Thursday, June 11, 2015

Gusweiler Reads Neither the Law Nor the Filings -- Here's the Proof

Is there no end to this tragic-comedy?

Just this month, the infamous Judge Gusweiler -- accused rightfully of adjudicating under some influence -- just proved my point.

Look at these 'Rulings':

1-- CIRCULAR REASONING -- Eagle had filed a motion to dismiss this case for a dozen unopposable reasons, from the assorted list of invalid claims in the DeathSquad lawyers bases. Including that they had already filed a case on the same issues in federal court and this current case was pitting one court against the other court since courts could differ in their orders. ROTFL as we picture the DUEL OF THE GAVELS... the DeathSquad lawyers live in the land of the grossly absurd.

But never fear the DeathSquad's Judge (Gusweiler of course is in their pocket as is clear already, see earlier posts) is on guard, ready with more strawmen and invalid fact-finding about 'second inquests' when the first was not completed.....

Obviously they have no confidence in any hold on the Federal Court Judge Barrett since that whole filing at Federal Court was just to smear the Coroner as her evidence was about to be presented to the local GrandJury looking at whether there was sufficient evidence to INDICT THE DEATHSQUAD, nothing more will be needed from that court of Southern Ohio....

SO HOW DID GUSWEILER EVADE THE EVIDENCE AND LOGIC AND CASE LAW?

Well just look at this 'ruling'



When you look at his referenced April 14th "Decision and Entry", and look to see what is the grand justification for this current argument (since the earlier one is all that is asserted), you find NADA.... LITERALLY IN THAT APRIL 14TH WORK, GUSWEILER AGAIN STATES A NAKED CONCLUSION, NOT A SHRED OF DECENT HINT OF THOUGHT ON AN ARGUMENT...

To be precise, all Gusweiler said on April 14th was
    "The Court finds that there is great likelihood that Plaintiffs will prevail in their Declaratory Judgment Action in these cases"


That's it, that's all, no fact-finding to identify the needed single issue of law under dispute and that the rest of the facts are 'relatively undisputed' by the world of logical arguing...

That's what is needed to 'succeed' in a Declaratory Judgment... without that, the case GOES TO BENCH TRIAL --with Jury in Federal Court, or whereever the 'cases' are that Gusweiler is inadvertently referencing among the battle of the gavels stirred up as mudslinging frivolity.....

And then Gusweiler HAS THE NERVE TO STATE THAT HE'S GOING TO **INCORPORATE THOSE FINDINGS** IN THIS CURRENT RULING...... boldly implying that there was anything existing in the April document that could be incorporated anywhere... except his prejudice... oh my.. Yup, now I see it, it's on the head of that pin prick at the end of the paragraph.... OY!!!! {/end of sarcasm attack}

Do you see that anywhere to be 'found' and 'incorporated'??? FAKERY

How can anybody stand such fraud on the court? Have these judges, like Gusweiler, recognized the possibility that no one in the law profession ever really does examine how far wrong a case could go and so it's safe to pad any situation with such fraud and expect to walk freely and even get re-elected??

The circular reasoning in this circle of zero dimension is so obviously a display of HOW A CRIMINAL IN BLACK ROBES CAN CAUSE THEIR PREJUDICE TO BECOME REALITY IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THEIR CRIME -- STRAIGHT REPETITION OF FALSEHOODS IN ORDER TO CONVINCE THE PUBLIC OF THAT FAKERY AS BEING REAL... straight from books on propaganda tactics... repetition becomes weight of a public's ill-formed opinion

Shall we let the public drink the koolaid? No we don't adore the 'public mind' but it's untolerable to think they are not suspicious yet.....

So maybe the next ruling will make them stronger...

2--GUSWEILER NEITHER READS THE LAW BOOKS NOR EVEN THE FILINGS -- and that's the most generous assessment possible to make of what he did in the ruling on the Motion to protect the Coroner's files from unauthorized access.....

You'll recall the hearing-ambush and the video evidence that the Death-Squad's lawyer stole from the Coroner's private files using the location that he tormented the weak Rob Junk to expose... yeah that Rob Junk who was supposed to be one of the Coroner's own lawyers. Granted he was a 'volunteer' to relieve the BC Prosecutor of her OBLIGATION to serve the County's officeholders so she enlisted Junk to do her chores and he obliged with the knowledge that the Coroner's own family lawyer (Eagle) was already doing all the litigating and needed no other fingers in the stew.....

After the turmoil --of the sudden appearance of one of the Coroner's WORK DATA FILES from her PRIVATE SPACE in the Coroner's ONLINE CLOUD STORAGE-- got thoroughly in an uproar as being THEFT OF OFFICIAL WORK FILES BY THE DEATH-SQUAD'S LAWYER, that thief revealed that he'd gotten the address of the file from Junk, which fact he had concealed for the ambush til after he'd smeared the Coroner with false claims that she was violating the court order to cease CONVENING AN INQUEST...

All of these facts on events were FULLY ADMITTED IN THE DEATHSQUAD'S LAWYERS' AFFIDAVIT.... YES A REAL, UNDER OATH AFFIDAVIT FROM ONE OF THE OPPONENTS' **LAWYERS** ...... as well as fully delineated in the opponents' FILING... and hence appeared TWICE among the "INTERESTING ARGUMENTS PROPOUNDED" AS GUSWEILER CALLS IT in his ruling..... lol.....

Yet after boldly claiming that he'd enjoyed those "interesting arguments" being propounded, Gusweiler comes right out and says what is TOTALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH ANY IDEA THAT HE HAD READ ANY OF THE FILINGS,,,

See for yourself, Gusweiler unbelievably says that the fact that the files had been stolen was a matter to be resolved BETWEEN THE DEFENDANT AND HER I.T. PROVIDER .. ROTFL...



The esteemed Court has been again defiled...... BY GUSWEILER... ON **MULTIPLE LEVELS**...

He not only ignorantly OR ARTFULLY (your guesstimate) expects the public record to accept that lawyers stealing files from an opponent is OK UNDER THE LAW, or he is attempting to pretend he has EXCUSABLY MADE A MISJUDGMENT DUE TO MISUNDERSTANDING THE COMPLICATED ONLINE ARCHITECTURE WHEN THE FACTS OF THE THEFT WERE IN THE FILINGS TWICE IN FULL DETAIL..... take your pick, artful or incompetence or inexcusable failure to read the filings on which he is purportedly making rulings....

Gusweiler agrees that the files were STOLEN... the DeathSquads' lawyer had the files that were supposedly unavailable to the public.... he literally says that..... WHERE IS GUSWEILER'S LAW TRAINING, WHERE IS HIS UNDERSTANDING OF UNHOLY VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSECRATED IN THE RULE OF LAW IN THE U.S.A. IN OUR CONSTITUTION AS PRIVACY RIGHTS.....

One of the bloodhounds proposes this analogy for WHAT A JUDGE IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO EMPLOY:

    Suppose the Coroner had her work-vehicle parked on her driveway BEHIND SOME BUSHES, NOT EVEN TAKING IT OUT ON THE ROAD, but 'someone' snitched on the vehicle's owner by simply relaying the idea that the Coroner's unpaid assistant was working on the engine with obvious intent to have a drivable vehicle.... and the person the snitch told was a law-trained member of the community who decidedly wanted to stop work on that vehicle.

    Next suppose that the Court had said that the Coroner could not drive the work-vehicle around and do her obligated chores (as Gusweiler has done)....

    Furthermore that snitch said that the coroner's assistant kept the key under the doormat... all those pieces of information are then in the hands of a law-trained member of the community...

    what would be the ONLY APPROVABLE *LEGAL* WAY TO TAKE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE???

    why of course, any 1st year law student would tell you that the LAW-TRAINED opponent would go to law enforcement officers AND LAW ENFORCEMENT WOULD GET A ***WARRANT*** FROM A **COURT** TO SEARCH AND SEIZE THAT WORK-VEHICLE FROM ITS PARKED LOCATION ON PRIVATE PROPERTY USING THE KEY.... Agreed?

    ANY LAW ABIDING CITIZEN SHOULD AGREE AND PERFORM THE REQUEST FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR A WARRANT......agreed?

        ???


    ANYONE WHO SIMPLY USED THE KEY TO STEAL THE CAR IS A CAR-THIEF, A FELON -- IN FACT EVEN MORE CULPABLE AS HAVING BEEN FULLY LAW TRAINED INDEED....

    AND ANYONE WHO AIDED AND ALLOWED THAT FELON-THIEF TO ESCAPE AND WALK AWAY FROM FELONY CHARGES IS ALSO A FELON....... Agreed?

    Arrest Gusweiler. Arrest Phillips. Call the SHERIFF'S MEN ...... rotflmhoas


    !!!


Gusweiler shows no recognition of having meant any part of his Oath of Office, nor his law license requirements. Throw the bloke in the river and see if he can swim any better than he can adjudicate... oh my, shades of domestic terrorism? Shades of Kaczynski? Shades of the Unabomber? Call the Sheriff's men.. rotfl

So what's your conclusion? Inexcusable laziness at logic and reading? Ignorance of the Rule of Law and it's constitutional requirements? OR ARTFUL CRIME IN ACTION TO DEPRIVE US OF JUSTICE?

I think the evidence is accumulating that favors the artful crime explanation, though clearly having an inexcusable prejudice while pretending to adjudicate instead of recusing himself would also lead to stonewalling the reading required with the judge-benefit of less work needed, allowing more focus on the art of cheating... But that says that Gusweiler is totally cynically engaging in fraud in judge's robes with likely full knowledge that he's IMMUNE from CONSEQUENCES set in place by his fellow LAWYERS IN THE LEGISLATURE with the excuse that holy justice required that judges not fear consequences...... rotfcas.....

To confirm this cynical criminal attitude, we'd add that Gusweiler displays total ignorance of logic OR TOTAL TYRANNICAL POMPOSITY in his peak fit of invalid demands when he imposed the 'injunction' forbidding the Coroner to DO ANYTHING WITH THE GOLDSON CASE

Gusweiler puffed himself up into a real fever pitch with his gavel waving in the air, threatening he would send the Sheriff's men to make his demanding threats have force...
    "The Court does want to make its Order abundantly clear at this time. There is one action and one action only that" the lowly ORC-creature female Judith Varnau "may take with respect to the death of Zachary Goldson. " She may grovel and beg and "petition" me the mighty "Brown County Court of Common Pleas to change the cause of death... to something other than'" her annoying medical opinion that it was "homicide by strangulation".
....

Don't you agree he was having a good ol fantasy... BECAUSE THAT ISN'T WHAT THE LAW REALLY SAYS.... NOR WHAT CASE LAW SAYS EVEN CLEARER..... Judge for yourself, here's the text from a recent case in the 8th District Ohio Appeal Court...



So did Gusweiler *just* stupidly misread the statute OR is the total picture of his bombastic delivery give away that Gusweiler was thwarted in his power grabbing attempt to control what the Coroner was allowed to do... so frustrated that he puffed himself up and twisted the statutes to bamboozle the ignorant Brown County NEWSPAPER EDITORS into mouthing his threats as if it was HOLY LAW..?

Which you will see is EXACTLY WHAT STUPIDLY MONEY-GROVELING WAYNE GATES DID,,, TWICE ON THIS POMPOUS THREAT ALONE.... Gates needs those Sheriff Sale advertisement pages to fund his multi section weekend paper, to the demise of the not-sufficiently equally groveling News Democrat who used to have the advertising revenues to afford multisection weekend publications back when the ND was carrying the Sheriff's ads........

How can they stand it?

How can Brown Countians stand it?

Wouldn't it be grand if Brown County could find a judge like the one in this news story from Truth in Media
    A transcript of the March 2014 hearing quoted the judge as saying in the courtroom following the revelation (video evidence), "All four officers lied on the stand today. ... All their testimony was a lie. So there's strong evidence it was a conspiracy to lie in this case, for everyone to come up with the same lie. ...Many, many, many, many times they all lied."
So now all four are charged with Felony Perjury.... WOW, don't we faint from wanting such justice here...

Well it looks like the TIME MAY HAVE COME WHEN THE PEOPLE OF BROWN COUNTY CAN WEIGH IN ON SLAPPING DOWN A SHERIFF WHO MISPERFORMS AS BADLY AS WENNINGER DOES -- WITHOUT WAITING FOR 2016 NOVEMBER WHEN HE'S UP FOR RE-ELECTION....

MORE ON THAT LATER... OR SOONEST WE CAN, NEXT POSTING.... TTYL