THE SPRINKLER HEAD (over their head at 2 feet from a 9 foot ceiling just a couple feet from where they're standing at the door)... <b> they are LOOKING DOWN instead of up....</b>... .
<br><br>
<ul>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NWqx4lzew58?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</ul>
<br><br>
These are the tapes that the Coroner has as NEW EVIDENCE to JUSTIFY RE-OPENING THE INVESTIGATION... <i><b>to answer such CORONER-SPECIFIC questions about what types of data that a proper law enforcement investigation and decent prosecution would need from her as to signs on the body and in forensic analysis of the damage done to the kid's body, that indicate weapon used, that indicate the intent involved in the speed of inflicting injury and so on</b></i>.....
<br><br>
BCI can only beg to be understood as being dead asleep when such evidence went past them unrecognized...... BUT MORE IS COMING TO SHAME THEIR WORK as we pursue what the SO did to the tapes, as it comes out what lack of evidence control by Schadle was allowed to pass unchallenged .... felony compounding felony.
<br><br><br><br>
<b> Here's Tom Eagle's round... SCORE! possible bloodhound alert!!</b>
<br><br><br>
Eagle spun on a dime as soon as he had the Judge's illegitimate Orders and fired a salvo with case law from a CASE THAT HAPPENED IN BROWN COUNTY <b>IN GUSWEILER'S OWN COURT in which Gusweiler absolutely affirmed the then coroner's right to re-open the old case to examine NEW EVIDENCE and CONTRIBUTED TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE WHO-DUN-IT </b>by re-examining the earlier coroner's data to alter the time of death to be more accurately determined AS WELL AS also opening it earlier when the coroner became aware of facts that were not originally in his grasp about the victim's hands that changed the cause of death to HOMICIDE...
<br><br>
Here's <a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/EagleBombshell-SupplementalAuthority-04-17-15.pdf">Tom Eagle's KNOCKOUT FILING</a>
<br><br>
and here's <a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GusweilerViolentTheft/CA2009-10-037CurtisMurderReopenedbyCoroner-NewEvidence.pdf">the 12th District Appeal Court affirmation</a> that <b>the Curtis case</b> was handled properly even though <b>the accused claimed precisely, as one of their grievances that the Coroner had opened the old evidence in his records after all concluded it was closed... The Court affirmed that the coroner acted rightly</b>.
<br><br>
Now you tell yourself just how short of a memory the courthouse Robber Gusweiler will have to claim to have to not 'recall' that widely publicized local case coming FROM HIS OWN COURTROOM <b>in 2009, only six years ago, prosecuted by Schadle's Babe Little. And to add to the memory challenges, it was Schadle himself who went to Florida to retrieve the accused</b> where he'd thought he was safe, but is now convicted. Gusweiler ordered 15 years in the penetentiary using evidence resurrected from a TWELVE YEAR OLD MURDER...on two separate occasions opened by the coroner to improve justice results...
<br><br>
Gusweiler, Schadle and Little ALL KNEW THAT THE CORONER HAS THE RIGHT TO PURSUE NEW DATA THAT WOULD ASSIST LAW ENFORCEMENT TO SOLVE CRIMES, USING THE INQUISITION IF NECESSARY, AND FOCUSING ON WHAT ASSISTANCE MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE COULD ADD TO THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CRIME, THE WEAPON, THE WHO-DUN-IT AND SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES AS WOULD SERVE JUSTICE FOR THE DECEDENT....
<br><br>
We especially like Eagle's helpful attitude in favoring the Judge's need to CHANGE HIS MIND once he is reminded... rotfl when you read it..... ttyl
<br><br><br>
indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-52086227442024750022015-04-14T15:08:00.001-07:002015-04-29T08:16:31.079-07:00Karma for Gusweiler and LawEnforcement -- Here and Boston
Blow-by-blow: Last Gusweiler round here in Common Pleas Brown County... Thomas Eagle scores ! ....again!! and again<br><b>
THE BATTLE OVER THE SANCTITY OF THE CORONER'S PRIVATE WORK FILES
<br><br><br>
Tom Eagle</b> -- the coroner's family lawyer -- filed the Motion to protect her work files because <b>Phillips -- the Death Squad's lawyer, Eagle's main opponent</b> -- had pilfered files from those private storage workspaces to <b>use as an ambush claim</b> in the final hearing March 7th and claimed that the files proved that the coroner was engaging in "convening an inquest" based on her husband's tentatively proposed 'preliminary' working comparison of testimonies and video security-cam data....
<br><br>
The murderous thugs' lawyer was in effect demanding that the coroner not work on her own case information when she is faced with his own blessed attack case in Federal Court on those same events in the files.... Imagine someone using this court to try to tie the hands of his opponent in his federal case against that opponent ---
<br><br>
Gee, <b>the Death Squad thugs's <i>modus operandi of attacking a victim that they had handcuffed and shackled</i> seems to have taught their attorney the Death-Squad's very own 'philosophy' of 'fair fighting'</b>.... rotfl
<br><br>
The <b>Death-Squad's lawyer (Phillips)</b> in his next filing then responded with more detail on his acquisition of those files' location... <i>Phillips admitted that he had induced Rob Junk</i> -- who was originally induced somehow to replace Prosecutor Little, aka Schadle's babe, to do the county-obligated law-work pro bono for the coroner -- <i>to divulge the location of the Coroner's private work files in online storage space. Phillips tried to claim that Junk was more ethical..... rotfl</i>
<br><br>
Whew, now is it clear why this stage of the battle is difficult? Fortunately the case here in BC Common Pleas is near the end, finally...
<br><br>
In the next round, right on time, <b>Eagle responded</b> and made it clear that Phillips <b>getting the files was still unauthorized</b> since <b>the owner of the files had not released those files to be distributed.</b> That accessing the preliminary work files, to the extent that Junk had seen them, CONSTITUTED a violation of ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED CONTENT. <b>BOOM!</b> Sounds like <b>Bar Association investigation</b> time. [ Being cynical about the Bar Association sorta spoils the fun. ]
<br><br>
Theoretically three rounds is all you get. UNLESS there's an ambush hidden in a reply. Well guess what, THE BIG PERPETRATOR OF AMBUSHES -- namely Phillips -- had guilty visions that he'd been ambushed because he didn't see that Attorney-Client Privileged Communication threat-shape coming in his admission of inducing Junk's revelation.... So, like clockwork, <b>Phillips fires back,</b> shrieking that Eagle had cheated and dumped NEW CLAIMS ON THE TABLE in an ambush-like tactic. FREUD's REVENGE GOT PHILLIPS RILED... and he tried <b>to add a MOTION TO STRIKE</b> ALL 'NEW' DATA...
<br><br>
So <b>without missing a beat, Eagle responded</b> that it was Phillips who had dumped new stuff on the table when Phillips made his revelation that the files had been gotten from Junk. HENCE EAGLE HAD A RIGHT TO RESPOND TO THAT REVELATION and <b>not doing that response 'before' was not an 'omission' that would have constituted a 'waiver' of his now claimed right to add the attorney-client realization... </b> IN FACT his earlier 'omission' was due to Phillips' <b>concealing</b> the Junk-revelation and so HIS 'OMISSION' of the attorney-violation-complaining WAS NOT A MATTER OF HAVING WAIVED THE RIGHT TO MAKE THOSE POINTS. And <b>so Phillips' basis for the Motion to Strike was invalid,</b> Phillips' stuff was 'new' and Eagle never waived any right to challenge it before.
<br><br><b>
That leaves the egg on Phillips face and leaves Gusweiler with NOTHING to validly use for his wanted CONTEMPT charges.</b> <i>CAUTION, It doesn't mean Gusweiler won't do it anyway, based on his past history of invalid decisions </i>(in the case cited earlier where the Brown Countian taught math logic to the unwilling OSC on Ohio's faulty case law giving immunity to obnoxious, unrighteous civil servants)..
<br><br>
Now we wait.... but maybe there's a better back door for Gusweiler,,, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE FEDERAL COURT FIRES UP ITS GAVEL AND TAKES OVER THE BATTLE BETWEEN THE DEATH-SQUAD AND THE CORONER....???
<br><br><br>
<b>
ENTER CINCINNATI'S FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT ACTION......
<br><br><br>
The Latest in Cincinnati....</b>
<br><br>
Phillips is celebrating Eagle's Motion to Dismiss. So brace yourselves, because this is the moment the lying reaches fever pitch BECAUSE in a Motion to Dismiss, the Judge IS OBLIGATED TO SWALLOW EVERY LIE A CORRUPT PLAINTIFF CAN MUSTER IN THEIR DEFENSE. so that the Court would appear unprejudiced against the dismissal-victim while the Judge and dismissal-seeker are seeking reasons to dismiss the case.... The Court then appears Justified in dismissing lousy cases without ever dealing with the merits, just looking for cracks in the rules and procedures that would make the lying game not work even if it were true.....
<br><br>
However in this case, IMO, we may not want the case dismissed either. Though Dr Varnau and Eagle may want it over with.
<br><br>
Consider this. If the case is dismissed AFTER Gusweiler's control is wiped away by the Federal Judge taking jurisdiction somehow [ theoretically removing the Death-Squad's TRO-stop-Coroner-action need for Gusweiler ], then yes we get the Inquest BUT IF THAT INQUEST DOES WHAT IT SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO, namely nail the evidence down that completes the Coroner's picture, TELL ME WHO IN THIS CORRUPT ENTERPRISE IN BROWN COUNTY'S LAW ENFORCEMENT IS GOING TO CHARGE THE KILLERS?? AND THEIR ESCAPE TEAM full of big state-connections?? Who's going to summon another Grand Jury? Who's going to prosecute? Who's going to judge? Where would Justice come from?
<br><br>
WHEREAS, I might believe the District Attorney in the Southern Ohio Federal Court (<a href="http://www.justice.gov/usao/ohs/meetattorney.html">Carter M Stewart </a> being an out-of-state Democrat who's prosecuted drug and gun crimes when he was in California ) just <b><i>MIGHT</i></b> take custody of the evidence WHEN THE FEDERAL COURT -- complete with jury -- lays out all of the guilt and demolishes the lying IN THE TRIAL ON THE MERITS..... and EAGLE COULD DO IT..... he's excellent at merits and there are lots of defense merits...... Agreed?
<br><br>
The DOWNSIDE is that such a trial on the merits will TAKE A LONG MISERABLE EXPENSIVE TIME.... but at least it goes some where that rids the County AND STATE government of a laundry list of corrupt frauds in law enforcement... including not just the Death Squad and the former-chief-deputy Schadle but also the Attorney General's Special Prosecutor-turned-Defense-Lawyer Breyer and his AG investigator Hornyak... hey maybe even the BC Prosecutor and the rest of the TWO-BIT GANGSTERS AT THE SHERIFF's OFFICE WHO STONEWALLED TO PROTECT THEIR MURDEROUS DEATH-SQUAD THUGS in their saluted uniforms...........
<br><br>
So now just what does it take to get to the finish line going in that direction..??
<br><br>
Some serious money on the Plaintiffs' side as well... Since Eagle has already filed his Answer as well as even his Motion to Dismiss, then (under court rules) the Death-Squad can't practically back out if the price goes steeper while the merits battle looks shaky... they can no longer just easily fold their tents and drop the case if the heat gets going in the Discovery process?
<br><br>
And on the money required.... Did the Death-Squad put up initial cash with the agreement that the winnings would pay the lawyers after the finale? Then it was Phillips calling of the shots on continuing...? He may be in over his head already... sweating Eagle's skill in the courtroom with visions of Eagle putting the kabotch on Phillips' winnings, his greedy payoff expectation of County deep pockets...
<br><br>
But who knows..., Phillips experience may show that he's good at smearing the opponent -- '<i>Dr Varnau is only a Doctor of Osteopathy</i>' and has <i>no knowledge of physiology, chemistry and physics</i> for forensics, rotfl at Phillips smear attempt, he is just so annoying !! Does he think Judges are so ignorant of medical education requirements? Maybe he does.....
<br><br><b>
Unfortunately, Phillips is so bad, that the federal case will likely get thrown out.</b>... whether we want the merits-path-to-the-District-Attorney or not...
<br><br>
First of all.... Eagle has the right to insist that the federal court "abstain" from involvement using the same Pullman case law that Eagle tried unsuccessfully in the Elfers case. He'd launch it again because, unlike the Elfers' lawyer (being smart enough to insist they were not challenging any Ohio law), <b>Phillips' list of 'Counts' of complaint are all predominately matters of Ohio law....just cloaked in federal constitutional rights framework.... so either the Ohio law fails the constitution's needs or why is Phillips in Federal Court?</b>
<br><br>
Specifically, Phillips even uses the sort of phrasing used in ORC2744.03(A)(6) in describing their grievances in all the Counts 1-4. When you look at his paragraphs 83 to 99, (in their Amended Filing) Phillips complains that Dr Varnau was acting in bad faith, engaging in malicious abuse of her authority, and proceeding in a reckless and wanton manner to cause loss of property (property being the Death-Squad's reputation, professional career opportunities and such).
<br><br><b>
The federal judge</b> (<i>also the same Judge Barrett here as in Elfers</i>) in the Elfers case <b>clarified Eagle's use of the Pullman abstention rule</b> to say <b>the plaintiffs should not bug the federal court</b> under various circumstances which included <b>"<i>when the challenged law is susceptible of a construction by state courts that would eliminate the need to reach the federal question"</i></b>..... but Elfers demanded their claims were separate issues from what's in the Ohio law being cited as relevant....
<br><br><b>
BINGO! </b> The Pullman abstention didn't work for Eagle's challenge to Elfer's lawyer because Elfer's lawyer specifically said they were not basing their complaining on Ohio laws, BUT PHILLIPS IS MIMICKING THE OHIO LAW... majorly
<br><br>
And BETTER YET.... <b>the main law that Phillips is mimicking in his Counts 1-4 is precisely ORC2744, <i>the law where the Ohio Supreme Court SCREWED UP IN LOGIC AND PUBLIC TRUST...</i></b> Their instructions to state courts on how to interpret ORC2744.03(A)(6) have denied Ohioans their right to protection from dictocratic bullies and thugs in government employment...
<br><br>
Specifically their screw-up consists of the real law versus the mangled interpretation<br>
<ul><b>
1) the ORC2744.03 DEFENSES -- IMMUNITY law says in division (A)(6):</b>
<br><br><ul>
In addition to any immunity or defense referred to in division (A)(7) {referring to prosecuting attorneys, law directors, etc} of this section and in circumstances not covered by that division or sections 3314.07 {referring to community school contractors} and 3746.24 {referring to voluntary-action & hazardous-substance contractors} of the Revised code, <b>the employee is immune from liability UNLESS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING APPLIES:</b>
<br><br><ul>
(a) The employee's acts or omissions were <i>manifestly outside the scope</i> of the employee's employment or official responsibilities;
<br><br>
(b) The employee's acts or omissions were with <i>malicious</i> purpose, in <i>bad faith</i> or in a <i>wanton or reckless</i> manner;
<br><br>
(c) Civil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of the Revised Code........
<br><br> </ul></ul><b>
and<br>
2) the esteemed Justices of the OSC said basically:</b> in the infamous <i>Colbert v. Cleveland,</i> 99 Ohio St, 3rd 215, 2003-Ohio-3319, that's constantly cited...
<br><br><ul><i>
Determining whether a political subdivision is immune from liability pursuant to ORC2744 involves A THREE TIERED ANALYSIS...
<br><br>
The first tier is the GENERAL RULE THAT A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IS IMMUNE...
<br><br>
The second tier of the analysis requires the court to determine whether any of the five exceptions to immunity listed in ORC2744.02(B) apply....
<br><br>
and EVEN IF ANY OF THE EXCEPTIONS TO IMMUNITY IN ORC2744.02(B) do apply and no defense in that section protects the political subdivision from liability then the THIRD TIER OF THE ANALYSIS requires a court to determine whether ANY OF THE DEFENSES IN ORC2744.03 APPLY, THEREBY PROVIDING THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IMMUNITY ANYWAY. </i>
<br><br></ul></ul>
Isn't that third tier fancy??!! <b>Thoroughly stonewalling and concealing that there is that subsection of ORC2744.03 namely divisions</b>(A)(5) and (6) that <b>DENIES IMMUNITY AND DOES SO ABSOLUTELY WHEN THE EMPLOYEE IS BEHAVING LIKE A ROGUE,......</b>
<br><br>
Nor can any other section, division, chapter make the rogue immune in spite of this division or else that section, division or chapter would be ripping this division up as untrue requirement to be insisted on and ULTIMATELY violating the inherent self-consistency that the Rule of Law demands. Laws cannot contradict one another and some such hypothetically rogue-defending law would contradict this DEFENSE OF WE THE PEOPLE.......
<br><br>
So that case law denial of rights and a violation of the Constitutions of state and U.S. has been in play for many years... too many, affecting many cases since the classic Colbert case law source is from 2003 ... twelve years of dictocratic tyranny imposed by the case law of those instructions.....
<br><br>
And if the OSC were told to straighten that mess out MADE BY THE OSC, then NOT ONLY SHOULD THE CASES WHERE OHIOANS HAVE BEEN WRONGED SHOULD BE OVERTURNED, just like the discovery that some racially prejudiced judge's lengthy handiwork was undone.... BUT IN THIS CASE, the Phillips' thugs would be obligated to take their dirty lies into STATE COURTS and start over under Pullman's abstention rule applied after unravelling the OSC tangle.... who's going to do it..... Eagle, maybe..... imagine the federal judges telling the OSC Justices they were officially wrong... could Eagle do it? He may have to, sort of... for Counts 1-4.....
<br><br>
Hence Eagle has Pullman's Abstention and Barrett agrees, so Phillips would have to defend his choice to go to federal court by dragging the OSC dirty laundry out <b>as his reason for not taking his clients through that denial of constitutional rights.</b> Barrett may not agree that such 'premonitions of being cheated' would justify going straight to federal court and triggering arguments convicting the OSC of damaging the DeathSquad thugs' federal rights in order to attack the Coroner without the State Court's twisted defense of the coroner.... and so Barrett would most likely dismiss those four Counts.....
<br><br>
Yet we've seen -- and Phillips could point to -- the Scioto jailers who ignored the desperate medical needs of inmates and got immunity granted them in Ohio courts by Ohio lawyers, only to be finding themselves in federal court with no immunity when the inmate's sister pursued (after the state court's damage was done) her grievance to federal judges who correctly interpreted the ORC2744 as denying immunity to rogue employees....
<br><br>
Only this time it's jailer-thugs that are demanding that it's the doctor who is a malicious thug..... rotfl, covering eyes to relieve the strain of crossing eyes tracking opponents switching sides....
<br><br>
And if that Counts-1-4-snafu wasn't enough of an indication of Phillips lack of grasp of strategy and law and logic, <b>there's an even more incredible snafu...., in Phillips Fifth Count, he literally claims that ORC 313.19 authorizes "<i>this court</i>" to make the coroner change her verdict..</b>.. [ clasp face and groan ]... literally he says the <i>ohio law</i> authorizes <i>federal judges</i> to act in affairs of ohio's coroners, when the law clearly says the COMMON PLEAS COURT is so charged under the appropriate circumstances...
<br><br>
It appears Phillips doesn't know where he is, he thinks he's in state court..?. rotfl, whoops it's not nice to laugh at sick people..... hmmmmmm.....
<br><br>
Phillips may not be very good at defending his clients BUT at least maybe he's not the prize winner for Most Prosecutorial Defense Lawyer ..... AT LEAST HE'S NOT OPENLY CONVICTING THEM like we see in the false flag operation to blame a Russian/Moslem (double-political-whammy) target in the Boston Marathon.... that fellow Dzhokhar (pr? Djokar ) Tsarnaev did not do 'it'... BUT HIS LAWYERS DECLINED TO CHALLENGE *ANY* -- NONE -- OF THE OFFICIAL PROSECUTOR'S CLAIMS ABOUT THE EVENTS.... how's that for a "defense"...
<br><br>
Dzhokhar steadfastly denies he or his brother did it... ....
<br><br>
Early photos of the exploded cookers showed that the remains of the backpack that placed the claimed exploding device WAS NOT THE BROTHERS' BIG BACKPACK THAT WAS SEEN ON CROWD PHOTOS THAT INCLUDED THE TSARNAEV BROTHERS, even in the moments after the explosion (theirs was still on the elder one's back)...... the strap and zipper location AND COLOR were wrong, AND the INSIGNIA PATCH (white square) <br><ul><ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Karma4Gusweiler&CrookedLEHere&Boston/BostonMarathon-BombBackpack.jpg" WIDTH="360"><br></ul></ul>
WAS FROM what appeared to be THE AUTHORIZED SECURITY CONTRACTORS FOR THE EVENT (Craft International?) and the Craft guard DID NOT HAVE HIS BIG BACKPACK AFTER THE EXPLOSION when the guards were leaving the scene .....
<br><ul><ul>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Karma4Gusweiler&CrookedLEHere&Boston/BostonMarathon-SecurityBomber.jpg" WIDTH="360"><br></ul></ul>
and many other intentionally false impressions for the media, plus evidence of the handiwork of crisis actors have been found in video coverage to exaggerate the terrorizing intended........ plus the chase and capture video footage (even on major media) that contradicts the official story of the prosecutors...
<br><br>
It was ripe for all sorts of challenges.... all of 'it' just NOT DISPUTED BY THE CHOSEN-BY-SOMEONE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS supposedly defending the younger Tsarnaev... so you take your pick... are the federal cheaters any better, or more proficient, or more integrated with the perpetrators of the TRIAL BY JURY HOAX than the Death Squad's cheaters, in Court and outside federal court, so far...
<br><br>
Of course the Death-Squad thugs have turned the game around and are using the state law-against-governmental-rogue-authorities to prosecute false charges against the high performing authority busily pursuing the suing thugs to get justice for the victim...... rotfl at these upside down BC imitators of the big time federal cheaters...
<br><br>
Oh well, we would recommend that the <b>wonderfully honest KY Senator (Rand Paul)</b> who boldly published that the emperor was naked and the Emperor and his minions were <b><i>Government Bullies</i></b> would be impressed with these small town imitators.... hope you were entertaining his sleuthing in spite of official 'stories' of who we should be terrified of......
<br><br>
Well, I guess that should be enough damaging fun..... ttyl, clasping head and laughing, you can't make these things up....
<br><br>
And as for Dzhokhar, none of the Innocence Projects will likely be able to penetrate to his real Defense.. not the phony 'blame-it-on-the-dead-brother' prosecution-by-govt-selected-'defenders'..... eh guys? ttyl indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-28544378262193299642015-04-01T16:11:00.000-07:002015-04-29T08:12:34.362-07:00Shocking The Conscience Fizzles & Case Law Abominations<b>Shocking the Conscience appears to be the Entertainment of Judges -- Elfers Federal Case is Dismissed without Trial on the Merits
<br><br>
The weird world of courts makes no sense.. </b>
<br><br>
Elfers' case was in federal court, loaded with false information as the basis for their inflated claims that Coroner Varnau's handling of Elfer's relative's death investigation was sufficient bad to SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE of the public.
<br><br>
This Elfers' court quest to attack Dr Varnau was the second hearse chasing scheme concocted by Chief Deputy John Shadle and his babe Prosecutor Little.. a disgusting manipulation of the grieving family to attempt to discredit Dr Varnau in any way the duo could, as their smokescreen WHEN SHADLE's JAIL HOMICIDE WAS FESTERING IN BCI's HANDS AND NOT BEING RULED TO THE LIKING OF SHADLE whose son was a prime suspect. The duo operate on the standard propaganda premise that if you repeat a lie often enough AND LOUD ENOUGH if becomes the public's accepted 'truth'... Shaming the Public in the process...
<br><br>
So if the case was so devoid of merit, why not simply celebrate...
<br><br>
Celebrate because:
<br><br><ul>
1) Elfers misbegotten distention of life to pursue the false claims is now relieved
<br><br>
2) Dr Varnau doesn't need any more lawyer bills, nor stress from misguided citizens and she has her hands full of the jail homicide fallout.
<br><br>
3) The County Commissioners are also relieved of their unpleasant defensive turmoil when they haven't harmed anyone in the Elfers' world.
<br><br>
4) The Federal Court can move on to better cases with less false claims hopefully.....
<br><br></ul>
Strange 'law' reality... right result SORT OF... (in this case),......
<br><br>
...but full of horrifying examples of things that were deemed to be revered in precedent setting cases to not shock the conscience.......... like this one from pg 13:
<br><br>
Cruz–Erazo v. Rivera–Montanez, 212 F.3d 617 (1st Cir. 2000) <i>(allegation that <b>police officers verbally harassed and intimidated homeowners, occupied their property without permission, deliberately lied in official documents, and perjured themselves in official court proceedings with intention of causing homeowners harm</b> did <u>not</u> sufficiently “shock the conscience” so as to violate substantive due process);</i>
<br><br>
or this curiously relevant one:
<br><br><i>
The allegation that <b>sheriff and prosecutors pursued baseless criminal charges for “political” reasons </b>was <u>not</u> so egregious as to “shock the conscience”; </i>
<br><br><ul>
If those don't shock the court's conscience then the 'judges' are evil people who should not be entrusted to control 'justice'..........
<br><br>
And if case law is so full of BAD JUDGMENTS forming PRECENDENTS, what chance does true need for justice stand in case law quicksand..?
<br><br></ul>
The filings to be dealt with, in response to the Plaintiff-Elfers false claims were the Motions to Dismiss, which is where the Judge started his own agenda...
<br><br>
For such an exercise of dismissal, the Judge MUST start with the assumption that everything the Plaintiff has claimed is true and then look for reasons in law books why those assumed-true combination of claims and facts fails to stand up against rules and precedents. A thoroughly backhanded process that is especially annoying when the claims are not worthy of that truth label. At all.
<br><br>
And as a practical matter of people's own limitation of energy and finances, the hairsplitting over whether one facet of a complex event's claim was 'a state matter' (not federal) and not dealt with there in state courts already, when other facets were not state matters, so the feds can then trash it..... granted the matter -- like the rest -- was not factually valid... but in other people's cases it could have been
<br><br>
How can you build a wholesome intellectual justice construct on bad principles?
<br><br>
All that effort at hairsplitting while ignoring the substantive matters and avoiding dealing with merit... not a single hint to the plaintiffs that
<ul>
1) it's not the coroner's duty to clean up the smithereens of a messy death scene... <br>
2) or that the skull piece was not practically reunitable with the body after the body was cremated....<br>
3) or that the coroner's arms length was the limit that the sheriff's deputies were to respect and get busy,<br>
4) or the fact that the process was done in the dark with flashlights because the sheriff's deputy did not want the light switch flipped on for fear of it being a trigger on a retributive trap set up by the suicidal character.........<br>
etc.....<br>
</ul><br><br>
So what's satisfying to a plaintiff AND the OBSERVING PUBLIC as a demonstration of JUSTICE? never having their issues dealt with but having their issues accepted as true and valid and yet rejected on mumbo-jumbo hairsplitting.......??.. puzzling.....
<br><br>
<a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/HearseChaseDismissed-FederalCourtOpinion&Order.pdf">
See for yourself</a>
<br><br>
So what do you think, having just waded through bucket-loads of case law?
Think there ought to be something more RELIABLY JUST AND CONFIRMABLY ACCURATELY APPLIED?
<br><br>
RELIABLY JUST because there is NO INDICATION that the court being referenced was not WRONGHEADED, aka crooked or stupid, in their advising.....
<br><br>
CONFIRMABLY ACCURATELY APPLIED because there's NO COMPARISON ATTEMPTED in foisting the quote on the arguing's progress.
<br><br><br>
<b><em>
Case Law Abomination
</em></b>
<br><br><br>
In court documents, whether it's arguing by the parties or it's a justification of a judge' orders, the reader faces reams of citations of case law.
<br><br>
And as you've noticed in the current battles, those citations are bare of much of any background other than the names of the parties and maybe a phrase or two to describe a connection to the point being demanded that the reader accept.
<br><br>
Now how prone to error do you suppose this practice is?
<br><br>
If this were a mathematical argument to establish a conclusion wanted by the writer, the bases must be stated, both the conditions that form the reasoning as well as the conclusion that is available if the conditions are met.
<br><br>
Where is that demanded logic in these DESPICABLE LAWYER PRACTICES?
<br><br>
Nowhere to be seen.
<br><br>
The foundation of math is math logic. Where is the training of the law schools on math logic that withstands the attacks of time and expansion of ideas?
<br><br>
Nowhere to be seen.
<br><br>
A couple of Examples should do, of the sort of egregious denials of justice that courts and lawyers perpetrate based on their faulty skills,
<br><br>
PRO SE AND PARENTAL RIGHTS.....
<br>
A case in point is the denial of 'pro se' rights in a wrongful death case based on case law, which when followed up showed that the cited case included a child as one of the Plaintiffs, whereas the 12th District Appeals Court denied the pro se rights to a pair of ADULTS based on the child's case. Obviously children would not be going to be exercising their own right to argue. And so on the basis of that denial of the child's access to Pro Se in case law, the Ohio Supreme Court refused to hear even cases where it was strictly adults making demands for justice.
<br><br>
This particular sort of combination of wrongful death and pro se is a <b>classist denial</b> since those with money to burn could continue with the child as a party when that child is represented by a lawyer, whereas the parent is denied the right to pursue the child's benefits. The lawyer has no personal interest and the child has no oversight... and in all other negotiations and contractual matters, including governmental affairs that parent is authorized to make momentous decisions. But not in Ohio's courts. Go figure that reasoning by the lawyers and their income producing motives.
<br><br>
Even the person charged by the Probate Court (as the Deceased's Personal Representative) to manage the affairs of the Deceased is prohibited from pursuing the Wrongful Death case Pro Se, figuratively standing in the shoes of a Deceased Loved One and carrying out his role
<br><br>
How many of those court cases are WRONGHEADED PRECEDENTS? One of the list above was clearly a matter of INACCURATELY APPLYING previous cited judgments.. both failures complicate the justice likelihood in Pro Se cases and Parental Rights cases....
<br><br>
... and the list of faulty case law usage goes on and on.... such as....
<br><br>
IMMUNITY OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS and EMPLOYEES.....
<br>
In both the Gusweiler TRO case and the DeathSquad's Federal (civil liberties violation case) filed over the same events and the same issues, the battles over whether governmental employees are IMMUNE to prosecution for their causation of loss of life and property have occupied key roles...
<br><br>
So let's look at that PRIVILEGE of IMMUNITY for governmental authority... especially in these battles where all the parties are employed in the same governmental lawsuit blizzard.
<br><br>
The Ohio law governing liability and immunity of cities, counties and their employees is ORC 2744...
<br><br>
ORC 2744 is a labyrinth of liabilities and exceptions and was not part of the State of Ohio's bold claim to BEGIN allowing governmental authorities to be sued.. but just some... and just sometimes..... Our big grievance is over the way that the Ohio Supreme Court HAS BUNGLED THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ORC 2744 <u>when there is a rogue governmental authority involved</u>...
<br><br>
To be specific, <u>the Ohio Supreme Court has decided</u> that the section titled <b>ORC 2744.03 Defenses - Immunities</b> is <u>only to defend governmental employees</u> when they are otherwise not protected by other section's specificity. But look at the <a href="http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/pdf_viewer.aspx?pdf=736158.pdf"> argument </a> in the <b>Ohio Supreme Court's Docket site </b> clearly against that decision....... complete with clear logic precision in analyzing the law's statement..
<br><br>
That argument's demonstration demolishes the right of the OSC to hold their heads up as able to do logic... AND WORSE untrustworthy in public wellbeing guardians responsible for JUSTICE because they are seeable AS CRIMINALLY AND PROFESSIONALLY HIDING THEIR MESS IN CASE LAW... specifically ON IMMUNITY FOR GOVERNMENTS...
<br><br>
<a href="http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2744.03">
ORC 2744.03 (A)(5) and (6) </a> say clearly that the political subdivision (aka county) and their employee are <b>LIABLE if the acts or omissions were done with malice, bad faith or in a wanton or reckless manner</b>... Yet the Ohio state courts insist that the section is for *defending* the political subdivision or employee... not the citizen.. imagine that judicial re-writing of the written law in plain site....
<br><br>
A wretchedly <u>obvious violation of the separation of powers</u> with the judges foisting their grand protection on rogue dictocrats and their thuggery IN SPITE of the fully expected public voices that induced the LEGISLATORS to write a paragraph into the law with protection for the public as well as the politically expected hairsplitting cases for moving vehicle incidents, toxic hazards controllers, law directors, volunteers, etc
<br><br>
The so-called Justices of the OSC, et al, declined to clean up the mess they made in Case Law and dismissed the case, continuing to hide that they are responsible for wrongly interpreting ORC 2744 and thereby instructing courts to misinterpret the Immunities Defenses law to the detriment of the public.
<br><br>
BUT in FEDERAL COURT the recent case against the Scioto County Jailers who caused the death of an inmate by maliciously and recklessly denying him medical attention has not been so corruptly dismissed on immunity for the jailers. The Cincinnati Federal District Judges on the Scioto inmate's case specifically used ORC 2744.03 (A)(6)... to say the case should go ahead, immunity was not granted in Ohio under Ohio law interpreted <u>by federal judges </u>.
<br><br>
So WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE DEATH-SQUAD's FEDERAL CASE...?
<br><br>
Why have they not used the LIE that the Coroner has an ANIMOSITY POWERED AGENDA AGAINST THE SHERIFF's OFFICERS.. together with ORC 2744 to say the case should go ahead??
<br><br>
Phillips made the point that Dr Varnau's website usages were 'proprietary' acts and so in Federal Court, they would be able under ORC 2744.03 (A)(5) to <u>demand rejection of dismissal</u> SINCE (in evaluating a Motion to Dismiss on the basis of Immunity like the Commissioners and Dr Varnau are claiming) THE COURT WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO BELIEVE THE PLAINTIFFS' LIE THAT DR VARNAU's ACTS WERE DONE IN BAD FAITH AND LIKELY MALICIOUS toward the aggrieved Death Squad.
<br><br>
rotfNotLaughing... even though it's likely that Phillips' admission that he had trouble finding any cases in Ohio law to support his contention that this case should go forward.. rotfl....
<br><br>
The Death-Squad's lawyer's handiwork is <a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/DeathSquadFederalCourt-EmptinessGoesOn.pdf">here</a>... see for yourself,,, of course the lawyers will argue that <b>Phillips has no case law FROM OHIO in the flood of crucial citations,</b> and rightly it should be recognizable that <b>citing case law from states all over the map would require unreasonable familiarity with the code books for mountains of states for each federal judge</b>, ignoring that they are lawyers from their chosen specific state.....
<br><br>
But Indy-us wants you to know that he cannot *wonder* what case law *should* do for these murderous thugs..... agreed?
<br><br>
Can Phillips argue that IF they had taken this case to State of Ohio Courts then it would have been thrown out, just like Scioto's jail inmate's sister's case was before going federal, so he took the case directly to Federal Court WITHOUT GOING TO OHIO's COURTS.....
<br><br>
<b>It seems to me that the Federal Court Judge should throw the case out because the DeathSquad hadn't exhausted their remedies before the law IN THE STATE before approaching the Federal Court.</b> Federal Court should not be available to thugs and their lazy, incompetent lawyers
<br><br>
What about IF the TRO case is thrown out (as it ought to be), would that count as exhausting the remedies in the state of origin? Who can say? But I doubt it...
<br><br>
Of course it would be worse if the TRO case were <u>not</u> thrown out, as it should have been... because of the <b>horrible precedents Gusweiler is setting into 'case law'</b>.......
<br><br>
Want to see what case law would look like after Gusweiler and Ringland get through with case law abominating.....
<br><br>
Gusweiler and Ringland were the immunity-for-abusive-civil-servant violative judges in that case that went to the OSC above... Did you see which county government office was the instant cause that got the case to the OSC where the OSC got a logic demonstration that the OSC had 'dirty laundry' to clean up on their violative interpretation of immunity now enshrined in case law on immunity.. Brown County does things differently out of court
<br><br>
With the obvious malfeasance already built into case law, wouldn't it be funny to testify that CASE LAW SHOULD BE SWEPT INTO THE TRASH.. making the lawyers all argue from scratch as it should be...
<br><br>
Just like much of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS WRITTEN INVALIDLY BY LEGISLATORS should be invalidated by a team of constitutional law experts, double checking one another... etc, etc
<br><br>
The requirement for proper mathematical logic applications and training of lawyers could and should have been a precondition for them to be entrusted with a structure of such importance and extent over human wellbeing as Case Law..
<br><br>
Is that justice construction any less important than the space launches with astronauts lives at risk? Is that justice function of so little importance as crucial to peace, pursuit of happiness and rightful liberties that the library of case law would be sloppily built, unlike bridges and skyscrapers, we hope..?
<br><br>
What say you? Can this be incrementally cleaned up? Time to think again... ttyl <br><br><br>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-398688135401702192015-03-19T13:30:00.000-07:002015-04-02T09:22:42.941-07:00Judge's Dilemma --- Eagle's Brief Wins In Spite of Felony Ambush JUDGE GUSWEILER'S DILEMMA --- EAGLE'S BRIEF WINS
<br><br>
Varnau's Attorney WON ON THE MERITS.....at every turn in the issues, as we shall display in the Varnau/Eagle Brief below, (plus the downloadable annotated full filings of his opponents' lawyers)
<br><br>
IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN HOWEVER whether the JUDGE WILL DECIDE the issues BASED ON MERITS.......
<br><br>
after all, Gusweiler's so corruptible that's it's openly admitted that 'the other party' wouldn't supply a candidate.... Humanly suggesting that the 'two-party' system has no meaning as seen in Ohio when, last election year, they set aside urgent work and fully collaborated legislatively on shutting out the frozen idea that any other party could run for office, then shut the door on third party (Libertarian this time) objections in the one-party courts in Ohio. Something for another post... For now, it's a toss up what level of corruption vs merits will be coming in this case.
<br><br>
But before we begin, we should warn you that you are being watched... if this were a sitcom, this would be hilarious..... that moronic Phillips law team that the Death-Squad hired, has done it again. His ignorance of the law, courtroom strategy, the internet, the public and their rights is stunning....
<br><br>
<b>In the Death-Squad's frozenly-invalid attempt (among their lying) to find evidence that the Coroner was in violation of the order not to 'convene' an inquest,</b> he claims at the end of his vaunted Closing Argument in his final Brief that they found with diligent sleuthing <b>**another** violation of the TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) on convening an inquest. Proof of defiance. Right here on this blog site.</b> ... Can you imagine they could advertise us any better? Whoohoo!
<br><br>
How, you may ask did the Coroner convene an inquest based on our respected postings?
<br><br>
Well you see that idiot Death-Squad lawyer, Phillips has to go tor the contempt-ruling tyranny target. Why? Because Phillips and company wouldn't admit he had no case, admitting that Eagle, the coroner's personal lawyer was defeating them left and right in the filings. So -- on top of inciting more deputies and sheriff and prosecutor to pile on the coroner with their own law teams -- Phillips had to bring in his law office partner so as to make a more impressive presence since their handiwork so far was so inferior, as filed, and their opponent Coroner Varnau had two lawyers, that would never do!
<br><br>
Hence. in desperation, when the Judge showed no decent put down on their Motion for Contempt based on phony interpretation of the TRO content, they decided to go after the contempt charges with falsified evidence, and total repetitions with their assembled mob of lawyers -- all shouting the line they'd agreed on even though none of them can seem to read and see it's not what the law or the order says --Phillips stupidly is claiming that our copy of the Coroner's work files (preparing for her inquest if allowed by this corrupt court) is proof that she's leaking the content of her inquest on our website, because we were showing their big felony-acquired video in spite of all the challenging lying they put her through at the hearing about that pilfered file.
<br><br>
I guess we should welcome y'all to the inquest but unfortunately it is not here and is still awaiting tyranny's decision on whether the controllers will reveal their despicable fist or allow the semblance of 'rule of law' to go forward.
<br><br>
Phillips does expect the court to believe that the coroner supplied the internet's public world with the here displayed (previous posting) coroner's comparison of the death-squad's interrogation 'answers' with the hallway security camera's video evidence. Imagine the levels of ubiquitous stupidity required for such belief, just on the surface.
<br><br>
The first thing this mob of ignorant lawyers needs to learn is what constitutes CONVENING an inquest (which we'll describe later) and then the rabid mob of stupid coroner's opponents need to learn that there are consequences for *THEIR* OWN BEHAVIOR. WE GOT THE COPY OF THE CORONER'S FILES BY LEGITIMATE MEANS THAT *THEY* ARRANGED. Thank you stupid Phillips for opening the door to distribution. Straight from the evidence files at the courthouse as public records request target
<br><br>
But the issue of contempt for court stupidity in allowing a hacking-based bit of electronic work to stand as validly usable evidence on TRO violation has ballooned. So that now the contempt for court's honorable function is now openly seeable as the unifying characteristic throughout the mob, not at all in the coroner and her law team, led by Eagle
<br><br>
IF GUSWEILER IS LOOKING FOR WHO TO CHARGE WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT, IT SHOULD BE THE DEATH-SQUAD LAWYER! Why ? <b>Because the judge knows that he, personally, had to give out the DVD </b>(he had it in his personal safe instead of in the court case file) to the Court Recorder so she could make a copy in response to an already filed (first open day of court after the Saturday hearing, one of the bloodhounds was at the courthouse with his request money) FOIA/Public Records Request. So GUSWEILER KNOWS THE DVD AND ITS CONTENTS ARE VALIDLY OUT HERE in the public's hands coming from his own safekeeping. How will he react to Phillips flimflamming him.
<br><br>
As a result. if the Judge dares to pound his contempt gavel on the coroner over these video files, he's acting contrary to his personal knowledge. Agreed that such would be openly challengeable to the Bar Association? Maybe we should visit them at their next meeting or maybe swing by their facebook page as entertainment March 20th when Gusweiler is giving a talk on domestic relations, oy......
<br><br>
So Phillips claiming stupidly in his Closing Argument the surprise final blow of his mob that the Coroner is guilty of violating the TRO by handing DVD contents out, with Phillips naming our blog (with the false claim that they found it in a search for the pending inquest report title) to blame the Coroner for our copy as if it were a TRO violation for it being in circulation, is hilariously outrageous nonsensical lying and should QUALIFY AS LYING TO THE COURT, in an obstruction of justice attempt by 'the Plaintiffs' Lawyer'....
<br><br>
BINGO, Contempt of Court on top of Felony 5 intrusion into the private storage of the Coroner's work data... how many months of jailtime scenes of Phillips in orange suit should we be drooling over...
<br><br>
Well... Enough fun from Phillip's idiocy, let's look at decent court writing and the MERITS OF THE CASE per Eagle, the Coroner's personal lawyer..... a real pro. Unlike Phillips, and his mob all involved in support of the Restraining Order.
<br><br><br>
Eagle begins, saying he's not going to repeat his well researched and established position from his previous brief (just citing it in the judge's folder), nor recite a litany of evidence items suggested with reservations and encumber the Closing Argument and reduce the power of the logic, law and facts. Instead he goes right to the Status of the Arguing, and lays out a knock-out list of TRO-invalidation facts that reduce the arguing to the remaining issues only. As we see here, he has firm control of the weaknesses of his opponents:
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-01.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
Hence he says <b>there's only one question left before the court </b>(deferring contempt discussions til after the crucial TRO issue is resolvable, dissolving the restraining order and releasing any idea of contemptible behavior by the mob til the end)..
<br><br>
That one question: <b> CAN A CORONER DO AN INQUEST AFTER A DEATH CERTIFICATE -- FINAL OR NOT? </b> which he says is the statutatory, legal, policy and practical question...
<br><br>
<ul>
<b>--1) In the Revised Code, </b> the sections on the Coroner's duties say how and with what needed goal the coroner must proceed. but there is NO STATEMENT THAT LIMITS THE CORONER'S INQUIRIES TO JUST WHAT'S NEEDED FOR A DEATH CERTIFICATE.... as Eagle puts it, <b> "no authority says 'no'. </b> and since the burden of proof is on the Death-Squad (as Plaintiff) side, they have no law behind them,
<br><br>
<b>-- 2) In case law </b>(the only source of rulings left), Eagle cites two crucial defining cases. The cited quotes define the responsibility and show DISCRETION as belonging to the Coroner...
<br><br>
Quoting fragments... <b>The coroner may properly decide to hold an inquest whenever. </b> [she] is "for reasons of substance led to <b>surmise or think </b> that the <b>death has been caused by violence" </b> ... and further, <b>her public report </b> is to cover the primary <b>'mode, manner and cause' </b> but the investigation is to report on <b>"time, place" and "all attendant circumstances" </b>. In those circumstances, <b>her discretion is her own guide </b>.
<br><br>
<b>-- 3) The key is the coroner's requirement to report for the public</b>... the coroner's records of investigating, especially the inquest being OPEN... law enforcement is opposed to recognizing the dual purpose, of the <b>coroner's public record </b> that's it is more than the co-ordination phase with law enforcement (including filing the death certificate for financial and probate reasons)... In common law, case law. etc the coroner's records and reporting is <b>to balance the secretive nature of the grand jury proceedings </b> which is (for obvious reasons) <i>crucial in cases where the death occurred at the hands of law enforcement </i>..... so the public's right to assurance that the public safety questions and answers have been dealt with to their satisfaction...
<br> <br>
Eagle is the only one to honor the openly stated purpose of the record required and the public proceedings, compared to the closed doors of law enforcement. They need to close the coroner's doors in order for comfortable tyranny to succeed.
<br><br>
The rest don't care about the public's rights nor the next of kin. And public safety rights would insist that no one wants a MURDER SUSPECT with badge and gun TO HANDLE THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS WHEN TROUBLE KNOCKS OR COULD KNOCK.... would you?
<br><br>
Law enforcement hides their proceedings, the Coroner is the counterweight for the public's benefit....
</ul>
<br><br>
This <b>Goldson case meets those requirements </b>, so the Coroner has authority to do the inquest at HER DISCRETION and <b>the meaning of the 'substantive reason' is now recognizable as urgent since Dr Varnau has finally received the hallway video and other data that were denied her when she was first working on the death certificate deadline limit.</b> The eyes of the protector of the public, the next-of-kin and the deceased do see the evidence not presented to the grand jury because meaning eluded the bias-blinded law enforcement and thereby denying the Grand Jury the needed evidence to go forward with their INDICTMENTS plural and numerous.
<br><br>
<b>And to ensure the court does not fail to see the full extent of the wrongheadedness of the Plaintiff's demands, Eagle has a reality check for Gusweiler, </b> and for us and the public paying attention.
<br><br>
Specifically that one question of whether these officers can demand the court stop the coroner has <b>incredibly important policy and precedent considerations,</b> which surely it does.
<br><br>
<ul> <b> 1) </b> <i>It is staggering to imagine</i> the IMPLICATIONS OF SUCH A PRECEDENT of <b>the use of the courts by one official to stop another office holder from the performance of the discretionary rights of that office holder. </b>
<br><br>
And to wake up the law enforcement audience as well as the judge, Eagle painted a picture of <i> BCI 'surmising' that there was a possibility of more evidence in an old murder case and announcing that they were re-opening the investigation BUT one of the suspects originally (or the coroner) sued them to get the court to stop BCI </I>.... <br> <br>
Gusweiler is thereby challenged to consider his hasty backing for the Death-Squad even if he foolishly still ignores their guilt. That image of police re-opening an old unsolved murder case is clearly a possible and desirable vision that his haste will block if he ignores the MERITS... that opportunity to reach for the implications of the possible evidence is what most would consider to be acceptable or even desirable in order to get a decent resolution. Else Law Enforcement failures complicate their relationship to the public.
<br><br>
So the judge should envision the can of worms he is opening with his unwise choice to not dismiss such a case as this Death-Squad complaint.. without further delaying
<br><br>
<b>and 2) </b> in this case, a homicide on sheriff's hands, THE INTERFERENCE IS PARTICULARLY STUNNING since <i>the court will be "shielding" a government office by prohibiting a public inquiry of <b>a death in those government officials hands </b>, because they disagree with the office holder authorized to do such inquiries.</i> Clearly <b>such an act has humanly shocking images of tyranny. </b>
</ul><br><br>
Such images stir the public mind to be severely distrustful of any law enforcement and to view the court as an instrument of tyrants.. Visions that should wake up whatever decency still resides in the courtroom.
<br><br>
It draws a line that, should Gusweiler cross it, he will have the infamy of being the confirmation that this country has been lost here in Ohio. The vision of summoning the Federal Law enforcement holds no comfort either. Agreed?
<br><br>
So if interfering is not wholesome, making the pieces of the governmental process co-operate by stand aside of one another what does that do to the big picture. Eagle's description of relationships and boundaries, keeps the coroner in a role of peer, not subordinate to law enforcement.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-03.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
And as a peer, on a high ground footing with discretion as has not been seen in action before in this county (and maybe in Ohio) where the coroner in the past was as minimally involved as they could manage so as to not interrupt their nine-to-five office work with paying patients.
<br><br>
This coroner, Dr Varnau, has a strong interest in forensics that has been only a private reading project and front row observing process, and (as an Obstetrician bringing lives into the world) is accustomed (more so than the usual family medicine type in politics) to stop and accommodate emergencies off her routine. And being a military woman now retired from that service, has the commitment to be an active coroner. With a husband to assist and accompany her to ungodly death scenes. Though she was a nurse in war zones it was not in any trenches, though ordinance was a constant factor. Does she frighten more authorities in government than most women in authority? Interesting scares (of course never mentioned by her lawyer)
<br><br>
The underbelly of law enforcement in many places has become unseemly corrupted and cosy with unwholesome power, that now writhes and strikes at the oversight that a coroner, using the office for the public record as designed, does bring to the office.
<br><br>
The discretion of an active coroner will be exciting, judging by the law's definitions of what constitutes discretion..
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-02.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
As for what will happen as this levening rises through the process of an inquest.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-04.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
Welcome to a balance in law enforcement not granted to many places.... only if the Court resists the writhing tentacles of the mob assembled.
<br><br>
On the Merits, case dismissed.
<br><br>
Next Eagle attacks the invalid Contempt charges that the opposing mob are aiming to catalyze in the judge's thinking, since his support for their restraining order would be in trouble on the merits.
<br><br>
First order of business is to establish what the Judge's Orders were. Simply the document said he was prohibiting and enjoining the coroner and her staff, volunteer or other, from CONVENING THE INQUEST. Plain, 'inartful' (?) and simple.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-05.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
Which then means that the actions complained of by the mob of lawyers must be limited to that prohibition. But that is not what the filings by the mob show.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-06.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
The mob could not claim any inquest had been convened so they tried to say that the judge meant this and then meant that because they had stumbled on some work project of the Coroner's husband, gathering materials for the eventual inquest in order to be prepared, as well as preparation for the Death-Squad's other case (in federal court, which court was strangely silent, except that the commissioners' lawyers had filed a motion to be excused)....
<br><br>
Such tactics are why there are RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES that say judge's orders require specificity or they are sources of constitutional errors and wrongful torment. In fact vague orders and laws are void in case law records.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-08.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
Eagle even pointed out that the mob had 2 full months to complain about what the Judge had put in his orders and make it a specific as they needed for their big claim of fear and harming. The mob was getting so unreasonable about their stretching of the orders that Eagle had to remind them that the courts already had decided that impossible demands were not ever grounds for contempt rulings.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/Eagle-07.jpg" WIDTH="540">
<br><br>
So far, the mob had nothing that qualified as proof-worthy evidence on which to base a severe claim... a claim that Eagle would feel the sting of failure both professionally and extremely personally as it shows in his intense defense that occupied more pages than all the rest combined.
<br><br>
And in particular, the ambush of the Felony Hacking evidence set by Phillips and Gates and their unknowable 'source' the night before court definitely opened the flood gates on Eagle's nerves. Page and pages.
<br><br>
His recognition of cheaters, with one in charge who unrighteously seemed greedy for any opportunity to escape judging on the merits -- in a venue that requires intelligent reasonable debating as he and Dr Varnau were prepared for -- triggered Eagle's nightmare visions of myriad twisted cheats that might have been about to be sprung. Resulting in an extended, hydra defense that seemed as tangled as needed to deal with medusa..
<br><br>
The lengthy ordeal of the rest of the brief reveals something of the humanly ungodly terror that ambushes inflict even on the professionals of high skill. That whole medusa ordeal should never have been required in any decent judging on merits... and confidently, Eagle and Varnau should have stopped defending and walked away knowing their arguing had the merits on their side of the ledger. But when dealing with tyrants and mobs, while only permitted the intelligent/reasonableness tactics in a combat where jail and huge fines are wielded by cheaters, does destroy balancing and confidence. So you fight, swinging many directions in wild disorder, just to cover anything imaginable if possible.
<br><br>
<br>
So with those considerations made clear, Eagle answers the remaining issue on Contempt and Computer Crime but only after identifying the tactic as an AMBUSH that the court did not censure.. It triggered Eagle's instincts and he defends every angle that Gusweiler could twist. .Particularly unnerving are the internal contradictions in the Plaintiff's claims and tactics showing that there is no justice in their ambush goal intended. Strictly to harm, and humiliate Dr Varnau with the mob's own total contempt for their professional responsibilities and privileges as 'members of the court'.
<br><br>
Fully the contempt of court is on the hands and face of Phillips and his mob. Resorting to attempting to humiliate her badly enough that the judge would find her contemptible and release any inhibition to corrupt ruling that may yet linger among the past history of such tyrannical judge tactics.
<br><br>
Fully annotated filings are here for those who wish to entertain the idea that the incompetent performance of Phillips couldn't have been so total... it was total and stunning that he makes his living as a lawyer and the idea that he could have dropped out of law school would be the only saving grace for his despicable performance. Nor did he do his clients any good, which is the only compensation for tolerating reading his lies and law-twisting.
<br><br>
Phillips, as the Plaintiff's lawyer HAD THE BURDEN OF PROOF REQUIRED and it surely was no where to be seen when 'no authority said no' and case law said the Coroner's discretion extended where ever she surmised it needed to go based on her reasonable ideas of 'substance' IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE PUBLIC WITH AN OPEN ANSWER REPORT. See for yourself, Phillips twists the law to say 'no' when the law does not logically do anything like 'no' and then fills the air with humanure...
<br><br>
Find your deep boots and protect your breathing...
<br><br><a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/DunningDeathSquad-v-Varnau.pdf"> Annotated PhillipsDeathSquad</a>
<br><br>
The others get even more hilariously hysterical, totally inventing their opponent til their target is unrecognizable and their impotent imagined punchingbag is feared to be next seeable descending on their unobserving innocent relatives and torturing them with open hostility and broadcasting the entire circus all over the county and the countryside...
<br><br>
The interesting part (after their scary-punchingbag) is <b>their finally revealed rationale for filing this attack. The BC Sheriff's Office has a HISTORY of suspicious suicides</b>... Something the Public should have had a coroner to rectify when they happened, leading to major distrust of law enforcers from the BCSO.
<br><br>
<b>The previous suspicious suicide was John Funk in April 18-19 of 2011 and the coroner (McKinley) didn't show his face b/c the BCSO said he wasn't needed,</b> as we heard in Court last year. But the law says that the coroner has to keep the autopsy records and in the past BC coroner files is <b>a photo of Funk's neck showing a total blooded ligature mark ALL THE WAY AROUND THE NECK, which is inconsistent with the description of a hanging written in the data</b> .
<br><br>
And what of another death at the BC Jail, John Gault? When we were data mining with this idea of multiple suspicious deaths, a few commenters at public media websites from years back, turned up a couple that indicated the writer was partial to the idea that some unsavory influence had been the real cause of Gault's suicide at the BC Jail. One specifically referenced neck marks, and another simply wanted justice for Gault to R.I.P.
<br><br>
These now-attacking Corrections Offices from BCSO are afraid this CURRENT properly performing coroner would start a precedent that would lead to Funk's justice ( at the very least, indirectly) producing more indictments of Jailers. In fact, <b>in the BCI interrogations, it was Dunning who said the Goldson case was his 'second suicide' at the jail </b>since he arrived. Figure that into the motivations.......
<br><br><a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/DunningMisc-v-Varnau.pdf"> Annotated Gast/MiscJailers</a>
<br><br>
As for the Sheriff's fairly brief Brief, we will point out that he ignored the fact that he and Breyer refused to co-operate with the Coroner's earlier investigation (another obstruction of justice), then repeats the Phillips goofy interpretation of jurisdiction as just over the body and death certificate not supported by any reading of the ORC on Coroner authority and responsibility.
<br><br>
So now <b>we'd wonder how he'd justify his opposition to the Coroner's revisiting the process of investigating with the new evidence</b> she's been provided with this case <b>when he was apparently re-opening old unsolved deaths back when he first was elected and attempting to build his image as an active sheriff seeking justice</b>.
<br><br>
Apparently that was grease for the goose but not the gander...
<br><br>
He should be reminded that his own re-visiting of cold cases could have been stopped by some suspect at that time if the opportunity to work on new evidence was deniable as he and his lawyer are attempting now, crashing his image building and not many cases would be ever re-opened leaving justice out in the cold....
<br><br><a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Judge&PressHackingFelony/GusweilersDilemma/DunningWenninger-v-Varnau.pdf"> Annotated Kelly/Wenninger</a>
<br><br>
No timetable on the ruling.......... see ya........
<br><br><br>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-47628419474749660252015-03-14T04:06:00.001-07:002015-03-15T03:37:49.485-07:00Last Ditch:: The Judge Stoops to Felony -- (THE EVIDENCE DVD)<b>
Last Ditch Effort Time for the Death Squad and their retinue of cover-up crony teams, local and state!
<br><br>
Since there was no substance in the Plaintiff-Murderers case (see last posting) and their 'unsuspecting' lawyer Phillips had inadvertently given the Defendant-Coroner the prize evidence-videos that the murderous Deputies and Jailers had prevented her from getting, in spite of law-authorized subpoenas, the Judge was left with very little to work on, in order to cheat the coroner. He doesn't worry about cheating Justice every day.
</b><br><br><br>
That's where this story stands. For the details on the earlier battles, we've covered those in these earlier posts, since all this chaos takes time.
<br><br>
If you decently want the overview -- In chronological order:<br>
<ul>
-- <b>Threats & Death at the Jail,</b> and the Coroner's Investigation Points to the 'Death-Squad' of Deputies and Jailers, compounded with higher Sheriff Office authorities destroying evidence and enlisting state authorities to cover the whole mess up. Mother of the victim uses her rightful access to the coroner's data to stir the county up. How we waited for the <b>TEST of the Justice System</b> to see whether the local Grand Jury can deal with what's coming. WHILE WE EXAMINE THE CORONER'S REPORT... the irrefutable evidence logic was the MARKS ON THE KID'S THROAT -- BLOODED, NARROW, FLAT AND PULLING UPWARD FROM THE BACK, thoroughly never caused by the neatly tied bunchy WIDE SHEET with UNSTRETCHED KNOTTED END ON THE SIDE OF HIS NECK --, see for yourselves... BOOM.. HOMICIDE...... <br>**
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Sheet&LigatureStrapTreachery.jpg" WIDTH="500">**<br>
gee whiz this is going to be a slam dunk we hoped if only that Coroner's Report was spread around. So we and the open source local bloodhounds did
<br><br>
-- <b> No luck but surprises.</b><br>
<ul>
Surprise #1: <b>The Death-Squad Strikes Back...</b> While waiting for the Crony Special Prosecutor (Breyer) and his Attorney General Special Investigator (Hornyak) to complete their Travesty of Justice Defense-instead-of-prosecution to bamboozle the country bumpkins on the Grand Jury, the Death Squad hurries its strategy into Federal Court with another lawyer (Phillips) in order to claim the Coroner is violating their civil rights, get that?
<br><br>
Surprise #2: The bold liar (Breyer) from Columbus releases a GRAND JURY REPORT, not to be outdone by Ferguson's scum. Boy, did we have a field day taking it apart, nailing Breyer's SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE gathered by the Coroner, his TWISTED LAW DEFINING to cover up assault by deputies, and his CONCEALING THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE FROM THE LIGATURE MARK, -- namely it's back-pulled-direction and its narrowness and bloodiness (versus the neatly level, unstretched sheet set for side yank-resistance)..
<br><br>
Since crucial pieces that appeared to be needed to identify alternative 'when' and 'how' were missing (the hallway video) and the actual BCI Report, denied to the Coroner as well, much speculating and logic-testing did pile up.
</ul><br><br>
-- <b> Free-for-all Lawsuit Blizzard Erupts</b> -- As if the federal civil rights case filed in August was decently defendable, and if the Grand Jury data was so solidly relieving those Death-Squad deputies and Jailers, then you might wonder why they were so TERRIFIED of the INQUEST PLANNED BY THE CORONER TO RESOLVE THE DISAGREEING EVIDENCE between the Coroner's Report and the Grand Jury Prosecutor's Report -- which resolution obviously needed to be done. Answer: it was because at an inquest the Death-Squad would have no lawyer in the room to fend off questions they didn't want to answer under oath... Two of them had already DECLINED A CONTINUATION INTERVIEW (under oath) BY BCI in the early stages. Gee how that could hurt them! Yes it would.
<br><br>
So -- against all standards of fair play in court battle -- Judge Gusweiler let the Death-Squad's lawyer file a lawsuit WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE CORONER THAT THEY WANTED A RESTRAINING ORDER TO STOP THE INQUEST SO SHE COULDN"T OPPOSE IT and tie it up with court wrangling while her resolution process (as well as the federal court's agenda, long prepared for already and having priority) went ahead, even though it was not due for a couple weeks. Imagine that. Then a lawyer for the Sheriff jumps in with his own lawsuit and refuses to comply with the Coroner's subpoenae for his email and phone records. More lawyers jump in, as well as the local Prosecutor jumping out, and the Commissioners get all excited, having just been forced to pay more lawyer bills for all of them, plus an apparently unrelated law altercation in the Board of Elections. Boy were they hot!
<br><br>
Gusweiler doesn't recuse himself, and instead butts in to federal court territory --clearly unlawfully to relieve HIS FAVORITE BULLIES with a Temporary Restraining Order and with all the lawyers, jumping in and out, there was NO TIME THEY COULD AGREE ON for a hearing AS ALL AVAILABLE AND READY. So all the action only consisted of Motions and Answers for months. In the altercation, the BCI Summary for Breyer to use on the Grand Jury became available and showed that it was not just Breyer whitewashing claims that deceived the GrandJury, it was ALSO Hornyak DOING THE REAL FORGERY OF EVIDENCE. They should both do 'time' instead of being paid county tax funds. Agreed? We were hoping the Commissioners would support NON-PAYMENT. No luck!
<br><br>
<b>-- A Breakthrough: </b> All the Motions and Oppositions became a circus with only one good performer, Tom Eagle, the Coroner's personal lawyer. As can be seen in the law research presented and logic of application argued. By contrast the Death-Squad lawyer (Phillips) bungled the ball, opening access to the video evidence that the Coroner had wanted and then, realizing the danger with Tom he ordered the Judge to fire Tom. A genuine Circus but <b>A CHANCE AT JUSTICE </b>. And that video (in a publicity ploy by Phillips) ends up online at Youtube,,, Open Source Bloodhounds delight and even though the coroner couldn't convene an inquest, the bloodhounds were making progress, holding their breath in realization that Gusweiler wasn't reliably interested in truth or facts or even law.
<br>
</ul>
<br><br>
-- SO THIS IS WHERE WE STAND with Gusweiler just completing the long awaited hearing on Saturday the 7th: It was an all day affair and the Judge was clearly hostile to the Coroner but it didn't help his crony lawyers who had not a bit of decent argument for Gusweiler to plagiaristically adapt for his 'Decision'. As a consequence, and not ignoring the involvement (in one capacity potentially) of 8 lawyers, the all day hearing did set the date of the 16th of March for those submitting Briefs to have them filed, WITH NO CHANCE OF RESPONDING TO OTHER'S BRIEFS.
<br><br>
For anyone questioning the opinion that the Judge was hostile, you must remember that he CHOSE TO VIOLATE HER RIGHTS AS A QUASI JUDICIAL ELECTED OFFICIAL WHEN HE CHOSE TO ISSUE THE RESTRAINING ORDER -- a move for which he had no authority and hence that reveals from the start that his allegiance IS NOT TO JUSTICE BUT TO HIS SUPPORT BASE IN THE SHERIFF's OFFICE.
<br><br>
Can you imagine how POWERLESS THE JUDGE IS WITHOUT THE SHERIFF's OFFICERS TO ENFORCE HIS ORDERS, TO DELIVER HIS BAD NEWS TO CITIZENS, TO JAIL THOSE WHO REFUSE TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE's ORDERS...??
<br><br>
His allegiance, just like a PROSECUTOR's ALLEGIANCE to law officers, is to the bully force THAT EMPOWERS HIM IN REALITY.
<br><br>
Gusweiler should have stepped aside and handed the case to at least an outside judge appointed by the OSC. At least that was clearly a conflict of interest in his choice to go ahead and automatically makes it no surprise of him being hostile to the Coroner.
<br><br>
But is goes deeper. in several dimensions. But staying within the area of Court operations and rules, he is now stuck with his INVALID POSITION AND OPENING VIOLATIONS OF LAW.
<br><br>
And.... With no decent argument coming from his allied party against the Coroner, and with the video data she needed for the Inquest now in her hands due to a tactical error by his allies' lawyer, you'd think this Court would be backpedalling rapidly.
<br><br>
But in for a penny, in for a pound, it seems. Weighing it up:
<ul>
<br>
1-- Gusweiler butted in where the Federal Court had already been summoned by the same Plaintiffs, over the same issues so it should have been time to recognize an untenable intrusion (that would be inherent in different opinions and whose should stand) and duck out.... but no...
<br><br>
2-- Gusweiler has no authority to prevent another office holder, a peer, from doing what the law authorizes that office holder to do, which is precisely what he is attempting to impose with his restraining order.... has he even considered those wrongheaded ideas as untenable in any orders he might want, now that Tom Eagle has clearly and elegantly made that claim and defended it...? No that's still on Gusweiler's agenda.. making the Coroner's Lawyer a double annoyance.
<br><br>
POWER IMPLICATIONS;<br><ul>
-- Apparently Gusweiler has no fear of any higher court authority overseeing his outrageous usurpation AND PUNISHING HIM, which implies that in Ohio, judges are dictators. He just has to be able to make some distorted argument -- based on lies of the plaintiffs that he grants credibility to, deserved or not. So far, Phillips handiwork doesn't sound credible. Making the restraining order permanent doesn't look too promising on its own.
<br><br>
-- Curiously, the Ohio State Coroners Association -- who should be screaming at this UNPRECEDENTED violation of their PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS -- is not among the players demanding that the usurper stand down which then allows this outrage to be a precedent to subjugate the defenders of the dead (if they ever live up to their obligation).
<br><br>
But then again, maybe there's a matter of financing as a sign of weakness in their position in the hierarchy... where do they get their funding and where is their law department.... a map check of the head office of OSCA shows that it is a cigar box on a highway access road filled with truck loading docks... another indication of the loss of stature of the Common Law defender of the dead.... They are comatose and led by one of the coroners who was silent when Breyer interpreted their medical findings as 'suicide'. You cannot determine 'suicide' from just the body so Breyer's pretense was that there was nothing indicating a 'hogtying' and 'abuse' and the coroner overseeing the autopsy found silence safer.
<br></ul><br></ul>
So why didn't Gusweiler either go ahead already at the Hearing since the Motions battle have been the arguing game in play for MONTHS if he's going to do it on his gambling with power in conflict with law..?
<br><br>
MAYBE HIS PLAN IS TO AVOID THE CONFLICT-ON-MERIT AND USE HIS TRUMP CARD
<br><br>
At the Saturday Hearing, Gusweiler was not afraid to be dictatorial and indicate that he could decide the case on his whim as we saw him build the possibility that he would use the Contempt of Court charges against the Coroner initiated falsely by Phillips earlier and added to at the hearing..
<br><br>
Back when the Restraining Order was first placed, the Coroner's husband who is in Law Enforcement, a lawyer and engineer by training and who accompanies his wife to death scenes for her safety, had started working on organizing opportunities for any in the community who had knowledge of some aspect of the Zachary Goldson homicide situation to contact him. He also manages a lot of the research and website content for her office from his own background. Hence he was actively checking some of the engineering behind the physical components of the sprinklerheads, where there were large disputes between the Prosecutor's claims and the earlier evidence that formed part of the bases for the Coroner's Report on those devices being claimed as part of the suicide claim.
<br><br>
When the TRO went into effect, Varnau (Dennis) disconnected the link for the inquest data collection. But further work on engineering data and analysis of data was NOT CONVENING ANYTHING. Which was compatible with the precise statement of the Court Order, as can be seen. Specifically the Gusweiler wrote:
<ul>
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:<br>
1. That temporarily, until further order of this Court, the Defendant Brown County Coroner's Office, and all those in active concert or participation with the office who receive actual notice of this order and each of them, be enjoined and restrained preventing Defendant from convening an inquest until further order of this Court.<br>
2. That the Plaintiffs have such other and further relief as may be equitable.
</ul><br><br>
The definition, law or otherwise. of 'convening' says that 'gathering a group' for a group purpose is what is enjoined. Phillips must never have done his homework in preparation for a test, or practiced for a play. It was the SETTING FOR THE TEST and/or the TICKET SELLING and LIVE PERFORMING that is the 'convening' for the stated purpose. In fact, the most competent and high performing students prepare for the lessons to be covered in the next class before ever setting foot in the lecture. (<b>Peak Learning</b>, by R. Gross).
<br><br>
Because Gusweiler indicated that he also was such a slouch in work habits as to consider doing preparation for a performance to be 'convening'. so even Tom Eagle decided to fold and be cautious about the tyranny of Contempt of Court by Judges who are already hostile to his client. Hence Eagle instructed the Varnaus to remove all public access to their work on the inquest. Public access does not mean remove it from your hard drive, by any stretch of law or silicon valley engineering. Nor does it mean that you have to sit on your hands totally.
<br><br>
But what if your hard drive is part of the 'cloud' -- the storage facilities of the internet, as the Varnaus' was?
<br><br>
The internet is a web of computers and hard drives and the catalog of public data is managed by the 'spyders' that crawl the index pages and provide the public search engines with direction to find the public areas of the interconnected systems. Anything not so hyperlinked to some domain's index is private. as confirmed by courts affirming that as 'protected computer resources' under the law. So Dennis Varnau was working on his own protected private hard drive. With a significant invested power point project to compare the Death-Squad's BCI-filmed-testimony with the provided footage of the security cameras' video files. Identifying the 'mis-speaking' and what happens to the handcuffs. Serious bloodhound results.
<br><br>
But now the tyranny factor opened the door to FELONY,
<br><br>
Wayne Gates, the editor of one of the local papers with the reputation of being the party-in-power's mouth, sought to favor the Death-Squad and their lawyer and build his reputation. Boy did his quest for fame succeed in his willingness to expose himself to the faulty law protection of Phillips. Gates effectively confessed (boldly and proudly) to committing a felony five (6-12 months prison) at the behest of Phillips. Who needs that lawyer! Phillips should have left his law degree at the door! Proper lawyer Research would have turned up 18 U.S.C. 1030 (a) etc or Ohio's state law's ORC 2913.04
<br><br>
Gates brought up the power point file on a laptop for the Court to see, using a private hyperlink. Dr Varnau and Eagle protested that such access was violating their private data and was not a public 'convening' of any kind.
<br><br>
Gusweiler was so eager to have something appearing to support his tyranny of Contempt rulings, that he wouldn't even hear of testing Eagle's assertion that the <i>screen could be merely displaying a cached file <b>from prior to the TRO</b>
</i>. And Gusweiler's glee at his hammering gavel of contempt charging led to his next move in his project to build a damaging case against the Coroner.
<br><br>
Considering his own lack of expertise, such display of tech expertise opens the door to both directions. In the hands of a favored party, the demonstration of knowledge of an area of expertise bolsters his already biased opinion of that party's credibility as an expert. In the hands of a disfavored party, such a demonstration is suspected as an attempt to deceive and evade the judge's questioning and thus offering GROUNDS FOR A TYRANNICAL CONTEMPT CHARGE.. No law reading, no fact-finding, no understanding, all inflated prejudice of supposed;y trustworthy opinion, straight tyranny.
<br><br>
He literally indicated that he was leaning toward considering Dr Varnau's answers as 'evasive'. It's an opening he's used in the past against opponents he considered too proficient in combat against a county dictocratic bureaucrat, so that the bureaucrat could win against the substance of the law and against the facts and science being in favor of the proficient party. More sly than the bold oppression of the creative fines-extortion seen in Ferguson, but serving the same goal, oppressive tyranny.
<br><br>
Gusweiler was so gleeful once the DVD copy was entered into evidence that he locked the DVD in his office safe instead of its proper place in the case file.
<br><br>
But it was immediately acquired under public records requests and circulated.... We'll look at it momentarily and with no cause for worry over further felony. because NOW IT'S PUBLIC DATA BY THE COURT RULES AND THE PLAINTIFF's CHOICE to enter it as court evidence!
<br><br>
Score points for Justice's possibility with the Death-Squad and cronies going to prison, BUT WHAT OF THE IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE CORONER OF GUSWEILER's TYRANNICAL CONTEMPT CHARGES TO PUT HER IN THE DEATH-SQUAD JAIL.
<br><br>
The dilemma excitement is only beginning. Don't you agree... Decisions on the Restraining Order are yet to be considered. Due to the number of lawyers and clients (though there's only one real pair of opponents), Gusweiler ordered those lawyers to submit their Briefs on Monday the 16th (next week) BUT ALL SIMULTANEOUSLY AND WITH NO ANSWERING battles. At the Clerk of Court's website, the case is 20150001
<br><br>
Now for the bombshell that's IN THE POWERPOINT VIDEO:<br><br>
[It's rather long but it moves well while in play]<br>
<b>Watch for the interview with <i>CO Felicia Landacre</i> (it's shown twice, the first time at the 19 minute mark, then at 38) and her religiously reported instructions from Meyer to Shadle Jr (on his smoke break) to get the cuffs that were put on Zach when they subdued him after the escape attempt. Then she watches them swing into action to get the cuffs and reports that THEY WENT STRAIGHT TO THE CELL. And that she supposed <i>'they had left the guy in the cuffs in the cell but didn't know about that'</i>
Then watch the clip as Shadle cuts his smoke break short (Landacre reported that they took only 5-10 minutes instead of 15, acting purposefully) and GOES DIRECTLY TO CELL #15... for reading their intended destination, watch their angle after they make the turn from the booking room, they walk diagonal toward the cell15 side of the hall not the commissary side of the hall... their feet stay to the left of the center line, definitely aiming to cell#15, not as an afterthought when getting to their destination. Cell 15 was their intended destination.
<br><br>
And per Dunning, they were to do a whole block check in a little while, so WHY PICK TO LOOK IN CELL15 AS A SPUR OF THE MOMENT CHECK **INSTEAD OF CHECKING CELL 14** WHERE THERE WAS A SUICIDAL INMATE THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE CHECKING **FREQUENTLY** and had clearly neglected. Any responsible impulsive checking would aim to patch up the neglected duty, agreed?
<br><br>
"Force of habit" (Shadles explanation for checking 15) was a joke on the cop-kissy interrogator who didn't even choke on it.......
<br><br>
GUILT ALL AROUND FOR THE DEATH-SQUAD, and ALL THEIR COVER UP TEAMS, local and DEWINE'S FOOLS,.. and now add Gusweiler and Gates as complicit fools, each with their own agendas.
<br><br>
--- not a chance of deceiving the jury of expected country bumpkins, not even with Hornyak and Breyer on team-coverup to make the claim that Zach **IN HANDCUFFS BEHIND HIS BACK** COULD HANG HIMSELF FROM THE SPRINKLER HEAD ---- BOOM !!!
<br><br>
And Landacre is CREDIBLE, not one of the suspects, was not near the events in the cell area at any point, but had a good watching post at the desk with the intercom and screens. And she got Meyer's call-content to relay and watch the effect. Perfect timing by a non-involved observer. So she's credible as a witness, good view/involvement but not even remotely a suspect.
<br><br>
By contrast, McKinzie spends time being pals with the suspects instead of staying in the front desk area where Shadle said was the *females'* area.
<br><br>
Landacre was the blessedly right person in the right place and the right time for Justice to have a chance! ENJOY --- WHILE YOU MAY, BECAUSE THE OUTCOME IS ANYTHING BUT KNOWABLE because this is a drain on everyone's resources.....</b>
<br><br>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/K0zcPWYAW00?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Dropbox Download if you prefer, try the copy at: <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/hj2siik1h71s1c5/did-zach-hang-himself-03-04-15.mp4">Comparing Testimonies and Security Camera Clips</a> (mp4)
<br><br> <br>
indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-55199026373044386562015-03-01T16:59:00.000-08:002015-04-02T09:11:29.856-07:00Death-Squad's Lawyer Hands Coroner the Victory.. A Chance for Justice<b>Death-Squad's Lawyer Hands Coroner the Victory..?? Opening up a Chance for Justice?</b>
<br><br>
ROTFL, unbelievable.. THE DEATH-SQUAD'S LAWYER INADVERTENTLY GIVES THE CORONER THE EVIDENCE SHE'D BEEN DENIED BY THE DEATH-SQUAD'S CRONIES -- AND THEN EMBARRASSINGLY, THAT DEATH-SQUAD LAWYER ATTEMPTS TO 'FIRE' HER LAWYER... WHAT NEXT! What Next!
<br><br>
And then OPEN SOURCE SLEUTHING TAKES OFF, in spite of the crony judge restraining the 'Defendants' -- Coroner Varnau and staff -- from 'convening the inquest.
<br><br>
Phillips --that LAWYER for that murderous bunch of sheriff's deputies and jailers now labeled the DEATH-SQUAD -- INADVERTENTLY GAVE THE CORONER ACCESS TO EVIDENCE THE SHERIFF&SHADLE HAD BLOCKED her from gaining via her law-authorized channels... not quite all that her subpoenas had specified in advocating for full investigating not being done by BCI, like death-squad phone records, but all the video records that the cover-up team of Shadle & the Sheriff & BCI had control of....
<br><br>
<b>So should we feel sympathy for such a criminal gang having the misfortune of having enlisted an incompetent court-mouthpiece... pshaw, no! </b>
<br><br>
WE SHOULD CELEBRATE WHAT LITTLE JUSTICE WE CAN FIND EVEN WHEN IT'S MERELY AN EARNED ACCIDENT..... so CHEERS!
<br><br>
oh yeah, Phillips thought he could overwhelm the courtroom battle so he was grabbing some favorable bravado, with his flashing the evidence in reach of the media, attempting to see them drool, but that was shortlived, and it did not compensate him as he'd planned for his lack of genuine law-based battle-position... Their claims are faulty in the extreme... -- AND so, after a couple of rounds in memorandum-battles, SEEING HE IS THOROUGHLY OUT-ARGUED BY TOM EAGLE, HER PERSONAL FAMILY LAWYER -- you won't believe what his next move is -- PHILLIPS ORDERS THE JUDGE TO FIRE THE CORONER'S LAWYER..... Can you imagine anything so absurd...
<br><br>
WHAT NEXT, what next, what next...... IN THIS BROWN COUNTY CIRCUS...
<br><br>
See for yourself:<br><ul>
<a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/SuicideWatchinCell14/EAGLEMotiontoDismiss.pdf">
Round One</a>: Eagle demolishes Phillips claims of 'having standing' to make demands for a restraining order, as well as Gusweiler's right to butt into an affair that's already in front of another court for adjudication (opening conflicts between courts trying an issue SIMULTANEOUSLY, TOTAL DISORDER)
<br><br>
<a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/SuicideWatchinCell14/EAGLEOppositionRemoveCounsel.pdf">
Round Two</a>: Eagle's opener is a priceless exercise in situational irony (of suspects demanding a judge as fact-finder to stifle fact-finding), followed by demonstrating that such tactics as phillips is demanding the court do are an insult to justice's battle-honor (not engaging in frivolous nor distraction tactics)... Phillips tried to bamboozle the court, trying to assert that you can't hire your own lawyer AT YOUR OWN EXPENSE (not the county's dime), when the county has hired you an official lawyer (b/c the county prosecutor Little was obligated to defend county officials but Little ducked on conflict of favors, so Little enlisted a colleague to do it pro bono, namely the county prosecutor from Pike County, named Robert Junk, who welcomed the role of co-counsel)
<br><br></ul>
We're beginning to empathize with the Commissioners trying to hide their faces and wish these court cases would go away... it must be thoroughly embarrassing, knowing everyone is laughing all around them...at least until the dread sets it, knowing the final round is a ruling from the indescribably wrongheaded Gusweiler...
<br><br>
Aggrieved BCers are so aware of Gusweiler's twisted 'law reading', if you can call it that, and lack of family rights and values, favoring govt dictocratic bureaucrats with "immunity" from liability for their usurped authority and reckless handling of children in recent school administrator cases... so aware of Gusweiler's treacherous perfidy that BCers are taking their cases to federal court instead of county Common Pleas.
<br><br>
You can't blame the ordinary BC citizen for this judgeship performance situation... It's not as though BCers had a choice and still re-elected Gusweiler, he was the only choice on the ballot. Sieg Heil Herr Republicrats.
<br><br>
The justice last straw hope is that maybe if Gusweiler gets the idea that the media -- and public's -- heat is not off what he's dealing with, and people crowd the courtroom, AND (he can't hide behind sealed documents) ALL THE CARDS WILL BE ON THE TABLE, (unlike the Podolski vs Sheriff case) he may decide his face is on the line.. right? Next Gusweiler move is a Saturday (because all the lawyers involved couldn't find a decent weekday as their agreed spot on their calendars)...
<br><br>
Wanna come by and watch? <b>The action starts March 7th at 10:00 AM (not a hard stretch for a Saturday morning)</b> if the judge is on time... once he's in and the doors go shut then it's near impossible to get in late (til there's an intermission which is unpredictable)... better than a demonstration on a picket line in the misery of this climate, imo...
<br><br>
And while you're deciding, let's take a look at what blew up from Phillips' evidence revelation gamble... That should entice more interest in wanting that inquest to get rolling..... unless you're a member of the GrandJury and are shamefaced... or a Death-Squad coverup crony....
<br><br>
So what was it? The golden payoff?
<br><br>
<b>Lots of video from the jail's security cam system!!</b> Something no one --who'd seen the autopsy photos and witnessed the evidence disappearing-acts perpetrated by the Chief Deputy Shadle -- would trust, yet its appearance was wanted, if only to see what was left on it. Shadle and Sheriff Wenninger had blocked the Coroner's access for over a year, beginning with official subpoenas and requests they stonewalled in November 2013, and hadn't even given it to BCI except in pieces, with stories about automatic system overwrites that supposedly now were just other people's rumors, contradicting their own tactical dodges at the time. Aided at one point by the BC Prosecutor Little (Schadle's Babe) claiming she couldn't imagine how to write a subpoena that would pry the Sheriff's hands off the evidence wanted, though the Coroner had listed the law to cite and the precise list wanted.. oy!
<br><br>
In the now accessible videos, There were clips from the camera in the sally port when the cruiser with Zach arrived, as well as a brief clip of hustling Zach through the pat-down room, then finally the supposedly full clip from when they pushed him into the cell til they 'discovered' him later.
<br><br>
<b>Plus whatever BCI official 'interviews' of all those involved the night of the 'homicide'</b> that BCI managed to put together. Mind you, the word is that Hornyak was 'leading' the interviewees in his own effort at whitewash & coverup. But the actual detailed accounts have been interestingly conflicting one another in spite of the 'leading'.. Minor details, maybe not. Yet the implications sparked ZERO interest from the coverup team of Hornyak and Breyer.
<br><br>
Even more interesting is <b>the opportunity to compare and verify stories with the visual record on the security camera record</b>, whatever there is of it. (BCI didn't take the system hard drive, swap it out, just swallowed, unafraid, what the suspects provided)... Clearly scrutinizing was not Hornyak's nor Breyer's intention, just doing the motions with annoyance at the Coroner... And the GrandJurors made no effort to demand anything questioning the coverup team. But now the Coroner has what she had been denied.
<br><br>
And she's not the only one. by a long shot...
<br><br>
When Phillips gave the so-called 'Hallway' film to the WCPO reporters, thinking they were as gullible as the Grand Jury -- which they were, just parroting Phillips' assurances that all was there and confirmed the official story (that BCI's hotshots had checked the video's integrity) -- WHAT PHILLIPS DIDN'T ANTICIPATE WAS THAT WCPO WOULD PUT THE VIDEO IN REACH OF ALL THE PUBLIC in 'CPO's grab for online viewers' attention for 'the real thing'.... WCPO put it up ONLINE (Youtube channel even) WHERE THE BLOODHOUNDS COULD DOWNLOAD IT AND SCARF IT UP......
<br><br>
Which they did.... THEN IT was OFF TO THE RACES... Scouring the footage -- frame by frame-- checking time stamps, looking for 'discontinuities' of any sort... in an excellent demonstration of OPEN SOURCE SLEUTHING TO REACH FACT-FOUND JUSTICE ... !
<br><br>
<b>Pay dirt? Well this is what they found so far.</b>
<ul><ul>
<b>1)</b> Definitely THE FILE FROM THE CAMERA OUTSIDE THE CELL#15 where they were thrusting Zachary into, WAS NOT THE SAME FORMAT AS THE OTHER CAMERA FILES.. the open source bloodhounds contacted the system manufacturer for confirmation and they said the supplied 'evidence' file had been taken off the system using an unknown third party piece of equipment... BANG... drag the security/evidence deputy into the RING OF SUSPECTS.... someone named Harry Martin has messed with the evidence for some reason... why wouldn't he have used his big system's built-in record-preserving equipment.... what Breyer and Hornyak passed off as unadulterated was not kosher..
<br><br>
<b>2)</b> Manufacturer information said that <b>the Jail security camera system was centrally timestamped by the main computer for consistent precision</b>, so the bloodhounds, assisted by the coroner's engineer husband, found a point on the 'pat-down room' camera (where Zachary was dragged through leading to the cell hallway) that should have had the identical timestamp for the matching point in the action on the hallway clip as that hallway camera took over.... Neat bit of sleuthing, watching for the point where the door hits the jamb as the last person passes through... <b>the time stamp on the adulterated file from the cell-hallway camera was A HALF A MINUTE OFF </b> (a full thirty seconds, each over a dozen frames long) <b> a lot of frames off from the time stamp on the <i>pat-down room camera,</b> whose file type was kosher....</i>
<br><br>
BANG... not only had the format been altered but THE CONTENT HAD BEEN CHANGED...... Fall down on your knees, BCI hotshots, and give the taxpayer back their money for your puffed-up, legendary, hotshot claims of inyegrity...
<br><br>
What content was changed? Not so easily determined....
<br><br>
<b>3)</b> At one point after the 'discovery', CO Shadle looks around as he leaves cell#15 and he notices and retrieves a SHEET OF PAPER OFF THE DOOR OF CELL#14 and takes it away (for some reason?)... <b>it turns out the INMATE IN CELL#14 WAS ON SUICIDE WATCH!!..</b> that means the COs were on orders to CHECK ON #14 EVERY TEN MINUTES... and they would initial and time-mark their duty completed, being just ear-shot and eye-shot away from #15... so where was that paper now... AND WHY IS THERE NO SIGN of activity ON THAT HALLWAY VIDEO OF ANY OF THE COs PERFORMING THEIR CHECK, NOT EVEN ONCE IN THE 2 or 3 checks for the VIDEO INTERVALS SUPPOSEDLY RECORDED... too busy preparing for completing their ruse, perfecting their alibi and finishing THE murder?
<br><br>
Do I detect another use of incompetence coming as 'plausible deniability'? Like all the security forces failing, in leading up to 9-11... extremely suspect.... not a single mention anywhere in any testimony, not even Shadle's, whom we hear got a promotion from Shadle Sr for good performance??? That tidbit traveled like lightning,
<br><br>
Even more exciting was the realization of a different flaw in their staged 'discovery'...
<br><br>
<b>4) No one looks upward at any point in the activity of 'discovery' and supposedly preparing to get him down</b> -- how odd when they all say he was hanging high... consistently they all are looking down... Clearly complicating any chance that the caller to 9-1-1 should be free of the ring of suspects.. She's in up to her eyeballs,,, BANG.... She's as guilty as sin.... prison time all around..
<br><br>
In the Coroner's photo of Zach on the floor, the neck-end of the bedsheet would just extend to the top of his head. So the top of Zach's head in the official story would have been right at the end of the ceiling-half of the sheet, which was 23" down from the ceiling in the measurements taken at the scene on the night of the homocide...
<br><br>
The official story and measurement (of ceiling height and sheet's pieces) would put Zachary's head just 23 inches away from the 9.5 foot high ceiling.... his head would have been -- in the death-squad official story-- 7ft high, <b>clearly an *up* angle for each and any 'discoverer'...</b> yet none look up, always downward into the cell's space, about where his thighs or lower would have been in the death-squad official story...<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/SuicideWatchinCell14/TheSheetisaLIE.jpg" WIDTH="520">
<br>BANG.. ALL GUILTY... no Oscar awards for any of them... bloodhound-audience booing such lousy production quality... even Harry Martin can't make up for their fraud.... so what did he try? what was crucial to cut and patch, a task that's tough to make ends match at start and end... but maybe not as totally impossible for low quality, motion-sense controlled video... ending up only 30 seconds over......
<br><br>
<b>5)</b> There were a couple places/frames that looked rather uncomplicatedly odd... there was some jostling at the cell#15 door after they thrust Zach in and a couple of them followed, but was there a third head going in (view of body blocked by those remaining in the hall) -- other than the ones nearer the camera... artifact of mismatched frames or mystery person..???. no mystery person is available anywhere in the official story, and only two came out when they closed the door... did some unknown individual stay inside...?? or was someone messing with the video frames at that point??
<br><br>
There was also, much later, what looked like a bright light, almost like a flash camera or flash light, that shone UNDER THE DOOR.... momentarily... WHAT WAS THAT... After discarding tazer-tormenting as not flash-producing likely, the speculation went creatively looking to connect the mystery person to the flash... one idea was that the COs have a (drum roll) jail-porn -- sadism specialty -- business on the side and Zachary's highly decorated body parts would draw good money for photos in that sort of market, also offering an explanation for the unexplainable affluence that allowed small-county deputies to afford so many law cases.. it also tied to the rapidly available high tech photo taking done by Shadle while they wait for the EMTs to certify Zach as no longer able to contradict their official narrative... OY!
<br><br>
Bloodhounds have to look at possibilities that coroners might not
<br><br>
<b>5) A more productive entertainment for bloodhounds was the game of "where are the handcuffs".</b> Like tracking the pea in a shell game... <b>the number of handcuffs, shackles and transport belts going into the cell vs what came out looked like there was still a pair of handcuffs on Zach when they locked him in.</b> Overlooked like the sheet!!?? We don't suppose that would fly even in Breyer's book, although he'd likely try.......
<br><br>
It's kind of hard to tie sheets to sprinkler-heads while hand cuffed! Have no fear, Breyer'd work on it...
<br><br>
</ul></ul>
SO DO YOU THINK WE NEED AN INQUEST.... Raise your hand if you do... Perhaps we should ask County Commissioner Gray if Enough is enough yet.. maybe they could vote on it....
<br><br><br>
The theory so far is that they hogtied the kid in a way that made the strap pull his head back, tied to his shackles so his own tortured pose strangled him as he would be unable to stop his body from trying to relieve the tormented position....
<br><br>
now I'm not at all acquainted with hogtying but it seemed to me that the tension on the strap tied to shackles would press on the victim's shoulders as the legs tried to straighten....... but THAT'S INCONSISTENT WITH THE ANGLE OF THE STRANGULATION STRAP-MARK... something else or someone held that strap up..
<br><br>
that 'ligature mark' runs away from the shoulders and up toward the top-back of the kid's head.......
<br><br>
the only way I can see that mark being there is if the thug just strung the strap around the kid's throat (after pushing him face down, still cuffed and shackled), and pulled up on the strap while putting his boot on the kid's spine between the kid's shoulderblades.....
<br><br>
murder 1..... not a miscalculated hogtying accident.....
<br><br>
that murder-1-scenario is also consistent with the scraped up adams apple, as the upward pulled strap slid til it reached under the kid's jaw and ears (not toward his shoulders)......
<br><br>
I'd also point out that the thugs were hot and hurtful in the dragging of the kid out of the cruiser so the thugs were able to intentionally slam the kid's upper body/head on the concrete... then hoisted him --jostling his body and rough as possible-- hustled through the pat-down room to the cell-hallway with urgency beyond any visible need than their personal vengefulness about to be satisfied, and thrust the kid through the cell doorway with a push that would end him up facedown on the floor, cuffed and shackled still... the precise opportunity for the chosen thug to strangle the kid, foot on the kid's spine, while the rest of the thugs glowered and got their satisfaction vicariously......
<br><br>
the time required would have been plenty for this theory of murder 1... and fits the hallway video timing, not wiped out in their messing with what they desperately had exposed to camera view... the actual murder would not be their camera-evidence worry........
<br><br>
perhaps any hogtying expert could counter the recognition of the angle of the strap mark, but I doubt it...
<br><br>
HOWEVER.... there's medical suggestions that the bloody ligature mark takes longer to form than the time to cut off his circulation and kill him..... average 3 minutes but would the minimum be near 1.5 minutes.... don't know yet... INQUEST TIME
<br><br>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-70797982767483641402015-01-18T18:52:00.000-08:002015-02-01T13:11:31.397-08:00FreeForAll !! LAWSUIT BLIZZARD Erupts in Brown County Government Offices!! FREE FOR ALL !! LAWSUIT BLIZZARD ERUPTS IN BROWN COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES
<br>
The deputies & sheriff are desperately trying to use their same-party courts TO STOP THE CORONER'S INQUEST b/c they know they are guilty and this coroner will nail them in their lies, since she does her homework and the BCI whitewash masquerading as a Goldson homicide investigation is ripe with forged evidence, and guilty fingerprints that go all the way to Columbus. Columbus is desperate to get rid of the Varnaus, both of them.
<br><br>
Inquests to resolve 'disparities' in evidence are law-authorized (such as ORC 313.09) and the judge (GUSWEILER, the Dems didn't even run a candidate against the Republican's mowing machine) has a hot potato restraining order to be ruled on in early Feb 2015.
<br><br>
CLEARLY THE SHERIFF'S MEN -- WHILE SCREAMING THAT INVESTIGATION MUST STOP AND THE CORONER'S DECISIONS MUST BE CHANGED -- ARE CONTRADICTORILY SETTING IN MOTION **MORE** INVESTIGATION PROCESSES
<br><ul>
A-- Things to tally up in scoring the free-for-all PLAYERS' STATUS:
<ul>
-- A GJ issuing a 'no bill' decision ONLY INDICATES THAT THE EVIDENCE THEY WERE MADE PRIVY TO DID NOT ADD UP TO 'ENOUGH' TO PROCEED TO TRIAL ON MURDER CHARGES... in no way does it CLEAR any one of GUILT... they are not 'cleared' and do not deserve 'innocence' labels in any valid thinking
<br><br>
-- The 'disparities' showing how the GJ was 'misled' are annotated at our previous post showing the need to resolve whose evidence should stand -- THE CORONER'S OR PROSECUTOR BREYER'S
<br></ul>
B-- Things to tally up in the PLAINTIFFS' YELLING and ARGUMENT-ILLOGIC
<ul>
1) -- Even before the game of a BCI 'investigation' was barely afoot, the Sheriff (Wenninger) revealed in a major newspaper QUOTE (Maysville iirc) that they intended to take the 'homicide' ruling to court to force a change to 'suicide' when the GJ no billed the suspicious behavior of 'his men'... my wasnt he confident... every other police captain or sheriff takes suspect officers off the street out of public safety concerns.... not wenninger! THE PUBLIC HAD TO LIVE WITH HIS UNPROVEN RISKY CHOICE and were told to expect even more court battling after the GJ's..... meanwhile he weeps that 'his men' were suffering from their being investigated, imagine that..!!!
<br><br>
2)-- Right before the GJ finally issued a decision, those very same 'men' filed a case in FEDERAL COURT to claim that their civil rights were being violated by the coroner's release of evidence to the victim's next of kin (which she is obligated to do and the kin are not obligated to keep the DeathSquad stress-free) -- and as part of that Federal trial, the Coroner's defense process would include a thorough "Discovery' deposition/questioning of those she would subpoena as well as 'Discovery' demands for their DATA.... THE DEATH SQUAD'S TERROR IS BECAUSE AN INQUEST BLOCKS THEIR LAWYERS' FROM BLOCKING QUESTIONS.... imagine that as the motive for their yelling and lawsuit BLIZZARD......
</ul></ul><br>
HOW CAN A JUDGE --- OR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -- CLAIM THE IMPETUS FOR INVESTIGATION IS COMING FROM THE CORONER, and that only her investigation is UNWARRANTED in the screaming Plaintiff's LITIGINOUS planning??
<br><br>
BUT INSTEAD THE REPUBLICAN LOCAL MEDIA -- SHOUTING HEADLINES that are *SCRIPTED* BY THOSE REPUBLICAN COMMISSIONERS' REPUBLICAN LAWYERS-- to entertain the public and mind-bend the party parrots in their daily gossiping -- broadcast in the local paper that "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"
<br><br>
You'd think the Coroner was the bully and that the Sheriff's detriment to the county just started when that bully coroner was elected.... think again!
<br><br><b>
Let's tally the Sheriff vs Coroner's scoring on detriment to the County
<br><br>
Starting with the tally of the Sheriff's detriment to the County
</b><ul>
1) back when budget belt tightening was first pushed hard in BC and departments did all sorts of cutting, THE SHERIFF TOLD THE COUNTY TO GIVE HIM HIS MONEY DEMANDS OR HE WAS SENDING INMATES TO BUTLER COUNTY'S JAIL AND THE COUNTY COULD SEE IF THEY WANTED TO PAY BUTLER COUNTY OR HIM..... remember that bit of EXTORTION... and before you think that his administrative limits were truly reached, think back to the alternate candidate JOSH BLACK of Mt Orab's Police with exciting action credibility WHO SHOWED A PLAN TO EXPAND SHERIFF'S SERVICES WITH LIMIT-ENGINEERED STAFF AND DECENT SAVINGS..... Black almost got elected so some people do read campaign Q&As, unfortunately, not enough... leaving the verdict standing that the SO's demands are lazy thinking extortion by Wenninger and Schadle...
<br><br>
2) or how about the bullying incident recently against the current county commissioners where Wenninger THREATENED (yes threatened) that he'd TAKE HIS MEN COMPLETELY OFF ROAD DUTY AND HAVE THEM SIT IN THE OFFICE TIL 9-1-1 CALLED THEM **UNLESS** THE COMMISSIONERS FORKED OVER EXTRA MONEY FOR 3 MORE COP CARS THAN WERE DUE UNDER NORMAL BUDGETING... then to dominate the players, Wenninger played games with the court attempt at using mediation til the County forked over most of what his demands were IMMEDIATELY, with the rest under commitment for this next period's 'extra' funds.
<br><br>
3) or remember the dictatorial AND AGAINST CITIZEN SAFETY rules that Wenninger unilaterally set up to establish his territorial control when a call for help might come from his territory but another police officer was closer... that nasty factor meant death to a BC woman intent on suicide when her husband died leaving her suddenly without a caregiver, right after emotional winter holidays.... NewYears 2013, iirc... a spectacular start for the new coroner's initiation to BCSO law enforcers 'cooperation'..
<br><br>
4) or maybe we should recognize a corrupt motive when, just a week before the news hit the streets that Wenninger was being sued for mistreating a sick inmate while the inmate was temporarily in BC jail custody, the oh-so-budget-conscious Shadle dumped responsibility on village/town police budgets for seeing to the medical needs of every Sheriffs-inmate-to-be before delivering that inmate (gift wrapped and cared for) to the Sheriff's wondrously unable-to-cope (though wondrously-able-to-be-state-quality staffed) jail....
<br><br>
5) oh but maybe he's such a prima donna at crime solving that BC citizens feel so protected on our streets... like how he *solved* the Stykes murder where the young mother was shot to death while simply driving down our main highway.. last we heard he claimed he had a decent *clue* on a motive.. that was half a year ago (nothing but silence since) which was when a local reporter raised the image of the 1 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNSOLVED MURDER to public attention, so now a year-and-a-half of NIL...... that whiz-bang qualified sheriff (known for his lack of qualifications) SHOULD HAVE HAD THE KILLER IN HIS GRASP WITHIN A WEEK OF THE MURDER... IF HE HAD ANY TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE OF CELLPHONE INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATION... that's right! Cellphone data are MAJOR Law topics on what privacy data that law enforcements are getting for crime-solving and prevention, hot topics even among the public,,,, all he needed to do was A) subpoena the tower owners for all the cell phones physically in the shooter's relevant/tight area for the hour before to the hour after the murder, B) do a search to identify those phone numbers that were stationary before the shooting and left the area briefly after, C) subpoena the relevant phone companies for the identity of those clearly suspect candidates... D) round em up.... and he had a limited time (a week, iirc) to get that data before the tower data was written over.... EITHER WENNINGER HAS NO DECENT CLAIM TO LAW ENFORCEMENT KNOWLEDGE **OR** THERE'S A *MOTIVE* OF HIS OWN FOR NOT PRODUCING THE KILLER... take your pick of detriments to the county's citizens....
<br><br>
6) as for his motives behind that campaigning grin, it's rather patently not his concern to keep his credentials up to 'snuff', since the Board of Elections CEASED EVEN RECORDING WHETHER HIS LAW-MANDATED CREDENTIALS MEET THE LAW'S REQUIREMENTS. They apparently don't check whether his paperwork is done or not, since WENNINGER FILED *NONE* FOR THE LAST 3 ELECTIONS, when bloodhound Podolski filed Public Records Requests to see them. Podolski is the joe fellow who sued to see what was in Wenninger's trial for 'counterfeit' credentials (openly filed in his 1st campaign), a trial that made him officially illegal but 'innocent' of knowingly passing counterfeit claims of eligibility so the local media trumpeted 'innocence' <b>without admitting his stupidity plea, nor raising the question of how and when he would be required to make those counterfeitting debts right</b>... but Gusweiler (the same one now bobbling the hot potato) decided voters did not have enough 'rights' to see the trial's outcome, compared to his buddy Wenninger's 'right' to keep it a secret......
</ul><br>...is that enough, or do you want more...<br><br><b>
So now let's look at the ledger on detriments due to the coroner's operations...
</b><ul>
Hmmm... she committed to go to EVERY DEATH SCENE (more service, unlike previous officeholder who reneged on going death scenes the Sheriff said he was not that needed on, like the year before's <b>sheriff-ruled-'suicide' at the jail</b>... but she actually PAYS toward her office staffing expenses, out of her own pocket... hmmm... never heard of something like that, eh?
<br><br>
Hmmmm.... all the ruckus in the media witchhunting (which court testimony and phone recording showed was the co-ordinated instigation of Schadle and his support babe the current prosecutor Little) turned out to be unrecognizable as valid ruckus in the evidence before 4 judges so far....
<br><br>
..... and the latest settlement over battles about conflicting areas of responsibility between SO and Coroner's Office (in preparation for the altercations in court) turned out in court to be the version the Coroner had initially insisted on when the SO tried to lock her into their own demands, her having seen those now-agreed rules successfully written about in law enforcement JOURNALS (some indication AGAIN of the Sheriff & Schadles lack of erudition) so SHE WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG....
</ul><b>
Hmmm... SO WHERE IS HER DETRIMENT CAUSATION???? WHETHER IN COURT BATTLES (where the errors were the Sheriff&Schadles, per the 9-1-1 and policeband communications records) or in taxpayers' service rights.....
</b><br><br>
So CONCLUSION #1: <b> THE COUNTY SHOULD BE BACKING THE CORONER
<br><br></b>
Hmmm.. and IF THE CORONER DOES THE NEEDED FURTHER INVESTIGATION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE 'DISPARITIES' IN THE GOLDSON UPHEAVAL SO FAR, IT WILL LIKELY <b>COST THE COUNTY LESS</b> BLOOD, SWEAT AND TEARS THAN IF A BUNCH OF LAWYERS MIX IT UP IN FEDERAL COURT... Agreed?
<br><br>
Although on the Federal Court route to resolution it's a distinct possibility that the PARTY CONTROL IN CINCINNATI'S FEDERAL COURT MAY NOT BE SO REPUBLICAN... interestingly that could result in even more 'consequences' since the Cincinnati Federal Court DIDN'T BUY THE OHIO SUPREME COURT'S MISREPRESENTATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE on government employee 'immunity' from prosecution AND INSTEAD JUDGED that THE SCIOTO COUNTY JAILERS WERE *NOT IMMUNE* IN THEIR 'MISHANDLING' OF A SICK PRISONER.... DO YOU SUPPOSE DEWINE ALREADY STEERED THE DEATH SQUAD TO A PERSUADABLE FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE JUDGE (than the pair of federal judges that handled the Scioto case) ON THE CINCINNATI BENCH? (it's a secret)
<br><br>
BUT JUDGING BY THE WHITEWASHING MISINFORMATION AND DOWNRIGHT FABRICATION OF THE EVIDENCE BY THE SPECIAL LAWYER/PROSECUTOR VISIBLE IN THE GrandJury REPORT, THE OUTCOME UNDER THE CORONER'S INQUEST WILL STAND UP CLEANLY IN JUSTICE'S SCALES. .... Agreed? at least I'd bet on that!
<br><br>
But of course if that hotpotato judge (GUSWEILER) says the coroner cannot hold her own inquest, ignoring the scoring above (and the law) THEN IT WOULD SEEM TO BE IN THE INTERESTS OF PROPER SERVICE TO THE TAXPAYERS' VALID NEED FOR JUSTICE FOR SAID TAX FUNDS TO BE <b>SUPPORTING THE LEAST DETRIMENTAL OFFICEHOLDER IN THE BATTLE....... Agreed? So Dear Commissioners, pay the Coroner's chosen lawyer, for your own duty to county well being</b>
<br><br>
And should you doubt that the lawyer/prosecutor Breyer (straight from Ohio Attorney General's special lawyer forces) would ever visibly fabricate lies in a court proceeding and defeat justice, take a look at the previous post (The Death Squad Strikes Back...) so titled because that Death Squad was NEVER **PROSECUTED** BY ANYONE IN FRONT OF THE GRAND JURY... BREYER WAS A DREAM DEFENSE LAWYER ALL THE WAY, slathering whitewash and fabricating unethical evidence even....
<br><br>
.... like Breyer's BCI 'evidence' that Shadle didn't perpetrate a felony obstruction of justice by authorizing the destruction of the sprinkler head supposedly used for the 'suicide' but instead BCI's Hornyak recovered precisely cell #15's sprinklerhead, guaranteeing it with proffered phony chain of control fantasy signed statement (wonder what those installers' signatures cost him).... BUT IT'S NOT THE SAME SPRINKLERHEAD, regardless of the fantasized guarantees to the jurors... SEE FOR YOURSELVES....
<br><br>
Here's pg 22 of the BCI prosecution 'Summary' for Breyer's use at the GJ hearings:
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/BCISummaryPg22.jpg" WIDTH="560"><br>
<br> Note the crimescene photo of the sprinkler head. Small, like a sawed off cone that would almost fit in a tuna can... that matches the crimescene photo certified by the coroner (See two posts ago: Justice Process TEST: Coroner's Proof....) ...
<br><br>
Now let's look at BCI's Summary page 23...
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/BCISummaryPg23.jpg" WIDTH="560"><br>
Wow ANOTHER CRIME SCENE PHOTO THIS TIME SHOWING A BIT OF A 'BEND'
<br><br>
For the Grand Jury, the BCI pandered a physical "evidence" item and backed it up with a manufactured crimescene photo to entertain the GJ that Goldson hung full weight on the jail sprinkler head with an apparently seeable deformation of the crimescene sprinkler.... while blindingly hiding that said photo was not even a crimescene sprinkler, let's enjoy a demo-proof-in-the-pudding:...
<br><br>
For pg 22's 'zoomed' knowably genuine photo measurement ratios.....
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/Blowup01.jpg" WIDTH="560"><br><br>
For pg 23's 'close-up' photo measurement ratios, to account for different angle POVs (point of view)...
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/Blowup02.jpg" WIDTH="560"><br><br>
Now the 3D proof-th-the-pudding modeling starts:
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/Blowup03.jpg" WIDTH="560"><br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/Blowup04.jpg" WIDTH="560"><br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/Blowup05.jpg" WIDTH="560"><br>
<br><br>
<br>BOOM! THE GRAND JURY WAS TOLD A LIE, COMPLETE WITH FORGED PHOTO..
<br><br>
IN FACT, IF THE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR WAS SO CLOSE-UP **AND** IF (per BCI testimony recorded in the GrandJury Report) the investigator EASILY SLIPPED THE KNOTTED SHEET OFF THE SPRINKLER, THEN <u>WHY WOULDN'T SAID INVESTIGATOR HAVE TAKEN A CLOSEUP OF THE **BENT** SPRINKLER-HEAD</u> WITH SUCH A SUICIDE-PROOFWORTHY SHOT IN FRONT OF HIS NOSE, EH?
<br><br>
Why no such naked sprinkler crimescene photo? because the 'closeup' pandered as a crimescene photo is NOT a crimescene photo at all, it's carefully FORGED EVIDENCE (complete with meticulously matching rag to complete the 'convincing' goal) IN ORDER TO LIE THE JURORS INTO SWALLOWING THE OFFICIAL STORY (AKA BIG FELONY LIE)
<br><br>
<b>
CONCLUSION #2
<br><br>
BCI AND BREYER SHOULD GET THEIR **COMPENSATION** but IN A FORM (trial, jury, jail) NOT IN DOLLARS FROM COUNTY COFFERS..... </b> agreed. rotflmho at the Ohio POLICESTATE, while ducking out of reach.... Possibly you'd want to relay these 'sentiments' above to the BC Commissioners (who somehow qualified their lawyers' recommendation to reject payment and kept a backdoor OPEN) by downloading this <a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/FreeForAllErupts/IndyMichael-atWAOI_Preview_FreeForAll_LAWSUITBLIZZARD_EruptsinBrownCountyGovernmentOffices.pdf">copy</a> (pdf already) and emailing it to your elected, cowardly county commissioners who do take citizen input at commissioners (at) browncountyohio (dot) gov indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-53740759549822773082014-12-14T19:22:00.000-08:002015-01-01T07:34:02.466-08:00The DeathSquad Strikes Back and the Grand Jury (Under Breyer's Direction) Strikes Out<BR>
Finally the Grand Jury 'speaks'.... or at least they repeat what their special Prosecutor (Daniel Woody Breyer) tells them.. As we shall see. Breyer's fingerprints are all over the ERRORS in their document..
<br><br>
We now have a copy of the GrandJury's report to display with annotations, so let's get started in examining what went wrong. Ferguson MO and Staten Island, NY are roiling with shock at their GrandJury errors and now Brown County has just such an error-ridden GJ effort free of the race card to reveal how the system 'works' to favor cop crime.
<br><br>
<br>
<B>** <img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Sheet&LigatureStrapTreachery.jpg" WIDTH="500"> **</B>
<BR><BR>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GoldsonGJ-pg1.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
Interestingly, the GJ wants to advertise their discontent AFTER the Prosecutor has led them all the way to NO BILL EVERYTHING... and clearly this visit shows that the GJ had no first hand look at the site of the death AT ALL during all the 'demonstrations' and 'story telling'.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GoldsonGJ-pg2.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
Yep, I'm sure the Sheriff and the fine Prosecutor Breyer shares that deepest sympathy.
<br><br>
In fact, the Sheriff has so much sympathy for the mother of the jail victim, that he's charging her for the sheet he says killed her son... no kidding! Real insight into the Sheriff's ideas of justice and HIS OWN FALSIFYING OF THE PUBLIC'S HOPES FOR JUSTICE.
<br><br>
We'd wonder about the validity of a juvenile court's anti-gun 'disability', imposed in the Homeland Security early attacks on young people, all the way to what age when the early charges didn't seem to involve guns...
<br><br>
No apparent recognition that the scary list of current charges now were totally victimless, possibly even unconstitutionally pursued, nor of any other decent personal factors in the kid's life as a young father and decent son. Just prejudicial images.
<br><br>
And as for Hamilton County's narrowing down on Zachary, that IS NO INDICATION OF GUILT IN ANY DECENT COURTROOM, Grand or otherwise, since you're innocent until proven otherwise. Or at least that was the jewel of the American justice system.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GoldsonGJ-pg3.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
The item number 4) is a total whitewash to make any reader gag. Violent threatening of someone over whom the deputies had the power to implement it BECAME IN BREYER's WHITEWASH: *could* be *interpreted* as threatening. Would a decent lawyer allow that as an indication of law definitions applied to the situation? Not likely. But then who says Breyer is a decent lawyer any more since now he works for Mike DeWine!
<br><br>
And then the carelessness of the 'escorting' oh so nice deputy, became an unprovoked 'attacked and INJURED' episode, to be discarded and to blot out the deputy's crucial error in LAW ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE, by suggesting that the reader and the speaker should think that <b>'recuffed'</b> was accurate and thereby to <b>cover up the judgment error of the deputy</b>.
<br><br>
BUT THAT WHITEWASH PALES BY COMPARISON TO THE CRIME OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE BOMBSHELL IN 5)
<br><br>
<b>BREYER HAS HIDDEN THE EVIDENCE</b> IN THE CORONER'S REPORT WHERE SHE DISCOVERED THAT <b>THE DEATH HAD BEEN KNOWN to some members of the Sheriff's Investigators A FULL 12 MINUTES BEFORE THE DEATH IS SUPPOSEDLY **DISCOVERED** back at the Jail and reported to 911.</b>
<br><br>
How can such a knockout piece of evidence be OMITTED in any DECENT prosecution determined to FIND THE TRUTH...
<br><br>
No -- only in a whitewash to COVER THE CRIME... THAT COVER UP IN A GRAND JURY MISDIRECTION TO EFFECT THE ESCAPE OF THE MURDERERS MAKES PROSECUTOR BREYER AN ACCOMPLICE IN FRAUD... and ultimately an accomplice in HOMICIDE.... aiding and abetting the escape from discovery of the killer is precisely being a PARTY TO THE CRIME.
<br><br>
Try to visualize WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS in deciding on indictments or no-billing...
<br><b>
SCENARIO #1... the official story of the DeathSquad..</b><br>
Try to imagine any way in a suicide, that 'the perpetrator' (with no involvement by those unbesmirched deputies) could reveal his crime to a remote detective while 'the perpetrator' is sequestered in his cell, just before the jail officers could discover his crime against himself...<b> impossible</b>...
<br><br><b>
SCENARIO #2... the official story ALMOST.. with fear-of-the-Coroner colors</b>
<br>Since we can't escape the idea that SOME involvement of the deputies or corrections-officers did occur, then to preserve the possibility of that involvement being INITIALLY innocent, we'd have to suppose the involved deputy/CO who made the early-discovery was just afraid of the potential consequences when the suicide would be officially discovered, so in order to warn his superiors to allow them some time to adjust in some way, this early-discoverer makes a phone call to DETECTIVE MEYER and delivers the news, then proceeds to slink away, SOMEHOW...
<br><br>
***BUT*** HOW COULD THEIR EARLY-DISCOVERY NOT BE ON THE HALL SECURITY MONITOR.??? That deputy/CO should be worried about that, don't you think.... CLEARLY they'd realize their presence in this secretive suicide-discovery scenario 2 from outside the cell would be VIEWABLE ON THE HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA and presumably would catch them up in any investigation?!
<br><br>
BOOM -- <b>*****that hall security monitor HAD TO HAVE BEEN DISABLED IN THE SLINK AWAY at the very least***** </b> no matter who "knew of" the dead body ahead of the 'official' discovery, that person was standing in the hall at some point and there is no record of that hall visitor, ON ANY "PORTION" OF THAT HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA ... So the camera was OFF or DISABLED....
<br><br>
AND IF THAT HALL MONITOR WAS SHUT DOWN OR DISABLED IN SOME PERIOD BETWEEN THE 'CHECKING' of Goldson's status in that cell AND THE NEXT PASSAGE (by ZANE SCHADLE) DOWN THAT HALLWAY AT THE OFFICIAL DISCOVERY, THEN THE SHUTTING-DOWN WAS MORE LIKELY DONE AHEAD OF THE "VISIT" TO EMPOWER THE MURDERERS TO TORTURE AND KILL ZACHARY... not just to escape culpability for early discovery and surreptitious relaying of the warning of trouble coming.... MAKING SCENARIO #3 HIGHLY POSSIBLE, so here it is.
<br><br><b>
SCENARIO #3 -- HOMICIDAL HANGING BY INSIDERS AT THE BCSO </b>
<br> Based on time stamps on existing footage from the hallway security camera, the homicide was committed in the interval from 2:38 to 2:45, when the perpetrators threw a dark cleaning rag over the motion detector in the hallway and proceeded to cuff and shackle Zachary with no explanation that would stir resistance. Then roped his throat with the first hobble strap, tossed him down, roped his ankle shackles with a second hobble strap and pulled him to death.... all within the time frame that matches the ForensicsPathology estimates for such a murderous deed, as the average time for death (where the neck bones are not broken as is reported in the autopsy) by such a deed is roughly 3 to 5 minutes, leaving adequate margins for execution, including the 'affixing' of a severed sheet to the sprinkler head and the other end tied to Zachary's throat... all within that 7 minute 2:38-2:45 timeslot and escape subsequently during the interval from 2:45 to 2:55 ditching the hobble straps, the cuffs and shackles and getting an alibi set.... driving from the jail to the hospital is a short trip, easily...
<br><br>
The interval between the expeditious placement of Zachary into the holding cell and the return to curiously "look in on him" 3 minutes later -- 2:34 to 2:37 -- is fully adequate for the murderous thugs to prepare the sheet and flat tool (since hobble straps are likely standard for law enforcers, as are cuffs and shackles) and prepare the sheet by cutting it in half, knotting one end in an estimated loop. No excessively suspicious hurrying, just expeditious like they were already moving in during the handling of Zachary's placement in the holding cell. And the casual advance knotting and later (as soon as the deed was done) suspending of the one end of the sheet on the sprinkler escutcheon fits the BCI mention that the knotted end of the sheet at the sprinkler was easily slipped off with the slight space (likely opened with the flat tool) just between the usually tight fitting escutcheon and the ceiling. <br>
BOOM, HOMICIDE IS FULLY A FIT TO THE TIME AND TOOLS AND PERSONALITIES AT THE SITE..... motive, means and modus operandi.... don't you think we're geniuses! gag!
<br><br>
BOOM -- and on top of that realization, is the realization that:
<br><br>
*** The Bureau of Crime Investigation had a whole year to think of this, and the Prosecutor DISCARDED that troublesome HOLE in HIS WHITEWASHING STORY-LIE TELLING.... to DECEIVE THE GRAND JURY AND THE PUBLIC *** AND IGNORE THE SUSPICIOUS DEVIOUS PARTIAL HANDING OVER OF PORTIONS OF THE HALLWAY TAPE, WITH ONE PORTION NOT HANDED OVER FOR THREE WEEKS....
<br><br>
OH MY THAT'S NOT SUSPICIOUS IS IT MR BREYER OR WAS IT BCI'S HORNYAK WHO AUTHORIZED IGNORING THAT CLEAR TAMPERING WITH THE SECURITY TAPE FOR THE MOST CRUCIAL PERIOD OF THE DEATH'S OCCURRENCE....
<br><br>
So now do you really think it was a suicide, Prosecutor Breyer? {sarcasm alert}
<br><br>
Oh how we should weep for those poor deputies and their 'besmirched reputations' as they put it in their ignominious federal lawsuit .{/end sarcasm} just recently filed against the amazing Coroner and her equally amazing engineer/lawyer overly determined husband/helpmate... funny how this town can revere General Grant for his unwavering determination, from early childhood on in Ned Lodwick's fascinating history accounts, but consider the Varnau fellow to be a troublemaker who is relentlessly pursuing an 'agenda' against the esteemed BC Sheriff...
<br><br>
Well, now we're not through with discovering the FELONIES OF THE PROSECUTOR, even if we think we've got him and his cronies in the corral.. so let's move on.......
<br><br>
So how did Prosecutor Breyer get away with this when it was going to be in the Coroner's testimony, well it appears that SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE along the line, the esteemed <b>Detective Larry Meyer</b> decided to CHANGE HIS HALF OF THE EARLY NOTIFICATION STORY, leaving just the PHONE RECORDS OF DETECTIVE BUDDY MOORE and Buddy's own report that he'd been told in a 2:46 phone call from Det Meyer, to shoulder the load of this evidence, *only* supported by his phone record....
<br><br>
AND that was the EXCUSE that Breyer made up to duck the Scenario #3 by discarding DETECTIVE MOORE'S TESTIMONY AND TIME RECORDS... and to stonewall the Coroner's demands that proper completion of her own duties did require that the BCI investigators would GET THE PHONE RECORDS FOR THE DEATH SQUAD AND SEE WHO MADE WHAT CALL TO DETECTIVE MEYER..
<br><br>
Well guess what... BCI only got the phone records of a couple of the deputies BUT somehow NEGLECTED TO GET THE PHONE RECORDS FOR CO ZANE SCHADLE... <B>BOOM</B> and then figured out that even QUESTIONING DEATHSQUAD DEPUTIES WAS TOO DANGEROUS??? so BCI had no objection when two of the Death Squad members decided they'd spoken enough to investigators and refused to co-operate further with a second round of questions... imagine doing that if you were a suspect in a suspicious death....
<br><br>
BY COMPARISON, in Common Law practice EVERY DEATH OF AN INMATE IN A JAIL OR POLICE CUSTODY IS CONSIDERED SUSPICIOUS, and in British Coroner's courts the law requires that there be an inquest with a jury trial under the coroner's direction, as the protector of the dead.. somehow it's not quite so well organized in Ohio law, as it seems at the moment....
<br><br>
WE'LL SEE WHEN THE BROWN COUNTY'S CORONER HOLDS HER INQUEST... wanna come?.. Back to examining Breyer's Grand Jury's mess......
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GoldsonGJ-pg4.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<BR>
<B> FORENSIC PATHOLOGY ONLINE FACTORS FOR DECISION: </B>
<br>
<br><br>
"Hanging is that form of asphyxia which is caused by suspension of the body by a ligature which encircles the neck." It may be 'partial' or 'complete' depending on whether some part of the body is touching the ground or supported in some other way, or none is. Complete suspension of the body is UNUSUAL IN A SUICIDE. Guess what we're told in the official BCSO, BCI and AG story!
<br><br>
<b>Symptoms</b> Loss of power, subjective random sensations, intense mental confusion, loss of logical thought, then rapid loss of consciousness. Then convulsions. Respiration stops before the heart.
<br><br>
<b>Ligature</b> THE LIGATURE MARK IN THE NECK IS THE MOST IMPORTANT EXTERNAL POST MORTEM, per ForensicPathologyOnline.
<br><br>
"The doctor should note whether the mark on the neck corresponds with the material alleged to have been used in hanging and if it is strong enough to bear the weight and the jerk of the body. He/she should also note its texture and length, to know whether it was sufficient to hang. Before removing the ligature from the neck, it should be described as to the nature and composition, width, mode of application, location and type of knot."
<br><ul>
1) composition, pattern and texture produced on the skin. Dr Varnau did, Montgomery had no record. Respect is given where earned.
<br>
2) width & multiplicity... a broad ligature will produce only a superficial mark, unlike narrow ligatures. THE WIDTH OF THE GROOVE/MARK IS ABOUT OR JUST SLIGHTLY LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE LIGATURE.... <b><em>a 1.5 inch folded sheet would only make a mark that was nearly the same width, not a mark that is <u>a whole inch narrower!</u></em></b>
<br><br>
So what did make it !!! Per the Grand Jury's report, they believed the ligature mark was consistent with a hanging by the sheet! *Someone* *mis-informed* them, either the Montgomery Allen or untrustworthy Breyer, and based on performance so far, the money is on Breyer doing the lying. Agreed?
<br>
<br><b>Significance?
BOOM! Forensics is saying that THE SHEET DID NOT MAKE THAT LIGATURE MARK!!! Look at the sheet and the ligature mark in the now famous Coroner's Autopsy Report,</b> Here it is:<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Sheet&LigatureStrapTreachery.jpg" WIDTH="500">.<br>
THE LIGATURE WAS A STRAPLIKE LIGATURE, not that sheet!!!
<br><br>What does that tell us about those behind the story that Zachary hung himself from a sheet tied to the ceiling sprinkler?? eh? They never abused him, eh? They just put him safely back in his cell in expeditious manner, and went about their respected duties, then found him hanging by the sheet. eh? THE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS, THE DEPUTIES, THE CHIEF DEPUTY, BCI AND THE PROSECUTOR ARE **KNOWINGLY** **DECEIVING** US, THE PUBLIC AND THE GRAND JURY, ALL.... LOOK AT THAT MARK... Didn't the Grand Jurors LOOK?
<br><br>BOOM!<br><br>
How far do you want to trust them? eh? Clearly some kind of hanging torture was inflicted on Zachary. USING A STRAP. like a hobble strap. Precisely "when" is yet to be determined, But the strap and the autopsy data reveals more than we want to know. But it is necessary. For Zachary's justice sake, for public safety in removing murderers from freely acting, and even acting supposedly in our name.
<br><br>
Perhaps some like the "current sheriff" would like to insist that the 1/2" ligature mark is not a ligature mark in order to escape the Breyer embarrassment, but then what is it... eh? It looks like one, even the Montgomery medical examiner called it a ligature mark.. It fits all the specs that describe ligature marks in the ForensicsPathology manual for a specific type....
<ul>it has the <b>oblique angle</b>,
<br>an <b>extent from front to along the sides of the neck</b> for a ligature formed in a <u>fixed loop with its fixed-knot over the back of the neck</u>, and
<br>it has the requisite <b>impressed ligature-mark</b> and red haemorrhage discoloration (indicative of suspension while alive) for a narrow, hard edge ligature.
<br>It even has the roughed up <b>scuffing of the front</b> of Zachary's throat where ligatures are prone to scrape upward as the ligature is pulled upward from behind, while Zachary is prone on his back. </ul>
(Unlike the suspiciously level sheet tied at the side on Zachary's neck even though a ligature that's been used for hanging, is uniformly pulled up at the suspending knot.. that sheet lie is confirming its untruth..) AND <b> How could the jurors swallow the idea that such SCRAPING was done by a sheet??!!</b>
<br><br>
The strap-ligature mark clearly was not there when he was at the hospital, or the medical doctors wouldn't have released him without explanation and treating it, now would they, now??? so how many times are we supposed to believe that choking strangling holds by sheet and strap were inflicted on Zachary by Zachary himself in the Prosecutor/BCI official suicide lie? eh? twice! all within that remarkably limited time while UNOBSERVED by the 'sheriff's deathsquad....
<br><br>And while we're at it, in that crazy double suicide idea, <b>where did that strap come from,</b> hocus pocus, eh? Got it away from another dumb deputy while he was handcuffed,,, How do you deal with such a sheriff's office... How do you deal with such a crooked prosecutor.....
</ul>
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GoldsonGJ-pg5.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
Oy, how much whitewash did that GJ swallow... better call Poison Control...
<br><br>
So let's do the seemingly Simple stuff first.... The Chief Deputy Schadle was on the hook publicly for suspiciously replacing the sprinkler head, so BCI sent their talented investigators to recover that item before there's another indictment-fire to be fighting in court trials. My how impressive that they managed to recover that evidence from the maintenance trash heap at a company that services a whole list of such fire suppression sites. Aren't we impressed?? ROTFL.. but let's hold that thought til we see their miracle.
<br><br>
Not only was it recovered, it was unaltered by the maintenance people or their tools, sure it was, just so the Grand Jurors could see the proof that there was a hanging body on that sprinkler.. so Breyer insists that we should believe that the damage we're supposed to see was done by Zachary, not the maintenance crew... nor anyone else either... yup...
<BR><BR>
So for the edification of the non-believers, the recovered sprinkler head was supposedly damaged presumably by Zachary in comparison to a standard model that we should be able to envision... a sort of obvious warping out of shape compared to the nice machined roundness of a new model.. well maybe the physical gizmo was sort of ovoid, instead of machined round perfect.. but is that really from hanging and not from subsequent influences..?
<BR><BR>
Perhaps a grand jury would want to be able to have a closer look to compare the warped physical gizmo supposedly recovered to what the original crime scene looked like, to make sure the damage was seeable before being discarded by Schadle... so BCI handily provided what they claimed was their crime-scene photo so you can see what shape that sprinkler head was in, ovoided back in Oct 2013,
<BR><BR>
Which still leaves the question open of what Breyer's talking about as damage from a *major* weight yanking the escutcheon out of shape.. is that ovoided enough or should the damage be altogether different... so for the GJ's further misunderstandings, here is the BCI claimed crime scene photo of the actual warped sprinkler head...
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Escutcheon-01-NewsShowDemoPristine.jpg" WIDTH="300"> -vs- the zoomed image from a KNOWN CRIME SCENE PHOTO TAKEN BY THE CORONER WHILE HER EXAMINATION WAS IN PROGRESS...
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/Escutcheon-02-JailEvidencePhotoZoomed.jpg" WIDTH="300">
<br>
This looks terribly suspect.... the Coroner's knowably genuine photo where we can see the rest of the room before the focus was zoomed on the sprinkler head shows NO OBVIOUS OVOIDING... No sign of Goldson's weight distorting that mildsteel escutcheon covering the sprinkler head that I can see. And the angle of view is almost the same, with the knotted sheet on the back right of the sprinkler head. WHERE's THE DAMAGE???
<br><br>
BUT WAIT..
<br><br>
Look at the extent that the sprinkler heads in these two photos extend down from the ceiling..!!
<br><br>
BCI's sprinkler head extends much further out from the ceiling than the knowably genuine sprinkler head...
<br><br><b>
-- BOOM --<br>
The sprinkler head in the BCI CLAIMED CRIMESCENE PHOTO IS **NOT** THE REAL SPRINKLER HEAD <br>
AND HENCE THEIR PHOTO IS NOT A CRIME SCENE PHOTO EITHER..
<br><br>
The whole BCI CREDIBILITY JUST FLUSHED SOUTH DOWN THE TOILET HOLE...
<br><br>
BCI, the illustrious Bureau of Criminal Investigations, are criminals themselves, because they <ul>
--FABRICATED A PHOTO, COMPLETE WITH PHONIED KNOTTED SHEET IN PLACE AND PRESUMABLY THE **CO-OPERATING JAILHOUSE** CEILING <br>
--AND THEN SENT BREYER TO LIE TO THE GRAND JURY WITH THE GIZMO AND THIS FRAUDULENT PHOTO FORGERY, <br>
--AS WELL AS SENDING THIS PHOTO TO THE MEDIA SINCE THAT PHOTO WAS GIVEN TO THE TV STATIONS FOR RELEASE TO JUSTIFY THE BCI CLAIMS OF SATISFACTORY INVESTIGATION OF A SUICIDE... <u>totally a lie</u>..
</ul>
thereby invalidating NOT ONLY the decision of the Grand Jury in not indicting Chief Deputy John Schadle FOR DESTRUCTION OF CRIME SCENE EVIDENCE, a clear felony BUT ALSO the idea that we should trust ANYTHING COMING FROM THE OHIO BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.. </b>
<br><BR>
BCI put a knotted sheet as nearly as they could fabricate into the warped escutcheon of their unknowable sprinkler head with just the right size knots and with the precisely peeking tip showing out the opposite edge, so that took some careful emulating of the actual sprinkler/sheet image, yet they screwed up on the extent that the gizmo extends down from the ceiling??? Simultaneous precision and incompetence.. huh?
<br><br>
Did they think no one would notice? And they'd get away with their forgery.?
<br><br>
Mind boggling brazen fraud and insulting flimflamming the JUSTICE PROCESS.. all courtesy of the OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S MIKE DEWINE'S HIGH POLISHED, HIGH PAID, CRIME INVESTIGATING SERVICE FOR SMALL TOWNS....
<br><br>
So now why do we bother wondering about the hanging resistance of devices, a quality not viewable in any crimescene image as to ovoidability, and should we wonder why that sprinkler head needed replacing, ROTFL
<br><br>
Considering the 'cooperating jail ceiling', the forgery had to have been done with Chief Deputy Schadle's knowledge and assistance, and we shall wonder what the rest of the correction's officers were doing, while the game was afoot....
<BR>
Completely RACKETEERING
<br><br>
But maybe we should wonder how and when the 'retrieved' sprinkler head's escutcheon cover EVENTUALLY GOT DAMAGED... They said in the BCI document submitted to Breyer that Schadle HAD NOT CONSULTED WITH BCI BEFORE REMOVING THE SPRINKLERS, but that they had NOT ONLY re-acquired the sprinkler from the maintenance service BUT HAD A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FROM THOSE SERVICE STAFF THAT THIS PRECISE SPRINKLER WAS FROM GOLDSON'S CELL... isn't that interesting?? So now, even though it's difficult to imagine that the difference in shape was an unnoticed denial of their acquisition's genuineness, they had covered themselves, at the service people's risk, with a written guarantee of authenticity in case this scheme was discovered. The blame would go back on the service people. Don't you think that was clever of them? In fact it''s so clever that it seems quite likely that they were disappointed that the acquired sprinkler had no apparent warping, another difficulty to be overcome... but being clever technical geniuses, they could scientifically take that ungenuine sprinkler and mount it on a beam, hang a sheet tied to the beam with a significant weight attached and viola the escutcheon gets somewhat warped in a grand jury fooling way. That only left the photographic challenge of taking the now suitably mangled substitute sprinkler and putting it back up in Zachary's cell, studying the crimescene photos and rigging the sheet to match knots and edges.... then they would have a 'substitute' crime scene photo to match their 'substitute' mangled sprinkler head... the perfect proof that Goldson hung successfully from that crime scene sprinkler head... Thoroughly thwarting Justice. Another day's work achieved for the Attorney General's unblemished record of a well run system..... Wow, maybe there's a promotion in this for someone named Hornyak!!!
<br><br>
Clearly the GJ could see the proof before their eyes, sigh!
<br><br>
So let's move on to the next misleading entertainment for the GJ.
<br><br>
A couple of points... the sprinkler system PIPES are not what the sheet was tied to, BECAUSE BREYER REMINDS US LATER that it was so easy to slide the knotted sheet off the sprinkler assembly.. Presumably some written log would confirm this so clearly the knotted loop was not reaching up into the attic and wrapped on the pipes. It was on the head with its escutcheon cover just like we see in the enlarged photo. That's the piece that would break off with the amount of force from Goldson's weight jerking it, because the head, though metal, and the pipes though structurally secured by hangers, the two are joined by a much less sturdy joint-piece for easy replacement of sprinkler heads. Flood time at break-off, but no pipes down. Pointless technical bragging about pipes withstanding high pressure (an internal force, not a suicidal jerking force) as a deceptive method of impressing the GJ with the 'strength' of the system under force of a suicidal maniac? But Breyer was desperate to make the suicidal hanging body appear believable.
<br><br>
Then comes the 'reachability' of the sprinkler head by Goldson. As demonstrated in the Coroner's report, the problem was the slant at which the 'reacher' would have to work (with BOTH hands) as well as the distance. That difficulty of the 'reacher' having to hold onto the light fixture (as the only other support while at the slant) is seeable in this Coroner's Report image, leading some to flat out simply say it was not doable to tie the knots while standing there, especially since the knots were on the opposite side of the sprinkler head. But that was lied about profusely to turn the GJ's heads.
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/LeaningReachToSprinkler.jpg" WIDTH="400">
<br><br>
As Breyer pointed out, the knotted loop over the sprinkler head, being easily slipped off the sprinkler head, would open the possibility that WHOEVER tied the sheet to the sprinkler head could have tied the knots in advance (estimating the loop-size needed) and slipped the loop over the device while clinging to the light fixture... all done after the preliminary clinging to the light fixture while prying the escutcheon down slightly with some stiff tool, stiffer than a fingernail..
<br><br>
That WHOEVER person could just as easily have been Dunning or Wedmore or Schadle or Meyer or any of the others 'interested' in their idea of a 'welcoming party' based on just this 'reaching' analysis... as you can see from the previous Breyer-hidden evidence, it's now a question of which 'reaching' deputies to include in the 'welcoming'....
<br><br>
Then to complete number 9) the effervescent Breyer laughably reveals his intent (or likely orders) to stifle any grand jury intentions of indicting any of the potential suspects of anything, even Chief Deputy Schadle. In order to do it he had to claim that there would be no need for that sprinkler head to be kept in place as evidence, implying that there would be no trial needed when he got through. ROTFLOHO
<br><br>
But let's get some more hilarity in Breyer's next batch of felony-quality fabricated obfuscations.
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GoldsonGJ-pg6.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
Rotfl, Breyer's very first statement was blown up in the explosions in number 5).. go check it out if you've forgotten and see if you would not imagine that some enterprising deputy simply tossed his handcuff-cleaning-rag over the motion detector as CO Schadle is exiting the hallway at 2:37 after appearing to 'check on Goldson'. Simpler than shutting that device off, or not? Once the hallway camera is shut down, the group reassembles and murder happens with a pair of hobble straps, shackles and cuffs. It won't take but a few minutes per the estimated rapidity of death, along with the force needed with hobblestraps, one to choke him and one to pull from the shackles, for whatever psychopathic partying their evil minds could entertain in their sick brains and still have time left over in the interval from 2:37 to 2:58 to be making calls before 2:45 and getting their alibis in place and/or preparing the sheet while on that proverbial smoke break and be ready for the official 'discovery' at 2:58.
<br><br>
Doesn't that seem logical, enough to please Sherlock? or Columbo even better? Aren't we so pleased, and now disappointment settles down on the euphoria, since with our puzzle pieces fitting to catch the killers, we can't stop them. All the figuring was for nothing.
<br><br>
We'll let you wonder about the letters supposedly taken from Zachary's cell....
<br><br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/GoldsonGJ-pg7.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
Perhaps we are pushing our speculation here on the 'missing' number 12) but we've seen other crooked prosecutors MISINFORM grandjurors about the level of certainty required for indicting... telling them that near certainty was needed to indict in a criminal case, making it impossible to get an indictment since at grand jury time, it's not nearly well enough prepared (well maybe when BCI takes 14 MONTHS to put together the case, you'd expect better than 'not nearly well enough' wouldn't you) to have 'without a doubt' type of certainty.....
<br><br>
Purely speculation, but clearly some number 12) was taken out of the report by someone, at someone's intended dissatisfaction. Before signing? After signing? Why? and What was in it......
<br><br>
In any case, the Grand Jury was excitingly 'misinformed' providing you can call felony obstruction of justice a simple matter of 'misinformation'.... do you agree?
<br><br><br><br>
<font color="green"><b><i>
Concluding, FIRSTLY and CLEARLY, THE CREDIBLE REPORT BY SGT DETECTIVE MOORE THAT THERE WAS AN "EARLY DISCOVERY" WOULD SHOW THAT ANY CREDIBLE SCENARIO FOR HIS PIECE OF EVIDENCE REQUIRES THAT IT BE RECOGNIZED THAT THE HALLWAY SECURITY CAMERA WAS DISABLED/TAMPERED WITH FOR THE PERIOD OF ZACHARY'S DEATH......<br> <font color="black"> otherwise there would be some record on the camera data showing someone in the hall during the interval 2:38AM to 2:45AM.... and according to BCI there was no sign of any person in that hallway based on the camera data, but no one except BCI (whose credibility was destroyed in their sprinkler evidence episode) claims to have examined the camera data and certified that it was all there, rotfl at their loss of credibility as true evidence handlers after their performance on the sprinkler substitution snafu. </font>
<br><br>
SECONDLY, THE BLOODY NARROW LIGATURE MARK ON ZACHARY'S THROAT MEANS THAT HE WAS MURDERED BY SOME PAIR OF INDIVIDUALS, with possibly more attending their murderous party, WITH HOBBLE STRAPS (one around his throat and the other pulling on his ankles) AND THAT CONFIRMS SCENARIO 3'S LIKELIHOOD (that their murderous party re-assembled in the interval while the security cam was disabled) TO A LEVEL THAT DEMANDS AN INDICTMENT OF <u>ZANE SCHADLE</u>, <u>JASON HUFF</u>, <u>GEORGE DUNNING</u> AND <u>RYAN WEDMORE</u>.... <font color="black"> because the bloody hemorrhage shows that injury was done while his heart was pumping blood, and was applied with a jerk from BEHIND, NOT FROM A KNOTTED SHEET STRUNG UP FROM THE **SIDE** of his head... and furthermore the blood called lividity (that settles into tissues in the direction of gravity after death) was seen AT THE ARRIVAL OF THE CORONER to be in Zachary's back, showing that he died on his back, not hanging vertically from a sheet until official "discovery"... clearly Montgomery's assistant coroner is a fraud or a COWARD and because of her cowardice the perpetrators soon would be free to strike again making her 'cowardice professionally' a justification for an indictment as a getaway accomplice to a murder.... which example would bring up the question of why the previous BC Coroner never showed his face when the last inmate supposedly committed suicide. Don't you think that previous BC Coroner should LIKELY be hung if only we could find the evidence and indict him as well... but we aren't going to be satisfied til we hear from herself that she said what the Hornyak/Breyer duo reported to the GrandJury</font>
<br><br>
AGREED?
<br><br>
FURTHER THE EXTENT, FREQUENCY AND CRUCIAL 'WARPING' OF THE TRUTH AND EVIDENCE AND LAW GUIDANCE THAT <u>PROSECUTOR BREYER</u> 'CONTRIBUTED' TO THE GRAND JURY DECISION IS GROUNDS FOR HIS INCLUSION IN THE INDICTMENT AS AN **ACCESSORY TO MURDER AND FELONY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE** <font color="black"> as surely as any getaway driver after a murder was committed. </font>
<br><br>RIGHT ALONG WITH <u>CHIEF DEPUTY JOHN SCHADLE</u> FOR **FELONY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE**... <font color="black"> for his collaboration in the security camera tampering and the removal of the sprinkler heads</font>...
<br><br> PLUS <u>BCI'S DAVE HORNYAK</u> FOR **OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN FABRICATING A FORGERY OF FALSE EVIDENCE**... <font color="black">with producing a visibly wrong sprinkler head (claiming it was the original evidence item) and then producing with considerable effort an imitation crime scene photo, and passing those off as the original evidence and photo... (Here's Hornyak's <a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/GoldsonGrandJury/BCIsOfficialProsecutorsSummary.pdf">BCI Report to Breyer</a>, which accidentally exposes Hornyack's forgery on pg 23 versus pg 22. See for yourself secretly)....So... We'd surely want to grill him on whose idea his effort was expended for.. Conceptually, Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine could be sweating bullets right now... or maybe he has planned other obstructions to be dealt with perseveringly by those insisting of justice in Law Enforcement...</font>
<br><br>AND DETECTIVE LARRY MEYER MAY BE UNDER FURTHER INVESTIGATION <font color="black"> to see what his explanation was for hiding his own <b>pre-knowledge of the suicide</b> in his early phone call confirmed as 12 minutes before the official 'discovery'....</font> <u>CO MCKINZIE</u> MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE INDICTMENTS FOR at least being an **ACCESSORY TO HIDING THE MURDER** WITH HER FALSELY REPORTING A "HANGING INMATE" <font color="black">until such details of possible threats against her child as are needed have been secured if real. Or whatever food-eating excuse she could come up with for not looking before reporting that curiously phrased 'a hanging inmate'...</font>
<br><br>
THESE AND FURTHER QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED WHEN THE CORONER HAS HER INQUEST.... STAY TUNED..... IT MIGHT BE IN JANUARY...
</FONT></b></i>
<br><br>
Wouldn't it be exciting if they summoned a talented bloodhound to identify whose scent (assuming the evidence was decently preserved ROTFL) is on the sheet's pieces, both halves should be tested.. agreed, wow! Aw darn, there would be too many confusing reasons why Schadle and Dunning might have touched the sheet, without it being for corrupt reasons. Or any other corrections officer, actually, for that matter, even McKinzie.. hmmmm...
<br><br>
Any more suggestions....Maybe a cool demonstration for the idiot Montgomery assistant coroner -- idiot OR GETAWAY EXPERT SUSAN ALLEN WHO WOULD BE INDICTABLE AS WELL FOR ACTING AS AN ACCOMPLICE IN A MURDER-GETAWAY if she fails to satisfactorily explain her idiocy -- to show that <b>a wide, soft ligature does not make a narrow ligature-mark in animal flesh (skinned mutton perhaps).... Not to mention the direction that the ligature is being pulled is important. SINCE THE NARROW MARK WAS PULLED FROM THE **BACK**, and the SHEET WOULD HAVE BEEN PULLED FROM THE KNOT ATTACHMENT ON THE **SIDE""</b> Her idiot performance (OR COWARDLY PERFORMANCE) suggests that medical board examinations are not worth much in practice. Agreed, rotfl at my own mistake in favoring practical logic over classroom testing when I am well qualified theoretically myself.. ttyl<br><br>
TTYL
<br><br>
indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-79060675432962492222014-10-27T10:01:00.001-07:002014-10-27T21:53:11.875-07:00Justice Process TEST: Coroner's Proof -v- Crony Prosecution Control of GrandJury<BR><BR>
<b>Here in Western Appalachian Ohio, and more specifically in Brown County Ohio, there is a murder to be 'processed' by the so-called U.S./Ohio Justice system.</b>
<BR><BR>
Hopefully, you will have heard about <B>Zachary Goldson,</B> a young fellow who had been in minor trouble as a juvenile and was under restrictions over firearms. That young fellow rashly did use a sawed off shotgun near Georgetown, presumably during a time while on a visit to see his mother there. No one was harmed, NOT EVEN THREATENED, yet the forces of law, SUPPOSEDLY TO PROTECT AND SERVE, saw fit to jail that young fellow and convict him of such a pile of charges as to make him likely to face 5 years in prison.
<BR><BR>
Unreal as a service to the public's wellbeing. Unreal as a demonstration of judicial purpose. Presumably we have Judge Scott T Gusweiler to thank for that miscarriage, as well as the Brown County Prosecutor, Jessica Little. Their conscience burns.
<BR><BR>
But worse, during Zachary's confinement, under unmet-monstrous bail requirement, his restless behavior got a deputy or two angry. The story of his altercation at the hospital -- where they had just discharged him for later surgery to remove inappropriate debris from an inordinate swallowing stunt -- provided some dashcam and <b>other testimony of observers of the threat made to 'break his (expletive deleted) neck when they got back to the jail'</b>.
<BR><BR>
That threat was made by one of the Sheriff's deputies, named <B>RYAN WEDMORE</B>. And within a blink of an eye after returning Zachary to a jail cell, the 911 operator was notified to send an ambulance to the jail because an inmate was hanging in the cell, reported in 911 recordings with a very strange phrasing by <b>female corrections officer named SARAH MCKENZIE</b>.
<BR><BR>
Now enter the Corooner Dr Judith Varnau, and she decides based on her rather well thought out figuring, that Zachary was a homicide victim. In the flurry of activity, some crucial videotape -- covering the hall outside Zachhary's cell -- was TAKEN OUT OF SERVICE BY THE CHIEF DEPUTY JOHN SCHADLE. Schadle, for your entertaining of motives, has a son also on duty that night in the Jail. Not that it matters, right? That tape was written over, and there were conflicting stories (unconfirmed as yet) that NO COPY WAS MADE FOR PRESERVATION OF RELATED EVIDENCE... That's serious OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY THE CHIEF DEPUTY. By any unbiased standard. Any objections?
<BR><BR>
That same Chief Deputy John Schadle ALSO HAD THE SPRINKLER HEAD REPLACED THAT SUPPOSEDLY WAS USED TO TIE THE SHEET FOR THE HANGING.. MULTIPLE OFFENSES OF MAJOR CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF THE JUSTICE PRACTICE.
<BR><BR>
But we're not done. Nope, no one other than jail personnel had seen Zachary hanging, as described. Add to that the fact that jail cells as well as many other such institutions have specially designed sprinkler systems where the heads break off at a minimal weight (namely 40 pounds) specifically to prevent suicidal episodes. By the time any outsider arrived Zachary was on the floor, in handcuffs, no less. Oh yeah, they claimed they put those on him BEFORE they attempted CPR, rotflac. In fact they were so intelligent in administering CPR that they didn't for some reason remove the noose (a sheet) around his throat. rotflasac. Is there any way to describe such crime and motive to visually prove to investigative eyes that indeed the sheet is what killed him?
<BR><BR>
Is there anything but murder written all over this list of facts? And so in steps the Coroner, judiciously, and begins the process of documenting every detail. My, did she thoroughly analyze it. Wouldn't you? Considering the reality of what the real events were?
<BR><BR>
So what would a GENUINE sheriff do, under those circumstances, especially and precisely after the Coroner issues her opinion that this was a homicide? Any other jurisdiction would have taken those officers involved OFF DUTY TO PUBLIC WORK, balancing public safety against the rights of an accused. Wenninger announced that he trusted "HIS MEN" and they were unaffected. Would you agree that was favoring everybody equitably?
<BR><BR>
After all, (sarcasm intended) wouldn't you want your 8 year old in the custody of such an accused murder suspect for a charity christmas shopping trip, as a publicity stunt to make parents relieved that their children would feel safer doing their private gift shopping with photo ops for county law enforcement publicity, because christmas shopping is a dangerous affair for young people. Hmmmmmmm..?
<BR><BR>
This county has a questionable sheriff in the first place, since he clearly filed false credentials in his runs for office and a grand jury made him stand trial for that in 2003. If those credentials hadn't been counterfeit, the grand jury would/should have No-Billed the charges made, once the grand jury had been shown the credentials and the law on what was legitimate. Clearly there was a sheriff who violated the law with unworthy credentials, BUT DID HE PASS THOSE COUNTERFEIT CREDENTIALS **KNOWINGLY**???
<BR><BR>
That was what the jury was told to determine. And they did decide that the Sheriff wasn't smart enough to be doing such fraud *knowingly*.
<BR><BR>
THEN CAME THE COLLABORATION OF THE MEDIA AND THE JUDGES. The media blared the headline SHERIFF INNOCENT and the Judge -- Ringland, now promoted to Appeal Court judge with hopes of higher for each special case he handles -- SEALED THE COURT RECORDS... So the public didn't catch on AND WHEN A CANDIDATE LATER CHALLENGED THAT UNQUALIFIED SHERIFF AT ELECTION TIME, every one was convinced that the sheriff should win, and when that candidate took the battle to the courts, everyone was LED TO BELIEVE THAT THE SHERIFF WAS A VICTIM OF A POOR LOSER.. imagine that??
<BR><BR>
Oh but it gets even better. The upper level courts either refused to hear the case, one saying that he'd made his complaint prematurely, and the next court, that his complaint should have been filed earlier. Go figure, but know (in your figuring) that the courts in Ohio are mainly populated by the same party as the sheriff's. All the way to the US Supreme Court, which in a demonstration of total incompetence as an institution, REFUSES TO LISTEN TO 99% OF THE CASES BROUGHT THERE AT GREAT EXPENSE AND EXTREME GRIEVANCE. Ohio's own Supreme Court nearly matches that dignity (or indignity if you're among the aggrieved) with a refusal rate of 93% when last tallied. JUSTICE DOES NOT PREVAIL in Ohio nor in the SCOTUS.
<BR><BR>
And we're not done yet with appalachian glory. That challenger to the Sheriff's right to be considered qualified was none other than Dr Varnau's husband, whose own qualifications would shame most nearly every candidate for sheriff ever imagined, since Dennis Varnau was not only a trained police office with appropriate experience but had a law degree acquired from the military after a career as a nuclear submarine engineer during the Vietnam war, and after. So now we hear nothing from the brain-dead, gossip-greedy media in this battle but the idea that this is nothing but politics on the Coroner's side. Clearly all the corrupt politics was in other hands whose fingerprints are all over this history of wrongdoing. No wrongdoing has ever been shown on the Varnau side, all the complaints are about his lawful challenges as being (gasp) bothersome, annoying, and incessant.
<BR><BR>
Determination and defiance are not virtues in appalachia any more, under the current influences -- like schools -- on that society.
<BR><BR>
<BR>
So now we have this test of this society and its law enforcement characters. Agreed, this will be a real test.
<BR><BR>
For your edification, we have acquired from those surrounding Zachary's parents, the text of the Coroner's analysis to be presented to the Grand Jury this month, per the newspaper's announcement. Yet we will see just how corrupted the Ohio Justice system can possibly be. After seeing the Bureau of Criminal Investigation under the Ohio Attorney General DeWine's control, all Republican, like the Sheriff, take a YEAR (not a couple of months, like the Coroner) to prepare their own assessment, yet BCI's results are hidden from public view, keeping the observant public in the dark over whether the BCI will unlikely support the Coroner (rotfl) or the Sheriff's men/women (aka a GANG of murderers and complicit obstructive coverup perpetrators) with enough cleverness to FOOL THE MEMBERS OF THE GRAND JURY..
<BR><BR>
Don't think this is not possible, as we have seen other Grand Jury's engage in stunning displays of both genius and criminal prejudice, stupidity and worse (See the report at Bergerac.tv under the title <a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~dectiri/Unjustic.htm">'The Unjustice System'</a>)
<BR><BR>
Spread what your own decision would have been if you had been on the GJ, with the understanding that you have the advantage of having seen the actual Coroner's analysis (next), since one tactic to deceive the actual Grand Jury would be to hide or obscure or eviscerate the evidence and overwhelm the GJ with so much opinion and credentials, as to deflect justice. It's your assignment, should you choose to accept it, to complete this test, as you are now really the ones also being tested.. As we all are here also making it our own joyous chore to insist that justice shall prevail. TTYL Sherlock Holmes hat, at the ready!
<BR><BR>
****** THE CORONER'S REPORT ******* <img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Judy.jpg" WIDTH="100"> ****** THE CORONER'S REPORT ******
<BR><BR>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg01.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg02.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg03.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg04.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg05.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg06.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg07.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg08.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg09.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg10.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg11.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg12.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg13.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg14.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg15.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg16.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg17.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg18.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/Coronerspg19.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
And for your use in disseminating this <a href="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/NEXT-OF-KIN_CORONERS_DETERMINATION101014amended.pdf"><B>Coroner's careful analysis</B></A>, we are hereby linking a downloadable copy. Go for it
<br><br><br>
<b>Speculation, from here on:</b><br>
Possible murder weapon <img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Varnau-v-Sheriff(BCCorruption)/HobbleStrapSold4PoliceUse.jpg" WIDTH="200"> standard Police Hobble Strap
<br><br>
Instead of being used to quickly tie ankles to prevent escape, it appears to be possible that several 'law officers' dragged our young fellow, struggling naturally, but still in hinged handcuffs, around the floor by his neck, as their idea of the 'party' at the jail, threatened by Wedmore at the hospital, minutes before leaving the hospital scuffle and arrival at the jail, and done in the 9 minutes while supposedly just removing restraints but having no other requirement to accomplish in that otherwise empty-of-purpose 9 minute interval, which they reported as used for 'leaving him in the cell', which we do conclude was in his jail clothing so they could replace the floor-wiping evidence by switching to suicide watch paper clothing when they were done). Concealing their 'party'.
<BR><BR>
All four then left to establish alibis, but Zane Shadle, Chief Deputy Shadle's son, aborted his claimed 'smoke break' normally 15 minutes allowable, to handle the suicide appearance, including the need to acquire ladder, sheet, paper clothing, and a scissors. Hence the need to destroy the video camera tape of the activity in the hall outside the cell.
<br><br>
Considering the young fellow's easy ability to relay the incident afterwards, if alive, those four could not let him live to tell. Premeditated murder by a gang of thugs in uniforms and badges. How much the female corrections officer McKenzie is involved easily is seeable as at least awareness of and completely supporting Zane Shadle, as maybe are the other staff, especially Deputy Chief John Shadle, Zane's 'old man'.
<BR><BR>
<b>The Sheriff's men.</b>
<BR><BR>
<b>Pure speculating,<i> but fitting the evidence</i></b>. Make your own assessment of the WHO-DUNN-IT part, using the solid data assembled and analyzed by the <b>Coroner to achieve her lawful responsibility to determine 'cause and manner' only</b>. Not the who-dunn-it part, from which she has refrained. As has the Sheriff made no effort (purportedly waiting on BCI) except for support for Shadle and attacks on the Coroner (see previous posts) in which criminally motivated attacks the Prosecutor assisted with eagerness, which assessment is based on her newspaper quotes.
<BR><BR>
.Spread it around so it can't be hidden and swept under some rug.indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-9389582044554498312014-10-13T07:23:00.001-07:002014-10-13T07:23:41.484-07:00Amory Lovins Leaps Over Tall Myths, While Ignoring UN's CO2 Myth into Insignificance<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg00b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiA4cpJb0uw">
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg-1a.jpg" WIDTH="560"></a>
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg-1b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg01a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg01b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg02a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg02b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg03a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg03b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg04a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg04b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg05a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg05b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg06a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg06b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg07a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg07b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg08a.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg08b.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<a href="http://www.engineering.com/ElectronicsDesign/ElectronicsDesignArticles/ArticleID/8272/Is-Storage-Necessary-for-Renewable-Energy.aspx">
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Amory&WinningAntiNukeCoalEndgame/pg09a.jpg" WIDTH="560"></a>
<br>
<br>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-70946434783445809442014-09-21T18:53:00.002-07:002014-09-21T18:53:47.176-07:00Walking Out on Climate Marches<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg1a-DeterminedCalculating.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg1b-DeterminedCalculating.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg2a-WheresthatElectric.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg2b-WheresthatElectric.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg3a-WarmCompostSitter.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg3b-WarmCompostSitter.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg4a-SinkVoteResister.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg4b-SinkVoteResister.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg5a-LilNuisance.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg5b-LilNuisance.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg6a-InHereSomewhere.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg6b-InHereSomewhere.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg7a-SeparettStoneCreek.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg7b-SeparettStoneCreek.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/DefecatingIntoDrinkingWater/pg8a-SunMartheEnd.jpg" WIDTH="560">
<br>
<br>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-647234812938072482014-06-17T19:56:00.001-07:002014-06-17T19:56:50.019-07:00Transcripts, Verdicts and Veterans' Suicides ScandalBrown County Coroner Varnau's trial verdict has been delayed while the BC court recorder was working on the Judge's request for a transcript, which took much longer than expected. That document was filed last week so it's public record, for those who were doubtful about the surprises that emerged in the trial. The media coverage was so clearly lacking in any attempt to connect the dots as to make one wonder why anyone would read the 'coverage' and not simply resign to the idea that they missed it. Now begins the wait for Judge Kessler to write his decision, suitably annotated with direct quotes, in about another week. His original estimate of having it done the week after the trial would likely mean the new estimate will be more lengthy, since the request for a transcript suggests more elaborate agendas. Agreed? Not what we expected. Suspenseful waiting, with some assurance from others who claim to be familiar with this judge's work. Unlike the usual 'work record' in Brown County's courts, where the performance is a disgrace to justice for citizens. More on that record soon.
<BR><BR>
Meanwhile, let's not allow more veterans to be lost forever in the suicides that opened the door for the Sheriff and Prosecutor to conspire with hearse-chasing lawyers to 'solve' their political problems with an indy coroner who goes to every death scene (unlike the previous coroner who only went when invited), at the expense of aggrieved families. Let's find ways to get proper help for our local veterans now risking suicides. Like the help in Oklahoma here a legislator made it his business to move the mountains of FDA resistance to get HBOT, the help he had seen, for himself, did actually work.. HBOT (hyperbaric oxygen) was improving every veteran's life abilities who tried it, some fully, others to 80% of their own ability within a few sessions, recognizing that they had suffered brain injuries in the battlefield's constant exposure to concussive forces of the ubiquitous explosive incidents. Acknowledging the reality of physical damage suffered, measuring brain scans improving, and life skills returning, to end the misery of suicides that is occurring around the country, not just in Brown County but across the country. Then veterans can return home, really whole. Not face more death here.
<BR><BR>
Nationally, the scandal over veterans' medical care, has direct ties to the recent unwholesome rash of veterans' suicides here as well. The statistics over all, show a terrifying number of suicides by our veterans. TWENTY TWO A DAY.
<BR><BR>
That's right. TWENTY TWO VETERANS COMMIT SUICIDE EACH DAY, EVERY DAY.
<BR><BR>
Let's realize that if some military adventure in the war zone had a death rate of that size, there would be news media and headlines and TVs doing major features. Where are they when this death rate is EVERY DAY. Not just an isolated tragedy.
<BR><BR>
And worse, every day once we think we have them safely home. Twenty two die here back among us.
<BR><BR>
Here in BC, we see many families losing loved ones that they thought were safely getting medical care from the VA. The reality -- as you would hear it if you were to talk to those at the Open Arms Always group here -- is that there is an opioid scandal in the way that the medical resources are doled to our veterans. On top of the nationwide scandal of delays.
<BR><BR>
The VA is drugging our veterans into silence when they finally get attention from the VA. Drugging, or trying to escape it.
<BR><BR>
Meanwhile their real injury goes untreated. One recent suicide here was of a young man whom the VA had allowed marijuana, at least something that had no harm, but that was merely covering up his real injury.
<BR><BR>
How many others are there in the quagmire or waiting. Brain injuries from the repetitive exposure to explosive incidents are rampant, as was shown in a Nebraska returning combat group, where more than half showed such injuries, though most, were not some visible wound at all, nor even medically noted.
<BR><BR>
In brain injuries, like PTSD, the behavior of the victim is not very predictable and sudden turn arounds to frightening behavior is not unexpected. So sedating these young people, further depriving them of their life potential is criminal. WHEN THERE IS A TREATMENT THAT HAS SHOWN GOOD PROMISE OF 80% RETURNS TO FULL PRODUCTIVITY WITH A FEW TREATMENTS.
<BR><BR>
That's what has been the experience of those who have tried the medical specialty of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, which is more well known along the US coastlines where it's usually called 'divers medicine' where it saves lives in diving accidents.
<BR><BR>
The treatment itself is decently do-no-harm and relaxing for an hour every other day in a pleasant chamber. An amazing, almost space-age scene, where the chamber is pressurized to a couple atmospheres. The treatment for PTSD now being used in New Orleans, actually only goes to 1.5ATA (aka atmospheres absolute). And even 1.3ATA of the soft-sided chambers have shown matching promise in TBI (traumatic brain injury). The soft-sided chambers are used by many top athletes with their own sports medicine MDs. Unfortunately many other athletes are simply handled by the team doctors who satisfy the greed of the NFL owners by doping up injured players so totally they continue to damage themselves by playing while injured with no sense of protecting themselves. So even those softsided chambers, only a few thousand dollars or even leased chambers, have shown good promise in controlled testing for brain injuries, why not try them for veterans, and reach tens of thousands now, not after many are dead.
<BR><BR>
Google Dr Paul Harch, PTSD, and hyperbaric oxygen, etc. then visualize what opportunities there would be for VETERANS' FAMILIES to own (maybe lease-to-own) such a chamber and then bring their own veteran's friends in for club meeting, around treatments, sharing the costs, instead of waiting for governmental bureaucrats by the tangled thousands, with misallegiances, incompetence, and mountains of insane paper and rules, to do the decent thing while stalwart veterans suffer.
<BR><BR>
Nor would such a venture be necessarily short term. If you didn't want it to be.
<BR><BR>
Our families, friends and relatives, making such an investment, would solve ADHD, stroke damage, birth injuries, post-surgery healing, pre-surgery body strengthening, and anti-aging problems. Can't you see how wonderful such an investment would be, for those making it as well as for those around them.
<BR><BR>
Why not pool resources, use savings before the government takes them all, and investigate your own HBO2 chamber possibilities. Like the folks at <a href="http://www.EMRClubhouse.net"> EMRClubhouse </a> setting up their own operation for 'Emergency Medical Refugee' friends, they say, and aren't our veterans, our families all looking like medical refugees to you. They do, in my opinion. <BR><BR>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-36701257155140879902014-05-19T17:53:00.000-07:002014-05-19T19:28:18.214-07:00Confirmed: Sheriff's Office is behind the attack on the Indy Coroner, all the rest is fluff-n-mirrors using grieving families as pawnsAfter 1 full day of trial, both sides came into the 2nd day a bit worn down. But the Defense still seemed much better prepared, particularly later on when the Prosecution couldn't find crucial evidence that they could then only merely claim did exist.
<BR><BR>
In that crucial claiming attempt, the prosecuting attorney (Bradley Braun) demanded that the court disbelieve the coroner (who said she had not ever rejected the Sheriff's men's help, particularly not from Chief Schadle) and the court should believe instead the conflicting (lying? for some reason, or simply wrongheaded interpretation) claim of the Chief Deputy (John Schadle) that she had rejected his offer in the initial negotiations in the 2hour effort at smooth changing of the guard time (when the old coroner retired in December 2012).
<BR><BR>
That negotiation was recorded and is accessible on the <a href="http://www.varnau.us/">Varnau website</a> for public assessing of public records and Varnau had just reviewed that recording the night before in anticipation of likely plaintiff-claims (since Schadle's testimony triggered that expectation on trialday 1) and she said she had found no mis-interpretable content. That lady does her homework.
<BR><BR>
The court tolerated a nearly half hour delay while the prosecution TEAM of Braun, Hawkins and an assistant went into a private area to search the CD for something to make their claim seem valid. The judge's patience eventually declined to wait any further, after even asking if they hadn't at least even captured it in transcribed form.
<BR><BR>
Totally disgraced as competent if not as truthful, but that didn't deter the bombastic Braun or induce him to tone down any bit of his unsupported claiming, not even after seeing <b>how many</b>, not just that one 'missing' evidence piece,<b> of their inflammatory claims were explained away in the reality of law enforcement and its law-based division of responsibility </b>in normal small county law enforcement.
<BR><BR>
For example, <b>the inciting-horror scene of one next of kin finding a piece of their loved-one's skull on the mantle and taking it to the coroner and asking what to do with it in a flurry of outraged expectations, we saw those crowd-inciting claims melt away in the testimony on the reality of the events.</b>
<BR><BR>
When the event of the skull-mutilated body discovery was testified to, it turned out that the body was found in a darkened room and the deputy chose to advise the coroner to NOT TURN ON THE LIGHT SWITCH AS IT MIGHT BE BOOBY TRAPPED, based on his opinion of the likelihood that such a planned suicide as he was considering this scene to be was sometimes set up to destroy those who discovered the body by booby trapping some feature that would need attention from those coming on the scene. And the darkened room seemed suspicious to him. And she complied as a good team player does. Hence the investigation proceeded BY FLASHLIGHT since there was no one to relieve that fear in some cautious forensic-science way.
<BR><BR>
Consequently the victim's head, the top of which was in smithereens, with blood, brain tissue, skin and bone fragment sections plastered on the ceiling, the curtains, everywhere was not so easily reassembled to determine 'missing' piece identities. The coroner gathered as much as was possible under the flashlight circumstances and sent the puzzle pieces with the body in the EMT's body bag to the hospital morgue, meticulously as possible under time pressure, but obviously not ceiling stuff, nor curtain stuff. The relative arrived much later with the skull fragment at a point after the body had been reduced to ash in a ceremonial cremation, leaving not much to be done with the kin's horror but to suggest a contemporary-style private burial for the skull-piece with a symbolic life-surviving tree planting to mark the decedent's passage.
<BR><BR>
Once the reality of the blood splashed, flash-light search disaster was before the courtroom's eyes, instead of conceding that one of the Plaintiff's grievances was answered decently, the desperate ploy used by Braun was to scowl and demand that the Coroner should have sent the piece to the funeral director to be cremated as well, IGNORING THE REALITY OF THE COST TO THE KIN OF A SECOND FIRING OF THE FULL SIZE KILN. Morons running the prosecution were in evidence. Yet the courtroom failed to show any cognition of stupidity and disgust at that ploy, possibly since the horror of the scene and the reality of flashlights scanning for fragments of brain tissue and skin and bone had most in shock.
<BR><BR>
Similarly, <b>the pumped up outrage of 'evidence destruction'</b> over the coroner's cleaning the face of the decedent in a possibly (remotely) suspicious death, <u>was just the Coroner making the deceased presentable for the decedent's parents after the deceased was in the hospital morgue, and after the initial photos and evidence gathering was done</u>... so that the parents would see a more recognizable son.
<BR><BR>
<b>Other evidence-loss claims similarly melted in the open description of the events</b>, such as the outrageously stupid idea that the coroner was supposed to have taken fingerprints off a gun and gunpowder residues off the body as part of her cause, manner and mode of death investigation when <u>plainly such evidence responsibilities were the Sheriff's burden as finding WHO-DONE-IT, not the medical cause, manner nor mode</u>.
<br><br>
Yet Braun demanded repeatedly such phrases that described crucial evidence-destruction, families deprived of consolation, etc be kept in the court's ears as the testimony's content, as if the discovery of what was IN THE LAW'S DEFINITION OF SHERIFF'S RESPONSIBILITIES had never emerged into view. <b>An obvious stonewalling of truth, no truth-seeking nor fact-finding reverence, by Braun and the prosecution group, ever.</b>
<BR><BR>
Not even after the Coroner from Highland County testified that such sorts of evidence were not part of a Coroner's professional training nor was any law-mandated requirement. The insiders did say that when dealing with the big city operations where Coroner's had roomfuls of technicians that more extensive services were sometimes provided, but not in small counties.
<BR><BR>
As we've heard from other sources, the Coroner uses part of her salary to supply extra deputies, one a medical colleague from her office whom she shares obstetric time-challenges with and the other a law enforcement investigator otherwise retired. End of conversation on public care for responsibilities at the Coroner's Office.
<BR><BR>
By contrast, the Sheriff's Office has had a couple of budget battles in which they extorted extra funding from the County's limited resources in order to hire extra people at the jail (demanding that the county pay even more to house what the Chief Deputy considered to be inadequately monitored inmates at the Butler County jail) and in the most recent battle demanding, in court combat with the County Commissioners, that the County pay ever more of the Sheriff's legal expenses.
<BR><BR>
This jail expense extortion has been compounded by (subsequent to hiring more deputies, possibly even including Schadle's son) two 'suicides' at the jail. The last one, the Goldson case, was investigated by the current Coroner. The previous death (just 2 years before Goldson) was not even investigated by the prior coroner, whose recollection failed as to his involvement, which absence is not something on tape, unfortunately for improving his recollection.
<BR><BR>
Guess what has happened with the current investigation: the marks on the victim's neck were consistent with strangulation NOT HANGING, as the jail staff claim happened. AND Chief Schadle's role (with his son being among the four on duty at the time) was to remove evidence including the sprinkler head supposedly used for the deed (ignoring the manufacturer's claim that it was suicide-proof which is accomplished by making the sprinkler head break off at 40 pounds of stress), as well as erasing the hallway security film within the week, not preserving it (though after the row that arose over this, Schadle claimed he gave 'a copy' to BCI). That 'suicide/homicide' was just about as long ago as it would take a bunch of socio-pathic villains to trump up this inflated bunch of charges against the Coroner who refused to back down on her evidence of homicide, not suicide.
<BR><BR>
Considering that the Ohio Bureau of Crime Investigations has not yet issued its report on this homicide/suicide dispute, taking extreme caution in hurry-avoidance, the incidents surrounding the jail were off limits in the Coroner's case, and so this is supposed to be just held in abeyance. But it fits the pattern of why the anti-coroner-evidence in this county-uproar of supposed outrage, is dissolving under the glare of examination of the circumstances.
<BR><BR>
Ditto the bandied-about-in-the-press interviews full of shock-n-awe do dissolve, with claims made by the cocky prosecution spreading accusatory slander about the one case involving money. The incident where <b>the deputy coroner had taken money from the decedent's wallet and given it away to someone other than the Sheriff,</b> with the Braun suggesting malfeasance, at the very least, fizzled. It turned out that the deputy had put the money in the coroner's safe until next of kin could be determined and finally gave it to some party (with receipt) who showed powers of attorney documents and with no next of kin found nearby. To which Braun then tried to save his own face by changing his accusations and now exclaiming that the Coroner was 'acting as a probate judge', with that scolding, scowling about practicing law without a license, and thereby attempting to divert sensible recognition that he was concealing the function of the decedent's executor and those who have custody of what's owed to the decedent, as well as the probate judge's role in simply overseeing the recordkeeping presented to the judge by the executor. Total gaming the truth by Braun.
<BR><BR>
And <b>then come the gun handling stories.</b> The annoyance of the faulty claiming by Braun was evident in <b>one astute observer's comparison of 'who was jeopardizing the public'</b>. Consider their analysis:
<BR><BR>
"The one thing that really irks me is this. They blame Dr. Judi Varnau for not taking the gun at the Zachary Adamson case after Dep. Crawford removed it from her body-scene and her assistant called 911 to have the SO come pick it up and they wouldn't do so, where Zachary's roommate, the roommate's sister and both of the roommates' parents were present, with other guns in the house, and we're supposed to believe that it was Dr. Judi Varnau's big fault to give the gun to the roommate after the sheriff's deputy had taken it for his purposes.
<BR><BR>
Then on the other hand the Sheriff's Office responds to Blue Sky Park Road where Joshua Carter had shot himself with a gun, same as Zachary Adamson, only people were standing around outside the house. The Sheriff's deputies leave the gun on the floor, the door open, and put yellow "CRIME SCENE" tape up around the house, indicating it is a crime scene, and then the sheriff's deputies completely leave the scene unattended, the life squad leaves, and the coroner hasn't even arrived on the scene.
<BR><BR>
Which instance are we supposed to believe is more dangerous to the public? Where the coroner doesn't take the gun with her who has no place to store a firearm or any other evidence from a scene, or the SO abandoning the gun when he not only has a place to store guns and evidence, but leaves a gun completely accessible to anyone who wanted to come in and pick it up and use it on someone else?"
<BR><BR>
Every time we tallied it, the prosecution's case was dissolving (though their rhetoric continued full blast) in each fact-found, logical explanation, with no real stretch of imagination. It wasn't that the answers didn't fit together in vague ways. The picture of each event was clearly showing that the prosecution's charges were fraudulent or at least so malfeasant in investigation and case-preparation, that their effort was nothing more than loud marketing of shocking claims without substance.
<BR><BR>
By comparison, Tom Eagle, the Varnau family lawyer's defense, was thoroughly prepared -- to ask the scene-developing questions, and <b>when an opposing witness developed 'amnesia' (like the Sheriff and a couple Deputies), Tom Eagle reached over the defense table and activated a media file, from sources like the 911-operator or the sheriff's communications records to "refresh" their curiously amnesia-plagued memories.</b> And sure enough, they recalled the events as described.
<BR><BR>
And the memory-battle with Schadle, where he admitted (with help) to gathering 'evidence' against the Coroner and had collaborated with others in order to cause this case to happen, was justified by Braun as being 'necessary to protect his deputies'. From what did they need protection, the Goldson homicide charge? or from what other possibility specifically that was not in view anywhere. Clearly if the 'outside' use of the grieving kin in BC deaths could be made to weaken the coroner's credibility, then the SO would have a credible chance to force (in court if necessary) the discrediting of the Coroner's opinion of 'homicide' at the Jail. What does it look like to you? To this writer, it certainly looks like the Sheriff's Office USED THE GRIEVING FAMILIES AS PAWNS. TO COVER THEIR OWN CRIMES, whether commission or negligence with complicity in covering it up. And if all was so calm between the SO and the previous coroner, including the jail house 'suicide' in 2011, what else was not too kosher in the Sheriff's administration of 'Justice' and 'Law'n'Order' when the prior coroner simply showed his face only when asked to by the SO. How much criminality is in progress at the SO, and likely not just at death scenes?
<br><br>
The only 'crime' that showed up as an error by the Coroner, was the posting of some documents at her website without proper redacting of the privacy matters. And as soon as the error was reported to her, she immediately had it fixed. And she acknowledged that error and apologized in court for the discomfort caused as her responsibility. This fine woman, had been chosen for high level responsible positions in the military, and done a stellar job, judging by her ascendence up the ranks from second lieutenant to being in charge of nearly three hundred staff in medical operations, stateside as well as oversees, and had in her early days seen action in Vietnam, tending troops in locations where there was active rocketfire. The comparison to the scurvy Sheriff and Chief Deputy is night and day. The only thing now is to await the decision to be formally written by Judge Kessler, who throughout the trial managed a credibly fact-finding focusing, and fair-handed operation, that hasn't been seen in Brown County in years. We don't suppose he'd like to come out of retirement and run here or we'd be elated. indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-17533198063629832502014-05-16T08:03:00.002-07:002014-09-16T07:24:10.077-07:00BrownCounty Coroner Varnau vs the Sheriff & his engineered ouster of the Coroner -- TrialDay 1<b>Day 1 -- May 14, 2014...</b><br>
Grey clouds would sweep across the sky, dropping torrents onto parts of Brown County during the mid-afternoon. Before that, it was bright and sunny, letting those involved with the Varnau case enter the Courthouse without any concern about being drenched.
<b>Bradley Braun, one of the prosecting attorneys, came smugly swaggering into the courtroom and that attitude was, likewise, reflected when he questioned the first witnesses (Judith Varnau and Officer Huff). </b> After a few questions in which Dr Varnau exhibited good control of information, he became exceedingly defensive when Judith Varnau was answering his questions and insisted she stick with 'yes or no' answers, even though previous answers had shown the needed answers were more complex than simply 'yes or no.' In fact, that he waited til seeing the pattern of competence of his target victim, and then suddenly changing and hostilely insisting she just answer 'yes or no' would indicate to the observant observer that he must've not liked her previous answers... Now what about her detailed explanations would've triggered that? Maybe he is too impatient to let someone other than himself have their say...except he asked for details from the following witness rather than keep them hidden.
<br><br>
Which leads some observers to believe that maybe Varnau's details would've destroyed his case and he needed to keep them hidden. Either way his arrogant, huffy attitude was clear despite him repeatedly mixing up names and seeming rather unprepared for the trial. You could see that it seemed like the judge was getting frustrated with Mr Braun's questions. <b>In contrast Defendant Varnau's family atterney, Tom Eagle, came across as 'ready'</b>... as though he'd actually prepared for the trial. Even in the one instance where he couldn't remember a street name, he did remember the people's name's involved in the 'events' being testified to and even graciously admitted it was his fault...<b>something Mr Braun *never* did.</b>
<br><br>
Instead Braun's attitude would make one wonder about his attitude and commitment to 'fact-finding' and 'truth-seeking', much less wonder about his hostility in which he incessantly descended into horrible slanderous preludes to the actual question (which 'question' would be all the witness was to speak to) when he was evidently more interested in lambasting his victim.
<br><br>
Even when someone didn't give the answer Mr. Eagle was looking for Mr Eagle admitted that he must've not phrased the question correctly and proceeded to rephrase the question so it basically meant the same thing with added touches for the witness' viewpoint, which got a more specific answer. Fact-finding exonerated.
<br><br>
Because there are four different brain types, because there are more personalities than just follow-the-leader-wanting-prosecution, different people will have different responses to each and very question. Mr. Eagle made it clear that he could properly communicate with any of those people, unlike Mr Braun's rigid inflexibility toward the witnesses.
<br><br>
Now, the testimony itself had some gems of information despite Mr Braun's seeming attempts to prevent it. For example Judith Varnau was the first witness Mr Braun called and he started out having her state her qualifications (strictly as coroner, no history) and established that <b>her duties as coroner, under the law, involved only determining the manner, cause and mode of death. They didn't include preserving the crime scene, nor crossing crime scene tape without authorization, nor taking fingerprints, nor removing anything from the scene that's outside the body and the near vicinity</b>. The prosecution went on from there to have her identify pieces of evidence...one such was an email wherein she withdrew from the 1st agreement between her office and the Sheriff. He'd tried getting her to 'admit' to withdrawing from all 3 agreements they'd had, but he failed. He even failed at keeping it hidden why she'd withdrawn from the agreement. SHE HAD WITHDRAWN BECAUSE THE SHERIFF'S RULES HAD FAILED and someone died, possibly because of his rule.
<br><br>
So one must wonder why would she, why would anyone, remain in an agreement that wasn't servicing public need while being honored and was a danger to citizens...but that isn't something the Prosecution would want people to think about. It would ruin their case!
<br><br>
Later on Mr Braun would bring up that Varnau had a car towed with a body in the backseat before an examination could be done, 'hinting' that it smacked of 'disrespect' for the dead. In response Varnau would reveal that it was BCI (Bureau of Crime Investigation) that ordered the car towed so they could examine evidence in the car without the January pouring rain all around. At the obvious realization of the courtroom observers' likely reaction to freezing rain, deep mud requiring tractors and middle of the night timing, this brought about, Mr Braun then hastily switched to asking whether it wasn't true that in a later instance Varnau was the one who suggested another car be towed for her own comfort. To which Varnau responded that no she hadn't, that she'd "asked whether it should be towed." Asked, not suggested. Keep in mind this was after BCI ordered the first car towed before any investigation was done...thereby setting an example that anyone would ask about the second time around. Varnau did what anyone else would in her situation because, remember, she's not in charge of crime scene preservation as the prosecution kept implying as damaging for citizen safety and sense of anger.
<br><br>
The attempt to establish that Varnau hadn't been delivering guns to the sheriff's office backfired quite thoroughly too, first while Mr Braun questioned Varnau and she established that she had asked the Sheriff officers to take weapons that they had moved in their safety examination for spent shells and hazard, and that was confirmed when Mr Eagle cross-examined Officer Huff. (Mr Eagle had occasional objections to the 'inept' Braun questions but in this Plaintiff-selected witness-calling strategy, Varnau was not 'cross-examined' or in any way questioned/interviewed by her own lawyer, but instead would be expecting to be planning on Eagle calling her later).
The second witness was, as mentioned, Officer Huff. The one, actually notable question from prosecution was whether an investigation was ongoing when Varnau stepped in a 'pool' of blood by the victim's dead. Officer Huff said "Yes," paused, "I believe so." It was then established in cross-examination that the pause meant that Officer Huff wasn't certain about what was 'ongoing'. Likewise it was earlier established that Varnau's duty WASN'T CRIME SCENE PRESERVATION, and Officer Huff testified he hadn't pointed out where she shouldn't step. According to testimony it would've been a rather terribly bloody scene, with bits of body tissue splattered ceiling to floor. In richer county's that mess would have triggered a summons to crime scene crew that specialize in disaster cleanup/sanitation. Obviously not in BC. Officer Huff also testified that a physician like Varnau wouldn't be the appropriate person, nor have the appropriate training for reliably handling unfamiliar firearms. He would also be willing to take firearms from Varnau, it had been testified that Varnau had asked the officer present to take firearms before. It was the SHERIFF that put policy in place preventing that from happening, that she must 'deliver' them, and they were not to simply 'take' them. Imagine that! Which the officer did imagine and acknowledged that it was 'absurd' policy, which leads to the conclusion that the Coroner is not the one making absurd policies.
<br><br>
Even more absurd was the later 'explanation' by Chief Schadle that he had instructed his deputies such because he feared that Dr Varnau would unreliably bring charges against them for bogus reasons of her own creation. So far, they produced no sign of Dr Varnau suing anyone. In fact her reputed letter to the Attorney General (for clarification of her responsibility) was her fear in the beginning of her term of office that giving firearms and/or evidence to Schadle's deputies would involve her in a later lawsuit by a slicker lawyer, who (to protect a client-suspect) would uncover the Supreme Court's error in calculating timing (known as 'laches') and promote the claim that the deputies had no validly issued authority to operate and then the coroner would have tampered with proper handling of evidence to thus release a suspect on invalid prosecution defenses.
<br><br>
None of the Courts (all the way to the Supreme Court) where her husband had pursued Wenninger's credentials lawful validity claims, had ever dealt with the merits of the credentials issues and only dismissed the cases on technicalities of timing (first too soon in some tangle of <i>quo warranto</i> etc, then too late by an error in OSC's calculation of 'laches'). So there was no reason, out of fear of a humanly sensibly cautious woman doctor, for any sane manager of police operations to decently make such an insane rule as was seen in court. Not just in firearms, but most absurdly in firearms, making the pretense of it being a public safety issue in the press's opinion.
<br><br>
Further, it is ridiculous to think that a doctor, one not 'qualified' to handle firearms, could dictate Sheriff Office policy on investigation work outside the medical body-related areas. So why do the prosecution lawyers have the nerve to circulate petitions (other than hearse-chasing for income) to citizens with no decent chance to gather such a wide scope of data, from esoteric law content to memos to myriad event circumstances. And how do these hearse-chasing lawyers get the nerve to openly and boldly mouth their badly researched charges in open court before a judge who would hopefully have some familiarity with the reality of law content and law enforcement.
<br><br>
More to come, maybe when the Sheriff gets on the stand for TrialDay2.
<br><br>
indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-46918809164957907722014-04-23T11:01:00.002-07:002014-04-23T21:43:07.193-07:00Brown County Party Monopoly seeks to oust Indy Coroner<B>Just a party-engineered Coverup for Sheriff's Office role in Murder at the Jail </B>
<BR><BR><BR>
The 1st PreTrial Hearing to Suspend Varnau, the Indy Coroner who actually commits to arriving at each and every death scene -- in contrast to the prior Sheriff-loved coroner who only came when the Sheriff summoned him -- was today (22nd April 2014).
<BR><BR>
Among the many revelations -- should anyone be common sense knowledgeable in assembling the pieces of testimony -- was the amazingly conflicted testimony of the sheriff's men. Three of them. The most senior -- and hence most responsible for the Sheriff's role -- was Johnnie Shadle, Chief Deputy who constantly was on the attack, regardless of what he was being asked. Clearly his intensity reveals the fact that his own son is a prime suspect in the recent (last November is recent in murder investigations by the Bureau of Crime Investigations) jail death, astutely and thoroughly analyzed by this coroner.
<BR><BR>
1) Combining the information stated by the Sheriff's (Wenninger) men at the trial we have the following:
-- A) it is so crucial to have a rapidly but thoroughly investigated DEATH scene, since it could be murder.
<BR><BR>
-- B) but maybe not so crucial to the Sheriff -- the poor helpless deputies were so intimidated by the Coroner's legal-opinion-seeking that the SHERIFF"S CHIEF INSTRUCTED THEIR DEPUTIES TO ABANDON ANY DEATH SCENE AS SOON AS THE CORONER ARRIVED. Their explanation was that there was a potential misunderstanding over their respective areas of investigation and they refused to be blamed if the lawyers later chose to agree with the coroner.
<BR><BR>
Among the comments heard from a young observer at the Pretrial, was the most knockout idea: <B>it would seem quite natural and pleasantly solvable to simply provide each deputy with a sheet of paper on which they would ask the Coroner on her arrival, to designate the perimeter of HER DEATH SCENE RESPONSIBILITY. To which she would be able to <U>sign for official purposes</U></B>. Then the deputies would continue their REQUIRED UNDER LAW PROMPT INVESTIGATION OF THE CRIME SCENE EVIDENCE, INCLUDING PHOTOS, THE SECURING OF WEAPONS AND VALUABLES AS WELL AS DEMARCATING THE PERIMETER THAT THE PUBLIC MAY NOT ENTER WITH CRIME TAPE.
<BR><BR>
Since the Coroner has the responsibility UNDER THE LAW for ONLY determining the MANNER AND CAUSE OF DEATH, not the investigation of the suspects, and potential witnesses, weapons, etc., then the Coroner's area of interest is THE BODY.
<BR><BR>
<b>The coroner has consistently extended her arms as her designated body-scene area of investigation. </b>
<BR><BR>
Instead of following ORC (Ohio Revised Code, aka the Law's) requirements,
instead of honoring their CLAIMED OPINION of the crucial need for immediate collection of evidence,
instead of concern for the CITIZENS OF BROWN COUNTY'S NEED FOR SUCH SECURING OF WEAPONS, VALUABLES AND ESTABLISHING OF LIMITS TO CRIME SCENES.
<BR><BR>
Instead the Sheriff and his ADMINISTRATOR Chief SHADLE, have resorted to EXTORTION OF TAX FUNDS by REFUSING TO WORK WITH THE CORONER ON ANY DEATH SCENE, especially suicide scenes, and instead charging the county for summoning investigators from Columbus. Sheriff Wenninger and Chief Deputy Shadle chose to EXPEND DESPERATELY NEEDED PUBLIC BUDGET FUNDS TO DEMAND THAT BCI BE CALLED DOWN FROM COLUMBUS FOR EACH INVESTIGATION. What exactly are the allocated 'sheriff office' payrolls being useful for??
<BR><BR>
And even more ridiculous was one of the Sheriff Office's other schemes. They, after refusing to co-operate in returning to the scene after the Coroner had left, did demand that she, the coroner, SEND A LETTER TO THE PROSECUTOR (as their intermediary) to REQUIRE THE RETURN of the deputies. Otherwise they wouldn't show up. Asinine.
<BR><BR>
But we should recall that -- 3 years ago, when budgets were a bit more generous but dwindling -- this is the same sheriff's office that extorted limited budget funds from the public coffers (while EVERY OTHER COUNTY OFFICE REDUCED THEIR FUNDING) by refusing to keep jail inmates at the jail and instead CHARGING THE COUNTY FOR WAREHOUSING INMATES AT NEIGHBORING BUTLER COUNTY'S JAIL. And the budget authorities acceded to the sheriff's threats because they had no viable choice. Wenninger and Shadle claimed that the Columbus rules would view the manpower shifts required by their choices to be risky and the BCSO did not wish to be frowned on any more in law enforcement.
<BR><BR>
That last remark recognized that the Sheriff did NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED CREDENTIALS WHEN HE FILED FOR OFFICE back in 2000.
<BR><BR>
If he had, then the Grand Jury reviewing the charges (from citizens in the county, including later Varnau's husband) would not have authorized a trial. Had the sheriff been able to provide the credential proofs to the grand jury as he would have had to provide them to the Elections Board (who failed as well), then the GRAND JURY WOULD HAVE NO-BILLED THE CASE. But the GRAND JURY DID NOT. so the case went to trial.
<BR><BR>
The Judge at the trial (crooked Ringland now rewarded with many advantageous opportunities in climbing the ranks of the judiciary, largely same party as the Sheriff) INSTRUCTED THE TRIAL JURY TO LIMIT THEIR ADJUDICATION TO WHETHER THE SHERIFF DID IT ON PURPOSE, since the law for falsification of election credentials (a felony) says 'knowingly'. So limited, the trial jury decided the Sheriff was just ignorant. Wonderful recommendation for a law enforcement official, but the reality was not so reported in the press. SHERIFF LEGAL were the headlines.
<BR><BR>
And the case went to appeal, each time denied on some claimed technicality, including some knowably false demands of violations of 'laches' -- a technicality that limits pursuing charges later than was available, which would in the 'Varnau' cases, the Coroner's husband now carrying the ball alone after he had challenged Wenninger at the ballot box himself, have required that Varnau's husband file his complaint before he was even in BC. An obvious 'mistake' that couldn't be made by all the justices on the supreme court by accident with a million to one odds.
<BR><BR>
<b>2) If it wasn't so criminal of the lawyers, it would have been hilariously aggravating. This bunch of fool lawyers was clearly AMBULANCE/HEARSE CHASER QUALITY. PREYING ON THE GRIEVING.</b>
<BR><BR>
Lawyers are expected to KNOW THE LAWs, especially the FOUNDATION OF THEIR CASE. Yet these criminals were making claims against the coroner that had nothing to do with the coroner's LAW REQUIRED DUTIES. They wanted the medical officer to do the LAW ENFORCEMENT DUTIES and ignored the real jerks who're not innocent of failing to do their duties. Security, providing safety were made into gossipy (puddles of blood, skull pieces, personal shock, guns and butcher knives, missing items) detail of scene hazard.
<BR><BR>
They made false claims about what the Coroner had said about the jail murders, claiming that she'd accused the staff, which is not what this law-careful coroner did. It was established that IT WAS THE NEWSPAPER THAT CONCLUDED THAT THE STAFF HAD DONE IT AS IF THE CORONER HAD SAID IT... and that newspaper RETRACTED THEIR INCORRECT REPORTING...... yet the Judge went ahead indicating that he expected the false claims to be normal???? but what about demanding the perpetrator retract it themselves, or be facing something comparable to perjury..? As filers of an 'oath-bound' affidavit, surely that's perjury if it's not retracted as error, publicly on the record.
<BR><BR>
<b> 3) The last of the county's officials to consider is the current Prosecutor, Jessica Little, WHO HAD HER OWN LAWYER TO DEFEND HER RIGHTS.</b> YET THE PERPETRATORS OF THIS RUSHED CASE DIDN'T ALLOW THE CORONER TIME TO ACQUIRE HER OWN LAWYER. Her family lawyer was not available for the RUSHED HEARING..
<BR><BR>
As for Little's claims that her fiduciary and statutatory responsibilities prevented her from doing any testifying on HER ROLE IN STIRRING UP THE ANIMOSITY AND AIDING THE SHERIFF IN THE STUPID IDEAS LIKE LETTER WRITING TO FAX (clearly after leaving the death scene) TO LITTLE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF INVESTIGATIONS... that elected official showed an amazing stupidity in deciding that a letter from the Attorney General sent to the Coroner (in answer to a question) that CCd Prosecutor Little did not rank as attorney-client covered in her conflicted role as defender of both Sheriff and Coroner, SO THE FOOL PROSECUTOR CIRCULATED THE LETTER TO THE NEWSPAPER (the Brown County Press) AND THE SHERIFFS OFFICE. BIG HEADLINES. Yet she showed no remorse.
<BR><BR>
On top of that obvious violation, there was an anonymous letter sent that ended up in the Varnau's custody, that said that Little had urged one grieving family to go to Little's chosen lawyer friend to file suit against the Coroner. Little's response on being shown the letter (when it arrived, not in court) was 'coward'.
<BR><BR>
So, the timing of the trial becomes even more suspect, in that BCI is expected to present their assessment very soon, on the jail house murder. Murder? Yep, the sprinkler head that the jail staff claims was used for attaching the bedsheet (tied around the kid's neck) is engineered to NOT HOLD MORE THAN 40 POUNDS before breaking away. Anti-suicide safety. Piece two, the marks on the kid's neck were not consistent with a sheet hanging, where the marks would have had a gap where the sheet was stretched upward, not against the neck parallel to the rest of the mark. Strangulations have no such gap. Piece three, the mark itself was not of a bunched sheet, but of a straight edge strap of uniform width. The careful coroner has the photos to back up her death certificate signature and she's not backing down. So the Sheriff, after destroying evidence (though later denying it), now says that BCI's investigation should rule, and that ruling could seriously damage the remaining credibility of the BCSO as well as implicate Shadle's son. Meanwhile the Sheriff and Shadle have not suspended any of the jail staff while the investigation goes on, trying to keep up the appearance of 'nothing' wrong here. Unlike what would have happened in any decent law enforcement department. Wouldn't any citizen be less certain of calling on the sheriff's men while knowing that one of them could be a murderer? Hence the obvious attack motive against the independent coroner who goes to EVERY death scene.
<BR><BR>
She's one strong, caring lady who served in a medical capacity in the military with appropriately accumulated responsibilities. She set out to do some public service by running for medical officer in her adopted community when the previous coroner declined to run again and no one stepped up to the plate, at all. Her offices (ObGyn) were in the process of being moved out of their hospital location when the hospital was sold and the new hospital owner decided that cancer patients brought in more money for that space, so it looked like her new local practice would be slow enough for her to do public service.... but she's not an insider in the local politics and the 'two party' choices are clearly wanting to stamp out any disgraces in their skeleton closets. The Ohio Legislators took time out of their fiduciary responsibilities and dealt the third parties in Ohio a serious blow to their ability to get on the ballot at all. The Libertarians had managed to get on this year's ballot by beating the law's deadline and challenging the law in court.
<BR><BR>
The no-choice two-headed duopoly (wherein the officials won't follow the letter of the law when it benefits regular citizens, and hide behind false immunity claims when their officials are found to do wrong) persists in Ohio.indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-65571255837027828522013-05-11T02:21:00.000-07:002013-05-11T02:21:56.442-07:00Benghazi -- not incompetence, but murder by proxyFrom WND's news coverage and discussions.... [with selected emphasis added, of course]
<ul><i>
Revelations in Wednesday’s congressional hearings on the Benghazi terrorist attacks prove it is a massive scandal that will carry significant consequences for those involved in the cover-up, according to retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney.
<br><br>
McInerney served at the highest levels in the Air Force, including time as assistant vice chief of staff and vice commander in chief of the U.S. Air Forces in Europe.
<br><br>
He believes the Obama administration deliberately misled the American people <b>on the motivation for the attack</b> and is now covering its tracks on decisions to <b>prevent a military rescue in Benghazi.</b>
He told WND that it is more clear than ever following Wednesday’s testimony of former Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Hicks and two others before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
“This is going to be the biggest scandal. It is going to make Watergate look like kindergarten because Watergate was primarily limited to the Oval Office. <b>This cuts across <u>the whole national security apparatus</u>, where people were lying and covering up</b>,” McInerney said. “It is a dereliction of duty that this nation has never seen before.”
<br><br>
So what consequences could that mean for the highest levels of the administration?
“Well, just see what the consequences were in Watergate. If it’s far worse than Watergate, the consequences will go right into the Oval Office,” he said.
<br><br>
McInerney said the tell-tale sign of Obama’s dereliction of duty can be determined in the admitted White House narrative of <b>the president’s actions as the terrorist attack played out</b> the night of Sept. 11, 2012.
“When is the exact minute he knew? We don’t have the timeline, and it was well before the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff went over there. He only talked to the secretary of defense one time, so it’s obvious he knew that <b>he had given the <u>stand-down order</u> and did not need to talk to the secretary of defense</b> or anybody else after that,” McInerney said. “Then he goes the next day out on a fundraising campaign to Las Vegas. That is a low for the commander in chief of this great nation.”
He also insists <b><a href="http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/benghazi-makes-watergate-look-like-kindergarten/">the stand-down order could only come from one source: the president</a></b> himself.
<br><br>
“The only person who could have given it was the president, and he had to give it through the secretary of defense, secretary of state. The word came out so it came from the combatant commands and other unites below, but nobody could have given that except the president of the United States, and that is very clear,” said McInerney, who noted that <b>the State Department’s own Accountability Review Board likely reached a similar conclusion in its report</b>, <u>which is why so few have seen it</u> and <b>why the leaders of that study refuse to appear before Congress</b>. McInerney believes <u>they should be subpoenaed</u>.
<br><br>
While he believes Obama has a lot to answer for, McInerney made it clear that many top-level subordinates deserve a lot of the blame too, and that’s what makes the scandal so troubling.
<br><br>
“It’s going to have significant consequences because it impacts two CIA directors, two secretaries of state, two chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, two secretaries of defense that are all involved now with the cover-up,” he said.
<br><br>
The general also singled out former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her comment at congressional hearings in January in which she bristled severely at accusations the administration concocted a plan to blame the attack on a spontaneous demonstration over an anti-Islam YouTube video that got out of hand. Clinton slammed Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, saying, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
<br><br>
[OBVIOIUSLY SHE HAS STILL BIG POLITICAL AMBITIONS SHE DOESN'T WANT BESMIRCHED]
<br><br>
McInerney sees that as a low point in American history.
<br><br>
“That is one of the most despicable statements that any American has said about such a tragic incident when you lose people like that. It makes a huge difference that our troops know that they will always be protected as much as they can and we’ll do anything to protect them,” he said. “She says, what difference does it make? That will live with her til the day she dies. I can tell you, all the people I know, both active and retired, think that is one of the most despicable statements we have ever heard a civilian leader say in our country’s history.”
</i></ul>
[BUT IT'S WORSE THAN DERELICTION OF DUTY ! MORE WAS BEHIND THE REQUEST FOR ADDED SECURITY, AND LIKELY MORE BEHIND THE DENIAL OF SECURITY, MUCH LESS RESCUE, HIDEOUS AS THAT IS..]
<br><br>
In another article from WND:
<ul><i>
Suspicions surrounding the administration’s actions were amplified during the hearing when <a href="http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/greg-hicks-state-dept-told-me-not-to-speak/#DtZ5hwbPdGLDflir.99">Greg Hicks, the No. 2 person in Libya</a> when the Sept. 11, 2012, attack took place, testified under questioning from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, that <a href="http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/greg-hicks-state-dept-told-me-not-to-speak/#DtZ5hwbPdGLDflir.99">he was told to “not allow himself to be interviewed by a congressional delegation</a>, led by Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, as to what he knew about the attack.”
<br><br>
Meanwhile, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., asked, “The question is: Why would they do a cover-up? What are they covering up?
<br><br>
“You know, <b>a week before the ambassador was killed in Libya, a ship left Libya and docked in Turkey</b>,” Senator Paul told WND. “[T]he captain of that ship said <u></i>there were arms on board <i></u> and that he actually witnessed <u></i>the rebels taking the arms<i></u> and disputing over who got what.”
</i></ul>
<br><br>
So why is it only in the commenting online by netizens, ordinary brainstormers or writers, publishers and videograpers working on their own understanding, that we hear more about those 'weapons', about 'motives', about who handled such suspicious magnets for a need for coverup? We don't believe that cleverness is so completely absent in government-'humans' and we use that designation loosely. Government strategy sessions are not so different from corporate strategic planning sessions and we testify that those are openly focused on cleverness. So why should we be expected to swallow the characterization of government officials as simply incompetent. Observations and open discussion in the marketplace of ideas online produces clear fitting of the puzzle together, calling it what makes it worthy of investigating, in plain language. For example.
freethought commented:
<ul><i>
In the home stretch of Obama's presidential campaign, where saving his ambassador would have been of real benefit; one needs to ask why a politician, as calculating as obama, chose not to be the strong hero, but made the decision to sentence Ambassador Stevens to a certain death.
<br><br>
I believe the answer lies in <b>the mission of Ambassador Stevens, to locate and track where arms sent to Libya have ended up</b>.
<br><br>
Obama calculated that losing an ambassador through perceived incompetence would be less damaging than the answers to where the weapons went in Libya; this is very troubling that <b>silencing Stevens through execution by proxy</b> was calculated by obama to be less damaging than the report from Stevens of the answers the ambassador was seeking.
<br><br>
The administration was not incompetent in their decision to deny security to a currently serving foreign ambassador, they are not that incompetent; <b></i>they purposely killed Stevens, by inaction, to silence him and any report of the arms deals ordered by the administration just before an election<i></b>.
<br><br>
I believe the administration is guilty of <b></i>premeditated murder<i></b>, and they only used the attack on the diplomatic safe house as they do all crises, it did not go to waste!
</i></ul>
<br><br>
We had read that it was Hillary Clinton's idea in a State Department brainstorming session that she thought it was possible to get around the prohibitions, official and public knowledge, against sending boots-on-the-ground assistance to the admittedly Al Qaida rebels fighting with the Syrian government by shipping arms to Libya as expected for their own security against Gadaffi's former troops, then cross shipping those weapons out of that country to Turkey where the Syrian rebels could access them. In the testimony before congress, Clinton feigned amnesia of such an inspiration but admitted she would have thought it possible that she did. ?
<br><br>
Hence someone was 'inspired'. Arms moved. Syria kept burning. Libya remained disrupted, needing U.S. assistance.
<br><br>
And the official prohibition responsibility of the Ambassador was apparently taken 'too seriously' by Ambassador Stevens and his finding out what was going on at the CIA dock headquarters on the Embassy doorstep may be the snafu that the presidentially ambitious types were intensely seeking to stifle.
<br><br>
Besides... a <b>"proof of need"</b> for homeland security targeting 'fanatics' with free speech, and raising <b>more anti-moslem talking by the public that the administration could demand be silenced while pointing everyone to it</b> was even better than the risk of looking foolish in the Administration's disinformation posing about some anti-mohammed youtube video that would even <b>make points for government control of internet sites, at least in the minds of some, inside legislative circles and out in public</b>.
<br><br>
You might even want to know how long it took to produce that slipshod video to serve as the pretext. How quickly the Administration became aware of it (EVEN graciously MAKING IT PUBLICIZED TO FANATICS ABROAD WITH ADMINISTRATION HELP so that other clerics could proxy protest as potential confirmation of the disinformation).
<br><br>
If that slipshod video job coincided with the time of arrival of the Steven's reporting to the Administration on his findings and/or suspicions, then the whole production could have been a premeditated operation to commit murder and stage another public demonstration to move opinion against middle eastern THREATS to virtuous Americans that the U.S. 'ought' to be doing something about and denigrate any remaining vestiges of peace-seeking activism and likewise denigrate libertarian realism on letting people solve their own problems as naivete.
<br><br>
And one other ominous puzzle, pointed out on PJTV by Bill Whittle, was the UNEXPLAINABLE reticence (in the furor at the time) of the Republican Romney IN THE DEBATES with fully national public venue. Romney rejected that pure golden opportunity to expose the incompetence of his opponent. Draw your own conclusions about what 'they' and their sources knew about CIA involvements and future plans for wars.
<br><br>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-31319118881490823762013-04-22T22:33:00.000-07:002013-04-22T22:33:14.830-07:00Gunshots and Possums in Sandy Hook's mysteries explainable
<font color="#ffffc4">
<CENTER><b>The heroic janitor or the body-snatching custodian?<br>
Confirming a ghastly possibility ?</b></center></font>
<br><br>
<font color="#4b3e2f">
Knowing what we know now about Adam and a few of the possible accomplices, maybe killers, it just seems so completely wrongheaded to imagine that anyone would give credence to the story of the 'heroic' janitor. But they did. Without thinking about it twice.
<br><br>
<font color="#ffffc4">Imagine someone bold enough to come into range of the marksman-killer, accidentally or not, and demand that we believe he was <b>close enough to the marksman-killer to demand that the gunman 'put down the gun'??</b>. Then regale us with the idea that he then managed to get away, to run through the halls pushing students and teachers into their classrooms and locking their doors...While he stayed quietly somewhere out in the hallway, supposedly in mortal danger... And to live to tell the story </font>to the police when they came in response to the 9-1-1 calls, presumably. Though all we have as evidence that he was actually standing guard, as the myths do say, is the story of his shouting to the police when they arrive that he isn't the shooter, retold by the 'saved' ones cowering inside the locked-down rooms, when they finally opened their doors b/c they heard the police come noisily down their hall.
<br><br>
<font color="#ffffc4">So now what else could a janitor actually be doing in the hallways, such as in the first of the scenarios we are examining for its credibility, ghastly as that pedophile theory is. So is there a real hero? Somehow, his name was not easy to come by, nor was he ever interviewed by the media, wonder why?</font>
<br><br>
Well, once the internet observers got ahold of this report, they went off to find out more about this individual 'hero', even if the media was content to just repeat the myth. Guess what those internet observers found.
<br><br>
First of all, there was a limited number of candidate janitors. First was <b>the main custodian, named Kevin J Anzellotti, and the searching only found his facebook page</b> which the data-miner decided she was not going to dignify the content thereof with her own description because she said it was <b>rather obnoxious</b>... However, <u>by the time I saw her video and went there, the whole area was thoroughly <i>familyized</i></u>. Completely, not a sign of anything remotely 'obnoxious'.
<br><br>
SOMEONE was paying attention to the datamining on Youtube. Otherwise, just wonder why Anzelotti's page was suddenly drastically revised. We shall have to consult with the data-miner as soon as possible to see if that element of noxiousness matched one or another of the scenario theories..
<br><br>
<b>The only other candidate for janitor-hero was a semi-retired former janitor who was not on the staff somehow until sometime after November this 2012</b>, neatly just a month before the massacre he shows up to help? <b>Neatly just about the time that the first of the slipups of uncleaned-up evidence of wrongdoing from the planning stages, handiwork that had been left visible online and discovered by data-miners</b>, specifically the polished video memorial (about Sandy Hook victims) stored on VIMEO with a confirmatory dated twitter (complete with title) that the upload had been accomplished, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrHI7kmqn2Y">all of which </a>produced the expectable reactions when shown on Youtube... mop-up time after VIMEO tried to claim that the video (seen and clips captured and presented) had *really* been uploaded sometime *later* than the date showed (making one wonder how credulous they think we are).
<br><br>
<b>The name of this 'other' janitor was Rick Thorne and may have been the actual one locking down all the rest of the school people so they wouldn't be involved with the disaster in progress. </b> <i>To the benefit of all concerned. </i> The bearer of that name however, in any list of addresses and identities in the general Newtown area, was living quietly and not to be disturbed by anyone since he seems to be unavailable at the moment. Perhaps the police brutality idea of being threatened with handcuffs to be sent to jail might explain it. Else where can he be?
<br><br>
Well consider this, since WE KNOW THAT whichever mythical janitor source it was, that janitor bragger WAS FULLY LYING IN THE ATTEMPT TO SPREAD DISINFORMATION <b>since we don't want to so easily believe that the shooters with their MARKSMANSHIP would have missed and neglected such a risky male interfering in the shooters' planning,</b> then <font color="#ffffc4">we would have asked different questions</font> about his mythical activities while the massacre was supposedly in progress. And likely had him arrested as an accomplice, shortly.
<uL>For one, we'd like to know just what he was doing at the time of the 'encounter' with the killers AND that activity should also be on the security camera data. Because <b>if the JANITOR was an accomplice</b>, that completely makes it MUCH MORE FEASIBLE TO BRING DEAD CHILDREN INTO THE SCHOOL in boxes AND REPLACE THE GAS-ANESTHETIZED SANDY HOOK CHILDREN WITH THE DEAD ONES. Yes, presumably in suitably-sized, plastic-lined, cardboard boxes or even lightweight crates handled just looking like supply boxes with furnishings perhaps. Heaping the dead children -- used by the pedophiles and killed elsewhere with 'long gun' weapons using 3-11 bullets each, and boxed for this profitable operation -- anywhere in the classroom while gassing the cupboards where the teacher had put the students in, and maybe even blocked them in. The whole operation would not take very long WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF A KNOWLEDGEABLE JANITOR, or even two when needed.
<br><br>
So now you see why we think that there should not only be <b>demands for the security camera footage presumably on cameras still in service, maybe even the data from the ones that could have been shot-out by the killers in the area where the killers were working.
<br><br>
but also for DNA TESTING OF PARENTS AND BURIED CHILDREN IF THE COFFINS WERE NOT DEMANDED TO BE OPENED PER PARENTAL DECISION FOR THE FUNERAL</b>... Until the funeral, none of the parents were ever allowed to see their child, so who knows what child was buried in those coffins. <b>If a coffin was wanted open for the funeral, in spite of the official instruction to parents not to do so, then the difficulty -- for the pedophile theory's viability -- is still surmountable by the criminals,</b> <u>IF</u> at least one of the CORONER'S CREW (likely one of those brought in to 'help'? maybe from FEMA's drill group or from the state's drill group) WERE ALSO IN ON THIS OPERATION, THEN THE PERMITTING OF AN OPEN CASKET (with the wrong body currently planned for disposal) COULD BE RESOLVED BY ENDING THAT MOTHER'S REAL CHILD'S LIFE (at that point in the custody of the pedophile) AND THAT NOW-DEAD CHILD BE RESUBSTITUTED in the casket AT DELIVERY TIME TO THE FUNERAL HOME. Ghastly, absolutely ghastly, but easily fitting the timeframes and supplying support for motive and profit to someone or to someones. And thoroughly consistent with the horribly immoral operators of such a pedophile ring where the lives of children are cheapened.</ul>
<br><br>
<b>The Children's Story -- the mainstream possum vs the various children sought out by online media doing investigative coverage</b>
<br><br>
As we scoured the evidence and other testimony of credible witnesses, we came to the testimony of children (appearing to be selected by online media) and have found it to be mostly in favor of this ghastly pedophile interpretation IF THE CORONER'S CLAIM OF 3-11 LONG RIFLE BULLETS PER VICTIM IS BELIEVABLE. Else the children's testimony means the Coroner was lying and the Witness Protection scenario is preferred.
<br><br>
To be specific: The children, uniformly have reported NOTHING LIKE THE HUNDREDS OF ROUNDS OF BULLETS FIRED RIGHT THERE INSIDE THEIR OWN OTHERWISE QUIET SCHOOL BUILDING. Unlike the woman's 9-1-1 statement, presumably at the initiating of police involvement, claiming the curiously accurate number of bullets in the police theory that the autopsies seem to also show -- a hundred gunshots she said, in advance basically.
<br><br>
Hundreds of bullets? A horrendous racket of cacophony that would have likely rattled the windows all over, judging from the online demonstration of the decibels of actual gunfire from either a Bushmaster or an AR-15 and we do suggest that FIRING RANGES ARE AN EXAMPLE OF HOW CACOPHONOUS THAT MAYHEM WOULD HAVE BEEN.
<br><br>
So let's examine those children's , LIKELY, innocent-of-agenda testimonies.
<ul>A couple of the older boys did report that the their estimate of the gunfire was not rapid fire, nor many, but more like 'animal control workers' they thought might be in the woodsy area somewhere nearby. As far as frequency and less than cacophonous sound, this would fit with the teacher's assistant in the locked down part of the school, who also added that the firing came in a pair of sessions, separated by a significant pause, during which time she was using her cellphone to call 9-1-1, plus calling her daughter who was an EMT thinking she would have been frighteningly alerted to come to her mother's aid but found out that no EMT alert had been sent yet. Some questioned her veracity since her description was not representative of the expected cacophony, but now may be seen as the giveaway that the gun story is majorly not trustworthy.
<br><br>Another child of younger age and possibly in a more nearby classroom if the classes were arranged progressively by age-grade, said that it sounded like 'pots and pans clattering' like someone clumsily handling furniture, which was the assessment of another child who said that it sounded like the 'janitor banging furniture around in the gym' rafters or some such structural storage idea. All of which support the idea that the janitor (maybe both) was/were moving bodies in boxes in haste. </ul>
<br><br>
<b>Now let's look at the major play given to another mainstream media-favored child.</b>
<br><br>
The only story that is currently being harder to analyze is <b>the story of the child, the only one in the 'first classroom' to escape being killed with the other near couple dozen dead children, was that she was 'playing dead' under the piled up disarray. </b>
<br><br>
Well now that poses the interesting question, DID SHE ONLY GO OUT OF CONSCIOUSNESS MOMENTARILY (not getting as much gas) WHILE THE OTHERS WERE BEING SHIPPED INTO BOXES AND SHE GOT MIXED UP WITH THE ALREADY DEAD CHILDREN... OR.... WAS SHE ONE OF THE ACTOR-CHILDREN, maybe never even in the class, AND WAS SIMPLY DOING HER ROLE FOR THE DISINFORMATION OPERATION? [<i>The actors in this circus will be analyzed in the next posting</i>] You can guess..
<br><br>
Now it's our turn. We would ask how it was unrecognized that, <font color="#ffffc4">with all the bullets flying 'supposedly in the police-interpreted story', that some stray bullet must be hiding somewhere in that child's body.</font> So figure it out yourself. We keep trying to find a way to discard this pedophile theory, or even the govt/mafia theory, BUT IT KEEPS COMING BACK IN SPADES. We thought for a while that the possum-playing child was going to succeed in complicating the pedophile theory, until we thought of the stray bullet problem. <font color="#ffffc4">If there were no stray bullets in that child's body then the possum story does not make sense (<b>unless there weren't that many bullets at all and the official 9-1-1 caller is lying, for her own reasons</b>), and only the knock-out gas idea (then finding herself under the pile of the coverup children, whose presence would be being cleared away as she was being unearthed by rescuers so she would not have been wanting to see more of the horror) explains her experiences </font>as well as CONFIRMS THE OPERATIONAL DETAILS. Ghastly, but we must be DEMANDING RELIEF from uncertainty BY EVIDENCE TO EITHER SAVE THE 'MISSING CHILDREN' OR TO RENDER THE THEORY'S PUZZLES OTHERWISE EXPLAINED.
<br><br>
So we would demand the dead children be exhumed BY INDEPENDENTS FOR DNA EXAMINATION, defintely FROM OUTSIDE THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT's CONTROL AND OUTSIDE ERIC HOLDER'S ALLIES' CONTROLLING INTERESTS.. <b>assuming they weren't cremated. then what...</b>
<br><br>
<b> Surveillance Cameras Needed </b>
<br><br>
We have heard from one of the swat-knowledgeable Youtubers pursuing this story that HOLDER, yes Fast & Furious Holder, HAS TAKEN CUSTODY OF THE TAPES ! As our source said, "Just like the 9-11 Pentagon security camera tapes"...
<br><br>
Would we even trust whatever video concocted data the police/Holder would produce by this time, without broad spectrum internet experts' own confirmation of it being genuine?? Not!
<br><br>
If the police said that they kept an original, then let them show it post haste, otherwise it's a unreliable as the Holder copy, and in fact, even now, it's been too long for clear trust of any kind.
<br><br>
How much worse could the police have handled this? There's no indication in anything they have told us or produced that would suggest that they even made use of such a valuable piece of evidence. So we don't know if the security system failed, if the management of the security system failed, or if the police even looked at anything on it at all.
<br><br>
You might have wondered if there was a security system there at all to be looked at, or what was handed over to Holder.. <font COLOR="#ffffc4">The announced-to-parents high-tech surveillance and security system, that appeared to have been installed at the Sandy Hook grade school, supposedly worked by insisting on personal face and/or card identification,</FONT> which system's records should provide such answers to confirm or expose comings and goings, at the very least. How many more cameras? Location? Their condition? Were the cameras even turned on? That leaves us to seriously doubt even the school's security staffers.
<br><br>
What was reasonable to expect from these people with direct and immediate access?
<br><br>
Quick responsiveness is REASONABLE TO EXPECT. Especially when the police department had massacre crisis training, as we have seen their CT state mouth-piece 'lieutenant' Paul Vance did appear in DHS videos of Aurora, CO, scavenged from DHS propaganda. Amazed at his Batman massacre presence?
<br><br>
How fast could the data have been in the hands of the police? As an example of the sort of speed expectable: When the asteroid exploded over Russia just a couple weeks ago, it was only moments before someone had uploaded the security footage of the timeframe around the impact so that the results in one of the offices being watched by a video security camera could be seeable and show how things shook and how the impact could be evaluated. No questions asked, 'rapid' is not beyond expectation.
<br><br>
If the stuff existed, maybe its display of the evidence WAS NOT confirming THEIR wild theory of a lone crazed shooter or maybe they didn't want to look? You'd think security tapes didn't exist, even though it appears the system did, which would mean possibly that the security system was intentionally shut down temporarily. Totally unacceptable managing.
<br><br>
<font COLOR="#ffffc4">The investigation was so tangled with chases in the woods suggesting multiple shooters, and the total confusion over weapons used, is just so suspect as being <b>directed mismanagement by 'someone' with clout or control</b>.</FONT>
<br><br>
Reasonably evaluated, they needed immediate confirmation in the security tapes of real timing, sound & fury, number of shooters (four like the car doors opened?) which weapons, others in the hallways, including escaping children (how?), who to believe in the tangled lies. Those tapes' data should have been IMMEDIATELY ACCESSED BY STAFF UNDER SUPERVISION AND PRESENTED AS CONFIRMING-REASSURANCE THAT ALL THE MURDERER(S) WERE DOWN AND NOT STILL AT LARGE and that THOSE NOW IN CHARGE WERE COMPETENTLY HANDLING THE EVIDENCE, knowing where to look for prints, and myriad other messed up details....
<br><br>
You be your own judge.
<br><br>
The families testified that they experienced that security systems' operation whenever they came to the school, so you'd think security tapes did truly exist as advertised, IF the security system was not intentionally shut down temporarily... why? to accommodate the incoming killers'? Leading back to the suspicions about insiders helping the killers. Turning it off 'inadvertently' doesn't seem credible for a manager of that security system. Police and security staffers should have to answer for this loss of evidence. And in Holder's hands it's truly lost. End of that vital opportunity. On to another.
<br><br>
Next we want to look at Mass Media Treachery and FEMA's knowable use of Crisis Actors.. Then we're ready to open the pandora's box of The Reason for Adam and Nancy.. what a knockout. TTYL
</font>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-761927822085162902013-03-25T18:25:00.001-07:002013-03-25T18:25:27.251-07:00Four Sandy Hook theories taking shape, recognizing a possible killer and the Franklin ScandalFour Sandy Hook theories taking shape, recognizing a possible killer and the Franklin Scandal
<font color="#ffffc4"><center><b>The implications of Adam's innocence vs the emergence of the 'pre-visit' staffer</b></center></font>
<br><br>
<font color="#4b3e2f">
<b>LET'S EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE from the SANDY HOOK so-called "PRE-VISIT"</b><br>
<font color="#ffffc4">with THE HELPFUL IMPLICATIONS OF ASPERGERS</FONT>
<br><br>
<font color="#ffffc4">
First of all, we demand to know the name/identity of the claimed Sandy Hook staff member who the media boldly reported that he had been involved in an 'altercation' with Adam Lanza, and precisely the "three other" adult victims of the mass murder and that this claimed confrontation took place THE DAY BEFORE THE MASSACRE,</FONT> specifically on December 13th at the Sandy Hook school. With such an undeniable agenda to convict Adam Lanza of intention to kill those three people (and likely the claimant himself, by his inference), such an explosive statement is INDICATIVE OF A SEVERELY INCRIMINATING PLOT PIECE. Yet the bearer of such lying is hidden from public view, and should be entirely suspected.
<br><br>
Worse, the ability to substantiate or explore that explosive claim was suspiciously EXTINGUISHED in the massacre itself, so what was the police's basis for trusting or dismissing such an explosive motive. In which case, we now have the responsibility to demolish that bearer of lying.
<br><br>
And we further wonder how that suspect got credibility to be broadcast on NBC and major media, <font color="#ffffc4">with NO verification from the official controllers either, since NBC declined to reveal who their 'police' source was,</FONT> REVEALING THAT IT SEEMS THE MEDIA IS DRIVING THE OFFICIAL CONTROL.
<br><br>
<b>HOW DO WE EVEN KNOW THAT SUCH A PERSON AND STATEMENT WAS EVEN EVER EXISTING..? </b>
<br><br>
It could all be a FABRICATION of the mainstream-media to hide their totally exposed false-reports on Adam that they broadcast the day before and to now hide how those broadcasted-lies were defeated by the internet with the strangely fine help of people's cellphones and cameras, completely to the media's embarrassment online (though in the TV world, the major networks were dribbling toxins into the TV-viewing public's veins, though not quite successfully), now being papered over by some mythical newly emerging chimera with lies to distract the public from their puzzling and to seem to repair the media's previous toxic 'opinions' in their now-claimed revival from the 'fog of war' confusions down in the trenches with the police (where they imply the public's internet was not privy) so as to denigrate the consensus forming in the public mind that the media were in on something unwholesome..
<br><br>
And lo and behold. we have just seen that unwholesomeness is so likely the case, as we see again in another one of those amazing discoveries. Now <b>the discovery is of the stunning AP bulletin</b> that was issued TWO HOURS BEFORE THE SHOOTINGS and found in extended searching by a sharp sleuther. That internet sleuther has displayed on Youtube the screen print of that AP news bulletin THAT WAS POSTED at precisely <b>7:25 AM</b> ON THE DAY OF THE MASSACRE... that AP Bulletin says:
<br><br>
<ul><font color="#ffffc4">"Police respond to report of school shooting in Newtown, Conn.: few other details available"</FONT>
<br> See this understatement here:
<br><img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/CIA-APnews-SandyHook-2hrsBEFORE.jpg">
</ul>Stunning discovery being relayed by one Youtuber in his compilation of evidence, with the young woman discoverer's Screencasting cursor pointing momentarily to the 'BREAKING' designation, where the cursor is highlighting the area inside the cursor's bright green circle. It must be all over the net by now. The posting date by someone at Associated Press Newservice is roughly lower left, left of 'Embed this Tweet' and below the row of icons. Drop dead clear..!
<br><br>
I don't suppose the control of data is so tight that AP could discover the identity of the poster of that BULLETIN, or would they... surely there were an amazing number of 'mistaken' press bulletins in that early period, fully confusing most people totally, and creating the 'fog of war' that the media later used as their 'out' for their own later-and-with-full-research-credibly-doable bad coverage. If that identity were available, right now, it had better be retrieved or be swept off the scene, as other evidence slipping out.
<br><br>
And we shall remember that the powerful over-reaching forces behind this engineered massacre will have some spokesperson declaring that 'some' programmers made 'some' sleight of hand datestamp-option for 'some' reason that is not very logical but obviously it accounts for the date discord and we are scolded: we must trust "THEIR COMMON SENSE" or risk being seen as a tin-hat. Which common sense of the generic sort says they've been caught and ALL THE MANY programmers IN SEVERAL DIVERSE SYSTEMS were not conceivably the problem in CASE AFTER CASE OF PREMATURE ESCAPES OF EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL PREPARATION... from Facebook pages that memorialized the valiant death of Soto DAYS BEFORE she was 'a victim', to the United Way solicitation of donations for the victims before any 'shooting' happened, to death certificates prior to deaths, to the KNOCKOUT VIDEO ON VIMEO showing a polished presentation on the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrHI7kmqn2Y">heroics at Sandy Hook with an upload date of mid-November</a>, a whole MONTH AHEAD OF THE MASSACRE (which cowardly Vimeo management when confronted with the discovery of the date of uploading, said they opined that it was truly possible that you could upload a new video over the older one without the date-of-upload being changed, believe it or not, and when the discoverers didn't believe it, the notified owners of the video made it 'private' and then removed it altogether)... So use your common sense, because there are at least some copies, including ones made with the screencasting displayed?
<font color="#ffffc4"><b>
However, in the event that some Sandy Hook staffer still has his involvement-trepidation-overcome so that he will persist in his lying, we shall insist that Adam's evidence of Aspergers conditions exposes that Staffer's lying, and that ADAM NEVER ACCOSTED ANYONE AT SANDY HOOK and the logic works in the following way:
</b></FONT>
<br><br>
<b>5) Since aspergers' symptoms were being considered in some depth in our previous post, we shall not repeat the details and shall, on that basis, demand that the fellow on staff at the school who claimed that he and 'the three' other dead staff members were accosted by Adam unexpectedly the day before the massacre, be held in suspicion, maybe even in custody. </b> He curiously did not show up 'for work' **in time** at the school on the day of the shooting as the 'other three victims' did whom he claims were with him in some nebulous 'altercation' with Adam the day before the massacre. HE SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY CONSIDERED A LIAR BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW OF ASPERGER ADAM, since <font COLOR="#ffffc4">Aspi Adam would, first of all, not have been poking around unexpectedly at some place unusual for him, as this school surprise visit may clearly be seen to be.</FONT> Such an unfamiliarity-plagued, location-changing discomfort is not desirable by any Aspi and would not have been pursued on his own, especially with his mother out of town as his carer, should things go wrong if such a wild idea ever crossed an Aspi's thoughts in the first place. Secondly, Nancy had left Adam a supply of prepared meals so that he'd be comfortable with his usual routines while she was on her latest holiday in NH for a pair of days. That is how Adam operated. <b>No way would a super cautious, intelligent Aspi take off into the uncertainty-charged atmosphere of unfamiliarity and venture to accost strange people, not seen in a dozen years at the very least. </b> No way! [ If ever at all, since another source said that Adam went to St Rosa's in the early years, not Sandy Hook Elem.]
<br><br>
As for the purpose of such lying claim and prejudicial-conviction-attempt... clearly <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">the MURDEROUS PLANNERS' goal was to focus everyone's attention on Adam. </FONT> THE MURDERING SCHEMER'S PATSY, their FALL-GUY IS SUPPOSED TO GET THE ATTENTION <b>so that police/media attention to investigation in the crucial early hours when the trail is hot is taken away from pursuing any other possible criminal collaborators</b>.
<UL>
<b>RESULT in PATSY IMAGE: </b> Creating an 'animosity' and hatefulness, not just drugged-confusion senselessness AS WE WERE SEEING IN AURORA last summer.
<br><br>
<b>RESULT in VICTIM IMAGES:</b> Maybe the 'brave three' were to be seen as too trusting of Autists (?) and other 'strangely different' people, but then even if beneficently trusting, they SHOULD HAVE REPORTED such odd-visit behavior, making the 'three' not so clever, and providing a 'lesson' for the public. This somewhat diminishes the victims now being credited with heroism in potentially defending child victims, so it must be highly important as <b>the intended message</b> <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">(now who would want such a snitch-embellishing message imprinted on the public mind)</FONT>... <u>Counter interpretation</u>: (If, as some have suggested, no one really died, then <u>envy of the glory</u> being attributed to the adult victims in the preposturous pronouncements of the posing-as-all-seeing Superintendent -- without any real events knowledge in her possession -- could be another favored explanation, <u>depending on when</u> this 'pre-visit' story did get put into circulation.)
</ul>
<b>NEEDED FOR PROPER INVESTIGATIVE CONCLUDING: timing and sequencing of related statements. </b>
<br><br>
Well at least on "timing" we have the next-day-AM NBC video date, pretty much eliminating the envy route (since the superintendent's sort of praise was not yet in play so soon): the villain had already put this claim of a supposed pre-visit into the police thinking before the end of the day of the massacre, but possibly not so late as to be seen as still needing questioning overnight, so that would put the disinformation likely in the midst of the confusion of the other captured suspects (from the woods, etc). because it was said in the NBC report early the next day, that the authorities were 'still' questioning this individual at that time with no reported results. We must have the name of that lying staffer who was magnifying his own crime-scene-intelligence while attempting to point at Adam with a libelously claimed motive.
<br><br>
<b>But more than that criminal need to point at Adam as 'to-be-hated', there's another level of significance</b>... <font color="#ffffc4">The fabrication of such a full-blown image-tale with potentially risky revealing explanation DETAILS</font> (as such an altercation episode would have and be requirable to be revealed) out of thin air (since Adam's innocence reveals the void where Adam was said to have been), <font color="#ffffc4">suggests considerable *need*,</font> not just prejudice against someone 'different' and 'conveniently accusable' nor as an explanation for not being at work that morning, which leads us to conclude that <u>his motives were likely severely criminal</u>, of some sort. So what were those risky involvements and motives...
<br><br>
<b>How would such an individual be involved as one of the criminals?</b> A number of possible gyrations in the tangled lying start unraveling as soon as we look, all of them seem to leave this lying individual in the line-up of criminals. So let's untangle them, just to favor the idea that he might not be *entirely* lying about 'the three':and him being in an altercation, though he was entirely lying about Adam's involvement.
<br><br>
To analyze the possible gyrations, visualize a branching tree. First branching point (there was no altercation at all) or (there was an altercation with that group among themselves). Then from each of those branching alternative explanations of reality, there are consequences to be explored in order to arrive at the motives and risky involvements.
<br><br>
<b>BRANCH 1: Since Adam wasn't involved in any such altercation, was there an altercation at all? </b>
<br><br>
If there was no altercation at all, then what role do the 'other three' victims play <u>in a non-altercation scenario?</u> <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"> CRUCIAL PUZZLE to identify consequences: Branch 1a) -- (Were they intentionally targeted <u>for some as yet unknown reason</u>) or (were they simply in the way and got killed?) </FONT>
<br><br>
<ul>If those 'three' weren't supposed to be in the way but were there anyway, possibly the plan was to USE <u>ANYONE</u> WHO DID GET IN THE WAY as being the main mysteriously-explainable target of the murderous planner's chosen patsy. Such an immediate connection would focus more police/media feeling of there having been intent to get those 'three' (not that they were just collateral damage) in the lone-shooter-theory image and so the killers' team would plan to belatedly reveal such pre-visit disinformation about some 'altercation' with *whomever* got in the way on shooting day, with the lying disinformer as an observer/paricipant of such altercation who could lyingly point to Adam as possibly seeking revenge. Since there would likely be some other victims than just children, then WE'D WANT TO KNOW HOW **SOON** THIS LYING INDIVIDUAL WAS FOISTING HIS LIE ON THE OFFICIALS..
<ul><b>If he waited until he was informed about the identities of the adult victims</b>, then there's a possibility that <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">his role was simply as 'escape-accomplice to murder' of the children and Adam.by distracting police from other work on the case </FONT>
<br><br><b>If however that lying individual did present his faulty story <i>before being told the identity of the victims</b>, <u>then <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">he is one of the shooters</font></u> and maybe even the precise killer designated to 'handle' anyone who would get in the way.</i> And he wouldn't have to run away very much, since he would be expected to be onsite, so he'd want to maybe be found just cowering in a closet like the rest, or be seen as if he were just arriving from the parkinglot (not fleeing, just hiding down in his car that he'd left there over night). </ul>
<br><br>
Else if the 'three' were actually to be targeted, then a lot of 'interesting questions' should follow. Not the least of which is <b>what was the basis of the discord between that lying individual and the 'three' </b>that brought on their targeting during the massacre...
<ul>Was the 'discord' already in the open prior to the massacre (in which case they must have known something about what was going on that affected the killers so as to trigger such a payback).
<br><br>Or was the discord between them and the lying individual still just *impending* (and then they apparently stood in the way of some opportunity or new player who would replace one of them and undo the relationship of the 'three' in a way crucial to some mafia style operation, like a pedophile ring in the area using school resources after hours, for example. Or using Sandy Hook's information resources, etc, but wanting more. In any case, the disinformer is DIRECTLY implicated in their murders. </ul>
</UL>
<b>BRANCH 2: If there was an altercation, then the possibility of targeting is <u>way</u> increased and the question would be how could the presence of 'those three' be arranged reliably at the massacre site-to-be and on the killers' schedule.</b> That ruse-need being done would be an indication that there was another staffer (since the disinformer wasn't at the school in the morning)also in the killers' group, like maybe the janitor (who incidentally was known to be in the area of the arriving shooters, per some tale of "heroics" AND lived to tell about it) who could be conjuring the need for the principal (one of 'the three') and her relatable associates (psychologist and one more) to come to the first grade class where the janitor has deposited some arriving boxes requiring a principal's signature and others' overseeing opinions on merit of the delivered items. <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"> So it would be easily conceivable whether done or not, and would imply <u>a second insider</u>. Such insiders could <b>also explain how the security cameras would be possibly able to get near instantaneous destruction so as to provide no record of the rampage</b>, </font> since being in possession of that location-knowledge would make such instantaneous destruction quite attainable for a professional target expert, as we have demonstrated the shooters did include
<br><br>
The official story is that 'the other three' went to the first grade classroom <i>after</i> the shooting started to see what was going on and rushed right in. Believable? Umm, sure, maybe or maybe not. If the shooters had to shoot their way into the front door as is believed, and then turned immediately toward the first grade classrooms (instead of toward the offices as the floorplan description in the governor's summary did claim per police-provided analysis) then how fast did 'these other three' (instead of summoning police help) rush from their meeting down the hall in order to arrive in time to intercept the shooters and be caught in the firing squad? Try picturing that as possible. Impossible, in your opinion, too?
<br><br>
Hundreds of rounds were supposedly being fired in those close quarters. In fact, if the shooters went straight to the classroom as the governor was supposedly summarizing with precision and a floorplan for the TV audience to understand how fast the disaster did overtake Sandy Hook before the highspeed response police could possibly arrive -- in 10 minutes? he emphasized, but clearly he is measuring from the time when the 9-1-1 calls came in reporting the shooting which calls were eventually numerous, but the front desk person was reported to have dove into hiding and didn't re-emerge for a lengthy time, per the varnished account provided by the nurse, iirc, so how much time elapsed, before the first call came at 9:35 is wobbly. Unvarnished accounts from the far side of the building (to be explored later), after they were hustled into classrooms and locked in by the janitor, per their story did estimate (unfortunately colored by fear) that the 10 minutes was 25min. Working from the ten minutes rapidity, then how did the first graders get hidden in the cabinets before the rushing shooters got to the room. They must have taken a full ten seconds, just to realize that the incredible cacophony was inconceivable-to-ordinary-people real gunfire right inside their hallways and nearby. The whole blessed room would have still been standing in a state of shock from the entry-way shootup noise, and possible security camera disabling. No time to register that an assault is what's in progress and make plans (not unless you're israeli and/or you've been drilled in such a ridiculous alarm strategy of hiding in cabinets for a shooter lockdown). You'd barely have time to screech 'what the hell was that' and look at your co-workers and/or students for their state of shock, before the idea sets in that it's real gunfire, but what to do. Those guns are LOUD, especially indoors (about 150 decibels, where people complain about generator noise of a paltry few decibels). Meanwhile those gun-wielders are on their way to go the short distance down the hall to the first room.
<br><br>
For analyzing the police theory for 'the three', in those short moments after the initial 10 second shock and awe, then seconds to drop what you are doing 'in the meeting' in some account, what would 'the three' be thinking on their way, following and seeing the destruction of the security lock and camera, and anything near those items, already having to have been 'blown away' without hesitation since their function and location were known to the shooters? Meanwhile the shooting is still going on. Doesn't 'oh my god' slow you down in your haste? 'What do I do?' Using up roughly a whole 60 seconds of the likely 3 minutes that the shooters were 'devoting' to the first classroom, with about an eery 3 minute pause (accounted for in the report of the an arriving mother with a bookbag to deliver and an unvarnished account of one locked-down teacher's aid on the far side of the building) with another 3 minutes spent in the second classroom before the police arrived and the shooters had split. So although their arrival and targeting is still possible, it doesn't seem likely that there was anyone from that classroom moving about to be saved by the last half minute of the three.
<br><br>
So we see, that 'the three' being in the midst of the first classroom massacre does more practically require some pre-planning, just to make the whole story hang together time-wise and misplaced sense of helping. So concluding, if there was an altercation among 'those three' and the disinformer, then there's likely another complicit-in-the-murder insider who co-operated in order to target 'the three'. Agreed, so as to arrange their presence with the disinformer not at the school yet that day? So that takes care of Branch 2 as well , and with Branch 1 included, then <b>either that disinformer is complicit in mass murder or is one of the shooters himself. So give us his identity</b> and make him take the Fifth in order to avoid FURTHER self-incrimination. Agreed?
<br><br>
The other realization that there are at least one and maybe a FEW more insiders in the mass murder. We wonder just when the 'one' in the offices did make the call to 9-1-1 which may not have been quite as soon as 'first' since one account said there were still more calls coming in when she called the second time, after the "pause". quite 'late' (relative to the bursting in the door) though that 'one' would have had to have known that the responsibility was on their heads, specifically on the head of the office person in charge of opening the front security door. Agreed that's likely?
<br><br>
And the office person in charge of opening the front security door would not likely -- on that 'shooting' day -- have been the 'secretary' who was so unusually taking a sick-day that precise day and then showing up when the mess was done, apparently not so down-and-out-for-the-count at all. That person in charge of the security door is one we want to ask about her own activities during the shooting. Plus there was -- according to the sources cited on wikipedia-- a 'secretary' hiding with the 'nurse', somehow, with the nurse under her desk in one account? What kind of infrastructure does Sandy Hook have? How many staffers did honestly have control of people-contact for the school.. and where were they when the shooting started?
<br><br>
<b>With now possibly two insider accomplices and a possible insider as shooter emerging from pacifying one or another of the explanations needed, one begins to take <u>the mafia and pedophile images</u> rather seriously. </b> The nationality of the 'mafia' is open to limited exploring since we are of the opinion that Eric Holder appears to have CONFIRMED links to drug cartel Sinaloa, whereas Obama has both Israeli/Jewish and muslim motivation ties. And Holder/Obama/Napolitano all have American mafia-style forces in the less-than-honorable employee elements in DHS, FBI, ATF and CIA. Consider the book <u><i>I was an economic hitman</i></u> whose author says that not all the employees in the U.S. spy and enforcement ranks are as naive as to deny the existence and knowledge of those mafia-style forces inside the Executive Branch. Taking the groups, one by one:
<br><br>
<ul>The Sinaloa option is going to be somewhat compromised by current courtroom difficulties in Chicago. Those relations are stressed to their limit.
<br><br>Israeli enterprising swat squads would be uninterested in aiding Obama's tyrannical anti-gun progress since Obama was unsupportive of the Israeli's expressed wishes that the US should block Palestinians receiving favor from the U.N. just that month so those highly trained squads would only be snubbing such an assignment, under any banner. And as for the Israeli intelligence operatives being the ones possibly designing this massacre for their own swat teams, even Netanyahu would be unwilling to put the American Jewish population into defensive modes again without real benefit to Israel, not just his image-pique nor simple revenge against the U.S. for not blocking the Palestinians in their U.N. bid.. And the Israelis have no motive for involving Adam.
<ul>And furthermore, we would thoroughly notice the amazing amount of British news coverage that was filthy with misinformation. Usually they do better. The British are not as known for being controlled by the "Jewish block" as the American politicians are reputed to be, and are instead easily more inclined to be under Moslem influence, in London especially, yet they're not pointing at some 'Israeli' intrigue, though they would be inclined to, under Moslem influence, don't you agree?
<br><br>
However we're not switching to accusing any Moslem terrorists either. Not as the manpower source, which was discredited in 9-11 as camel jockeys used as pawns, who couldn't fly a piper but could jet-pilot-enviably spiral a 757 into ground-skimming precision to thread the needle's eye and smash into the precisely least monitored path and point on the entire perimeter of the high-security Pentagon Building, and/or even more hilariously magically bring down even Building 7, independent of the World Trade Buildings 1 and 2, from remotely caused ordinary office fires, precisely descending gracefully into its own footprint. ROTFLMHO </ul></ul>
<br><br>
So far, the hitmen seem more likely executive branch insiders with violent rogue services as their resume.. Adding other government mouthpieces as media insiders.. <b>exposed by <u>media-insider slipups in AP-evidence escaping into public view</u>, if you will agree that your tinhat feels ok. </b>
<br><br>
Now, that momentary pedophile-reference above (in the mafia list) may seem rather shocking out of the blue, but as a matter of fact the black honda thought to be "Nancy's car" <b>allegedly</b> "being driven by Adam" in their lone gunman theory (presuming that Adam was still alive and able to drive with his Aspergers, some Aspis cannot handle road stress even without other life stresses, and certainly not under such enormously horrendous conflict circumstances as the killers were putting Adam under) leads someplace unexpected and almost discarded. Who drove the car, not just who owned it.
<br><br>
That black honda was described by one of the earlier unknowing parents arriving to deliver part of a missing schoolbag's needed requirements, just as the shooting was likely restarting (since according to one teacher's assistant inside the 'safely lockdown' side of the school building, there had been a significant pause, and this arriving mother was unaware of any shooting noises as she approached the school entry (but soon noticed the broken glass at the entry, so the massacre was in play) and as she was just reaching the frontstep, she noticed the strangest feature of <u>a black honda just</u> STANDING WITH <b>ALL FOUR DOORS WIDE OPEN</b> and some cloth-like items, possibly a couple of dark towels scattered around it. <b> Why would a <u>lone</u> shooter open all <u>four doors</u>?? </b> is what those of us pursuing this case want to know. She just thought it was unusual and had only a momentary look before she claimed to have realized there was trouble inside the school after noticing that the glass pane alongside the door was broken up, and then the shooting started (again) so she quickly high-tailed it out of harm's way. (To use her cellphone from the safety of her car to seek help?)
<br><br>
About that noticing of broken glass next to the entry door, someone analyzing overhead views (news chopper video covering the incident? though maybe taken earlier?) frame-by-frame, showed an image of the entry that didn't seem busted up. Oh well, surely no one would clean up a crime scene. Also analyzing that scene, some suggested that <i>the discarded black cloths were to conceal <u>their guns</u> until the last moment, and were dropped when ready to enter the school</i>. Much examination was going on. But that initial recognition of the strange black honda as the vehicle the killers may have likely come in started even more interesting searching.
<br><br>
That black honda was wrapped in crime-scene yellow tape once the police were in charge and was left sitting there overnight, at least it seems so, because <b>they didn't discover the sole long gun (bushmaster? shotgun? whatever, the only long gun anywhere) in its trunk until it was quite dim out,</b> and maybe even that car was unattended over two nights, since the mainstream media made a fuss about the towing away of "Nancy's car", supposedly on the 16th, two days later. WITH NO MENTION OF FINGERPRINTS TAKEN. And over that period, a couple of other cars seemed to be also suspiciously unattended (left for what by whom), some with yellow tape, plus one (with a busted driver-side window, covered up) in the driveway of the neighbor (his role to be discussed later) just a stones' throw from the school and across from the firehouse where supposedly all the rescued children were sent in order to organize reuniting episodes with parents? The license plates of those cars were duly copied, when possible, from examining crime scene images. Those plate numbers could be magical. Other vehicles of interest to the police were not so easily taggable by their plates.
<br><br>
<b>The black honda </b>with the doors originally wide open (closed later by someone with likely no examination?) <b>at the front of the school had plates that said 872YEO</b> so most attention was on that plate. Wondering what the police were finding (or hiding again), <b>folks were listening and recording police band radio</b>. A few who were listening to the police radio bands for the local area, some taping simultaneously as many as 2 or 3 at a time, were <b>convinced that they heard a police officer identify the owner of that car as being someone named Christofer Rodia and the race was on to find out what there was on that individual, via data mining.</b>
<br><br>
It turned up that he had a couple of homes, one in the area and one in Florida. But most stunning was the record of HIS CONVICTIONS, for PEDOPHILE CRIMES. Someone with likely 'ring' connections as a CHILD-ABUSER suspiciously near a murder of small CHILDREN... Fireworks.. And connections to drug names/addresses in the area. After bringing the information to query the police officials, and being told by them that there was no record of any relationship to Sandy Hook, the re-examining of the audio records went into high gear and produced a possible explanation, namely that <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"> the Rodia suspect, while driving his own car by that time, was almost an hour away and was stopped for some other reason, and his identity exposed,</FONT> but the signal on that radio band from the police making the stop, was underlaying the audio from the other police department band, making it sound as if the identification was for the 872YEO request. Dang.
<br><br>
So after that discouraging discovery, it was decided that maybe there was no connection to the murders. Another clue thrown away, prematurely.? Although Rodia was now considerably further away than most might have thought was relatable to the Sandy Hook location, the fact that Rodia is not the "owner" of the black honda, DOES NOT MEAN THAT HE WASN'T POSSIBLY THE DRIVER for the killers and <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">left immediately in his pre-planned escape vehicle -- since the Honda had to be left for the police to tie to Adam's arrival and failure to escape -- for some reason not yet figured out</FONT>, maybe because he had that triggering record as a pedophile, that would blow the case wide open if his presence close to Sandy Hook were noted when the shooting was done.
<br><br>
And <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"> if it was so incredibly important that his connection to Sandy Hook and pedophilia was so crucial to be avoiding his involvement at such lengths, then who's skin is behind this operation to make it unforgivable to fail to keep him off the radar.</FONT> So should this be discarded, not in my neophyte opinion. The connection to VULNERABLE CHILDREN is TOO UNCOMFORTABLE TO JUST DROP IT YET.
<br><br>
Such a pedophile connection to a 'school tragedy' was part of the monstrous strategy that may be part of the <i>recent scandal in Britain that took down the BBC's chairman/CEO</i> for his squashing of a revealing documentary. I remember seeing a video a while back (sometime around the time of the scandal's aftermath this fall in which a high ranking group of pedophiles was -- after the hours of work -- <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">running a ring for the rich and powerful, as well as for visiting dignitaries and government spies from all over</FONT>, possibly going all the way back to the Profumo affair of the 1960s. This ring was specifically engaging in child abuse beyond sexual abuse. In one of those episodes to try to escape discovery, they needed to get rid of a group of victims, brutally harmed, and so <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">they arranged a fire at some **other** children's school, switched the bodies of the children they needed to be rid of with the children of that school, burned the school with the identities of the undesired victims obliterated conveniently in the fire as if they were the original children attending that school. The children that they absconded with who used to be quietly attending that one now-burned school, became the 'new flesh' for the rich and famous abuser-pedophiles. </FONT>
<br><br>
So we think that we should explore this Sandy Hook massacre very thoroughly just <b> in case those Sandy Hook children (supposedly the ones in the coffins) are still alive somewhere, in the custody of some mafia's pedophile operations,</b> which operations btw may include some CPS (child protective services') disappearing children, though those children are reputed to be mostly black children, as I recall in the furor over the CPS attempt to take that woman's child and force drug her child in Detroit, which the mother (Maryanne Godboldo) was trying to prevent. Eventually getting to a justifiable gun involvement at one point where the furor that resulted made widespread awareness come online..
<br><br>
That British operation did sometimes use what they would call 'homes' (more maybe like orphanages) to 'store' their supply of victims. Horrifying is not even close to what this did imply about the complicity of the government's "carers" on top of the elite's access to control and escape from justice when anyone got wise. People trying to blow their abusers' cover, had accidents, documented in that video coverage, and people living in the area (as well as royalty when one of the older children appealed for help) shunned the idea that such wild talk was 'real' and/or did not seem to understand that it was precisely the *carers* who were the pedophiles' , the 'johns' and accomplices, and so the pedophiles did manage to kill that boy in one of the attempts, not just his, to end the pedophile tormenters' access. As you may agree, such a story is not one you always think you'd need to keep more carefully filed. Now if I could just unearth that referenced video that came in an email, stashed somewhere in my inbox...
<br><br>
<UL>[ This is the latest British pedophile scandal story as it appears in the mainstream at the moment: A major media scandal has toppled the head of the BBC over the network’s handling of two reports on sex abuse, wrongly implicating a politician in one report, and killing the other report on its own popular BBC host, the late Jimmy Savile. One year after his death, <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"> Savile has been accused of abusing potentially hundreds of victims, over 300 children, while the BBC stayed silent. </FONT> ]
<br><br>
It was covered by many media about in mid November 2012, about when this Sandy Hook operation may have been in planning stages? <u>Inspiring the killers still in planning mode</u>? </UL>
<br><br>
<b>And before anyone tries to ever claim that such massive corrupt pedophile rings could never be part of <u>this country's own elite</u>,</b> we just were lucky enough to have wonderfully intuitive BrasscheckTV.com circulate the rough UNAIRED DOCUMENTARY (planned to be broadcast in Ireland and the UK) THAT WAS SILENCED TOTALLY BACK IN 1993 digging into <b><FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">the FRANKLIN SCANDAL, a $40 million bank fraud with A PEDOPHILE RING that reached from Nebraska's Boy's Town to the Whitehouse party guests and Embassy Row.</FONT></b> The sex perversion was covered up by the FBI who sealed the evidence in such a tangled list of obstacles-to-release as to make it gone forever. In Washington DC, there were special services and <b>The Golden Boys 'specialty' sought boys under 10years old.</b> And yes, the drugs, sadism, and blackmailing of influential officials, etc was all in that maze.
<br><br>
That story was attempted to be investigated by the Washington Times in DC, to no avail when the FBI sealed the evidence after seeing that the WT reporter, Rodriguez, was digging into the files; the witness-victims were prosecuted for perjury in NB's attempt (started by a righteous legislator, then thwarted by the county prosecutor 'editing' the video evidence being shown to the jury so as to frame the witness for perjury, with further assistance from the FBI) with unheard-of sentences of 25 years for telling the truth! While the pervert ring operator, Lawrence King, who was eventually brought down by the IRS for his financial fraud and theft from the Franklin Credit Union of $40Million, only got a 15 year sentence, with no part of the pedophile ring ever revealed to the public, in court or media. People were murdered, had unexplained accidents (FBI impounded the accident evidence there too), faced threat after threat if they pursued their case. Sound familiar yet?
<br><br>
After the murders, the whole team, foster care investigator, special investigators, witnesses, and their families, pursuing justice gave up and left the lawyer, John Dekamp, who had bravely and boldly stepped up to try to win the appeal of the witness' perjury case in spite of the threats, was left with nothing but his analysis of <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><i>what is needed for the elite to totally squelch discovery of such a monstrous evil, namely control of <u>the media, the Justice Department, and the police</u></i></FONT>. His counter examples where even Presidents were unable to silence discovery of vile dirty laundry were where the media was not controlled by those attempting suppression... <b>Look what we now face, acting as genuinely independent media, instead of the mainstream government mouthpieces... We must not let the government control our internet media.. </b>
<br><br>
The unaired roughcut video is here (maybe for a while);
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mtstlx96s8M?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
And if not, try the website: <a href="http://www.FranklinScandal.com">FranklinScandal.com</a>
<br><br>
So now we have -- after all that tangential exploration of child-related sex-perversions in despicable networks operating here in the USA, formerly unchallengeable -- <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><b>a candidate theory for Sandy Hook, the PEDOPHILE THEORY, for involvement of pedophiles in the children's thread-fitting</b></FONT>, to add to the loose ends as we continue the examination of clues. <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">The switching of two groups of children with one set being the majorly unfortunate cover for the PROCUREMENT of the other now-unfortunate set of children,</FONT> is the favored idea at the moment for explaining <b>'why the children'?</b>
<br><br>
Except for <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><b>the ANTI-GUN-RIGHTS THEORY</b></FONT> based on the realization that <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">children's deaths would empower the 'Justice' department to make the claim that current world conditions, life and voter demands for action make it requirable to take down the 2nd Amendment and confiscate the public's LAST RESORT of self-defense against assaults by that constitution-violating government's agents,</FONT> thereby ignoring the recognition that the purpose of the 2nd Amendment was citizen control of rogue government and citizens' right for using weapons against tyrannical bureaucratic government, which <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLVAJPFggZk">one speaker at a hearing on gun-control</a> said <b>we'd best not 'lose our last resort'</b>! And that Anti-Gun-Rights Theory surely has some powerful merit as a motivation for accessing Holder's and Napolitano's ample resources b/c this 'classic project of tyrants' will need even more money, manpower and contact controllers, than we see even in this engineered massacre. But <b>we saw the corrupt FBI in the Franklin Scandal engage in both courtroom criminality and also saw mafia-like events perpetrated against those seeking justice.</b> Some powerful elite was mobilizing government criminals and even causing murders and 'accidents'. <b>The corrupt elements in government are there for accessing by those who know who and how and that sort of 'knowledge' possessors includes very highly positioned elite elements within the government, high enough to shield the operations. </b> Like Fast&Furious. We shall make note of what departments of government make appearances, who they report to, their modes and motives. Among those making unexplained, unceremonious 'visits' to the Sandy Hook Police Department's management was Eric Holder. More later.
<br><br>
But that tyrannical citizen-disempowering planning of the anti-gun-rights planners would be served as well (or better) if <i>the Justice Department's mafia allies would agree to take the role of implementers of death and destruction</i> with other insiders in government handling the scene control. Think that alliances between mafia and 'Justice' are not claimable? That Fast&Furious were 'lapses' in judgment? In case the drug cartel Sinaloa and their mob operatives is not on your agenda to explore, Pulitzer Prize nominee, <a "http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/01/10/this-what-i-want-to-hear-obama-say-about-guns/">Jon Rappoport reported on 'Justice' and government connections to the mob</a> in this <u>open letter to Obama</u>:
<ul><i>
Mr. President, just thought of something else. You've heard of the name, Jesus Vicente Zambada-Niebla? I'm sure you've been getting briefings on him. He's standing trial in your old city, Chicago.
<br><br>
Niebla is a member of the Sinaloa Cartel (drug gang). For some reason, his trial keeps getting postponed. Niebla and his lawyers state that he has special immunity from the DEA, because there is a deal between the US federal government and Sinaloa.
<br><br>
In exchange for the Sinaloa providing intelligence on rival Mexican drug gangs, the US government is permitting Sinaloa to ship tons of drugs into the US through Chicago.
<br><br>
<b>US prosecutors have been asserting the right to suppress quite a bit of evidence in the Niebla trial, for national security reasons.</b>
<br><br>
Is this perhaps one reason why you don't mention gang gun violence in your campaign to take away guns?
</i></ul>
Which, under the usual 'flea' rules, means that there's lots more not going to be seen in a court, and even more outside/beyond this case. Hand in hand. So although the pedophile theory seems quite secure in its own right , it does as well by being included for serving the tyranny motivations of government so Holder would support the pedophiles. The Anti-Gun-Rights theory, only covers motivation and maybe motivation covers the access to media-control resources, and the personnel to supply manpower for controlling the public via crisis support people of currently unknowable roles and powers. But we shall see what they did as we copy their strategy in our traditional manner of simulative thinking.. 'stimming'
<br><br>
<i>The intuitive difficulty with a purely government operation</i> comes primarily when/if we figure that the government would have to supply the killers: <i>would we be as ready intuitively to look for government "employees" to serve as killers of children of our citizens, say from the CIA turning their anti-foreign populations skills inward</i>. But in fact that's just precisely like what the POTUS is trying to do with drone-kill-capable control impositions in the hands of local police as servants of the DHS, aka Homeland 'Security'. Feel safer yet with government-only in charge? Clearly <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><i>these anti-citizen thought-processes are fully in play INSIDE government bureaucratic heads, though the public may still be sleeping, or at least not fully awake to that extent of the horror.</i></FONT> Except maybe for Senator Paul who boldly challenged Holder to answer Paul's constitutional challenge in his risky filibuster. In fact, however, Obama actually asked his secretly authorized anti-citizen future military forces at a signing <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><b>whether they would 'fire on Americans while on American soil IF HE ORDERED IT UNDER HIS AUTHORITY' AS POTUS.</b></FONT> Shocked yet, because we had our jaws on the floor, and not rolling and laughing. Can't people hear? Don't they think such a clear statement could be <u>fully calculated</u> by the speaker to test his control of willing implementers honored by inclusion at a signing giving them powers?
<br><br>
So we shall not be disposing of the anti-citizen hideous theory -- on its own self-sufficient abilities -- that the 'Justice' department and 'Health & Human Service' could supply the firepower with full confidence that they would not hesitate to take down children. <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">In fact, market news shows that the government has ordered 'unusual' target models for their target practice ranges</FONT>, not the usual threatening black sillouettes with bold circle bullseyes. No the latest include <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"> a pregnant woman image, a child with a gun, and an elderly old coot with a shotgun. And the federal government has bought <u>hundreds of billions of rounds</u> for their 'target practicing'.</FONT> What else do these government employees do with taxpayer dollars, all of which are getting scarcer by the day. Maybe they have ideas on how to get blood from those taxpayer-turnips (as they say, not so unscarily, and with no pun intended, in these circumstances).
<br><br>
On the other hand, as police bullies have found out, the current social infrastructure with highspeed uncontrollable communications devices in all hands, large and small, there is a high risk of discovery and disruption of the plan (assuming the first responders do not include corrupted individuals able to suppress receipt of distress calls). It's not just a few security cameras and no firepower in the hands of victims that these practiced hitmen would have to work with and then escape, because setting up a patsy is going to be a complication that could make the unpredictableness of the myriad communication devices speed in summoning help be the flaw that turns an escape into a shootout. The ability to 'place' operatives into the school staff, the local law enforcement and control of the media would be a deciding factor in choice of plans.
<br><br>
On the other hand, it would be -- judging by our own observation of the difficulty in executing such an engineered massacre as this, even with practiced hitmen, especially in this current social infrastructure, with so many nearby responding resources to try to anticipate and with highspeed uncontrollable communications in all hands, large and small -- only total desperation that would launch a government tyrannical planner on that heinous route of a real bloodbath involving potentially hundreds. NOT WHEN THERE'S THE <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><b>WITNESS PROTECTION THEORY option,</b></FONT> as our next theory is going to be called in our explorations, wherein <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><i>the children are 'kidnapped' temporarily (with full knowledge of their parents) so no one gets hurt (just in case something goes south) and all public contact is handled by trained actors.</i></FONT>
<br><br>
<i>Under the <b>Witness Protection Option</b>, the Justice Department only has to supply things that government is publicly known to be well practiced at: <ul>
--- kidnapping using sedation technologies, likely not going into school on the 14th at all, more like an outing with protective medical staff for the 20 from the two classes, resulting in a couple scattered empty seats on the regular school buses among the other 400some students, and a handful of 'busy-ness' child actors with semi-closed classroom doors at the far end of the hallway near the offices..<br><br>
--- phony death certificates, funerals with closed caskets, and <br> <br>
--- new phony birth certificates, possibly same last name but a year younger like being your own sibling, altered school records just for K-1 as having gone to another local school <br><br>
--- underadvertised resources for relocation jobs for the parents of the victims possibly doing unmonitored government jobs which would be a welcomed solid job future for the parents of the short-term 'victims'.. <br><br>
--- with phony death certificates for participating staffers, phony birth certificates, revised job resumes, credit histories, and other identities, with explanations for them to provide to spouses and close family (if any) on 'possible' high-security clearance opportunities requiring silence for their family safety... government has plenty of experience in gaging silence-keeping factors (as we shall see next posting )... accounting for how close were the adult victims on a daily basis with their responding family members?<br><br>
--- plus new school opportunities for three years for the children (the ones being kidnapped and their younger siblings). Older siblings would be rather unacceptable risks so selection of candidate children based on their households would be advantageous and doable, e.g. after knowing family data on last year's kindergartners (so choose 1st graders for the class to be used). Just like it would be unadvisable to 'kidnap' older than k-1st age victims b/c older age children's speech is sometimes given credibility by the public in general <br><br>
--- with an option for dispersal instead to military base support government functions as a family option, since children's education could be tutored during a transition favored to convince the kidnapped victims that they are temporarily hospitalized with full access to parents in visiting roles.. and maybe tutoring by familiar teacher also in that facility's dedicated staff... extended daycare with hospital-style medicating for a few weeks?? .<br><br>
--- convincing indoctrination (masquerading as continuing education) of local authorities, both police and public services, by authority-drenched federal government resources, on the terrorist realities of lone-gunman horrors, frightening gun hazards, plus glorifying their public service potential roles in identifying and responding to such severe threats, plus ascertaining compliance and future complicity measurement (built into evaluations) for when they are confronted with their opportunity-to-serve to 'end crime' against small children and the harmless public, (exceptionally unrealistic idealism would serve the purpose, like the press released personnel information on 'the three' and Soto ) and their public service importance in convincing legislators and the public when presented with a strong taste of the possible reality, "without actually harming anyone" they would be promised... </UL></i>
<br><br>
Basically reams of paperwork, government employment, and intimidating indoctrination of local authorities with whom DHS and HHS have been working for over a year on a benificent project for the betterment of Sandy Hook, per the major grants, etc
<br><br>
Which would suggest that these potentially complicit kidnappers/staffers MAY NOW BE wondering just how not-dead and not-harmed are Adam and Nancy, so these staffers may be just cautiously silencing their own doubts.. agreed? Censorship of the emulated-'hospital' internet access would be expectable, and since those staffers would instantly have "lost" their own adequately trackable phones with mobile internet resources at the day's start, if any, the federal government may not worry about 2nd-doubts possibility since they'd figure, that the doubters would conclude that Adam and Nancy were as unharmed as the doubters themselves would be unharmed...
<br><br>
So there you have it, somehow it does have initially credible workable ideas that seem quite possible and maybe less harmful-to-the-government if something blows up, though they have solid control of mainstream media for any eventuality
<br><br>
How much more credible/risky would it be to make their favored friends in the mafia do the dirty work, for their mafia's own profit as long as they do it to appear to happen in the prescribed way of intended public thinking, timing of manipulations, etc, and that mafia branch can expect appropriate government 'gratitutde' and for government to fully and simply provide the background control for their mafia perpetrators' safe escape to profitable pedophile operation. <i>What do you think..??</i>
<br><br>
<FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">Although each of these theories does account for 'the children' and 'staff victims', <b>each of them would be relegating Adam (and necessarily Nancy) to a 'handy patsy' role,</b> with the idea that any inside-the-government controllers could data-mine in order to find a suitable patsy as simply as data-mining to locate<ul>1-- a nearby household with <b>gun licenses registered in the government's database</b> as well as <br><br><b>2-- A MALE in the household who had been</b> prescribed, whether taken or not, some autism or depression pharmaceuticals, OR might be claimed to have been simply b/c HE was <b>listed in some database of autistics,</b> mostly young males, possibly considered as potential class action participants in the government's ongoing efforts to silence anti-vaccine court cases. The government does have a database of mental health diagnoses, for one example for data-miners.<br><br> 3-- Preferably <b>divorce-involvement and fairly isolated, like in census data</b>. </UL></FONT>
<br><br>
Data-mining potentials for picking-out Adam & Nancy for their patsy role this way wouldn't be so unimaginable <b>as being government-insider doable</b>. Maybe even if the murderous planners were outside government, using online consulting staff (who had worked inside government) whose services could be bought since none of the searches is openly vile to someone talented but in need of money.. Otherwise a different school would have to be selected. How many small towns have received HHS and DHS favored attention like Sandy Hook so that there would be federal employees dispersed through the town's operation as part of the help from DC? A lot.. but gun ownership and autistic sons are not such small databases, so candidates might not be too difficult to narrow down.
<br><br>
HOWEVER, <b>there is a very interesting route to understanding the Sandy Hook massacre</b> (to the extent that someone was (actually at least two were) indeed killed, brutally) <b>that STARTS with Adam and Nancy</b>. And that route need not be so entirely focused on guns and drugs AS AURORA WAS. In fact <b> in the efforts by those studying the police band radio recordings</b> to unravel the entanglement of the pedophile's presence from Nancy's license plate search, <b>another shocking (presumably police) voice</b> got everyone's attention online. The muffled voice <b>was saying, pretty certainly, <i>'End the life of Adam'.</i></b>
<br><br>
That portion was played and replayed, yet it produced only that fine idea that Adam was not yet dead about one hour after the arrival of the police.
<br><br>
More like the Aurora situation with an alive shooter like the substitute James Holmes, practically turning himself in as the shooter, is what the murderous planners wanted <b>except that Adam had maybe been found drugged-unconscious</b>, <u>demolishing the lone-shooter plan, no chance that he was responsible</u>...
<br><br>
Had there been some plan for Adam to be a confused, frightened withdrawn captured shooter who was physically not able to cope with the reality and simply be seen a crazy and hateful gun-toting threat *IF* HE HAD ONLY COME OUT FROM THE DRUG WHILE THE SHOOTING WAS IN PROGRESS? Had he ONLY NOW, an hour later, begun to come out from under the drug used to bring him onsite, limp but not bloodying the one hauling him, but much more deeply unconscious than expected BECAUSE THE USUAL DRUG DOSE WAS TOO MUCH FOR AN ASPI'S LOW CORTISOL...
<br><br>
Imagine the confusion in the shooters, who were supposed to leave fogged Adam to face the consequences, as he is just coming to. Nothing they could do to bring him to but shaking him, and more loud noisy sounds like breaking furniture. Losing time that was for retrieving the extra gun in the trunk. Meanwhile the police are showing up. Should the killers split and hope Adam will wake up or should they make an attempt to shoot him, but like a failed suicide, like a grazing wound, since he was supposed to survive to serve as a 'hostage' in the lengthy court processes during which his connection to corrupted financial characters would be exploitable.
<br><br>
Imagine any corrupted members of the police who were primed to work with media on a captured shooter, but now what they are finding is looking like a suicide since Adam was likely sprawled horribly and bloodied (if there was real carnage all around) and surrounded by several guns. Maybe no one noticed the absence of the expected long gun, except those in charge of media-disinformation. Wouldn't they be wondering where that gun had been dropped, somewhere around and just let the lying disinformation go out to media as planned hoping they'd find where it was dropped.
<br><br>
So Adam would be another James Holmes, ONLY THIS TIME HE'D BE THE REAL SON of the targeted financial insider -- not a curiously substituted 'son' in the attempt at mimicking James -- OF THE INTENDED FINANCIAL INSIDER TO BE HELD SILENT. Being the real son would presumably have some leverage, unlike the substitute-James, where the Aurora shooter lacked any real hold on the real James Holmes' financial insider father, other than some embarrassment.
<br><br>
So why would they substitute when having the real son would give them the leverage the killers wanted, presumably? Maybe the killers had made their move on taking control of James in the week before the killings but James had made a fatal attempt to escape his captive status in his own apartment. It was in the week before the Batman opening planned carnage, when the gun ordering was suddenly initiated. If they still held the real James then possibly kidnap-hostage leverage would still be useful, though risky for the psyop.
<br><br>
In any case, the real James is not the booked-James. In facial movement, smiling, grimacing etc, the backs of the ears and the lower eyelid do not flex their 'width' in the changing of facial expressions. Hence the substitute, even if he mimicked James' happy engaged smile could not match James' neat pinned-back ear (visible on his left) nor the protective lower eyelids in the photo comparisons online. They are clearly not the same person, as seeable in the genuine pre-med student in one photo and in the substitute's photo after arraignment. <img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Holmes-orNot.jpg" WIDTH=600> James' ear lays flat to the curve of his head, the psyop-substitute in custody has the type of ear that protrudes relative to the curve of his head. You can stretch you ear higher, but you can't spread it outward, making it protrude. Done. The authorities don't have the real James Holmes. Where is he? Was it a Failed psyop. Was the plan for Sandy Hook's Adam to be done differently, better for leverage, no substitute, but alive?
<br><br>
And yes we are going to explore the ADAM AND NANCY THEORY in another posting, since it has a significant burden of heavy digging and connecting to make it credible, since some diggers have already fallen short on attempting this path. For now we shall call this <FONT COLOR="#ffffc4"><b>the ADAM AND NANCY THEORY</b></FONT> and acknowledge that we shall be digging into their, and our, financial realities. But for now, the idea is simply to designate that there's a crucial thread or three yet to be woven into any <u><i>ultimate theory, maybe a multi-dimensional coat of many colors to be woven</i></u>.
<br><br>
Well, before we begin to dig into the merits of one theory COMPARED TO another, against each and every bit of evidence and testimony on what we know of the REAL EVENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND EVIDENCE, there are still a few more 'loose ends' not yet in our hands, in that list of 'evidence and testimony' to have in our weaving. Hence we shall work on those bits of evidence and testimony in our next posting to prepare for ultimate theory concluding.
<br><br>
<FONT COLOR="#ffffc4">Finally....
Wrapping up on the staffer claiming falsely that there was a pre-visit plus an altercation</FONT>... for that staff member's conviction-attempt-motivated lying and all its implications on aiding the killers' escape, even likely knowing the killers, and/or possibly even having been one of the shooters, we would suggest that HE BE HELD IN JAIL or CUSTODY for possible CHARGING WITH COMPLICITY IN MURDERING 20 SMALL INNOCENTS AND ADAM AS WELL AS "THE OTHER THREE" THAT HE PRESUMABLY HAD THE ALTERCATION WITH. Fundamentally, based on his obvious complicity in the execution of the necessary planning of disinformation-spreading in order to complete the other shooters' escapes, at the very least, while all police, media and observers were being focused on Adam. with possible role as a shooter. Interpretation of his altercation will be examined in the context of each theory, in due time, after more characters, testimony and evidence, including looking for other possible insiders as accomplices.
<br><br>
[ I wonder just how many communities 'benefit' from government largesse because the government would benefit from community favoritism-to-government that isolates people with verifiable grievances against government FDA for authorizing a bad vaccine??? or against some other government malfeasant criminality] ttyl
<br><br>
</font>indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8510040116508052864.post-63982200434850680072013-03-06T03:16:00.000-08:002013-03-13T21:54:10.968-07:00Adam Lanza Didn't Do It<font color="#ffddb4"><center><b>Brilliant Aspi geek Adam, still Nancy's Pride & Joy</b></center></font>
<br><br>
<b>LET'S EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE FROM SANDY HOOK -- Part One</b>
<br><br>
<font color="#ffddb4">LOOKING AT LOGISTICS</FONT>
<br><br>
<b>1) There is NO WAY that the ALLEGED shooter (Adam Lanza) could actually be the killer who hauled around the necessary gear that has been claimed to be in the local police's custody as having been used in the killings.</b>
<br><br>
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>a) Look at the full-length photo of Adam</b> and tally in the idea that he spent <b>many hours on his computer</b> doing gaming, etc and was a member of his highschool Technology Club. He is lightly built to start with, about 120lbs in the latest photos (when he was 16 and males are near grown), was <b>unaccustomed to heavy work</b> of any kind, spent massive amounts of his recent days doing nothing either aerobic nor resistance building exercise, was having health problems that involve gut difficulties (might have benefited from raw milk, etc). <font color="#ffddb4">Not inclined to athletics. <b>A lightly built 120 lb <i>deskjockey</i></b></font>.
<br><br>
<font color="#ff6970">-----</font><b>b) Add up the loads: </b> the weight of a bullet proof vest on Adam, that also would necessarily have been well-pocketed in order to carry the hundreds of rounds that the Coroner and the police were claiming had been fired into the children. Plus stray bullets and leftover ammunition for each gun. Such vests and such heavy fire-power ammunition weigh down even highly trained SWAT team members to the point where they find it difficult to continue their operations so they avoid such weight loads as much as possible and spread the firepower among more team members. <b>The gear would have come to</b> <i><b>near 40lbs</b></i> by looking online for specs on these things. <b>Nearly a third of Adam's OWN weight</b>. Try that while 'charging around' the school building seeking victims. This video will do your homework for you with the help of SWAT team expertise:<a href="http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/the-war-on-terror-is-a-fraud-1/sandy-hook-the-logistics.html">"Sandy Hook, the Logistics"</a>
<br><br>
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>c)</b> The guns NOW acknowledged (or should we say re-revised alleged) to have been in Adam's possession at the final capture (after he was already killed/suicided to be determined) were 3 or 4 handguns of significant size as well, BUT THE ASSAULT RIFLE WAS NOT THERE. The ONLY rifle being claimed as part of this scenario was locked in the trunk of a car, not being used... yet the Coroner/Medical Examiner claimed that each of the victims had been shot MULTIPLE TIMES (3-11 times) WITH A RIFLE... Confirming the ammunition quantity in the load calculated, if not the weapon (gun types is not required of coroners, though claimed). Though we would wonder:: <i>how, precisely, does one "miscount" and "misidentify" handguns as rifles, just idly laying around Adam's body while being so damned certain he was 'the' lone gunman</i>??
<br><br>
<b>ERGO, Based on Logic and official-facts: Adam Lanza is not the killer BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A 120 LB DESKJOCKEY with no athletic interests nor heavy work experience, only computer work and gaming EXTENDEDLY, TO HEFT AND HAUL 40 LBS OF GEAR, AMMUNITION, GUNS AND HEAVY ARMORED VEST, MUCH LESS IN RAPID CHARGING MOVEMENT FROM ROOM TO ROOM TO THREATEN AND KILL MANY MOVING TARGETS WITH GREAT ACCURACY BESIDES.</b>
<br><br>
IMPOSSIBLE. Try it, with the load set at 1/3rd your own weight and with simple geek gaming lifestyle. Any injuries you incur while insisting on attempting hernia risk is your own logic-defying fault.
<br><br>
<b>The official police department chief spokeman's storyline is therefore a TOTAL LIE</b>. Either the chief or his spokesperson is knowlingly lying or is a totally incompetent bureaucrat, moronically saying what he's told to say by SOMEONE IN CHARGE OF the KILLER-ESCAPE-SUPPORTING <i>DISINFORMATION</i>, all the while pompously acting like he's tough and in charge for <i>quality</i> control of ideas. So are you going to believe him! We do not and further research by online savants has found him in videos on Colorado's (Aurora) mass murder demonstration, in a similar role, (even same nametag: Lt Paul Vance) which discovery we shall detail when we get to the rest of the players in this story, outside our focus now on the Lanzas.
<br><br>
Profoundly Adam seems the only real genuine good guy in this scene. So IN ADDITION to concluding (based on the above) that he was not the killer, we shall dignify the idea that someone killed him, not that he committed suicide, as we have been told as part of their incompetence or treachery. <i>Some of the outside, experienced peace officers even consider that Adam may have been killed earlier and brought to the scene.</i> We shall keep these possibilities in mind as we see what else has been told to the public about such a pivotal character as Adam in this scenario taking shape.
<br><br>
<b>An enterprizing WSJ reporter, for example, sought out every firing range in the Newtown and Sandy Hook area</b>, to find out what sort of <i>practicing and training</i> had been engaged in, and what people could tell about Adam and his mother. <b>Not one of those places had ever seen or served Adam with or without his mother as users of the ranges</b>, and were only aware of the Lanzas now, not before, just media familiarity now.
<br><br>
<b>2) The killer had a <i>hit ratio</i> that was <i>professional</i>, by the opinions of professional gun users,</b> such as awac222 on youtube. That commenter calculated that ratio this way: Taking the number of rounds to be on the low side of 100 since there's some conflict between reports on the number of shots heard, and then deduct a few IF you believe the idea that firing was used to gain entry to the building. So 90 fired at people-targets. Since the Medical Examiner said that each child had 3 to 11 bullet wounds, and since we chose the lower estimate for bullets used, then we'll use 3 'hits' per victim, which means that the hit ratio of target-hits to bullets fired at targets is estimated by 78/90 = <b>88%. Impressive for small moving targets emerging from hiding places around the rooms, at least for a non-professional. </b>
<br><br>
And per the Governor's rehash of the events -- complete with his specific response-timing boldly stated as around 10 minutes (to ensure no one at Sandy Hook or in the police department got the state sued for lack of appropriate and rapid response time after their Homeland Security/FEMA training in Colorado? Aurora? Courtesy of the federal government's Napolitano, who recently bought 7000 high quality assault rifles..) -- this professional score was achieved in *amazing* time. <i>Ten minutes of hundreds of shots in multiple locations with high accuracy.</i> Too amazing. Clearly not a never-tried-a-real-gun-before score, nor by someone who hasn't handled one in recent memory (and per PBS, likely not more than a few times when Nancy and Peter took their 'boys', presumably surely not while divorce troubles were in play after Adam was a pre-teen). <b><i>Sandy Hook was dealing with a professional hit man or hitmen. Not Adam Lanza.</i></b> At all!
<br><br>
<br>
Perhaps you believe a squad/team-as-killer theory (as we do) but you would not yet dismiss the idea that Adam was part of it, or at least that the murder at the Lanza home is Adam's fault, *somehow* because you have been <i><b>accumulating PREJUDICIAL 'motive ideas' from the raft of questionable people seeking media attention with their own twisted life-views</b></i>. So that examination of all sorts of prejudicial motive data is here and now going to be dealt with, starting with misconceptions about Adam's health, about Nancy's wellbeing and mental state, about how they lived, about institutionalization speculation, about the claimed pre-visit, etc.
<br><br>
<br>
<font color="#ffddb4">LOOKING AT SUGGESTED MOTIVATING FACTORS, CONCEIVABLE OR NOT</FONT>
<br><br>
<b>3) Adam's Health was sickly(was it not?)</b>
<br><br>
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>a)</b> At least one credible witness (as well as several other relatively agenda-free witnesses) have stated that <b>Adam had Aspergers</b>, or more specifically aspergers symptom disorder. What that means in terms of health ideas is here explored in answer to this item's question.
<br><br>
Well, although Adam was certainly not that focused on athletic fitness-health, all the evidence suggests that he however <b>was well cared for and was actively knowledgeable in his own condition</b>. Data mining online shows that <b>a major explanation for the unusual behaviors in the Aspergers-type condition requires some insight into our bodies' adrenal glands workings</b>.
<br><br>
In addition to producing the characteristic adrenaline, <b>that adrenal gland produces/moderates cortisol</b>, which is <i>an energizing hormone that rises to its peak as you are awakening and dwindles throughout the day, sending you into retreat mode when it's low</i>. <b>Aspies have lower cortisol in their blood</b>. Hence when faced with fight-or-flight situations or even low level stressful personal confrontations, their resources require special effort to cope, making them gentle people and somewhat shy. The lower level problem also interferes with usual sleep/wake patterns.
<br><br>
Doesn't quite seem so horrible or scary, now does it!
<br><br>
But it sure does make it possible for prejudice-mongers to target Aspies for being withdrawn and different, especially since they are usually so intelligent.
<br><br>
So do you really think Adam in SWAT gear is a threat?
<br><br>
Adding to the total mis-information being unjustly foisted on aspies -- by ignorant speakers as if they knew some wicked truth about people they are prejudiced against -- are the repeated, ignorant remarks on 'pain infliction' and 'no feeling'. <b>The public seems to feel pompously proud of speaking evil authoritatively -- when offered a microphone -- with no attempt, in their human responsibility before relaying such accusatory remarks, to check the source who conveyed that evil claim to them</b> or at least caution their hearers that they have not checked that authenticity. Libel laws and slander rules are written to prevent such misuse of language and speech. We shall point out that this whole pain-inflicting idea as relevant to Adam's case, nor to the majority of Aspies, is so far wrong as to be witch-burning stupid. Clearly <font COLOR="#ffddb4"> the absence of any countering opinion in the media and their supplying the key to correction is further confirmation that <b>the government school system has grossly failed to develop proper data checking </b>when taking in new information, which lack <b>makes the public profoundly vulnerable to propaganda purveyors and to the vicious compounding of errors</b>.</FONT> This immoral behavior is especially damnable when done by broadcasting personnel who have preparation time and staff. Absolutely despicable.
<br><br>
<b>Among possible publicly knowable examples and spokespersons for autists, aspies and ADHD people, that public relations and news people that could have been consulting, should have been Dr. Grandin</b>, whose books on the subject, including website presence for fact-checkers would have been easily found in their reach. <a href="http://www.templegrandin.com">Dr Temple Grandin</a> is a renowned savant autist, is the inventor of the 'hug' device for comforting children with ordinary autistic tantrums when not yet controllable by their carers, and has independently pioneered a whole field of research -- both academic AND field-applied -- specifically to relieve pain in animal slaughterhouses. On pain, she insists that it is moral to eat meat ONLY if the humans are decently providing a quality life for these animals and a pain-free 'harvesting' experience. I wonder just how thoughtful the irresponsible, bad-mouthing newspeople have been as they eat their fellow creatures every meal of every day. Such concerns possibly mimic her own fear of pain, as Adam would fear, judging by his demonstrated caring concern for those around him and his careful pleasant personality as described in the words of those who respectfully had their own experience with him. <b>Such testimony of Adam's caring interactions were provided by the high school Tech Club advisor and Adam's teacher, plus one of Adam's fellow college students who qualified as her own expert on trying to dispel the hex being worked by the media on their choices in speakers. Plus another highschool friend on youtube who wrote that Adam wouldn't even hurt a fly in his own home. </b>
<br><br>
In addition some <b>research found online with google ease</b>, shared by parents of autists who are finding ways to make progress with their children, does demonstrate that even those other autistic children with pain-related confusions were conceivably in pain themselves in many cases (based on what was discovered to solve the problem) and had no way to describe/identify that pain, but these were low-performing, tantrum-suffering children at the start of the online reported observations. Adam's <b>Aspergers was not that tantrum-suffering type of Autism</b>, if in fact it is legitimate to group Aspergers with every other 'behavioral' disorder in the broad category of autism, as psychiatrists do, all of which category creation is the grossly fabricated 'knowledge' being sold as expertise in the marketplace by people calling themselves <i>psychiatrists with no definitive testing as the basis for their 'behavioral' definitions nor for their diagnoses, and too eager prescription pads for harm-filled drugs.</i> In Adam's case, Nancy was extremely cautious, as every mother should be, not to risk Adam's high level of human performance without severe 'on top of it' information checking.
<br><br>
Among the validly qualified testimony by people with frequent and relevantly deeper interaction with the Lanzas we would point out specifically the decently covering interview on ABCNews with Adam's own mother's friends in town at her favorite restaurant and bistro (MyPlace) where she regularly spoke to the owners -- son and mother especially. For the record, Nancy did specialize in 'dinner-pickup', just so you'll get her own image free of the miserable prejudices. <b>Per that owner/son in this interview, Adam was quiet and shy, and his mother was proud of him and was always 'on it' whenever there was some need for her helping handedness.</b> No lack of ability to convey personal need between Adam and his mother Nancy. End of the public mis-conceptions on Adam's health.
<br><br>
Unaccountably (from a major media outlet with major digging resources, producing the video here being shown as evidence of the real life Adam and Nancy in their friends' experiences), the biased/motivated-freak who does the video-titles for ABCNews has posted that interview (with the three owners of the restaurant) as if it was focussed on just whether his mother was responsible as a gun owner. Go figure. And yes, they emphatically said she was, when finally asked near the end of the video -- after significant revelations on Adam and Nancy's lives -- though gun care is now seen as immaterial, it was all that mattered to the freak AND THE PRODUCER. Similarly that cruelty-minded ABCNews video-namer/producer chose to name another one "Friends: Shooter's Mom Struggled with Son" when the content showed that they were doing quite well, as we shall discuss momentarily. Buyer beware, check contents and founding assumptions, always, including here, though you will find ours pretty thoroughly dug into.
<br><br>
[<a href="http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/showthread.php?tid=15655">For more on Adrenal Cortisol levels</a> not being as high as others, leading to discomfort in changes in routine and disruption of location, high/low blood pressure issues and disrupted sleep cycle and awake cycle. etc]
<br><br>
<br>
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>b) Related Realizations: </b> By implication <font COLOR="#ffddb4"> since the shooters could not have included Adam, then we'd suggest that the GUNS AT THE SCENE should have been <b>VERY</b> CAREFULLY HANDLED TO SEE JUST HOW MANY <u>DIFFERENT SETS OF FINGERPRINTS</u> WERE ON EACH GUN</FONT>... But if those guns were as BADLY MANAGED AS THE RIFLE (of whatever sort) THAT WAS IN THE TRUNK of the ( claimed to be Nancy's ) car, then the whole affair is everywhere BUNGLED. In a media video record of the existence of the rifle in the car, we see where the deputy(?) appears to be removing the rifle to display it, AND <u>did not even have gloves on</u> and thoroughly <u>smudged away any trace of prints by a 'user'</u> in his demonstration of how to load, empty cartridges and display it for those present. Online overseers were aghast at the loss.
<br><br>
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>c)</b> In addition to mishandling of gun evidence that would have vindicated Adam, there has been <b>no announced results of ballistics, where are they?</b> Other than the coroner/medical examiner's claim to know "more about weapons than he should" and his own statement that the children were killed with many bullets from a long gun or rifle, there has been no decent ballistics workup demonstrated. So what's missing is the identity of that rifle that fired the shooter's bullets, guaranteeing that the idea of rifles involvement was likely a 'red herring' (for gun control) or who could deny it? Those results are required in the sensible effort to justify ANY VALID charge by identifying the weapons used in killing Adam and his mother as well as what was used to kill the children. And thus the ballistics could validly <i>implicate the real killer</i> and relieve the frozen idea that Adam did any of this, as well as get the investigation going properly to find that real killer.
<br><br>
Such a killer had been clearly threatening Adam with his own death, and that death was then clearly not happening as told to us as being a suicide.
<br><br>
So red herring for gun control or not, 'a rifle' was their story. Until the 'discovery' of the only rifle anywhere to be found, being still locked in the trunk of the car, then suddenly the rifle idea went away, having possibly served its anti-2nd-amendment controllers' of the population with openly fear-mongering purpose.
<br><br>
Now the officials expect us to ignore that their perfidy was discovered (not by them at all) by the officially-castigated public-who-are-so-interested and that official government perfidy is now being slowly erased from sight by their media mouth-pieces implying that it was just 'haste', as if they should be trusted as before, after they have
--1) perpetrated gross violations of their intelligence gathering,
--2) disrespected the rights of the people to be considered innocent until evidence proves otherwise and
--3) grossly violated their duty not to help the heinous killer escape by failing to do thorough and careful management of crime scenes, meanwhile
--4) insulted and hampered real help, while swallowing, and worse, regurgitating for media, every lying statement by those in the vicinity. (Curiously ignoring Adam's defenders, who were not that difficult for this writer to find (among those found by others on the scene) without even trying, yet the only voices allowable to have a major microphone (except one ABC mic digging for Nancy's side), were the ignorant, and hostile toward Adam speakers, just TOO coincidental to be excusable, ever.)
<br><br>
Meanwhile, after all this time, we're to just be satisfied with their totally unsupported story and ignore that the ballistics data would open up great opportunities for frozenly being able to focus on the real killer, not Adam, by those who are the members of the demonstratedly competent public-who-are-so-interested and thus those ballistics-withholders are enabling the real killer to escape, free and clear..!
<br><br>
<font COLOR="#ffddb4">Maybe we shouldn't even trust whatever they eventually publish, considering their fully incompetent and/or criminal-involvement seen so far and their clear motive and opportunity to <b> now</b>cheat, invent what would definitely temptingly cover their mishandling. Would you trust them to not 'manufacture' stuff to suit their agenda, whatever that is this time??? </FONT>
<br><br>
<br>
<b>About Nancy's wellbeing and mental state...</b>
<br><br>
<b>4) Was Nancy's mental state indicative of a deteriorating relationship about to come apart? Was 'the burden' of caring for Adam's few and complicated needs becoming excessive as some expectantly ghoulish individuals were bandying about? Was Nancy giving up her life and chances to enjoy herself so that she would be seeking "relief" in institutionalizing her pride and joy? </b>
<br><br>
Oh well, the media mouthpieces for the officials want us to cancel that 'pride and joy' stuff since we're to believe (mistakenly or under intentional disinformation) that Adam was constantly about to explode. Unfortunately for those who prefer their daytime soaps to factual data, 'pride and joy' does triumph, per the testimony of her frequently interacting contacts ay MyPlace. See the ABCNews videos. And recognize that <b>Nancy was not some housebound drudgery-suffering caregiver, she had her own lively ideas filling her weekly agenda. </b>
<br><br>
And Nancy obviously had hobbies, travel opportunities (a photo of her enjoying the fair last season was among the images and text published online), and lots of resources in her lifestyle. <b>And for the record of the quality of Adam's impact on Nancy's liveliness and sanity in that period immediately prior to the massacre</b>, there's another video showing that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-ISB93mHGc">Nancy had been caringly able to take a happy, worryfree holiday in northern NH</a>, her native state, 4 hours away, <b>for a pair of scenic days this very December,</b> right before the massacre and her death at the hands of the real killers. Adam's impact was not a 'denial' of opportunity.
<br><br>
The female reporter of that 'scoop' on Nancy's funfilled vacation intended to convey the idea that Nancy was irresponsibly enjoying herself (trying to cast doubt on her gun management) instead of micro-managing Adam's life at home but the reporter failed to show that at all, because Adam was not the killer, as we know, and was not sneaking to prepare for his killing spree while Nancy was absent as that 'journalistic' failure was presuming. The realization that these irresponsible 'journalists' (and I use that term 'journalist' loosely as they presume they know-it-all and presume government never makes errors, never accuses the wrong person, and she and her editor never ever used the word 'alleged' killer, perhaps thinking that a dead assailant could not sue them for their cowardly libel) were still believing all the lies perpetrated as disinformation and never catching on in their own research and 'erudition', all of which blows away that female's idea that she had any credibility as an intelligence-oriented, skilled investigator. Luck and prejudice is what they rely on, only.
<br><br>
Instead, the displayed data on Nancy's friendly conversations while at the resort show that <font COLOR="#ffddb4">she was relaxed and was in no hurry or in any anxiety</FONT>, total relaxed visiting, so we know that Adam was not becoming a big worry and leaving him alone to fend for himself for a couple of days wasn't any big anxiety about his behavior and <font COLOR="#ffddb4">he could be expected to manage by himself with no oversight</FONT>. Clearly no valid reason on which to base an implication that Adam was such an out-of-control person, suddenly deteriorating over the previous weeks. Quite the opposite, Adam was quietly having downtime to find his own path on which to move forward, after suspending his pursuit of college courses, locally.
<br><br>
<br>
<b>About how they lived,</b> and
<b>About institutionalization speculation,</b>
<br><br>
In spite of what ease-and-realized-comfort in her home-life with Adam does imply about Adam's making progress, maybe slowly at first, some gossipy speaker (given access to a microphone) has speculated that Adam's mother was preparing to put Adam into an institution, but that conflicts with more solid data on Adam's own future planning that we can infer from Adam's homeschooling and college efforts. Though we shall decline to engage in a lot of life-learning theory for internal sense of direction development explanations for the moment, these patterns of downtime for realignment of effort are confirmed with surprising information in the plumber's testimony based on his in-house observation of the Lanza household.
<br><br>
That plumber was disparaging the idea that Adam showed no interest in engaging with him (sorry fella your conversation wasn't that interesting) in any idea of recognition of any common ground in ideas, but that plumber was nevertheless <font COLOR="#ffddb4">accurately describing the preferences of an Aspi to shut down any conversation (wouldn't talk to him at all, straightforward rejecting "conversation"), preferring instead quiet time in an undisturbed hideaway in the remoter well-appointed basement, soft loose clothing, gaming on the computer for Adam, no disruptive hassle (just turned inward and walked away), and quiet personality</FONT>.
<br><br>
In the plumber's cultural ideas, he *presumes* that he is *entitled* to expect that anyone he encounters in his path-smoothing as an 'intruder' in privacy areas while working on his plumbing contract, MUST return his overtures or else he can prejudge them as ANTI-SOCIAL and now entertain us as his erudite assessment of scary people.
<br><br>
(If you want/need more information on life-learning theory, try a couple of issues of <a href="http://www.LifeLearningMagazine.com">Life Learning Magazine</a>.)
<br><br>
Adam was clearly engaging in his own path finding for his life-led learning by detecting his own intuitive needs and inner preferences (by mental role-playing, stimming to study challenges and responsiveness to personal experience of personal challenging effort), appreciating his own developing skills (to see what's easy and pleasuring to engage in and worthwhile in his opinion) and more. Why would anyone not enjoy Adam's own company when you love your child and marvel in their insights and bright ideas, just occasionally revealed for your delight. Stimulating company is not necessarily incessant badgering chattiness or boisterous activity. Surely most people who've had family, close and dear, would easily feel comfortably soothed with such a personality in their presence and household as Adam's. Don't you agree?
<br><br>
So with no sign of deteriorating behavior in that household's reported lifestyle, and such a soothing undemanding yet promising companion, why would anyone EVER be believed to be considering 'institutionalizing' your best friend no matter how much they worry that they need to be more understanding of a way to help. Clearly that gossipy woman is a paparazzi wannabe, with a mind twisted by prejudice against difference, and just hovering around people with microphones to find some reason to get into the company of media personalities, at best.
<br><br>
<b>But even more likely in such a powerfully engineered massacre as this Sandy Hook school shooting, the 'gossipy' woman was far more likely to be an insider to the group of criminal perpetrators. </b> Agreed? Or do you still harbor the idea that there are such statistically-predominant, evil minded people PREFERENTIALLY FAVORED BY GOVERNMENT MOUTH-PIECE MEDIA ANCHORS with their own VIEWERSHIP-TRANSFIXING motivations, based on media/educator assessments of low-intellectual aptitude and public appetite to favor evil-minded commenters reluctant to reveal their identity and bias, instead of hearing from friends that might disrupt the hex the media had built for their illusions in 'the matrix'? Unlike PBS where they did find friends to consult as well in analyzing the relationships over time.
<br><br>
The Peter-and-Nancy divorce/separation had ended one relationship for Adam as well as for Nancy. And Adam's brother had left already to start his accounting training and career. Only Adam was yet in highschool at home back then. So, after high school and more in focus with the gossip's evil charge, let's look at Adam's share of household expenses and responsibilities. Adam's way of life at home, as they were living up to the point of the incident, was <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i> no financial strain,</i></FONT> by any means, based on the description of his focus on finding entertainment in online gaming and spending all his time in such activities. <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i>Nor were spatial and territorial issues, in a home that magnificently accommodatable, going to be some contention. Institutional care would have deprived Nancy of Adam's company and would have been a major expense in any household</i></FONT>, plus there is no idea that Adam's mother had that sort of interest in being on her own more than she managed normally, nor was her life overly-constrained by Adam's needs, since someone even provided a photo of Nancy at a fair in NH just a month or so before and she was looking thoroughly at ease. At least twice a week she brought in dinner from her favorite restaurant and bistro where she had friends to visit with during dinner-pick-up. She was not employed in some outside career. A big house, yes, from days gone by, but no big career to complement whatever the divorce settlement was, <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i> there was no Jackie Kennedy Onasis style ambition involvement either any more. </i></FONT> She just loved her son, sensibly caring and sharing household life with her eccentric companion who loved his mother as his support person now that he was an adult.
<br><br>
But most of all in the medical arena, <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i> Nancy had furthermore strongly resisted moves to side-track her brilliant son, as proposed by some at the high school, and thereby bravely was rejecting any tendency to such direction earlier, including the usual likely drugging, aka 'medicating', being pushed by schools, with harmful drugs currently being monstrously over-prescribed and ultimately recorded in the government's pharmaceutical controlled-substances database records.</i></font> Judging by the developing medical research, by now, and the unfavorable publicity on the drugs in cases of depression, and the absence of drugs as solutions in autism as well, suggests that <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i> Nancy would have felt confirmed in her original negative opinion of those drug options and have been unlikely to change her preferences at this point and now adopt such things without seeing evidence of some turnaround in the drug research even if she were distraught with the length of the downtime that Adam was taking.</i></font> <b>Hence if there was no sign of drugs in the Lanza household as there appears to be none showing up in any 'revealing investigation into motive' by the bragged about police media reporting, then there's absolutely no remaining reason for considering this evil-gossipy woman as having any credibility</b> and assign her idea to oblivion as evidence of anything relevant to the investigation <b>with the exception of considering her to be part of the killer's plan of disinformation spreading necessary for the killers' escape..</b>
<br><br>
So why have we no confirming pharmaceutical investigation results in the search of the Lanza household? With all the talk about drug involvement in previous shootings, didn't those incompetent investigators look through the medicine cabinets, refrigerators, wherever? Why have we heard nothing from the police investigators and their media..? <b>Clearly if they had some evidence of a drug in the Lanza household, one that had side effects that included homicidal or suicidal impulses, that would be front and center by now, surely if the police were decent investigators and the media were not 'deterred' by drug advertising MONEY.</b> And any such bottle, with date of purchase and refill date, count of remaining supply and prescribing MD would be crucial to have as a media announcement of investigation progress... but there has been none. <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i> So why would anyone conclude that Adam's condition was deteriorating to the point of needing institutionalization as a motive for an escape attempt involving violence. <b>He was not deteriorating, at all.</b></i></FONT>
<br><br>
Some earlier reports claimed that some uncle of Adam's was making a claim about taking medical drugs. However <font COLOR="#ffddb4">that earlier story about Adam taking the drug <b>Fanapt -- actually for schizophrenia, a niacin deficiency disorder, not Aspergers</b> -- supposedly on the word of that 'uncle' turned out to be one of those <b>paparazzi weirdnesses</b>. The magazine <b>publisher has retracted the story</b> with the explanation that the individual claiming to be an 'uncle' turns out to have been a well-known faker (also showing up in Aurora CO with phony information) who follows high-profile events and pretends to have knowledge that editors would die for.</FONT>
<br><br>
As for the possibility that drug evidence was being concealed AND that some incompetent MD would mistake Adam's downtime behavior for schizophrenia -- based on an erroneous opinion that downtime is 'amotivation' which medical term is sometimes among the symptoms of schizophrenia? That serious MISTAKE would be immediately. partly precluded by the current realization in the medical literature that schizophrenia has its onset at ages between 25 and 35, not as young as Adam's dropping out of classes and primarily precluded by the realization of the certainty that Nancy would have checked the side effects, among which was 'aggressive behavior' as 'common', right alongside 'common' heinous wonders such as 'mental impairment', 'seizures', 'stroke', etc.. Yes common! Yes, immoral drug companies get approval from their immoral allies in the FDA! Hideous drug and its hideous manufacturers and hideous approvers. <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i> The idea that Nancy would choose to risk such hideous harm on her brilliant son, is so unthinkable, so it stands to reason that there is no way that institutionalization with drugs such as Fanapt was on Nancy's agenda. Compare that drug/desperation to the mere 'worry' in the ABCNews interview testimony on Nancy's care for Adam relative to any such drug that tampers with the brain of <b>a brilliant reclusive eccentric son of whom Nancy was so proud.</b></i></font> End of such drug story.
<br><br>
Besides, not only is schizophrenia just a nutritional deficiency of epic proportions requiring daily doses of niacin that are 500 TIMES the corrupted FDA's limits of 'recommended' daily ALLOWANCE.. BUT it came to our attention in the recent PBS special (unfortunately they're not able to undo the population and government-induced prejudiced opinion from horror and disinformation) <font COLOR="#ffddb4"><i> THAT ADAM AND HIS MOTHER NANCY were going to buy a home in either WASHINGTON state or NORTH CAROLINA so that ADAM COULD STUDY <b>HISTORY </b> (per one of Nancy's family members, beginning the search in 2012 for a college that would fit Adam's requirements so that he would be able to pursue his interests as definitely successfully as his <b>WCSU 3.25 grade point average</b> would show possible as an healthy, attainable benchmark) </i></FONT>whIch study-of-history interest would be a natural subject for someone accomplished at stimming, aka simulating story explanations, especially for someone like Adam who was curious about why people do the things they seem to favor doing, for their own ODD REASONS... That's right <u>our culture</u> IS ODD IN ANY RATIONAL ASSESSMENT, and this western society should re-examine its own self and restore real evidence-and-natural-law-based lifestyle and relationships, and we believe there is a move to doing such, beginning with SENSIBLE SUSTAINABILITY as Nancy was doing before the killers ended her lively ideas.
<br><br>
End of that story, both of them, the paparazzi-uncle and the toxic-gossip, because no evidence of desperation exists or is credible. Adam and Nancy were working on planning a new adventure and opportunities. Distraught with change needed does not mean desperate. Amotivation is not downtime and vice versa. Mark both the paparazzi 'uncle' and the evil-gossipy woman as SUSPECTS until further investigation to justify their release from suspicion. They are at least guilty of disinformation in a felony of extreme proportions.
<br><br>
And to confirm this analysis of Nancy and Adam's story is the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lybs1TP377U">ABC News video</a> on "Friends: Shooter's Mom Struggled with Son" which instead <b>shows that Nancy was only worried about changing academic direction, not some behavioral troubles. No such frightening behavior issue was ever claimed to exist and the speakers reference nothing of the sort.</b>
<br><br>
Specifically, the video confirms in the midst of the interviewer's agenda:
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>a) Nancy was very proud of Adam's accomplishments, taking a stream of college courses, already as early as age 16, and almost totally ace-ing them.</b> Clearly, Nancy had high expectations for Adam's brilliance, (and so do we, posthumously) like we see in the autistic writer & animal behaviorist PhD, Temple Grandin who wrote extensively on her own experience, reaching success and describing what it was like for her to be autistic of some kind back when she was struggling to succeed. Just because Adam did not find the college (starting Western CT State U nearby at age 16) appealing after a bunch of courses doesn't mean he was falling apart, only that <font color="#ffddb4">he wanted something different than that direction in academia. And Nancy couldn't figure out what resource to provide so she was distraught, not depressed, much less deceiving nor desperate.</font> Just normal finding direction, and impatient at most, likely.
<br><br>
<font color="#ffddb4">Unfortunately, many prejudiced -- before (because Adam was different) and/or now (because of police and media libelous incompetence and soaps-brained tv) -- people have converted her motherly concern and ordinary distress (over changing goals and life-led self-learning) into ideas of Adam being psychologically "ill" in some threatening way.. At least, now that people's thinking has been toxified by the police and media's immoral and illegal lying..
<br><br>
For the record, going from classroom-driven learning to life-led home-learning generally requires about one month of downtime for every year in schoolish-driven learning before the learner becomes self-directed, then the rate of progress is turned on its head without the classroom organizational slowness. Similar downtime transitions occur in becoming self-employed. Adam was simply taking his transition at a time when most of his age-mates are engaging in a frenzy of activity, so it was more noticeable, especially since he was so far ahead of his age-peers when he started college.</font>
<br><br>
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>b)</b> Like her fellow companion at the MyPlace bistro (that Nancy favored two dinners a week at) said, she spoke to him often but <font color="#ffddb4">her concerns were not about discord over bad behavior of any 'sick' kind.</font> <u>Get it into people's heads.</u> <b><i>Adam didn't shoot his mother, THE KILLER(S) DID.</i></b> Clearly, her distress was over changing direction of goals, not unusual in this current climate of college-worth bad news everyday, with all the attendant lack of focus on real study ideas by students. Adam was not in trouble or her companions would have heard about that specifically.
<br><br>
<font color="#ff6990">-----</font><b>c)</b> And as for friendly social relationships while at school, a young woman who was <font color="#ffddb4">a student in Adam's classes said that there was nothing "scary" about Adam</font> and just that he was shier than most people understood. And in a separate post at youtube, a young fellow from Adam's technology club basically confirmed that Adam was gentle and extremely intelligent.
<br><br>
As a companion, Adam was very honest, though not outgoing with those who didn't share any interests or who engaged in unthinking social games and rigamorole. Looking at the most recent photo of Adam from the divorce period precisely, shows a very honest young man, very worried about the future as his home-relationships were disintegrating, no cover up grin. He was his mother's moral support and inspiration for struggling through.
<img src="http://www.cighe.net/IndyMichael/Adam&Nancy-inNancysEyes.jpg", WIDTH="500">
<font color="#ffddb4">Even Adam's closest teacher, from the technology club as well, said he was so brilliant, and gentle in conversation, echoing the pleasant ideas posted by that one of those club members who considered himself Adam's friend.</font> (in a youtube posting)
<br><br>
<b>ERGO, we shall keep that gossiper under observation as a potential suspect</b>, complicit directly as a planned toxic contributor, wanted in the criminals planning, since <i>disinformation is a verifiable asset in devious scheming to inflict harm. </i>
<br><br>
<br>
<b>So then why was Adam tangled in this killing spree at all. Surely his pivotal role as patsy must mean something</b>. Why Adam and why his mother, or why either of them, since an attack based on one would have led to confrontation with the other.
<br><br>
<i>Purposeful inclusion of something or someone that has a role as one of the key components in a scheme would be in that scheme to provide consequences that were desired by the schemer</i>. So what are those?
<br><br>
<b>Coming soon, we'll dig into how Adam and Nancy were dragged in so as to get those consequences. <font color="#ffddb4">Part 7 whatever? -- Sandy Hook -- Why Adam and Nancy.</font></b>. coming hopefully next week.
<br><br>
Plus <b><font color="#ffddb4">Why the children and even better HOW the children ?.</font></b>.. coming sooner than later, but shocking as you will see, if you dare.
<br><br>
<br>
What we were told were lies, constant lies. Incessant, vicious engineered lies.
<br><br>
Not simple <b><u>random</u> errors</b> of 'fog or war', as the government's media's new reassurances deceive.
<br><br>
<b>What would it take for you to withdraw your support from this Fast&Furious, mafia-infested, monetarily incoherent US government</b>, with full realization that you will face seriously jeopardizing your own credibility with your peers, at least highly likely so.. BUT at such a serious level of shock and realization, you will just *know* that you can not imagine any other path for your own integrity.. Well this may be that moment. Don't give up.
<br><br>
Caio and/or ttyl.indymichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00889648800620975308noreply@blogger.com1